@@ -648,6 +648,7 @@ static void cachefiles_issue_write(struct netfs_io_subrequest *subreq)
struct netfs_cache_resources *cres = &wreq->cache_resources;
struct cachefiles_object *object = cachefiles_cres_object(cres);
struct cachefiles_cache *cache = object->volume->cache;
+ struct netfs_io_stream *stream = &wreq->io_streams[subreq->stream_nr];
const struct cred *saved_cred;
size_t off, pre, post, len = subreq->len;
loff_t start = subreq->start;
@@ -661,6 +662,7 @@ static void cachefiles_issue_write(struct netfs_io_subrequest *subreq)
if (off) {
pre = CACHEFILES_DIO_BLOCK_SIZE - off;
if (pre >= len) {
+ fscache_count_dio_misfit();
netfs_write_subrequest_terminated(subreq, len, false);
return;
}
@@ -671,10 +673,22 @@ static void cachefiles_issue_write(struct netfs_io_subrequest *subreq)
}
/* We also need to end on the cache granularity boundary */
+ if (start + len == wreq->i_size) {
+ size_t part = len % CACHEFILES_DIO_BLOCK_SIZE;
+ size_t need = CACHEFILES_DIO_BLOCK_SIZE - part;
+
+ if (part && stream->submit_extendable_to >= need) {
+ len += need;
+ subreq->len += need;
+ subreq->io_iter.count += need;
+ }
+ }
+
post = len & (CACHEFILES_DIO_BLOCK_SIZE - 1);
if (post) {
len -= post;
if (len == 0) {
+ fscache_count_dio_misfit();
netfs_write_subrequest_terminated(subreq, post, false);
return;
}
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ static int netfs_pgpriv2_copy_folio(struct netfs_io_request *wreq, struct folio
if (netfs_buffer_append_folio(wreq, folio, false) < 0)
return -ENOMEM;
- cache->submit_max_len = fsize;
+ cache->submit_extendable_to = fsize;
cache->submit_off = 0;
cache->submit_len = flen;
@@ -112,10 +112,10 @@ static int netfs_pgpriv2_copy_folio(struct netfs_io_request *wreq, struct folio
wreq->io_iter.iov_offset = cache->submit_off;
atomic64_set(&wreq->issued_to, fpos + cache->submit_off);
+ cache->submit_extendable_to = fsize - cache->submit_off;
part = netfs_advance_write(wreq, cache, fpos + cache->submit_off,
cache->submit_len, to_eof);
cache->submit_off += part;
- cache->submit_max_len -= part;
if (part > cache->submit_len)
cache->submit_len = 0;
else
@@ -283,6 +283,7 @@ int netfs_advance_write(struct netfs_io_request *wreq,
_debug("part %zx/%zx %zx/%zx", subreq->len, stream->sreq_max_len, part, len);
subreq->len += part;
subreq->nr_segs++;
+ stream->submit_extendable_to -= part;
if (subreq->len >= stream->sreq_max_len ||
subreq->nr_segs >= stream->sreq_max_segs ||
@@ -424,7 +425,6 @@ static int netfs_write_folio(struct netfs_io_request *wreq,
*/
for (int s = 0; s < NR_IO_STREAMS; s++) {
stream = &wreq->io_streams[s];
- stream->submit_max_len = fsize;
stream->submit_off = foff;
stream->submit_len = flen;
if ((stream->source == NETFS_WRITE_TO_CACHE && streamw) ||
@@ -432,7 +432,6 @@ static int netfs_write_folio(struct netfs_io_request *wreq,
fgroup == NETFS_FOLIO_COPY_TO_CACHE)) {
stream->submit_off = UINT_MAX;
stream->submit_len = 0;
- stream->submit_max_len = 0;
}
}
@@ -462,10 +461,10 @@ static int netfs_write_folio(struct netfs_io_request *wreq,
wreq->io_iter.iov_offset = stream->submit_off;
atomic64_set(&wreq->issued_to, fpos + stream->submit_off);
+ stream->submit_extendable_to = fsize - stream->submit_off;
part = netfs_advance_write(wreq, stream, fpos + stream->submit_off,
stream->submit_len, to_eof);
stream->submit_off += part;
- stream->submit_max_len -= part;
if (part > stream->submit_len)
stream->submit_len = 0;
else
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ struct netfs_io_stream {
unsigned int sreq_max_segs; /* 0 or max number of segments in an iterator */
unsigned int submit_off; /* Folio offset we're submitting from */
unsigned int submit_len; /* Amount of data left to submit */
- unsigned int submit_max_len; /* Amount I/O can be rounded up to */
+ unsigned int submit_extendable_to; /* Amount I/O can be rounded up to */
void (*prepare_write)(struct netfs_io_subrequest *subreq);
void (*issue_write)(struct netfs_io_subrequest *subreq);
/* Collection tracking */
Because it uses DIO writes, cachefiles is unable to make a write to the backing file if that write is not aligned to and sized according to the backing file's DIO block alignment. This makes it tricky to handle a write to the cache where the EOF on the network file is not correctly aligned. To get around this, netfslib attempts to tell the driver it is calling how much more data there is available beyond the EOF that it can use to pad the write (netfslib preclears the part of the folio above the EOF). However, it tries to tell the cache what the maximum length is, but doesn't calculate this correctly; and, in any case, cachefiles actually ignores the value and just skips the block. Fix this by: (1) Change the value passed to indicate the amount of extra data that can be added to the operation (now ->submit_extendable_to). This is much simpler to calculate as it's just the end of the folio minus the top of the data within the folio - rather than having to account for data spread over multiple folios. (2) Make cachefiles add some of this data if the subrequest it is given ends at the network file's i_size if the extra data is sufficient to pad out to a whole block. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org --- fs/cachefiles/io.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ fs/netfs/read_pgpriv2.c | 4 ++-- fs/netfs/write_issue.c | 5 ++--- include/linux/netfs.h | 2 +- 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)