Message ID | 20250107074252.1062127-1-quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [v4] arm64: mm: Populate vmemmap/linear at the page level for hotplugged sections | expand |
On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 03:42:52PM +0800, Zhenhua Huang wrote: > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c > index e2739b69e11b..5e0f514de870 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c > @@ -42,9 +42,11 @@ > #include <asm/pgalloc.h> > #include <asm/kfence.h> > > -#define NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS BIT(0) > -#define NO_CONT_MAPPINGS BIT(1) > -#define NO_EXEC_MAPPINGS BIT(2) /* assumes FEAT_HPDS is not used */ > +#define NO_PMD_BLOCK_MAPPINGS BIT(0) > +#define NO_PUD_BLOCK_MAPPINGS BIT(1) /* Hotplug case: do not want block mapping for PUD */ > +#define NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS (NO_PMD_BLOCK_MAPPINGS | NO_PUD_BLOCK_MAPPINGS) Nit: please use a tab instead of space before (NO_PMD_...) > +#define NO_CONT_MAPPINGS BIT(2) > +#define NO_EXEC_MAPPINGS BIT(3) /* assumes FEAT_HPDS is not used */ > > u64 kimage_voffset __ro_after_init; > EXPORT_SYMBOL(kimage_voffset); > @@ -254,7 +256,7 @@ static void init_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, > > /* try section mapping first */ > if (((addr | next | phys) & ~PMD_MASK) == 0 && > - (flags & NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS) == 0) { > + (flags & NO_PMD_BLOCK_MAPPINGS) == 0) { > pmd_set_huge(pmdp, phys, prot); > > /* > @@ -356,10 +358,11 @@ static void alloc_init_pud(p4d_t *p4dp, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, > > /* > * For 4K granule only, attempt to put down a 1GB block > + * Hotplug case: do not attempt 1GB block > */ I don't think we need this comment added here. The hotplug case is a decision of the caller, so better to have the comment there. > if (pud_sect_supported() && > ((addr | next | phys) & ~PUD_MASK) == 0 && > - (flags & NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS) == 0) { > + (flags & NO_PUD_BLOCK_MAPPINGS) == 0) { > pud_set_huge(pudp, phys, prot); Nit: something wrong with the alignment here. I think the unmodified line after the 'if' one above was misaligned before your patch. > > /* > @@ -1175,9 +1178,21 @@ int __meminit vmemmap_check_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp, int node, > int __meminit vmemmap_populate(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, int node, > struct vmem_altmap *altmap) > { > + unsigned long start_pfn; > + struct mem_section *ms; > + > WARN_ON((start < VMEMMAP_START) || (end > VMEMMAP_END)); > > - if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES)) > + start_pfn = page_to_pfn((struct page *)start); > + ms = __pfn_to_section(start_pfn); Hmm, it would have been better if the core code provided the start pfn as it does for vmemmap_populate_compound_pages() but I'm fine with deducting it from 'start'. > + /* > + * Hotplugged section does not support hugepages as > + * PMD_SIZE (hence PUD_SIZE) section mapping covers > + * struct page range that exceeds a SUBSECTION_SIZE > + * i.e 2MB - for all available base page sizes. > + */ > + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES) || !early_section(ms)) > return vmemmap_populate_basepages(start, end, node, altmap); > else > return vmemmap_populate_hugepages(start, end, node, altmap); > @@ -1339,9 +1354,25 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size, > struct mhp_params *params) > { > int ret, flags = NO_EXEC_MAPPINGS; > + unsigned long start_pfn = page_to_pfn((struct page *)start); > + struct mem_section *ms = __pfn_to_section(start_pfn); This looks wrong. 'start' here is a physical address, you want PFN_DOWN() instead. > > VM_BUG_ON(!mhp_range_allowed(start, size, true)); > > + /* should not be invoked by early section */ > + WARN_ON(early_section(ms)); > + > + /* > + * 4K base page's PMD_SIZE matches SUBSECTION_SIZE i.e 2MB. Hence > + * PMD section mapping can be allowed, but only for 4K base pages. > + * Where as PMD_SIZE (hence PUD_SIZE) for other page sizes exceed > + * SUBSECTION_SIZE. > + */ > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES)) > + flags |= NO_PUD_BLOCK_MAPPINGS | NO_CONT_MAPPINGS; In theory we can allow contiguous PTE mappings but not PMD. You could probably do the same as a NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS and split it into multiple components - NO_PTE_CONT_MAPPINGS and so on. > + else > + flags |= NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS | NO_CONT_MAPPINGS; Similarly with 16K/64K pages we can allow contiguous PTEs as they all go up to 2MB blocks. I think we should write the flags setup in a more readable way than trying to do mental maths on the possible combinations, something like: flags = NO_PUD_BLOCK_MAPPINGS | NO_PMD_CONT_MAPPINGS; if (SUBSECTION_SHIFT < PMD_SHIFT) flags |= NO_PMD_BLOCK_MAPPINGS; if (SUBSECTION_SHIFT < CONT_PTE_SHIFT) flags |= NO_PTE_CONT_MAPPINGS; This way we don't care about the page size and should cover any changes to SUBSECTION_SHIFT making it smaller than 2MB.
Hi Catalin, On 2025/1/8 3:22, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 03:42:52PM +0800, Zhenhua Huang wrote: >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c >> index e2739b69e11b..5e0f514de870 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c >> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c >> @@ -42,9 +42,11 @@ >> #include <asm/pgalloc.h> >> #include <asm/kfence.h> >> >> -#define NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS BIT(0) >> -#define NO_CONT_MAPPINGS BIT(1) >> -#define NO_EXEC_MAPPINGS BIT(2) /* assumes FEAT_HPDS is not used */ >> +#define NO_PMD_BLOCK_MAPPINGS BIT(0) >> +#define NO_PUD_BLOCK_MAPPINGS BIT(1) /* Hotplug case: do not want block mapping for PUD */ >> +#define NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS (NO_PMD_BLOCK_MAPPINGS | NO_PUD_BLOCK_MAPPINGS) > > Nit: please use a tab instead of space before (NO_PMD_...) > >> +#define NO_CONT_MAPPINGS BIT(2) >> +#define NO_EXEC_MAPPINGS BIT(3) /* assumes FEAT_HPDS is not used */ >> >> u64 kimage_voffset __ro_after_init; >> EXPORT_SYMBOL(kimage_voffset); >> @@ -254,7 +256,7 @@ static void init_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, >> >> /* try section mapping first */ >> if (((addr | next | phys) & ~PMD_MASK) == 0 && >> - (flags & NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS) == 0) { >> + (flags & NO_PMD_BLOCK_MAPPINGS) == 0) { >> pmd_set_huge(pmdp, phys, prot); >> >> /* >> @@ -356,10 +358,11 @@ static void alloc_init_pud(p4d_t *p4dp, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, >> >> /* >> * For 4K granule only, attempt to put down a 1GB block >> + * Hotplug case: do not attempt 1GB block >> */ > > I don't think we need this comment added here. The hotplug case is a > decision of the caller, so better to have the comment there. Yeah, will remove. > >> if (pud_sect_supported() && >> ((addr | next | phys) & ~PUD_MASK) == 0 && >> - (flags & NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS) == 0) { >> + (flags & NO_PUD_BLOCK_MAPPINGS) == 0) { >> pud_set_huge(pudp, phys, prot); > > Nit: something wrong with the alignment here. I think the unmodified > line after the 'if' one above was misaligned before your patch. Noted and will correct in next patch. > >> >> /* >> @@ -1175,9 +1178,21 @@ int __meminit vmemmap_check_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp, int node, >> int __meminit vmemmap_populate(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, int node, >> struct vmem_altmap *altmap) >> { >> + unsigned long start_pfn; >> + struct mem_section *ms; >> + >> WARN_ON((start < VMEMMAP_START) || (end > VMEMMAP_END)); >> >> - if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES)) >> + start_pfn = page_to_pfn((struct page *)start); >> + ms = __pfn_to_section(start_pfn); > > Hmm, it would have been better if the core code provided the start pfn > as it does for vmemmap_populate_compound_pages() but I'm fine with > deducting it from 'start'. I found another bug, that even for early section, when vmemmap_populate is called, SECTION_IS_EARLY is not set. Therefore, early_section() always return false. Since vmemmap_populate() occurs during section initialization, it may be hard to say it is a bug.. However, should we instead using SECTION_MARKED_PRESENT to check? I tested well in my setup. Hot plug flow: 1. section_activate -> vmemmap_populate 2. mark PRESENT In contrast, the early flow: 1. memblocks_present -> mark PRESENT 2. __populate_section_memmap -> vmemmap_populate > >> + /* >> + * Hotplugged section does not support hugepages as >> + * PMD_SIZE (hence PUD_SIZE) section mapping covers >> + * struct page range that exceeds a SUBSECTION_SIZE >> + * i.e 2MB - for all available base page sizes. >> + */ >> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES) || !early_section(ms)) >> return vmemmap_populate_basepages(start, end, node, altmap); >> else >> return vmemmap_populate_hugepages(start, end, node, altmap); >> @@ -1339,9 +1354,25 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size, >> struct mhp_params *params) >> { >> int ret, flags = NO_EXEC_MAPPINGS; >> + unsigned long start_pfn = page_to_pfn((struct page *)start); >> + struct mem_section *ms = __pfn_to_section(start_pfn); > > This looks wrong. 'start' here is a physical address, you want > PFN_DOWN() instead. Sorry, my mistake.Thanks for catching it. > >> >> VM_BUG_ON(!mhp_range_allowed(start, size, true)); >> >> + /* should not be invoked by early section */ >> + WARN_ON(early_section(ms)); >> + >> + /* >> + * 4K base page's PMD_SIZE matches SUBSECTION_SIZE i.e 2MB. Hence >> + * PMD section mapping can be allowed, but only for 4K base pages. >> + * Where as PMD_SIZE (hence PUD_SIZE) for other page sizes exceed >> + * SUBSECTION_SIZE. >> + */ >> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES)) >> + flags |= NO_PUD_BLOCK_MAPPINGS | NO_CONT_MAPPINGS; > > In theory we can allow contiguous PTE mappings but not PMD. You could > probably do the same as a NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS and split it into multiple > components - NO_PTE_CONT_MAPPINGS and so on. > >> + else >> + flags |= NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS | NO_CONT_MAPPINGS; > > Similarly with 16K/64K pages we can allow contiguous PTEs as they all go > up to 2MB blocks. Yes! > > I think we should write the flags setup in a more readable way than > trying to do mental maths on the possible combinations, something like: > > flags = NO_PUD_BLOCK_MAPPINGS | NO_PMD_CONT_MAPPINGS; > if (SUBSECTION_SHIFT < PMD_SHIFT) > flags |= NO_PMD_BLOCK_MAPPINGS; > if (SUBSECTION_SHIFT < CONT_PTE_SHIFT) > flags |= NO_PTE_CONT_MAPPINGS; Good idea indeed. We no longer need to worry about PAGE SIZE CONFIG. > > This way we don't care about the page size and should cover any changes > to SUBSECTION_SHIFT making it smaller than 2MB. >
On 1/8/25 00:52, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 03:42:52PM +0800, Zhenhua Huang wrote: >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c >> index e2739b69e11b..5e0f514de870 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c >> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c >> @@ -42,9 +42,11 @@ >> #include <asm/pgalloc.h> >> #include <asm/kfence.h> >> >> -#define NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS BIT(0) >> -#define NO_CONT_MAPPINGS BIT(1) >> -#define NO_EXEC_MAPPINGS BIT(2) /* assumes FEAT_HPDS is not used */ >> +#define NO_PMD_BLOCK_MAPPINGS BIT(0) >> +#define NO_PUD_BLOCK_MAPPINGS BIT(1) /* Hotplug case: do not want block mapping for PUD */ >> +#define NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS (NO_PMD_BLOCK_MAPPINGS | NO_PUD_BLOCK_MAPPINGS) > > Nit: please use a tab instead of space before (NO_PMD_...) > >> +#define NO_CONT_MAPPINGS BIT(2) >> +#define NO_EXEC_MAPPINGS BIT(3) /* assumes FEAT_HPDS is not used */ >> >> u64 kimage_voffset __ro_after_init; >> EXPORT_SYMBOL(kimage_voffset); >> @@ -254,7 +256,7 @@ static void init_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, >> >> /* try section mapping first */ >> if (((addr | next | phys) & ~PMD_MASK) == 0 && >> - (flags & NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS) == 0) { >> + (flags & NO_PMD_BLOCK_MAPPINGS) == 0) { >> pmd_set_huge(pmdp, phys, prot); >> >> /* >> @@ -356,10 +358,11 @@ static void alloc_init_pud(p4d_t *p4dp, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, >> >> /* >> * For 4K granule only, attempt to put down a 1GB block >> + * Hotplug case: do not attempt 1GB block >> */ > > I don't think we need this comment added here. The hotplug case is a > decision of the caller, so better to have the comment there. Agreed. > >> if (pud_sect_supported() && >> ((addr | next | phys) & ~PUD_MASK) == 0 && >> - (flags & NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS) == 0) { >> + (flags & NO_PUD_BLOCK_MAPPINGS) == 0) { >> pud_set_huge(pudp, phys, prot); > > Nit: something wrong with the alignment here. I think the unmodified > line after the 'if' one above was misaligned before your patch. > >> >> /* >> @@ -1175,9 +1178,21 @@ int __meminit vmemmap_check_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp, int node, >> int __meminit vmemmap_populate(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, int node, >> struct vmem_altmap *altmap) >> { >> + unsigned long start_pfn; >> + struct mem_section *ms; >> + >> WARN_ON((start < VMEMMAP_START) || (end > VMEMMAP_END)); >> >> - if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES)) >> + start_pfn = page_to_pfn((struct page *)start); >> + ms = __pfn_to_section(start_pfn); > > Hmm, it would have been better if the core code provided the start pfn > as it does for vmemmap_populate_compound_pages() but I'm fine with > deducting it from 'start'. Right, that will require changing arguments in generic vmemmap_populate(). > >> + /* >> + * Hotplugged section does not support hugepages as >> + * PMD_SIZE (hence PUD_SIZE) section mapping covers >> + * struct page range that exceeds a SUBSECTION_SIZE >> + * i.e 2MB - for all available base page sizes. >> + */ >> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES) || !early_section(ms)) >> return vmemmap_populate_basepages(start, end, node, altmap); >> else >> return vmemmap_populate_hugepages(start, end, node, altmap); >> @@ -1339,9 +1354,25 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size, >> struct mhp_params *params) >> { >> int ret, flags = NO_EXEC_MAPPINGS; >> + unsigned long start_pfn = page_to_pfn((struct page *)start); >> + struct mem_section *ms = __pfn_to_section(start_pfn); > > This looks wrong. 'start' here is a physical address, you want > PFN_DOWN() instead. Agreed. > >> >> VM_BUG_ON(!mhp_range_allowed(start, size, true)); >> >> + /* should not be invoked by early section */ >> + WARN_ON(early_section(ms)); >> + >> + /* >> + * 4K base page's PMD_SIZE matches SUBSECTION_SIZE i.e 2MB. Hence >> + * PMD section mapping can be allowed, but only for 4K base pages. >> + * Where as PMD_SIZE (hence PUD_SIZE) for other page sizes exceed >> + * SUBSECTION_SIZE. >> + */ >> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES)) >> + flags |= NO_PUD_BLOCK_MAPPINGS | NO_CONT_MAPPINGS; > > In theory we can allow contiguous PTE mappings but not PMD. You could > probably do the same as a NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS and split it into multiple > components - NO_PTE_CONT_MAPPINGS and so on. That's a good idea. > >> + else >> + flags |= NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS | NO_CONT_MAPPINGS; > > Similarly with 16K/64K pages we can allow contiguous PTEs as they all go > up to 2MB blocks. > > I think we should write the flags setup in a more readable way than > trying to do mental maths on the possible combinations, something like: > > flags = NO_PUD_BLOCK_MAPPINGS | NO_PMD_CONT_MAPPINGS; > if (SUBSECTION_SHIFT < PMD_SHIFT) > flags |= NO_PMD_BLOCK_MAPPINGS; > if (SUBSECTION_SHIFT < CONT_PTE_SHIFT) > flags |= NO_PTE_CONT_MAPPINGS; Just wondering why not start with PUD level itself ? Although SUBSECTION_SHIFT might never reach the PUD level but this will help keep the flags calculations bit simple and ready for all future changes. flags = 0; if (SUBSECTION_SHIFT < PUD_SHIFT) flags |= NO_PUD_BLOCK_MAPPINGS; if (SUBSECTION_SHIFT < CONT_PMD_SHIFT) flags |= NO_PMD_CONT_MAPPINGS; > > This way we don't care about the page size and should cover any changes > to SUBSECTION_SHIFT making it smaller than 2MB. > Agreed.
On 1/8/25 15:37, Zhenhua Huang wrote: > >> >>> /* >>> @@ -1175,9 +1178,21 @@ int __meminit vmemmap_check_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp, int node, >>> int __meminit vmemmap_populate(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, int node, >>> struct vmem_altmap *altmap) >>> { >>> + unsigned long start_pfn; >>> + struct mem_section *ms; >>> + >>> WARN_ON((start < VMEMMAP_START) || (end > VMEMMAP_END)); >>> - if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES)) >>> + start_pfn = page_to_pfn((struct page *)start); >>> + ms = __pfn_to_section(start_pfn); >> >> Hmm, it would have been better if the core code provided the start pfn >> as it does for vmemmap_populate_compound_pages() but I'm fine with >> deducting it from 'start'. > > I found another bug, that even for early section, when vmemmap_populate is called, SECTION_IS_EARLY is not set. Therefore, early_section() always return false. Hmm, well that's unexpected. > > Since vmemmap_populate() occurs during section initialization, it may be hard to say it is a bug.. > However, should we instead using SECTION_MARKED_PRESENT to check? I tested well in my setup. > > Hot plug flow: > 1. section_activate -> vmemmap_populate > 2. mark PRESENT > > In contrast, the early flow: > 1. memblocks_present -> mark PRESENT > 2. __populate_section_memmap -> vmemmap_populate But from a semantics perspective, should SECTION_MARKED_PRESENT be marked on a section before SECTION_IS_EARLY ? Is it really the expected behaviour here or that needs to be fixed first ? Although SYSTEM_BOOTING state check might help but section flag seems to be the right thing to do here.
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c index e2739b69e11b..5e0f514de870 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c @@ -42,9 +42,11 @@ #include <asm/pgalloc.h> #include <asm/kfence.h> -#define NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS BIT(0) -#define NO_CONT_MAPPINGS BIT(1) -#define NO_EXEC_MAPPINGS BIT(2) /* assumes FEAT_HPDS is not used */ +#define NO_PMD_BLOCK_MAPPINGS BIT(0) +#define NO_PUD_BLOCK_MAPPINGS BIT(1) /* Hotplug case: do not want block mapping for PUD */ +#define NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS (NO_PMD_BLOCK_MAPPINGS | NO_PUD_BLOCK_MAPPINGS) +#define NO_CONT_MAPPINGS BIT(2) +#define NO_EXEC_MAPPINGS BIT(3) /* assumes FEAT_HPDS is not used */ u64 kimage_voffset __ro_after_init; EXPORT_SYMBOL(kimage_voffset); @@ -254,7 +256,7 @@ static void init_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, /* try section mapping first */ if (((addr | next | phys) & ~PMD_MASK) == 0 && - (flags & NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS) == 0) { + (flags & NO_PMD_BLOCK_MAPPINGS) == 0) { pmd_set_huge(pmdp, phys, prot); /* @@ -356,10 +358,11 @@ static void alloc_init_pud(p4d_t *p4dp, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, /* * For 4K granule only, attempt to put down a 1GB block + * Hotplug case: do not attempt 1GB block */ if (pud_sect_supported() && ((addr | next | phys) & ~PUD_MASK) == 0 && - (flags & NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS) == 0) { + (flags & NO_PUD_BLOCK_MAPPINGS) == 0) { pud_set_huge(pudp, phys, prot); /* @@ -1175,9 +1178,21 @@ int __meminit vmemmap_check_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp, int node, int __meminit vmemmap_populate(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, int node, struct vmem_altmap *altmap) { + unsigned long start_pfn; + struct mem_section *ms; + WARN_ON((start < VMEMMAP_START) || (end > VMEMMAP_END)); - if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES)) + start_pfn = page_to_pfn((struct page *)start); + ms = __pfn_to_section(start_pfn); + + /* + * Hotplugged section does not support hugepages as + * PMD_SIZE (hence PUD_SIZE) section mapping covers + * struct page range that exceeds a SUBSECTION_SIZE + * i.e 2MB - for all available base page sizes. + */ + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES) || !early_section(ms)) return vmemmap_populate_basepages(start, end, node, altmap); else return vmemmap_populate_hugepages(start, end, node, altmap); @@ -1339,9 +1354,25 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size, struct mhp_params *params) { int ret, flags = NO_EXEC_MAPPINGS; + unsigned long start_pfn = page_to_pfn((struct page *)start); + struct mem_section *ms = __pfn_to_section(start_pfn); VM_BUG_ON(!mhp_range_allowed(start, size, true)); + /* should not be invoked by early section */ + WARN_ON(early_section(ms)); + + /* + * 4K base page's PMD_SIZE matches SUBSECTION_SIZE i.e 2MB. Hence + * PMD section mapping can be allowed, but only for 4K base pages. + * Where as PMD_SIZE (hence PUD_SIZE) for other page sizes exceed + * SUBSECTION_SIZE. + */ + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES)) + flags |= NO_PUD_BLOCK_MAPPINGS | NO_CONT_MAPPINGS; + else + flags |= NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS | NO_CONT_MAPPINGS; + if (can_set_direct_map()) flags |= NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS | NO_CONT_MAPPINGS;
On the arm64 platform with 4K base page config, SECTION_SIZE_BITS is set to 27, making one section 128M. The related page struct which vmemmap points to is 2M then. Commit c1cc1552616d ("arm64: MMU initialisation") optimizes the vmemmap to populate at the PMD section level which was suitable initially since hot plug granule is always one section(128M). However, commit ba72b4c8cf60 ("mm/sparsemem: support sub-section hotplug") introduced a 2M(SUBSECTION_SIZE) hot plug granule, which disrupted the existing arm64 assumptions. Considering the vmemmap_free -> unmap_hotplug_pmd_range path, when pmd_sect() is true, the entire PMD section is cleared, even if there is other effective subsection. For example page_struct_map1 and page_strcut_map2 are part of a single PMD entry and they are hot-added sequentially. Then page_struct_map1 is removed, vmemmap_free() will clear the entire PMD entry freeing the struct page map for the whole section, even though page_struct_map2 is still active. Similar problem exists with linear mapping as well, for 16K base page(PMD size = 32M) or 64K base page(PMD = 512M), their block mappings exceed SUBSECTION_SIZE. Tearing down the entire PMD mapping too will leave other subsections unmapped in the linear mapping. To address the issue, we need to prevent PMD/PUD/CONT mappings for both linear and vmemmap for non-boot sections if corresponding size on the given base page exceeds 2MB(SUBSECTION_SIZE). We only permit 2MB PMD block linear mapping in 4K page size config as its PMD_SIZE matches the SUBSECTION_SIZE. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.4+ Fixes: ba72b4c8cf60 ("mm/sparsemem: support sub-section hotplug") Signed-off-by: Zhenhua Huang <quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com> --- arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)