From patchwork Tue Dec 27 03:08:25 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Kirill A. Shutemov" X-Patchwork-Id: 13082053 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C07CC4332F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2022 03:09:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 5C8628E0010; Mon, 26 Dec 2022 22:08:59 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 52AF48E0011; Mon, 26 Dec 2022 22:08:59 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 21DFB8E0010; Mon, 26 Dec 2022 22:08:59 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0015.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.15]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 094F68E000E for ; Mon, 26 Dec 2022 22:08:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin10.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1E3EA044A for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2022 03:08:58 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 80286604356.10.0AC0F78 Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by imf03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CF9B20003 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2022 03:08:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf03.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=A8EnqZIG; spf=none (imf03.hostedemail.com: domain of kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com has no SPF policy when checking 134.134.136.24) smtp.mailfrom=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1672110537; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=Qg4vaTMb+9PkFsCOYp+C/L7w4P1xSjElnkamq7/2Ef8=; b=dfK40sftK/8IXnPDb2KSFFmeHz6Lv7QKFfAUq/6yPLv50VBMMORKzBzsxFYia8fimBjlqz jjZ8DLGnLdPuIEZSKq7CQO36FYAD+F4vvSiNE3PglsfP8LIjTl8U5tv4D5n7sMzzRP+Yne tsUEH0UGZEl2t5wJSJ5bc3nl7S/emRs= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf03.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=A8EnqZIG; spf=none (imf03.hostedemail.com: domain of kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com has no SPF policy when checking 134.134.136.24) smtp.mailfrom=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1672110537; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=HqaNjtXCM4CiFUbQ6T34cW7oLr7nXljam+boayHXR1RL5fFxO+sSzL0MJTSoZdFGI3IDf7 rcOz8lv5J+b3h54fd1X3fi4Zyk0hFQ4KzHs21l6eWRWwCSF6psyBE/+zynojnd2yzRNsHG FKHXuVMUaTfUmumxhkpZv5z83XJc06w= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1672110537; x=1703646537; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1pBfAOkQ7J1AFfoVfQmMQolBNFBcBfukgLGZulMuiy0=; b=A8EnqZIGMRWSS2YTuMdIJN3f8Pi8TSfrgUfW40slSgiY2hzIt7XdvIA0 83kAnuf0yuW5s7voWEDNmN1y4ZTF4ZgsLZXYMh6sNpwFyQ1F88AQ+L7CI jyc+D3zI96qOrb/sorDJZivQ1FfTgUgvE5ToT4Z3VEkniNXSJewCdiQ4G zD7z5v8MAuTPMfryw/1JDVuf6rDPGMC+qEptEHDFcJmyfg5TY9j+AoQv4 v1nHnvH+ux6OJBfl7RklLW9UAaCqM4ZZztdDRwP4jS+5UxPiNEaof+LPg FUDSc2JPRq1dG2YTqX7P9IkrKxcUNjOjaiyDAwE+WeKcwL1N2lv9PNl4+ Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10572"; a="321869807" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,277,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="321869807" Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Dec 2022 19:08:53 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10572"; a="652917554" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,277,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="652917554" Received: from ppogotov-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO box.shutemov.name) ([10.252.62.152]) by orsmga002-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Dec 2022 19:08:48 -0800 Received: by box.shutemov.name (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 013ED10BBB9; Tue, 27 Dec 2022 06:08:37 +0300 (+03) From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" To: Dave Hansen , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra Cc: x86@kernel.org, Kostya Serebryany , Andrey Ryabinin , Andrey Konovalov , Alexander Potapenko , Taras Madan , Dmitry Vyukov , "H . J . Lu" , Andi Kleen , Rick Edgecombe , Bharata B Rao , Jacob Pan , Ashok Raj , Linus Torvalds , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Weihong Zhang , "Kirill A . Shutemov" Subject: [PATCHv13 12/16] selftests/x86/lam: Add mmap and SYSCALL test cases for linear-address masking Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2022 06:08:25 +0300 Message-Id: <20221227030829.12508-13-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.38.2 In-Reply-To: <20221227030829.12508-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> References: <20221227030829.12508-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam04 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0CF9B20003 X-Stat-Signature: 3ad8z5dh34jcfbcrd5a9ex87kfqaomhw X-HE-Tag: 1672110536-203451 X-HE-Meta: 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 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: From: Weihong Zhang Add mmap and SYSCALL test cases. SYSCALL test cases: - LAM supports set metadata in high bits 62:57 (LAM_U57) of a user pointer, pass the pointer to SYSCALL, SYSCALL can dereference the pointer and return correct result. - Disable LAM, pass a pointer with metadata in high bits to SYSCALL, SYSCALL returns -1 (EFAULT). MMAP test cases: - Enable LAM_U57, MMAP with low address (below bits 47), set metadata in high bits of the address, dereference the address should be allowed. - Enable LAM_U57, MMAP with high address (above bits 47), set metadata in high bits of the address, dereference the address should be allowed. Signed-off-by: Weihong Zhang Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov --- tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c | 144 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 140 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c index 900a3a0fb709..cdc6e40e00e0 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include @@ -29,11 +30,18 @@ /* Specified test function bits */ #define FUNC_MALLOC 0x1 #define FUNC_BITS 0x2 +#define FUNC_MMAP 0x4 +#define FUNC_SYSCALL 0x8 -#define TEST_MASK 0x3 +#define TEST_MASK 0xf + +#define LOW_ADDR (0x1UL << 30) +#define HIGH_ADDR (0x3UL << 48) #define MALLOC_LEN 32 +#define PAGE_SIZE (4 << 10) + struct testcases { unsigned int later; int expected; /* 2: SIGSEGV Error; 1: other errors */ @@ -49,6 +57,7 @@ jmp_buf segv_env; static void segv_handler(int sig) { ksft_print_msg("Get segmentation fault(%d).", sig); + siglongjmp(segv_env, 1); } @@ -61,6 +70,16 @@ static inline int cpu_has_lam(void) return (cpuinfo[0] & (1 << 26)); } +/* Check 5-level page table feature in CPUID.(EAX=07H, ECX=00H):ECX.[bit 16] */ +static inline int cpu_has_la57(void) +{ + unsigned int cpuinfo[4]; + + __cpuid_count(0x7, 0, cpuinfo[0], cpuinfo[1], cpuinfo[2], cpuinfo[3]); + + return (cpuinfo[2] & (1 << 16)); +} + /* * Set tagged address and read back untag mask. * check if the untagged mask is expected. @@ -213,6 +232,68 @@ static int handle_malloc(struct testcases *test) return ret; } +static int handle_mmap(struct testcases *test) +{ + void *ptr; + unsigned int flags = MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_FIXED; + int ret = 0; + + if (test->later == 0 && test->lam != 0) + if (set_lam(test->lam) != 0) + return 1; + + ptr = mmap((void *)test->addr, PAGE_SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, + flags, -1, 0); + if (ptr == MAP_FAILED) { + if (test->addr == HIGH_ADDR) + if (!cpu_has_la57()) + return 3; /* unsupport LA57 */ + return 1; + } + + if (test->later != 0 && test->lam != 0) + if (set_lam(test->lam) != 0) + ret = 1; + + if (ret == 0) { + if (sigsetjmp(segv_env, 1) == 0) { + signal(SIGSEGV, segv_handler); + ret = handle_lam_test(ptr, test->lam); + } else { + ret = 2; + } + } + + munmap(ptr, PAGE_SIZE); + return ret; +} + +static int handle_syscall(struct testcases *test) +{ + struct utsname unme, *pu; + int ret = 0; + + if (test->later == 0 && test->lam != 0) + if (set_lam(test->lam) != 0) + return 1; + + if (sigsetjmp(segv_env, 1) == 0) { + signal(SIGSEGV, segv_handler); + pu = (struct utsname *)set_metadata((uint64_t)&unme, test->lam); + ret = uname(pu); + if (ret < 0) + ret = 1; + } else { + ret = 2; + } + + if (test->later != 0 && test->lam != 0) + if (set_lam(test->lam) != -1 && ret == 0) + ret = 1; + + return ret; +} + static int fork_test(struct testcases *test) { int ret, child_ret; @@ -241,13 +322,20 @@ static void run_test(struct testcases *test, int count) struct testcases *t = test + i; /* fork a process to run test case */ + tests_cnt++; ret = fork_test(t); + + /* return 3 is not support LA57, the case should be skipped */ + if (ret == 3) { + ksft_test_result_skip(t->msg); + continue; + } + if (ret != 0) ret = (t->expected == ret); else ret = !(t->expected); - tests_cnt++; ksft_test_result(ret, t->msg); } } @@ -268,7 +356,6 @@ static struct testcases malloc_cases[] = { }, }; - static struct testcases bits_cases[] = { { .test_func = handle_max_bits, @@ -276,11 +363,54 @@ static struct testcases bits_cases[] = { }, }; +static struct testcases syscall_cases[] = { + { + .later = 0, + .lam = LAM_U57_BITS, + .test_func = handle_syscall, + .msg = "SYSCALL: LAM_U57. syscall with metadata\n", + }, + { + .later = 1, + .expected = 1, + .lam = LAM_U57_BITS, + .test_func = handle_syscall, + .msg = "SYSCALL:[Negative] Disable LAM. Dereferencing pointer with metadata.\n", + }, +}; + +static struct testcases mmap_cases[] = { + { + .later = 1, + .expected = 0, + .lam = LAM_U57_BITS, + .addr = HIGH_ADDR, + .test_func = handle_mmap, + .msg = "MMAP: First mmap high address, then set LAM_U57.\n", + }, + { + .later = 0, + .expected = 0, + .lam = LAM_U57_BITS, + .addr = HIGH_ADDR, + .test_func = handle_mmap, + .msg = "MMAP: First LAM_U57, then High address.\n", + }, + { + .later = 0, + .expected = 0, + .lam = LAM_U57_BITS, + .addr = LOW_ADDR, + .test_func = handle_mmap, + .msg = "MMAP: First LAM_U57, then Low address.\n", + }, +}; + static void cmd_help(void) { printf("usage: lam [-h] [-t test list]\n"); printf("\t-t test list: run tests specified in the test list, default:0x%x\n", TEST_MASK); - printf("\t\t0x1:malloc; 0x2:max_bits;\n"); + printf("\t\t0x1:malloc; 0x2:max_bits; 0x4:mmap; 0x8:syscall.\n"); printf("\t-h: help\n"); } @@ -320,6 +450,12 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) if (tests & FUNC_BITS) run_test(bits_cases, ARRAY_SIZE(bits_cases)); + if (tests & FUNC_MMAP) + run_test(mmap_cases, ARRAY_SIZE(mmap_cases)); + + if (tests & FUNC_SYSCALL) + run_test(syscall_cases, ARRAY_SIZE(syscall_cases)); + ksft_set_plan(tests_cnt); return ksft_exit_pass();