From patchwork Tue Aug 30 01:01:02 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Kirill A. Shutemov" X-Patchwork-Id: 12958587 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 049B4ECAAD3 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 01:01:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 4980594000D; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 21:01:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 24A43940007; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 21:01:39 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 0994F94000C; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 21:01:39 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0017.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.17]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDBF9940007 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 21:01:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin31.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBEE9A04CD for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 01:01:38 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79854456276.31.DF03721 Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by imf24.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38BCC180012 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 01:01:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1661821298; x=1693357298; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=paLLfnuCD3vCLKnZtUsd0mpWPekiZ/gq8Xe6lyMWCSA=; b=EZur8Cd9BcROwVmaDDK6nkqClPGoYJIKEvLugCsRCHJUFpChvfBOdt/v jplAEb1JCqevju46jGhX6VX9bvJblqlIbX3RbZcR7IvV3loEYL+jwplDH yJLxIzDv6d5baBgdBcxD6YodZtXMODbcYtyUTzLBs92ijSgsKfv+7ENKN 96issaMF7TVaoejKjfXDn57uc+XuBM3lcjWTHFH5B+0KVIBB0GKp/Rl4d lSaG76Db4EYUqcOIFMJHhcUaZ/cSoRl+CFLVz93LIosFr/7oAcDpZZS+a CDaW4r2C/pl9OAuVRw6ecSeZ/mhfa0+oQJkZvsPpmZadgFfkkiYhJOWGF Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10454"; a="296322937" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,273,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="296322937" Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Aug 2022 18:01:37 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,273,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="787305244" Received: from fpalamon-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO box.shutemov.name) ([10.252.54.23]) by orsmga005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Aug 2022 18:01:33 -0700 Received: by box.shutemov.name (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B1E3C10428A; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 04:01:24 +0300 (+03) From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" To: Dave Hansen , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra Cc: x86@kernel.org, Kostya Serebryany , Andrey Ryabinin , Andrey Konovalov , Alexander Potapenko , Taras Madan , Dmitry Vyukov , "H . J . Lu" , Andi Kleen , Rick Edgecombe , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Weihong Zhang , "Kirill A . Shutemov" Subject: [PATCHv8 09/11] selftests/x86/lam: Add mmap and SYSCALL test cases for linear-address masking Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 04:01:02 +0300 Message-Id: <20220830010104.1282-10-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.1 In-Reply-To: <20220830010104.1282-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> References: <20220830010104.1282-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1661821298; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=SAIzxc65Opn0KyALQkvZEY2zNik/AM0XeYYz4LFNm27hS4BWVvYDxIfTAidqHoiIKcLnKO l3Sgd3Ahwt3NQKVAqbojqe18dFdKDB5gs3SU90VxfQ9g2T6LNYPW6D2m4hMCHH8xkIIVPS /jbkZh0kqAnDReWNCGLId+w56hFrtJI= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf24.hostedemail.com; dkim=none ("invalid DKIM record") header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=EZur8Cd9; spf=none (imf24.hostedemail.com: domain of kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com has no SPF policy when checking 134.134.136.65) smtp.mailfrom=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF" header.from=intel.com (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1661821298; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=2nynb095/h4K5Rcr0D/L0f1/TgQgPtmEt2VP6orJNkk=; b=Fg1UqPTYoLOehL4xSILrA9gIO50RT1+LmxfTcWHNV8le1I/0oy6j+pFuKeud2zHcvtjGSj XwsyBkdVR5EWQXIy38a5ta+VysQ7KOF96auuEnZIYF2bVN1uv/A3SX3BLIoi4P7CuQJb9u KRFnLYudhsw/8/IapKU6ifxiYspEHig= Authentication-Results: imf24.hostedemail.com; dkim=none ("invalid DKIM record") header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=EZur8Cd9; spf=none (imf24.hostedemail.com: domain of kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com has no SPF policy when checking 134.134.136.65) smtp.mailfrom=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF" header.from=intel.com (policy=none) X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam11 X-Stat-Signature: 6i4of5jaqm4uiis8rb931mnyg9kg8xte X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 38BCC180012 X-HE-Tag: 1661821298-410831 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: From: Weihong Zhang Add mmap and SYSCALL test cases. SYSCALL test cases: - LAM supports set metadata in high bits 62:57 (LAM_U57) of a user pointer, pass the pointer to SYSCALL, SYSCALL can dereference the pointer and return correct result. - Disable LAM, pass a pointer with metadata in high bits to SYSCALL, SYSCALL returns -1 (EFAULT). MMAP test cases: - Enable LAM_U57, MMAP with low address (below bits 47), set metadata in high bits of the address, dereference the address should be allowed. - Enable LAM_U57, MMAP with high address (above bits 47), set metadata in high bits of the address, dereference the address should be allowed. Signed-off-by: Weihong Zhang Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) --- tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c | 135 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 132 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c index 900a3a0fb709..b88e007ee0a3 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include @@ -29,11 +30,18 @@ /* Specified test function bits */ #define FUNC_MALLOC 0x1 #define FUNC_BITS 0x2 +#define FUNC_MMAP 0x4 +#define FUNC_SYSCALL 0x8 -#define TEST_MASK 0x3 +#define TEST_MASK 0xf + +#define LOW_ADDR (0x1UL << 30) +#define HIGH_ADDR (0x3UL << 48) #define MALLOC_LEN 32 +#define PAGE_SIZE (4 << 10) + struct testcases { unsigned int later; int expected; /* 2: SIGSEGV Error; 1: other errors */ @@ -49,6 +57,7 @@ jmp_buf segv_env; static void segv_handler(int sig) { ksft_print_msg("Get segmentation fault(%d).", sig); + siglongjmp(segv_env, 1); } @@ -61,6 +70,16 @@ static inline int cpu_has_lam(void) return (cpuinfo[0] & (1 << 26)); } +/* Check 5-level page table feature in CPUID.(EAX=07H, ECX=00H):ECX.[bit 16] */ +static inline int cpu_has_la57(void) +{ + unsigned int cpuinfo[4]; + + __cpuid_count(0x7, 0, cpuinfo[0], cpuinfo[1], cpuinfo[2], cpuinfo[3]); + + return (cpuinfo[2] & (1 << 16)); +} + /* * Set tagged address and read back untag mask. * check if the untagged mask is expected. @@ -213,6 +232,68 @@ static int handle_malloc(struct testcases *test) return ret; } +static int handle_mmap(struct testcases *test) +{ + void *ptr; + unsigned int flags = MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_FIXED; + int ret = 0; + + if (test->later == 0 && test->lam != 0) + if (set_lam(test->lam) != 0) + return 1; + + ptr = mmap((void *)test->addr, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, + flags, -1, 0); + if (ptr == MAP_FAILED) { + if (test->addr == HIGH_ADDR) + if (!cpu_has_la57()) + return 3; /* unsupport LA57 */ + return 1; + } + + if (test->later != 0 && test->lam != 0) + if (set_lam(test->lam) != 0) + ret = 1; + + if (ret == 0) { + if (sigsetjmp(segv_env, 1) == 0) { + signal(SIGSEGV, segv_handler); + ret = handle_lam_test(ptr, test->lam); + } else { + ret = 2; + } + } + + munmap(ptr, PAGE_SIZE); + return ret; +} + +static int handle_syscall(struct testcases *test) +{ + struct utsname unme, *pu; + int ret = 0; + + if (test->later == 0 && test->lam != 0) + if (set_lam(test->lam) != 0) + return 1; + + if (sigsetjmp(segv_env, 1) == 0) { + signal(SIGSEGV, segv_handler); + pu = (struct utsname *)set_metadata((uint64_t)&unme, test->lam); + ret = uname(pu); + if (ret < 0) + ret = 1; + } else { + ret = 2; + } + + if (test->later != 0 && test->lam != 0) + if (set_lam(test->lam) != -1 && ret == 0) + ret = 1; + + return ret; +} + static int fork_test(struct testcases *test) { int ret, child_ret; @@ -268,7 +349,6 @@ static struct testcases malloc_cases[] = { }, }; - static struct testcases bits_cases[] = { { .test_func = handle_max_bits, @@ -276,11 +356,54 @@ static struct testcases bits_cases[] = { }, }; +static struct testcases syscall_cases[] = { + { + .later = 0, + .lam = LAM_U57_BITS, + .test_func = handle_syscall, + .msg = "SYSCALL: LAM_U57. syscall with metadata\n", + }, + { + .later = 1, + .expected = 1, + .lam = LAM_U57_BITS, + .test_func = handle_syscall, + .msg = "SYSCALL:[Negative] Disable LAM. Dereferencing pointer with metadata.\n", + }, +}; + +static struct testcases mmap_cases[] = { + { + .later = 1, + .expected = 0, + .lam = LAM_U57_BITS, + .addr = HIGH_ADDR, + .test_func = handle_mmap, + .msg = "MMAP: First mmap high address, then set LAM_U57.\n", + }, + { + .later = 0, + .expected = 0, + .lam = LAM_U57_BITS, + .addr = HIGH_ADDR, + .test_func = handle_mmap, + .msg = "MMAP: First LAM_U57, then High address.\n", + }, + { + .later = 0, + .expected = 0, + .lam = LAM_U57_BITS, + .addr = LOW_ADDR, + .test_func = handle_mmap, + .msg = "MMAP: First LAM_U57, then Low address.\n", + }, +}; + static void cmd_help(void) { printf("usage: lam [-h] [-t test list]\n"); printf("\t-t test list: run tests specified in the test list, default:0x%x\n", TEST_MASK); - printf("\t\t0x1:malloc; 0x2:max_bits;\n"); + printf("\t\t0x1:malloc; 0x2:max_bits; 0x4:mmap; 0x8:syscall.\n"); printf("\t-h: help\n"); } @@ -320,6 +443,12 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) if (tests & FUNC_BITS) run_test(bits_cases, ARRAY_SIZE(bits_cases)); + if (tests & FUNC_MMAP) + run_test(mmap_cases, ARRAY_SIZE(mmap_cases)); + + if (tests & FUNC_SYSCALL) + run_test(syscall_cases, ARRAY_SIZE(syscall_cases)); + ksft_set_plan(tests_cnt); return ksft_exit_pass();