Message ID | 20220908041150.3430269-1-naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2] mm/huge_memory: use pfn_to_online_page() in split_huge_pages_all() | expand |
On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 01:11:50PM +0900, Naoya Horiguchi wrote: > From: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com> > > NULL pointer dereference is triggered when calling thp split via debugfs > on the system with offlined memory blocks. With debug option enabled, > the following kernel messages are printed out: > > page:00000000467f4890 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x121c000 > flags: 0x17fffc00000000(node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0x1ffff) > raw: 0017fffc00000000 0000000000000000 dead000000000122 0000000000000000 > raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000 > page dumped because: unmovable page > page:000000007d7ab72e is uninitialized and poisoned > page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PagePoisoned(p)) > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > kernel BUG at include/linux/mm.h:1248! > invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI > CPU: 16 PID: 20964 Comm: bash Tainted: G I 6.0.0-rc3-foll-numa+ #41 > ... > RIP: 0010:split_huge_pages_write+0xcf4/0xe30 > > This shows that page_to_nid() in page_zone() is unexpectedly called for an > offlined memmap. > > Use pfn_to_online_page() to get struct page in PFN walker. > > Fixes: 49071d436b51 ("thp: add debugfs handle to split all huge pages") > Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com> > Co-developed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> > Reviewed-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> > Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> > Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> > Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.10+ Looks good: Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> But it makes me think if there's other similar cases. "page is offline" is rather obscure case that rarely covered by routine testing. Otherwise the bug would not survive for 6 years. After quick look, kvm_pfn_to_refcounted_page() looks suspicious. kdb_getphys() too. Maybe we should make pfn_valid() false for offline pages and introduce other check that allows offline pages which can be used in codepaths that deal with offline pages explicitly.
On Thu 08-09-22 15:23:03, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: [...] > But it makes me think if there's other similar cases. "page is offline" is > rather obscure case that rarely covered by routine testing. Otherwise the > bug would not survive for 6 years. > > After quick look, kvm_pfn_to_refcounted_page() looks suspicious. this one is hard to judge for me. Is this ever used for something that could be offlined? > kdb_getphys() too. this one looks it needs a fix > Maybe we should make pfn_valid() false for offline pages and introduce > other check that allows offline pages which can be used in codepaths that > deal with offline pages explicitly. Back when pfn_to_online page was introduced altering pfn_valid was considered but the semantic is not the same. offline pages could be still pfn_valid. The discussion should be in archives. Sorry do not have the link handy. We have also considered changing pfn_to_page but that would add an overhead for unlikely case to everybody. So the conclusion was that only pfn walkers should care. Most other users just translate pfn to page when the page cannot be offlined (e.g. because it is referenced). I do realize this is fragile but we couldn't come up with something more clever without introducing overhead all over the place.
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c index 5fa2ba86dae4..730eb6d6836b 100644 --- a/mm/huge_memory.c +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c @@ -2894,11 +2894,9 @@ static void split_huge_pages_all(void) max_zone_pfn = zone_end_pfn(zone); for (pfn = zone->zone_start_pfn; pfn < max_zone_pfn; pfn++) { int nr_pages; - if (!pfn_valid(pfn)) - continue; - page = pfn_to_page(pfn); - if (!get_page_unless_zero(page)) + page = pfn_to_online_page(pfn); + if (!page || !get_page_unless_zero(page)) continue; if (zone != page_zone(page))