@@ -2987,7 +2987,7 @@ struct folio *alloc_hugetlb_folio(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
struct hugepage_subpool *spool = subpool_vma(vma);
struct hstate *h = hstate_vma(vma);
struct folio *folio;
- long retval, gbl_chg;
+ long retval, gbl_chg, gbl_reserve;
map_chg_state map_chg;
int ret, idx;
struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg = NULL;
@@ -3140,8 +3140,16 @@ struct folio *alloc_hugetlb_folio(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_cgroup_rsvd(idx, pages_per_huge_page(h),
h_cg);
out_subpool_put:
- if (map_chg)
- hugepage_subpool_put_pages(spool, 1);
+ /*
+ * put page to subpool iff the quota of subpool's rsv_hpages is used
+ * during hugepage_subpool_get_pages.
+ */
+ if (map_chg && !gbl_chg) {
+ gbl_reserve = hugepage_subpool_put_pages(spool, 1);
+ hugetlb_acct_memory(h, -gbl_reserve);
+ }
+
+
out_end_reservation:
if (map_chg != MAP_CHG_ENFORCED)
vma_end_reservation(h, vma, addr);
@@ -6949,7 +6957,7 @@ bool hugetlb_reserve_pages(struct inode *inode,
struct vm_area_struct *vma,
vm_flags_t vm_flags)
{
- long chg = -1, add = -1;
+ long chg = -1, add = -1, spool_resv, gbl_resv;
struct hstate *h = hstate_inode(inode);
struct hugepage_subpool *spool = subpool_inode(inode);
struct resv_map *resv_map;
@@ -7084,8 +7092,16 @@ bool hugetlb_reserve_pages(struct inode *inode,
return true;
out_put_pages:
- /* put back original number of pages, chg */
- (void)hugepage_subpool_put_pages(spool, chg);
+ spool_resv = chg - gbl_reserve;
+ if (spool_resv) {
+ /* put sub pool's reservation back, chg - gbl_reserve */
+ gbl_resv = hugepage_subpool_put_pages(spool, spool_resv);
+ /*
+ * subpool's reserved pages can not be put back due to race,
+ * return to hstate.
+ */
+ hugetlb_acct_memory(h, -gbl_resv);
+ }
out_uncharge_cgroup:
hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_cgroup_rsvd(hstate_index(h),
chg * pages_per_huge_page(h), h_cg);
During our testing with hugetlb subpool enabled, we observe that hstate->resv_huge_pages may underflow into negative values. Root cause analysis reveals a race condition in subpool reservation fallback handling as follow: hugetlb_reserve_pages() /* Attempt subpool reservation */ gbl_reserve = hugepage_subpool_get_pages(spool, chg); /* Global reservation may fail after subpool allocation */ if (hugetlb_acct_memory(h, gbl_reserve) < 0) goto out_put_pages; out_put_pages: /* This incorrectly restores reservation to subpool */ hugepage_subpool_put_pages(spool, chg); When hugetlb_acct_memory() fails after subpool allocation, the current implementation over-commits subpool reservations by returning the full 'chg' value instead of the actual allocated 'gbl_reserve' amount. This discrepancy propagates to global reservations during subsequent releases, eventually causing resv_huge_pages underflow. This problem can be trigger easily with the following steps: 1. reverse hugepage for hugeltb allocation 2. mount hugetlbfs with min_size to enable hugetlb subpool 3. alloc hugepages with two task(make sure the second will fail due to insufficient amount of hugepages) 4. with for a few seconds and repeat step 3 which will make hstate->resv_huge_pages to go below zero. To fix this problem, return corrent amount of pages to subpool during the fallback after hugepage_subpool_get_pages is called. Fixes: 1c5ecae3a93f ("hugetlbfs: add minimum size accounting to subpools") Signed-off-by: Wupeng Ma <mawupeng1@huawei.com> --- mm/hugetlb.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)