Message ID | 20250115041634.63387-1-yuntao.wang@linux.dev (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | mm/page_alloc: Remove the incorrect and misleading comment | expand |
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index cae7b93864c2..ff23296e30dc 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -5161,13 +5161,6 @@ static void build_thisnode_zonelists(pg_data_t *pgdat) zonerefs->zone_idx = 0; } -/* - * Build zonelists ordered by zone and nodes within zones. - * This results in conserving DMA zone[s] until all Normal memory is - * exhausted, but results in overflowing to remote node while memory - * may still exist in local DMA zone. - */ - static void build_zonelists(pg_data_t *pgdat) { static int node_order[MAX_NUMNODES];
The comment removed in this patch originally belonged to the build_zonelists_in_zone_order() function, which was introduced by commit f0c0b2b808f2 ("change zonelist order: zonelist order selection logic"). Later, commit c9bff3eebc09 ("mm, page_alloc: rip out ZONELIST_ORDER_ZONE") removed build_zonelists_in_zone_order() but left its comment behind. Subsequently, commit 9d3be21bf9c0 ("mm, page_alloc: simplify zonelist initialization") moved the node_order variable into build_zonelists(), making the comment originally belonged to build_zonelists_in_zone_order() appear as if it were part of build_zonelists(). Remove this misleading comment. Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang <yuntao.wang@linux.dev> --- mm/page_alloc.c | 7 ------- 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)