diff mbox series

[-next,v4,1/3] x86/mce: remove redundant fixup type EX_TYPE_COPY

Message ID 20240111135548.3207437-2-tongtiangen@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series minor improvements for x86 mce processing | expand

Commit Message

Tong Tiangen Jan. 11, 2024, 1:55 p.m. UTC
In commit 034ff37d3407 ("x86: rewrite '__copy_user_nocache' function"),
rewrited __copy_user_nocache() uses EX_TYPE_UACCESS instead of
EX_TYPE_COPY,this change does not broken the MC safe copy for
__copy_user_nocache(), but as a result, there's no place for EX_TYPE_COPY
to use. Therefore, we remove the definition of EX_TYPE_COPY.

Signed-off-by: Tong Tiangen <tongtiangen@huawei.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/asm.h                 |  3 ---
 arch/x86/include/asm/extable_fixup_types.h | 23 +++++++++++-----------
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/severity.c         |  1 -
 arch/x86/mm/extable.c                      |  9 ---------
 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

Comments

Borislav Petkov Jan. 30, 2024, 9:09 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 09:55:46PM +0800, Tong Tiangen wrote:
> In commit 034ff37d3407 ("x86: rewrite '__copy_user_nocache' function"),
> rewrited __copy_user_nocache() uses EX_TYPE_UACCESS instead of
> EX_TYPE_COPY,this change does not broken the MC safe copy for
> __copy_user_nocache(), but as a result, there's no place for EX_TYPE_COPY
> to use. Therefore, we remove the definition of EX_TYPE_COPY.

Please use passive voice in your commit message: no "we" or "I", etc,
and describe your changes in imperative mood.

Also, pls read section "2) Describe your changes" in
Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for more details.

Also, see section "Changelog" in
Documentation/process/maintainer-tip.rst

> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/extable_fixup_types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/extable_fixup_types.h
> index fe6312045042..787916ec1e12 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/extable_fixup_types.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/extable_fixup_types.h
> @@ -36,18 +36,17 @@
>  #define	EX_TYPE_DEFAULT			 1
>  #define	EX_TYPE_FAULT			 2
>  #define	EX_TYPE_UACCESS			 3
> -#define	EX_TYPE_COPY			 4
> -#define	EX_TYPE_CLEAR_FS		 5
> -#define	EX_TYPE_FPU_RESTORE		 6
> -#define	EX_TYPE_BPF			 7
> -#define	EX_TYPE_WRMSR			 8
> -#define	EX_TYPE_RDMSR			 9
> -#define	EX_TYPE_WRMSR_SAFE		10 /* reg := -EIO */
> -#define	EX_TYPE_RDMSR_SAFE		11 /* reg := -EIO */
> -#define	EX_TYPE_WRMSR_IN_MCE		12
> -#define	EX_TYPE_RDMSR_IN_MCE		13
> -#define	EX_TYPE_DEFAULT_MCE_SAFE	14
> -#define	EX_TYPE_FAULT_MCE_SAFE		15
> +#define	EX_TYPE_CLEAR_FS		 4
> +#define	EX_TYPE_FPU_RESTORE		 5
> +#define	EX_TYPE_BPF			 6
> +#define	EX_TYPE_WRMSR			 7
> +#define	EX_TYPE_RDMSR			 8
> +#define	EX_TYPE_WRMSR_SAFE		 9 /* reg := -EIO */
> +#define	EX_TYPE_RDMSR_SAFE		10 /* reg := -EIO */
> +#define	EX_TYPE_WRMSR_IN_MCE		11
> +#define	EX_TYPE_RDMSR_IN_MCE		12
> +#define	EX_TYPE_DEFAULT_MCE_SAFE	13
> +#define	EX_TYPE_FAULT_MCE_SAFE		14

You don't need to renumber them - all you need to do is to comment it
out:

/* unused, was: #define EX_TYPE_COPY 		4 */
Tong Tiangen Feb. 1, 2024, 11:02 a.m. UTC | #2
在 2024/1/31 5:09, Borislav Petkov 写道:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 09:55:46PM +0800, Tong Tiangen wrote:
>> In commit 034ff37d3407 ("x86: rewrite '__copy_user_nocache' function"),
>> rewrited __copy_user_nocache() uses EX_TYPE_UACCESS instead of
>> EX_TYPE_COPY,this change does not broken the MC safe copy for
>> __copy_user_nocache(), but as a result, there's no place for EX_TYPE_COPY
>> to use. Therefore, we remove the definition of EX_TYPE_COPY.
> 
> Please use passive voice in your commit message: no "we" or "I", etc,
> and describe your changes in imperative mood.
> 
> Also, pls read section "2) Describe your changes" in
> Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for more details.
> 
> Also, see section "Changelog" in
> Documentation/process/maintainer-tip.rst

OK, thanks, Improved in the next release.

> 
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/extable_fixup_types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/extable_fixup_types.h
>> index fe6312045042..787916ec1e12 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/extable_fixup_types.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/extable_fixup_types.h
>> @@ -36,18 +36,17 @@
>>   #define	EX_TYPE_DEFAULT			 1
>>   #define	EX_TYPE_FAULT			 2
>>   #define	EX_TYPE_UACCESS			 3
>> -#define	EX_TYPE_COPY			 4
>> -#define	EX_TYPE_CLEAR_FS		 5
>> -#define	EX_TYPE_FPU_RESTORE		 6
>> -#define	EX_TYPE_BPF			 7
>> -#define	EX_TYPE_WRMSR			 8
>> -#define	EX_TYPE_RDMSR			 9
>> -#define	EX_TYPE_WRMSR_SAFE		10 /* reg := -EIO */
>> -#define	EX_TYPE_RDMSR_SAFE		11 /* reg := -EIO */
>> -#define	EX_TYPE_WRMSR_IN_MCE		12
>> -#define	EX_TYPE_RDMSR_IN_MCE		13
>> -#define	EX_TYPE_DEFAULT_MCE_SAFE	14
>> -#define	EX_TYPE_FAULT_MCE_SAFE		15
>> +#define	EX_TYPE_CLEAR_FS		 4
>> +#define	EX_TYPE_FPU_RESTORE		 5
>> +#define	EX_TYPE_BPF			 6
>> +#define	EX_TYPE_WRMSR			 7
>> +#define	EX_TYPE_RDMSR			 8
>> +#define	EX_TYPE_WRMSR_SAFE		 9 /* reg := -EIO */
>> +#define	EX_TYPE_RDMSR_SAFE		10 /* reg := -EIO */
>> +#define	EX_TYPE_WRMSR_IN_MCE		11
>> +#define	EX_TYPE_RDMSR_IN_MCE		12
>> +#define	EX_TYPE_DEFAULT_MCE_SAFE	13
>> +#define	EX_TYPE_FAULT_MCE_SAFE		14
> 
> You don't need to renumber them - all you need to do is to comment it
> out:
> 
> /* unused, was: #define EX_TYPE_COPY 		4 */

OK.

Thanks.
Tong.

>
Tong Tiangen Feb. 1, 2024, 12:43 p.m. UTC | #3
在 2024/1/31 5:09, Borislav Petkov 写道:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 09:55:46PM +0800, Tong Tiangen wrote:
>> In commit 034ff37d3407 ("x86: rewrite '__copy_user_nocache' function"),
>> rewrited __copy_user_nocache() uses EX_TYPE_UACCESS instead of
>> EX_TYPE_COPY,this change does not broken the MC safe copy for
>> __copy_user_nocache(), but as a result, there's no place for EX_TYPE_COPY
>> to use. Therefore, we remove the definition of EX_TYPE_COPY.
> 
> Please use passive voice in your commit message: no "we" or "I", etc,
> and describe your changes in imperative mood.
> 
> Also, pls read section "2) Describe your changes" in
> Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for more details.
> 
> Also, see section "Changelog" in
> Documentation/process/maintainer-tip.rst

Hi Borislav:

how about this commit msg change?

Since commit 034ff37d3407 ("x86: rewrite '__copy_user_nocache'
function") rewrited __copy_user_nocache() uses EX_TYPE_UACCESS
instead of EX_TYPE_COPY,there is no user for EX_TYPE_COPY,so
remove it.

Thanks.
Tong.

> 
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/extable_fixup_types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/extable_fixup_types.h
>> index fe6312045042..787916ec1e12 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/extable_fixup_types.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/extable_fixup_types.h
>> @@ -36,18 +36,17 @@
>>   #define	EX_TYPE_DEFAULT			 1
>>   #define	EX_TYPE_FAULT			 2
>>   #define	EX_TYPE_UACCESS			 3
>> -#define	EX_TYPE_COPY			 4
>> -#define	EX_TYPE_CLEAR_FS		 5
>> -#define	EX_TYPE_FPU_RESTORE		 6
>> -#define	EX_TYPE_BPF			 7
>> -#define	EX_TYPE_WRMSR			 8
>> -#define	EX_TYPE_RDMSR			 9
>> -#define	EX_TYPE_WRMSR_SAFE		10 /* reg := -EIO */
>> -#define	EX_TYPE_RDMSR_SAFE		11 /* reg := -EIO */
>> -#define	EX_TYPE_WRMSR_IN_MCE		12
>> -#define	EX_TYPE_RDMSR_IN_MCE		13
>> -#define	EX_TYPE_DEFAULT_MCE_SAFE	14
>> -#define	EX_TYPE_FAULT_MCE_SAFE		15
>> +#define	EX_TYPE_CLEAR_FS		 4
>> +#define	EX_TYPE_FPU_RESTORE		 5
>> +#define	EX_TYPE_BPF			 6
>> +#define	EX_TYPE_WRMSR			 7
>> +#define	EX_TYPE_RDMSR			 8
>> +#define	EX_TYPE_WRMSR_SAFE		 9 /* reg := -EIO */
>> +#define	EX_TYPE_RDMSR_SAFE		10 /* reg := -EIO */
>> +#define	EX_TYPE_WRMSR_IN_MCE		11
>> +#define	EX_TYPE_RDMSR_IN_MCE		12
>> +#define	EX_TYPE_DEFAULT_MCE_SAFE	13
>> +#define	EX_TYPE_FAULT_MCE_SAFE		14
> 
> You don't need to renumber them - all you need to do is to comment it
> out:
> 
> /* unused, was: #define EX_TYPE_COPY 		4 */
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/asm.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/asm.h
index fbcfec4dc4cc..692409ea0c37 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/asm.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/asm.h
@@ -215,9 +215,6 @@  register unsigned long current_stack_pointer asm(_ASM_SP);
 #define _ASM_EXTABLE_UA(from, to)				\
 	_ASM_EXTABLE_TYPE(from, to, EX_TYPE_UACCESS)
 
-#define _ASM_EXTABLE_CPY(from, to)				\
-	_ASM_EXTABLE_TYPE(from, to, EX_TYPE_COPY)
-
 #define _ASM_EXTABLE_FAULT(from, to)				\
 	_ASM_EXTABLE_TYPE(from, to, EX_TYPE_FAULT)
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/extable_fixup_types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/extable_fixup_types.h
index fe6312045042..787916ec1e12 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/extable_fixup_types.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/extable_fixup_types.h
@@ -36,18 +36,17 @@ 
 #define	EX_TYPE_DEFAULT			 1
 #define	EX_TYPE_FAULT			 2
 #define	EX_TYPE_UACCESS			 3
-#define	EX_TYPE_COPY			 4
-#define	EX_TYPE_CLEAR_FS		 5
-#define	EX_TYPE_FPU_RESTORE		 6
-#define	EX_TYPE_BPF			 7
-#define	EX_TYPE_WRMSR			 8
-#define	EX_TYPE_RDMSR			 9
-#define	EX_TYPE_WRMSR_SAFE		10 /* reg := -EIO */
-#define	EX_TYPE_RDMSR_SAFE		11 /* reg := -EIO */
-#define	EX_TYPE_WRMSR_IN_MCE		12
-#define	EX_TYPE_RDMSR_IN_MCE		13
-#define	EX_TYPE_DEFAULT_MCE_SAFE	14
-#define	EX_TYPE_FAULT_MCE_SAFE		15
+#define	EX_TYPE_CLEAR_FS		 4
+#define	EX_TYPE_FPU_RESTORE		 5
+#define	EX_TYPE_BPF			 6
+#define	EX_TYPE_WRMSR			 7
+#define	EX_TYPE_RDMSR			 8
+#define	EX_TYPE_WRMSR_SAFE		 9 /* reg := -EIO */
+#define	EX_TYPE_RDMSR_SAFE		10 /* reg := -EIO */
+#define	EX_TYPE_WRMSR_IN_MCE		11
+#define	EX_TYPE_RDMSR_IN_MCE		12
+#define	EX_TYPE_DEFAULT_MCE_SAFE	13
+#define	EX_TYPE_FAULT_MCE_SAFE		14
 
 #define	EX_TYPE_POP_REG			16 /* sp += sizeof(long) */
 #define EX_TYPE_POP_ZERO		(EX_TYPE_POP_REG | EX_DATA_IMM(0))
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/severity.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/severity.c
index c4477162c07d..bca780fa5e57 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/severity.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/severity.c
@@ -290,7 +290,6 @@  static noinstr int error_context(struct mce *m, struct pt_regs *regs)
 
 	switch (fixup_type) {
 	case EX_TYPE_UACCESS:
-	case EX_TYPE_COPY:
 		if (!copy_user)
 			return IN_KERNEL;
 		m->kflags |= MCE_IN_KERNEL_COPYIN;
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/extable.c b/arch/x86/mm/extable.c
index 271dcb2deabc..2354c0156e51 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/extable.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/extable.c
@@ -163,13 +163,6 @@  static bool ex_handler_uaccess(const struct exception_table_entry *fixup,
 	return ex_handler_default(fixup, regs);
 }
 
-static bool ex_handler_copy(const struct exception_table_entry *fixup,
-			    struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
-{
-	WARN_ONCE(trapnr == X86_TRAP_GP, "General protection fault in user access. Non-canonical address?");
-	return ex_handler_fault(fixup, regs, trapnr);
-}
-
 static bool ex_handler_msr(const struct exception_table_entry *fixup,
 			   struct pt_regs *regs, bool wrmsr, bool safe, int reg)
 {
@@ -267,8 +260,6 @@  int fixup_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr, unsigned long error_code,
 		return ex_handler_fault(e, regs, trapnr);
 	case EX_TYPE_UACCESS:
 		return ex_handler_uaccess(e, regs, trapnr, fault_addr);
-	case EX_TYPE_COPY:
-		return ex_handler_copy(e, regs, trapnr);
 	case EX_TYPE_CLEAR_FS:
 		return ex_handler_clear_fs(e, regs);
 	case EX_TYPE_FPU_RESTORE: