| Message ID | 20230330160747.3107258-1-peterx@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | selftests/mm: Split / Refactor userfault test | expand |
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 12:07:47PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote: > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.c > index c57757c2a36f..17f2bb82c3db 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.c > @@ -330,33 +330,6 @@ void uffd_test_ctx_init(uint64_t features) > err("pipe"); > } > > -uint64_t get_expected_ioctls(uint64_t mode) > -{ > - uint64_t ioctls = UFFD_API_RANGE_IOCTLS; > - > - if (test_type == TEST_HUGETLB) > - ioctls &= ~(1 << _UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE); > - > - if (!((mode & UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_WP) && test_uffdio_wp)) > - ioctls &= ~(1 << _UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT); > - > - if (!((mode & UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MINOR) && test_uffdio_minor)) > - ioctls &= ~(1 << _UFFDIO_CONTINUE); > - > - return ioctls; > -} > - > -void assert_expected_ioctls_present(uint64_t mode, uint64_t ioctls) > -{ > - uint64_t expected = get_expected_ioctls(mode); > - uint64_t actual = ioctls & expected; > - > - if (actual != expected) { > - err("missing ioctl(s): expected %"PRIx64" actual: %"PRIx64, > - expected, actual); > - } > -} Here I dropped the other reference of get_expected_ioctls(), so I also dropped this test which I think is kind of flawed IMHO - as I replied in the other thread, we should probably not reference UFFD_API_RANGE_IOCTLS. But I can feel (from the comments in the other patch that removed the other reference of get_expected_ioctls()) that a lot of us would still care about this test. So I added a new patch / test on top of the series (so it'll have one more patch in the next version at last), just to test all possible combinations of UFFDIO_REGISTER alongside with its returned uffdio_register.ioctls. This is IMHO better than get_expected_ioctls() because: - It's much cleaner to have a separate test on this rather than testing it randomly in the code with random values passed in. - It tests all combinations. It not only includes shmem-private that this series introduced while wasn't there before, but also all combinations of (miss, wp, minor) tuples. - It doesn't rely on UFFD_API_RANGE_IOCTLS anymore. It'll be something like this: ===8<=== /* * Test the returned uffdio_register.ioctls with different register modes. * Note that _UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE is tested separately in the zeropage test. */ static void do_register_ioctls_test(uffd_test_args_t *args, bool miss, bool wp, bool minor) { uint64_t ioctls = 0, expected = BIT_ULL(_UFFDIO_WAKE); mem_type_t *mem_type = args->mem_type; int ret; ret = uffd_register_with_ioctls(uffd, area_dst, page_size, miss, wp, minor, &ioctls); /* * Handle special cases of UFFDIO_REGISTER here where it should * just fail with -EINVAL first.. * * Case 1: register MINOR on anon * Case 2: register with no mode selected */ if ((minor && (mem_type->mem_flag == MEM_ANON)) || (!miss && !wp && !minor)) { if (ret != -EINVAL) err("register (miss=%d, wp=%d, minor=%d) failed " "with wrong errno=%d", miss, wp, minor, ret); return; } /* UFFDIO_REGISTER should succeed, then check ioctls returned */ if (miss) expected |= BIT_ULL(_UFFDIO_COPY); if (wp) expected |= BIT_ULL(_UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT); if (minor) expected |= BIT_ULL(_UFFDIO_CONTINUE); if ((ioctls & expected) != expected) err("unexpected uffdio_register.ioctls " "(miss=%d, wp=%d, minor=%d): expected=0x%"PRIx64", " "returned=0x%"PRIx64, miss, wp, minor, expected, ioctls); uffd_unregister(uffd, area_dst, page_size); } static void uffd_register_ioctls_test(uffd_test_args_t *args) { int miss, wp, minor; for (miss = 0; miss <= 1; miss++) for (wp = 0; wp <= 1; wp++) for (minor = 0; minor <= 1; minor++) do_register_ioctls_test(args, miss, wp, minor); uffd_test_pass(); } ===8<=== Side note: the _UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE test will be left in the specific zeropage test. I considered moving get_expected_ioctls() rather than dropping in the same patch, but that's just over-complicated when without the unit test frameworks being ready. I hope this addresses the concern here, otherwise please shoot. I've also attached the two patches that will test uffdio_register.ioctls as a whole, just in case helpful for discussion before I post v2. Thanks,
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 12:07:47PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote: > Add two helpers to register/unregister to an uffd. Use them to drop > duplicate codes. > > This patch also drops assert_expected_ioctls_present() and > get_expected_ioctls(). Reasons: > > - It'll need a lot of effort to pass test_type==HUGETLB into it from the > upper, so it's the simplest way to get rid of another global var > > - The ioctls returned in UFFDIO_REGISTER is hardly useful at all, because > any app can already detect kernel support on any ioctl via its > corresponding UFFD_FEATURE_*. The check here is for sanity mostly but > it's probably destined no user app will even use it. > > - It's not friendly to one future goal of uffd to run on old kernels, the > problem is get_expected_ioctls() compiles against UFFD_API_RANGE_IOCTLS, > which is a value that can change depending on where the test is compiled, > rather than reflecting what the kernel underneath has. It means it'll > report false negatives on old kernels so it's against our will. > > So let's make our live easier. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugepage-mremap.c | 7 +- > .../selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c | 6 +- > tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.c | 28 +------ > tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.h | 2 - > tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-stress.c | 83 +++++-------------- > tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c | 37 +++++++++ > tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.h | 7 ++ > 7 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 104 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugepage-mremap.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugepage-mremap.c > index e53b5eaa8fce..2084692fe1c4 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugepage-mremap.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugepage-mremap.c > @@ -60,7 +60,6 @@ static void register_region_with_uffd(char *addr, size_t len) > { > long uffd; /* userfaultfd file descriptor */ > struct uffdio_api uffdio_api; > - struct uffdio_register uffdio_register; > > /* Create and enable userfaultfd object. */ > > @@ -96,11 +95,7 @@ static void register_region_with_uffd(char *addr, size_t len) > * handling by the userfaultfd object. In mode, we request to track > * missing pages (i.e., pages that have not yet been faulted in). > */ > - > - uffdio_register.range.start = (unsigned long)addr; > - uffdio_register.range.len = len; > - uffdio_register.mode = UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING; > - if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_REGISTER, &uffdio_register) == -1) { > + if (uffd_register(uffd, addr, len, true, false, false)) { I'd replace booleans with a bit flags as it easier to read. Other than that LGTM. > perror("ioctl-UFFDIO_REGISTER"); > exit(1); > }
On Fri, Apr 07, 2023 at 02:08:54PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > @@ -96,11 +95,7 @@ static void register_region_with_uffd(char *addr, size_t len) > > * handling by the userfaultfd object. In mode, we request to track > > * missing pages (i.e., pages that have not yet been faulted in). > > */ > > - > > - uffdio_register.range.start = (unsigned long)addr; > > - uffdio_register.range.len = len; > > - uffdio_register.mode = UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING; > > - if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_REGISTER, &uffdio_register) == -1) { > > + if (uffd_register(uffd, addr, len, true, false, false)) { > > I'd replace booleans with a bit flags as it easier to read. > Other than that LGTM. It was mostly for no need to remember the long names of macros, and easier when conditionally set with some modes. E.g., we have 5 callers have things like: uffd_register(..., test_uffdio_wp ? UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_WP : 0); The bools simplifes it to: uffd_register(..., test_uffdio_wp, ...); But let me know if you still think that's better - I can switch here. Thanks,
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 03:13:18PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote: > On Fri, Apr 07, 2023 at 02:08:54PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > @@ -96,11 +95,7 @@ static void register_region_with_uffd(char *addr, size_t len) > > > * handling by the userfaultfd object. In mode, we request to track > > > * missing pages (i.e., pages that have not yet been faulted in). > > > */ > > > - > > > - uffdio_register.range.start = (unsigned long)addr; > > > - uffdio_register.range.len = len; > > > - uffdio_register.mode = UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING; > > > - if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_REGISTER, &uffdio_register) == -1) { > > > + if (uffd_register(uffd, addr, len, true, false, false)) { > > > > I'd replace booleans with a bit flags as it easier to read. > > Other than that LGTM. > > It was mostly for no need to remember the long names of macros, and easier > when conditionally set with some modes. E.g., we have 5 callers have things > like: > > uffd_register(..., test_uffdio_wp ? UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_WP : 0); > > The bools simplifes it to: > > uffd_register(..., test_uffdio_wp, ...); > > But let me know if you still think that's better - I can switch here. No strong feelings, however you prefer. > Thanks, > > -- > Peter Xu >
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugepage-mremap.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugepage-mremap.c index e53b5eaa8fce..2084692fe1c4 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugepage-mremap.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugepage-mremap.c @@ -60,7 +60,6 @@ static void register_region_with_uffd(char *addr, size_t len) { long uffd; /* userfaultfd file descriptor */ struct uffdio_api uffdio_api; - struct uffdio_register uffdio_register; /* Create and enable userfaultfd object. */ @@ -96,11 +95,7 @@ static void register_region_with_uffd(char *addr, size_t len) * handling by the userfaultfd object. In mode, we request to track * missing pages (i.e., pages that have not yet been faulted in). */ - - uffdio_register.range.start = (unsigned long)addr; - uffdio_register.range.len = len; - uffdio_register.mode = UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING; - if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_REGISTER, &uffdio_register) == -1) { + if (uffd_register(uffd, addr, len, true, false, false)) { perror("ioctl-UFFDIO_REGISTER"); exit(1); } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c index d8b5b4930412..d3f26050dfd7 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c @@ -178,7 +178,6 @@ static void test_unmerge_discarded(void) static void test_unmerge_uffd_wp(void) { struct uffdio_writeprotect uffd_writeprotect; - struct uffdio_register uffdio_register; const unsigned int size = 2 * MiB; struct uffdio_api uffdio_api; char *map; @@ -210,10 +209,7 @@ static void test_unmerge_uffd_wp(void) } /* Register UFFD-WP, no need for an actual handler. */ - uffdio_register.range.start = (unsigned long) map; - uffdio_register.range.len = size; - uffdio_register.mode = UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_WP; - if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_REGISTER, &uffdio_register) < 0) { + if (uffd_register(uffd, map, size, false, true, false)) { ksft_test_result_fail("UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_WP failed\n"); goto close_uffd; } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.c index c57757c2a36f..17f2bb82c3db 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.c @@ -330,33 +330,6 @@ void uffd_test_ctx_init(uint64_t features) err("pipe"); } -uint64_t get_expected_ioctls(uint64_t mode) -{ - uint64_t ioctls = UFFD_API_RANGE_IOCTLS; - - if (test_type == TEST_HUGETLB) - ioctls &= ~(1 << _UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE); - - if (!((mode & UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_WP) && test_uffdio_wp)) - ioctls &= ~(1 << _UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT); - - if (!((mode & UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MINOR) && test_uffdio_minor)) - ioctls &= ~(1 << _UFFDIO_CONTINUE); - - return ioctls; -} - -void assert_expected_ioctls_present(uint64_t mode, uint64_t ioctls) -{ - uint64_t expected = get_expected_ioctls(mode); - uint64_t actual = ioctls & expected; - - if (actual != expected) { - err("missing ioctl(s): expected %"PRIx64" actual: %"PRIx64, - expected, actual); - } -} - void wp_range(int ufd, __u64 start, __u64 len, bool wp) { struct uffdio_writeprotect prms; @@ -609,3 +582,4 @@ int copy_page(int ufd, unsigned long offset) { return __copy_page(ufd, offset, false); } + diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.h b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.h index d9430cfdcb19..11f770391bd9 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.h @@ -101,8 +101,6 @@ extern uffd_test_ops_t *uffd_test_ops; void uffd_stats_report(struct uffd_stats *stats, int n_cpus); void uffd_test_ctx_init(uint64_t features); void userfaultfd_open(uint64_t *features); -uint64_t get_expected_ioctls(uint64_t mode); -void assert_expected_ioctls_present(uint64_t mode, uint64_t ioctls); int uffd_read_msg(int ufd, struct uffd_msg *msg); void wp_range(int ufd, __u64 start, __u64 len, bool wp); void uffd_handle_page_fault(struct uffd_msg *msg, struct uffd_stats *stats); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-stress.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-stress.c index c68a9aeefc41..e6d39a755082 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-stress.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-stress.c @@ -463,28 +463,19 @@ static int uffdio_zeropage(int ufd, unsigned long offset) /* exercise UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE */ static int userfaultfd_zeropage_test(void) { - struct uffdio_register uffdio_register; - printf("testing UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE: "); fflush(stdout); uffd_test_ctx_init(0); - uffdio_register.range.start = (unsigned long) area_dst; - uffdio_register.range.len = nr_pages * page_size; - uffdio_register.mode = UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING; - if (test_uffdio_wp) - uffdio_register.mode |= UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_WP; - if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_REGISTER, &uffdio_register)) + if (uffd_register(uffd, area_dst, nr_pages * page_size, + true, test_uffdio_wp, false)) err("register failure"); - assert_expected_ioctls_present( - uffdio_register.mode, uffdio_register.ioctls); - if (area_dst_alias) { /* Needed this to test zeropage-retry on shared memory */ - uffdio_register.range.start = (unsigned long) area_dst_alias; - if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_REGISTER, &uffdio_register)) + if (uffd_register(uffd, area_dst_alias, nr_pages * page_size, + true, test_uffdio_wp, false)) err("register failure"); } @@ -498,7 +489,6 @@ static int userfaultfd_zeropage_test(void) static int userfaultfd_events_test(void) { - struct uffdio_register uffdio_register; pthread_t uffd_mon; int err, features; pid_t pid; @@ -514,17 +504,10 @@ static int userfaultfd_events_test(void) fcntl(uffd, F_SETFL, uffd_flags | O_NONBLOCK); - uffdio_register.range.start = (unsigned long) area_dst; - uffdio_register.range.len = nr_pages * page_size; - uffdio_register.mode = UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING; - if (test_uffdio_wp) - uffdio_register.mode |= UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_WP; - if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_REGISTER, &uffdio_register)) + if (uffd_register(uffd, area_dst, nr_pages * page_size, + true, test_uffdio_wp, false)) err("register failure"); - assert_expected_ioctls_present( - uffdio_register.mode, uffdio_register.ioctls); - if (pthread_create(&uffd_mon, &attr, uffd_poll_thread, &stats)) err("uffd_poll_thread create"); @@ -550,7 +533,6 @@ static int userfaultfd_events_test(void) static int userfaultfd_sig_test(void) { - struct uffdio_register uffdio_register; unsigned long userfaults; pthread_t uffd_mon; int err, features; @@ -566,17 +548,10 @@ static int userfaultfd_sig_test(void) fcntl(uffd, F_SETFL, uffd_flags | O_NONBLOCK); - uffdio_register.range.start = (unsigned long) area_dst; - uffdio_register.range.len = nr_pages * page_size; - uffdio_register.mode = UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING; - if (test_uffdio_wp) - uffdio_register.mode |= UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_WP; - if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_REGISTER, &uffdio_register)) + if (uffd_register(uffd, area_dst, nr_pages * page_size, + true, test_uffdio_wp, false)) err("register failure"); - assert_expected_ioctls_present( - uffdio_register.mode, uffdio_register.ioctls); - if (faulting_process(1)) err("faulting process failed"); @@ -629,7 +604,6 @@ void check_memory_contents(char *p) static int userfaultfd_minor_test(void) { unsigned long p; - struct uffdio_register uffdio_register; pthread_t uffd_mon; char c; struct uffd_stats stats = { 0 }; @@ -642,17 +616,10 @@ static int userfaultfd_minor_test(void) uffd_test_ctx_init(uffd_minor_feature()); - uffdio_register.range.start = (unsigned long)area_dst_alias; - uffdio_register.range.len = nr_pages * page_size; - uffdio_register.mode = UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MINOR; - if (test_uffdio_wp) - uffdio_register.mode |= UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_WP; - if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_REGISTER, &uffdio_register)) + if (uffd_register(uffd, area_dst_alias, nr_pages * page_size, + false, test_uffdio_wp, true)) err("register failure"); - assert_expected_ioctls_present( - uffdio_register.mode, uffdio_register.ioctls); - /* * After registering with UFFD, populate the non-UFFD-registered side of * the shared mapping. This should *not* trigger any UFFD minor faults. @@ -777,7 +744,6 @@ static void userfaultfd_wp_unpopulated_test(int pagemap_fd) static void userfaultfd_pagemap_test(unsigned int test_pgsize) { - struct uffdio_register uffdio_register; int pagemap_fd; uint64_t value; @@ -805,10 +771,8 @@ static void userfaultfd_pagemap_test(unsigned int test_pgsize) err("madvise(MADV_NOHUGEPAGE) failed"); } - uffdio_register.range.start = (unsigned long) area_dst; - uffdio_register.range.len = nr_pages * page_size; - uffdio_register.mode = UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_WP; - if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_REGISTER, &uffdio_register)) + if (uffd_register(uffd, area_dst, nr_pages * page_size, + false, true, false)) err("register failed"); pagemap_fd = pagemap_open(); @@ -858,8 +822,8 @@ static int userfaultfd_stress(void) { void *area; unsigned long nr; - struct uffdio_register uffdio_register; struct uffd_stats uffd_stats[nr_cpus]; + uint64_t mem_size = nr_pages * page_size; uffd_test_ctx_init(UFFD_FEATURE_WP_UNPOPULATED); @@ -894,20 +858,13 @@ static int userfaultfd_stress(void) fcntl(uffd, F_SETFL, uffd_flags & ~O_NONBLOCK); /* register */ - uffdio_register.range.start = (unsigned long) area_dst; - uffdio_register.range.len = nr_pages * page_size; - uffdio_register.mode = UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING; - if (test_uffdio_wp) - uffdio_register.mode |= UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_WP; - if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_REGISTER, &uffdio_register)) + if (uffd_register(uffd, area_dst, mem_size, + true, test_uffdio_wp, false)) err("register failure"); - assert_expected_ioctls_present( - uffdio_register.mode, uffdio_register.ioctls); if (area_dst_alias) { - uffdio_register.range.start = (unsigned long) - area_dst_alias; - if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_REGISTER, &uffdio_register)) + if (uffd_register(uffd, area_dst_alias, mem_size, + true, test_uffdio_wp, false)) err("register failure alias"); } @@ -949,12 +906,10 @@ static int userfaultfd_stress(void) nr_pages * page_size, false); /* unregister */ - if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_UNREGISTER, &uffdio_register.range)) + if (uffd_unregister(uffd, area_dst, mem_size)) err("unregister failure"); if (area_dst_alias) { - uffdio_register.range.start = (unsigned long) area_dst; - if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_UNREGISTER, - &uffdio_register.range)) + if (uffd_unregister(uffd, area_dst_alias, mem_size)) err("unregister failure alias"); } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c index 8e9da621764a..10e76400ed70 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@ // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 #include <string.h> #include <fcntl.h> +#include <sys/ioctl.h> +#include <linux/userfaultfd.h> #include "../kselftest.h" #include "vm_util.h" @@ -193,3 +195,38 @@ unsigned long default_huge_page_size(void) fclose(f); return hps; } + +int uffd_register(int uffd, void *addr, uint64_t len, + bool miss, bool wp, bool minor) +{ + struct uffdio_register uffdio_register = { 0 }; + uint64_t mode = 0; + int ret = 0; + + if (miss) + mode |= UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING; + if (wp) + mode |= UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_WP; + if (minor) + mode |= UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MINOR; + + uffdio_register.range.start = (unsigned long)addr; + uffdio_register.range.len = len; + uffdio_register.mode = mode; + + if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_REGISTER, &uffdio_register) == -1) + ret = -errno; + + return ret; +} + +int uffd_unregister(int uffd, void *addr, uint64_t len) +{ + struct uffdio_range range = { .start = (uintptr_t)addr, .len = len }; + int ret = 0; + + if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_UNREGISTER, &range) == -1) + ret = -errno; + + return ret; +} diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.h b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.h index d9fadddb5c69..a67db8432855 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.h @@ -45,6 +45,13 @@ bool check_huge_shmem(void *addr, int nr_hpages, uint64_t hpage_size); int64_t allocate_transhuge(void *ptr, int pagemap_fd); unsigned long default_huge_page_size(void); +int uffd_open_dev(unsigned int flags); +int uffd_open_sys(unsigned int flags); +int uffd_open(unsigned int flags); +int uffd_register(int uffd, void *addr, uint64_t len, + bool miss, bool wp, bool minor); +int uffd_unregister(int uffd, void *addr, uint64_t len); + /* * On ppc64 this will only work with radix 2M hugepage size */
Add two helpers to register/unregister to an uffd. Use them to drop duplicate codes. This patch also drops assert_expected_ioctls_present() and get_expected_ioctls(). Reasons: - It'll need a lot of effort to pass test_type==HUGETLB into it from the upper, so it's the simplest way to get rid of another global var - The ioctls returned in UFFDIO_REGISTER is hardly useful at all, because any app can already detect kernel support on any ioctl via its corresponding UFFD_FEATURE_*. The check here is for sanity mostly but it's probably destined no user app will even use it. - It's not friendly to one future goal of uffd to run on old kernels, the problem is get_expected_ioctls() compiles against UFFD_API_RANGE_IOCTLS, which is a value that can change depending on where the test is compiled, rather than reflecting what the kernel underneath has. It means it'll report false negatives on old kernels so it's against our will. So let's make our live easier. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugepage-mremap.c | 7 +- .../selftests/mm/ksm_functional_tests.c | 6 +- tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.c | 28 +------ tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-common.h | 2 - tools/testing/selftests/mm/uffd-stress.c | 83 +++++-------------- tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c | 37 +++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.h | 7 ++ 7 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 104 deletions(-)