Message ID | 20231119194740.94101-7-ryncsn@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | Swapin path refactor for optimization and bugfix | expand |
Hi Kairui, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-everything] [also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.7-rc2 next-20231117] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Kairui-Song/mm-swap-fix-a-potential-undefined-behavior-issue/20231120-035926 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231119194740.94101-7-ryncsn%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH 06/24] swap: rework swapin_no_readahead arguments config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-003-20231120 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231120/202311200826.8Nl5w3h8-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 16.0.4 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git ae42196bc493ffe877a7e3dff8be32035dea4d07) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231120/202311200826.8Nl5w3h8-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311200826.8Nl5w3h8-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> mm/swap_state.c:872: warning: Function parameter or member 'mpol' not described in 'swapin_no_readahead' >> mm/swap_state.c:872: warning: Function parameter or member 'ilx' not described in 'swapin_no_readahead' >> mm/swap_state.c:872: warning: Function parameter or member 'mm' not described in 'swapin_no_readahead' >> mm/swap_state.c:872: warning: Excess function parameter 'vmf' description in 'swapin_no_readahead' vim +872 mm/swap_state.c d9bfcfdc41e8e5 Huang Ying 2017-09-06 859 19f582d2684e47 Kairui Song 2023-11-20 860 /** 19f582d2684e47 Kairui Song 2023-11-20 861 * swapin_no_readahead - swap in pages skipping swap cache and readahead 19f582d2684e47 Kairui Song 2023-11-20 862 * @entry: swap entry of this memory 19f582d2684e47 Kairui Song 2023-11-20 863 * @gfp_mask: memory allocation flags 19f582d2684e47 Kairui Song 2023-11-20 864 * @vmf: fault information 19f582d2684e47 Kairui Song 2023-11-20 865 * 19f582d2684e47 Kairui Song 2023-11-20 866 * Returns the struct page for entry and addr after the swap entry is read 19f582d2684e47 Kairui Song 2023-11-20 867 * in. 19f582d2684e47 Kairui Song 2023-11-20 868 */ 598f2616cde014 Kairui Song 2023-11-20 869 static struct page *swapin_no_readahead(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask, 2538a5e96fe62f Kairui Song 2023-11-20 870 struct mempolicy *mpol, pgoff_t ilx, 2538a5e96fe62f Kairui Song 2023-11-20 871 struct mm_struct *mm) 19f582d2684e47 Kairui Song 2023-11-20 @872 { 19f582d2684e47 Kairui Song 2023-11-20 873 struct folio *folio; 2538a5e96fe62f Kairui Song 2023-11-20 874 struct page *page; 19f582d2684e47 Kairui Song 2023-11-20 875 void *shadow = NULL; 19f582d2684e47 Kairui Song 2023-11-20 876 2538a5e96fe62f Kairui Song 2023-11-20 877 page = alloc_pages_mpol(gfp_mask, 0, mpol, ilx, numa_node_id()); 2538a5e96fe62f Kairui Song 2023-11-20 878 folio = (struct folio *)page; 19f582d2684e47 Kairui Song 2023-11-20 879 if (folio) { 2538a5e96fe62f Kairui Song 2023-11-20 880 if (mem_cgroup_swapin_charge_folio(folio, mm, c2ac0dcbf9ab6a Kairui Song 2023-11-20 881 GFP_KERNEL, entry)) { 19f582d2684e47 Kairui Song 2023-11-20 882 folio_put(folio); 19f582d2684e47 Kairui Song 2023-11-20 883 return NULL; 19f582d2684e47 Kairui Song 2023-11-20 884 } c2ac0dcbf9ab6a Kairui Song 2023-11-20 885 c2ac0dcbf9ab6a Kairui Song 2023-11-20 886 __folio_set_locked(folio); c2ac0dcbf9ab6a Kairui Song 2023-11-20 887 __folio_set_swapbacked(folio); c2ac0dcbf9ab6a Kairui Song 2023-11-20 888 19f582d2684e47 Kairui Song 2023-11-20 889 mem_cgroup_swapin_uncharge_swap(entry); 19f582d2684e47 Kairui Song 2023-11-20 890 19f582d2684e47 Kairui Song 2023-11-20 891 shadow = get_shadow_from_swap_cache(entry); 19f582d2684e47 Kairui Song 2023-11-20 892 if (shadow) 19f582d2684e47 Kairui Song 2023-11-20 893 workingset_refault(folio, shadow); 19f582d2684e47 Kairui Song 2023-11-20 894 19f582d2684e47 Kairui Song 2023-11-20 895 folio_add_lru(folio); 19f582d2684e47 Kairui Song 2023-11-20 896 19f582d2684e47 Kairui Song 2023-11-20 897 /* To provide entry to swap_readpage() */ 19f582d2684e47 Kairui Song 2023-11-20 898 folio->swap = entry; 19f582d2684e47 Kairui Song 2023-11-20 899 swap_readpage(page, true, NULL); 19f582d2684e47 Kairui Song 2023-11-20 900 folio->private = NULL; 19f582d2684e47 Kairui Song 2023-11-20 901 } 19f582d2684e47 Kairui Song 2023-11-20 902 19f582d2684e47 Kairui Song 2023-11-20 903 return page; 19f582d2684e47 Kairui Song 2023-11-20 904 } 19f582d2684e47 Kairui Song 2023-11-20 905
On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 11:48 AM Kairui Song <ryncsn@gmail.com> wrote: > > From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> > > Make it use alloc_pages_mpol instead of vma_alloc_folio, and accept > mm_struct directly as an argument instead of taking a vmf as argument. > Make its arguments similar to swap_{cluster,vma}_readahead, to > make the code more aligned. It is unclear to me what is the value of making the swap_{cluster,vma}_readahead more aligned here. > Also prepare for following commits which will skip vmf for certain > swapin paths. The following patch 07/24 does not seem to use this patch. Can it merge with the other patch that uses it? As it is, this patch does not serve a stand alone value to justify it. Chris > > Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> > --- > mm/swap_state.c | 15 +++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/swap_state.c b/mm/swap_state.c > index fd0047ae324e..ff6756f2e8e4 100644 > --- a/mm/swap_state.c > +++ b/mm/swap_state.c > @@ -867,17 +867,17 @@ static struct page *swap_vma_readahead(swp_entry_t targ_entry, gfp_t gfp_mask, > * in. > */ > static struct page *swapin_no_readahead(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask, > - struct vm_fault *vmf) > + struct mempolicy *mpol, pgoff_t ilx, > + struct mm_struct *mm) > { > - struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma; > - struct page *page = NULL; > struct folio *folio; > + struct page *page; > void *shadow = NULL; > > - folio = vma_alloc_folio(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE, 0, > - vma, vmf->address, false); > + page = alloc_pages_mpol(gfp_mask, 0, mpol, ilx, numa_node_id()); > + folio = (struct folio *)page; > if (folio) { > - if (mem_cgroup_swapin_charge_folio(folio, vma->vm_mm, > + if (mem_cgroup_swapin_charge_folio(folio, mm, > GFP_KERNEL, entry)) { > folio_put(folio); > return NULL; > @@ -896,7 +896,6 @@ static struct page *swapin_no_readahead(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask, > > /* To provide entry to swap_readpage() */ > folio->swap = entry; > - page = &folio->page; > swap_readpage(page, true, NULL); > folio->private = NULL; > } > @@ -928,7 +927,7 @@ struct page *swapin_readahead(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask, > > mpol = get_vma_policy(vmf->vma, vmf->address, 0, &ilx); > if (swap_use_no_readahead(swp_swap_info(entry), entry)) { > - page = swapin_no_readahead(entry, gfp_mask, vmf); > + page = swapin_no_readahead(entry, gfp_mask, mpol, ilx, vmf->vma->vm_mm); > cached = false; > } else if (swap_use_vma_readahead()) { > page = swap_vma_readahead(entry, gfp_mask, mpol, ilx, vmf); > -- > 2.42.0 > >
Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org> 于2023年11月21日周二 14:44写道: > > On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 11:48 AM Kairui Song <ryncsn@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> > > > > Make it use alloc_pages_mpol instead of vma_alloc_folio, and accept > > mm_struct directly as an argument instead of taking a vmf as argument. > > Make its arguments similar to swap_{cluster,vma}_readahead, to > > make the code more aligned. > > It is unclear to me what is the value of making the > swap_{cluster,vma}_readahead more aligned here. > > > Also prepare for following commits which will skip vmf for certain > > swapin paths. > > The following patch 07/24 does not seem to use this patch. > Can it merge with the other patch that uses it? > > As it is, this patch does not serve a stand alone value to justify it. Yes, I'll rearrange this.
diff --git a/mm/swap_state.c b/mm/swap_state.c index fd0047ae324e..ff6756f2e8e4 100644 --- a/mm/swap_state.c +++ b/mm/swap_state.c @@ -867,17 +867,17 @@ static struct page *swap_vma_readahead(swp_entry_t targ_entry, gfp_t gfp_mask, * in. */ static struct page *swapin_no_readahead(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask, - struct vm_fault *vmf) + struct mempolicy *mpol, pgoff_t ilx, + struct mm_struct *mm) { - struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma; - struct page *page = NULL; struct folio *folio; + struct page *page; void *shadow = NULL; - folio = vma_alloc_folio(GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE, 0, - vma, vmf->address, false); + page = alloc_pages_mpol(gfp_mask, 0, mpol, ilx, numa_node_id()); + folio = (struct folio *)page; if (folio) { - if (mem_cgroup_swapin_charge_folio(folio, vma->vm_mm, + if (mem_cgroup_swapin_charge_folio(folio, mm, GFP_KERNEL, entry)) { folio_put(folio); return NULL; @@ -896,7 +896,6 @@ static struct page *swapin_no_readahead(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask, /* To provide entry to swap_readpage() */ folio->swap = entry; - page = &folio->page; swap_readpage(page, true, NULL); folio->private = NULL; } @@ -928,7 +927,7 @@ struct page *swapin_readahead(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask, mpol = get_vma_policy(vmf->vma, vmf->address, 0, &ilx); if (swap_use_no_readahead(swp_swap_info(entry), entry)) { - page = swapin_no_readahead(entry, gfp_mask, vmf); + page = swapin_no_readahead(entry, gfp_mask, mpol, ilx, vmf->vma->vm_mm); cached = false; } else if (swap_use_vma_readahead()) { page = swap_vma_readahead(entry, gfp_mask, mpol, ilx, vmf);