@@ -176,18 +176,8 @@ void end_buffer_write_sync(struct buffer_head *bh, int uptodate)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(end_buffer_write_sync);
-/*
- * Various filesystems appear to want __find_get_block to be non-blocking.
- * But it's the page lock which protects the buffers. To get around this,
- * we get exclusion from try_to_free_buffers with the blockdev mapping's
- * i_private_lock.
- *
- * Hack idea: for the blockdev mapping, i_private_lock contention
- * may be quite high. This code could TryLock the page, and if that
- * succeeds, there is no need to take i_private_lock.
- */
static struct buffer_head *
-__find_get_block_slow(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block)
+__find_get_block_slow(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, bool atomic)
{
struct address_space *bd_mapping = bdev->bd_mapping;
const int blkbits = bd_mapping->host->i_blkbits;
@@ -204,7 +194,16 @@ __find_get_block_slow(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block)
if (IS_ERR(folio))
goto out;
- spin_lock(&bd_mapping->i_private_lock);
+ /*
+ * Folio lock protects the buffers. Callers that cannot block
+ * will fallback to serializing vs try_to_free_buffers() via
+ * the i_private_lock.
+ */
+ if (atomic)
+ spin_lock(&bd_mapping->i_private_lock);
+ else
+ folio_lock(folio);
+
head = folio_buffers(folio);
if (!head)
goto out_unlock;
@@ -236,7 +235,10 @@ __find_get_block_slow(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block)
1 << blkbits);
}
out_unlock:
- spin_unlock(&bd_mapping->i_private_lock);
+ if (atomic)
+ spin_unlock(&bd_mapping->i_private_lock);
+ else
+ folio_unlock(folio);
folio_put(folio);
out:
return ret;
@@ -1388,14 +1390,15 @@ lookup_bh_lru(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, unsigned size)
* it in the LRU and mark it as accessed. If it is not present then return
* NULL
*/
-struct buffer_head *
-__find_get_block(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, unsigned size)
+static struct buffer_head *
+find_get_block_common(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block,
+ unsigned size, bool atomic)
{
struct buffer_head *bh = lookup_bh_lru(bdev, block, size);
if (bh == NULL) {
/* __find_get_block_slow will mark the page accessed */
- bh = __find_get_block_slow(bdev, block);
+ bh = __find_get_block_slow(bdev, block, atomic);
if (bh)
bh_lru_install(bh);
} else
@@ -1403,6 +1406,12 @@ __find_get_block(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, unsigned size)
return bh;
}
+
+struct buffer_head *
+__find_get_block(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, unsigned size)
+{
+ return find_get_block_common(bdev, block, size, true);
+}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__find_get_block);
/**
Callers of __find_get_block() may or may not allow for blocking semantics, and is currently assumed that it will not. Layout two paths based on this. The the private_lock scheme will continued to be used for atomic contexts. Otherwise take the folio lock instead, which protects the buffers, such as vs migration and try_to_free_buffers(). Per the "hack idea", the latter can alleviate contention on the private_lock for bdev mappings. For reasons of determinism and avoid making bugs hard to reproduce, the trylocking is not attempted. No change in semantics. All lookup users still take the spinlock. Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> --- fs/buffer.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)