diff mbox series

[v3,1/6] exit: perform add_device_randomness() without tasklist_lock

Message ID 20250201163106.28912-2-mjguzik@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series reduce tasklist_lock hold time on exit and do some | expand

Commit Message

Mateusz Guzik Feb. 1, 2025, 4:31 p.m. UTC
Parallel calls to add_device_randomness() contend on their own.

The clone side aleady runs outside of tasklist_lock, which in turn means
any caller on the exit side extends the tasklist_lock hold time while
contending on the random-private lock.

Signed-off-by: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/exit.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Oleg Nesterov Feb. 3, 2025, 5:51 p.m. UTC | #1
On 02/01, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
>
> +	add_device_randomness((const void*) &p->se.sum_exec_runtime,
> +			      sizeof(unsigned long long));

I won't insist, but do we really need to keep this ugly "(const void*)"
typecast? and perhaps sizeof(p->se.sum_exec_runtime) will look a bit
better?

Oleg.
Mateusz Guzik Feb. 3, 2025, 5:55 p.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 6:51 PM Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 02/01, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> >
> > +     add_device_randomness((const void*) &p->se.sum_exec_runtime,
> > +                           sizeof(unsigned long long));
>
> I won't insist, but do we really need to keep this ugly "(const void*)"
> typecast? and perhaps sizeof(p->se.sum_exec_runtime) will look a bit
> better?
>

Thanks for the review, I'm going to wait for Eric to chime in before
doing anything here.

As for the thing at hand, I tried avoid messing with it in order to
reduce discussion. :->

However, we seem to be in agreement this should be augmented, so I'm
going to do it in v4.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
index 3485e5fc499e..1eb2e7d36ce4 100644
--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -174,9 +174,6 @@  static void __exit_signal(struct task_struct *tsk)
 			sig->curr_target = next_thread(tsk);
 	}
 
-	add_device_randomness((const void*) &tsk->se.sum_exec_runtime,
-			      sizeof(unsigned long long));
-
 	/*
 	 * Accumulate here the counters for all threads as they die. We could
 	 * skip the group leader because it is the last user of signal_struct,
@@ -278,6 +275,8 @@  void release_task(struct task_struct *p)
 	write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
 	proc_flush_pid(thread_pid);
 	put_pid(thread_pid);
+	add_device_randomness((const void*) &p->se.sum_exec_runtime,
+			      sizeof(unsigned long long));
 	release_thread(p);
 	put_task_struct_rcu_user(p);