| Message ID | 20240801173955.1975034-1-ackerleytng@google.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Fixes: f32fb32820b1 ("KVM: x86: Add hook for determining max NPT mapping level") | expand |
On Thu, Aug 01, 2024, Ackerley Tng wrote: > The `if (req_max_level)` test was meant ignore req_max_level if > PG_LEVEL_NONE was returned. Hence, this function should return > max_level instead of the ignored req_max_level. > Fixes: ? > Signed-off-by: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com> > Change-Id: I403898aacc379ed98ba5caa41c9f1c52f277adc2 Bad gerrit, bad!
On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 10:58 AM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 01, 2024, Ackerley Tng wrote: > > The `if (req_max_level)` test was meant ignore req_max_level if > > PG_LEVEL_NONE was returned. Hence, this function should return > > max_level instead of the ignored req_max_level. > > > > Fixes: ? I think it's in the subject :) > > > Signed-off-by: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com> > > Change-Id: I403898aacc379ed98ba5caa41c9f1c52f277adc2 > > Bad gerrit, bad! >
On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 7:40 PM Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com> wrote: > > The `if (req_max_level)` test was meant ignore req_max_level if > PG_LEVEL_NONE was returned. Hence, this function should return > max_level instead of the ignored req_max_level. > > Signed-off-by: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com> > Change-Id: I403898aacc379ed98ba5caa41c9f1c52f277adc2 It's worth pointing out that this is only a latent issue for now, since guest_memfd does not support large pages ( __kvm_gmem_get_pfn always returns 0). Queued with a small note in the commit message and fixed subject. Thanks, Paolo > --- > arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c > index 901be9e420a4..e6b73774645d 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c > @@ -4335,7 +4335,7 @@ static u8 kvm_max_private_mapping_level(struct kvm *kvm, kvm_pfn_t pfn, > if (req_max_level) > max_level = min(max_level, req_max_level); > > - return req_max_level; > + return max_level; > } > > static int kvm_faultin_pfn_private(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > -- > 2.46.0.rc2.264.g509ed76dc8-goog >
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c index 901be9e420a4..e6b73774645d 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c @@ -4335,7 +4335,7 @@ static u8 kvm_max_private_mapping_level(struct kvm *kvm, kvm_pfn_t pfn, if (req_max_level) max_level = min(max_level, req_max_level); - return req_max_level; + return max_level; } static int kvm_faultin_pfn_private(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
The `if (req_max_level)` test was meant ignore req_max_level if PG_LEVEL_NONE was returned. Hence, this function should return max_level instead of the ignored req_max_level. Signed-off-by: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com> Change-Id: I403898aacc379ed98ba5caa41c9f1c52f277adc2 --- arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)