diff mbox series

[v2,30/34] sh: Convert pte_free_tlb() to use ptdescs

Message ID 20230501192829.17086-31-vishal.moola@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series Split ptdesc from struct page | expand

Commit Message

Vishal Moola May 1, 2023, 7:28 p.m. UTC
Part of the conversions to replace pgtable constructor/destructors with
ptdesc equivalents. Also cleans up some spacing issues.

Signed-off-by: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola@gmail.com>
---
 arch/sh/include/asm/pgalloc.h | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

John Paul Adrian Glaubitz May 6, 2023, 11:35 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi Vishal!

On Mon, 2023-05-01 at 12:28 -0700, Vishal Moola (Oracle) wrote:
> Part of the conversions to replace pgtable constructor/destructors with
> ptdesc equivalents. Also cleans up some spacing issues.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola@gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/sh/include/asm/pgalloc.h | 9 +++++----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/sh/include/asm/pgalloc.h b/arch/sh/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> index a9e98233c4d4..ce2ba99dbd84 100644
> --- a/arch/sh/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> +++ b/arch/sh/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
>  #ifndef __ASM_SH_PGALLOC_H
>  #define __ASM_SH_PGALLOC_H
>  
> +#include <linux/mm.h>
>  #include <asm/page.h>
>  
>  #define __HAVE_ARCH_PMD_ALLOC_ONE
> @@ -31,10 +32,10 @@ static inline void pmd_populate(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd,
>  	set_pmd(pmd, __pmd((unsigned long)page_address(pte)));
>  }
>  
> -#define __pte_free_tlb(tlb,pte,addr)			\
> -do {							\
> -	pgtable_pte_page_dtor(pte);			\
> -	tlb_remove_page((tlb), (pte));			\
> +#define __pte_free_tlb(tlb, pte, addr)				\
> +do {								\
> +	ptdesc_pte_dtor(page_ptdesc(pte));			\
> +	tlb_remove_page_ptdesc((tlb), (page_ptdesc(pte)));	\
>  } while (0)
>  
>  #endif /* __ASM_SH_PGALLOC_H */

Looking at the patch which introduces tlb_remove_page_ptdesc() [1], it seems that
tlb_remove_page_ptdesc() already calls tlb_remove_page() with ptdesc_page(pt), so
I'm not sure whether the above tlb_remove_page_ptdesc((tlb), (page_ptdesc(pte)))
is correct.

Shouldn't it just be tlb_remove_page_ptdesc((tlb), (pte))?

Thanks,
Adrian

> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20230417205048.15870-5-vishal.moola@gmail.com/
Vishal Moola May 15, 2023, 7:11 p.m. UTC | #2
On Sat, May 6, 2023 at 4:35 AM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
<glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Vishal!
>
> On Mon, 2023-05-01 at 12:28 -0700, Vishal Moola (Oracle) wrote:
> > Part of the conversions to replace pgtable constructor/destructors with
> > ptdesc equivalents. Also cleans up some spacing issues.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/sh/include/asm/pgalloc.h | 9 +++++----
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/sh/include/asm/pgalloc.h b/arch/sh/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> > index a9e98233c4d4..ce2ba99dbd84 100644
> > --- a/arch/sh/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> > +++ b/arch/sh/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> > @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> >  #ifndef __ASM_SH_PGALLOC_H
> >  #define __ASM_SH_PGALLOC_H
> >
> > +#include <linux/mm.h>
> >  #include <asm/page.h>
> >
> >  #define __HAVE_ARCH_PMD_ALLOC_ONE
> > @@ -31,10 +32,10 @@ static inline void pmd_populate(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd,
> >       set_pmd(pmd, __pmd((unsigned long)page_address(pte)));
> >  }
> >
> > -#define __pte_free_tlb(tlb,pte,addr)                 \
> > -do {                                                 \
> > -     pgtable_pte_page_dtor(pte);                     \
> > -     tlb_remove_page((tlb), (pte));                  \
> > +#define __pte_free_tlb(tlb, pte, addr)                               \
> > +do {                                                         \
> > +     ptdesc_pte_dtor(page_ptdesc(pte));                      \
> > +     tlb_remove_page_ptdesc((tlb), (page_ptdesc(pte)));      \
> >  } while (0)
> >
> >  #endif /* __ASM_SH_PGALLOC_H */
>
> Looking at the patch which introduces tlb_remove_page_ptdesc() [1], it seems that
> tlb_remove_page_ptdesc() already calls tlb_remove_page() with ptdesc_page(pt), so
> I'm not sure whether the above tlb_remove_page_ptdesc((tlb), (page_ptdesc(pte)))
> is correct.
>
> Shouldn't it just be tlb_remove_page_ptdesc((tlb), (pte))?

As of this patchset all implementations of __pte_free_tlb() take in a
struct page. Eventually we'll want it to be tlb_remove_page_ptdesc(tlb, pte),
but for now the cast is necessary here.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/sh/include/asm/pgalloc.h b/arch/sh/include/asm/pgalloc.h
index a9e98233c4d4..ce2ba99dbd84 100644
--- a/arch/sh/include/asm/pgalloc.h
+++ b/arch/sh/include/asm/pgalloc.h
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ 
 #ifndef __ASM_SH_PGALLOC_H
 #define __ASM_SH_PGALLOC_H
 
+#include <linux/mm.h>
 #include <asm/page.h>
 
 #define __HAVE_ARCH_PMD_ALLOC_ONE
@@ -31,10 +32,10 @@  static inline void pmd_populate(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd,
 	set_pmd(pmd, __pmd((unsigned long)page_address(pte)));
 }
 
-#define __pte_free_tlb(tlb,pte,addr)			\
-do {							\
-	pgtable_pte_page_dtor(pte);			\
-	tlb_remove_page((tlb), (pte));			\
+#define __pte_free_tlb(tlb, pte, addr)				\
+do {								\
+	ptdesc_pte_dtor(page_ptdesc(pte));			\
+	tlb_remove_page_ptdesc((tlb), (page_ptdesc(pte)));	\
 } while (0)
 
 #endif /* __ASM_SH_PGALLOC_H */