@@ -320,10 +320,6 @@ static void scftorture_invoke_one(struct scf_statistics *scfp, struct torture_ra
struct scf_check *scfcp = NULL;
struct scf_selector *scfsp = scf_sel_rand(trsp);
- if (use_cpus_read_lock)
- cpus_read_lock();
- else
- preempt_disable();
if (scfsp->scfs_prim == SCF_PRIM_SINGLE || scfsp->scfs_wait) {
scfcp = kmalloc(sizeof(*scfcp), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!scfcp) {
@@ -337,6 +333,10 @@ static void scftorture_invoke_one(struct scf_statistics *scfp, struct torture_ra
scfcp->scfc_rpc = false;
}
}
+ if (use_cpus_read_lock)
+ cpus_read_lock();
+ else
+ preempt_disable();
switch (scfsp->scfs_prim) {
case SCF_PRIM_RESCHED:
if (IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_SCF_TORTURE_TEST)) {
Memory allocations can not happen within regions with explicit disabled preemption PREEMPT_RT. The problem is that the locking structures underneath are sleeping locks. Move the memory allocation outside of the preempt-disabled section. Keep the GFP_ATOMIC for the allocation to behave like a "ememergncy allocation". Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> --- kernel/scftorture.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)