diff mbox series

[v4,26/28] rust: str: test: replace `alloc::format`

Message ID 20240805152004.5039-27-dakr@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series Generic `Allocator` support for Rust | expand

Commit Message

Danilo Krummrich Aug. 5, 2024, 3:19 p.m. UTC
The current implementation of tests in str.rs use `format!` to format
strings for comparison, which, internally, creates a new `String`.

In order to prepare for getting rid of Rust's alloc crate, we have to
cut this dependency. Instead, implement `format!` for `CString`.

Note that for userspace tests, `Kmalloc`, which is backing `CString`'s
memory, is just a type alias to `Cmalloc`.

Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
---
 rust/kernel/str.rs | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Danilo Krummrich Aug. 12, 2024, 1:07 p.m. UTC | #1
On 8/8/24 9:22 AM, Benno Lossin wrote:
> On 05.08.24 17:19, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>> The current implementation of tests in str.rs use `format!` to format
>> strings for comparison, which, internally, creates a new `String`.
>>
>> In order to prepare for getting rid of Rust's alloc crate, we have to
>> cut this dependency. Instead, implement `format!` for `CString`.
>>
>> Note that for userspace tests, `Kmalloc`, which is backing `CString`'s
>> memory, is just a type alias to `Cmalloc`.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
>> ---
>>   rust/kernel/str.rs | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>   1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/rust/kernel/str.rs b/rust/kernel/str.rs
>> index 0b6ffbade521..8f234224cbf5 100644
>> --- a/rust/kernel/str.rs
>> +++ b/rust/kernel/str.rs
>> @@ -523,7 +523,28 @@ macro_rules! c_str {
>>   #[cfg(test)]
>>   mod tests {
>>       use super::*;
>> -    use alloc::format;
>> +
>> +    struct String(CString);
>> +
>> +    impl String {
>> +        fn from_fmt(args: fmt::Arguments<'_>) -> Self {
>> +            String(CString::try_from_fmt(args).unwrap())
>> +        }
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    impl Deref for String {
>> +        type Target = str;
>> +
>> +        fn deref(&self) -> &str {
>> +            self.0.to_str().unwrap()
>> +        }
>> +    }
> 
> Don't actually think we need this newtype.

Right, but I thought it's a bit more extensible and cleaner than...

> 
>> +
>> +    macro_rules! format {
>> +        ($($f:tt)*) => ({
>> +            &*String::from_fmt(kernel::fmt!($($f)*))
> 
> We could just do this:
> 
>      CString::try_from_fmt(kernel::fmt!($(f)*)).unwrap().to_str().unwrap()

...doing it inline.

I'm fine either way, but unless you really want me to change it, I'd
rather keep it as it is.

> 
> ---
> Cheers,
> Benno
> 
>> +        })
>> +    }
>>
>>       const ALL_ASCII_CHARS: &'static str =
>>           "\\x01\\x02\\x03\\x04\\x05\\x06\\x07\\x08\\x09\\x0a\\x0b\\x0c\\x0d\\x0e\\x0f\
>> --
>> 2.45.2
>>
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/rust/kernel/str.rs b/rust/kernel/str.rs
index 0b6ffbade521..8f234224cbf5 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/str.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/str.rs
@@ -523,7 +523,28 @@  macro_rules! c_str {
 #[cfg(test)]
 mod tests {
     use super::*;
-    use alloc::format;
+
+    struct String(CString);
+
+    impl String {
+        fn from_fmt(args: fmt::Arguments<'_>) -> Self {
+            String(CString::try_from_fmt(args).unwrap())
+        }
+    }
+
+    impl Deref for String {
+        type Target = str;
+
+        fn deref(&self) -> &str {
+            self.0.to_str().unwrap()
+        }
+    }
+
+    macro_rules! format {
+        ($($f:tt)*) => ({
+            &*String::from_fmt(kernel::fmt!($($f)*))
+        })
+    }
 
     const ALL_ASCII_CHARS: &'static str =
         "\\x01\\x02\\x03\\x04\\x05\\x06\\x07\\x08\\x09\\x0a\\x0b\\x0c\\x0d\\x0e\\x0f\