Message ID | Y5dhRrNFzNX1Z64/@fedora (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [GIT,PULL] percpu changes for v6.2-rc1 | expand |
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 9:13 AM Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org> wrote: > > Baoquan was nice enough to run some clean ups for percpu. There will be > a minor merge conflict with Vlastimil's slab PR [1]. This is due to > adjusting the PERCPU_DYNAMIC_EARLY_SIZE up for proper early percpu > reservation size on arm64 with 64k pages. Well, the merge was trivial, but... > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dennis/percpu.git for-6.2 Argh, this is a plain branch. I was really hoping that we had all moved on to using signed tags for pulls. I've pulled this, because I still don't absolutely _require_ signed tags for kernel.org accounts, but can you please try to start using them in the future? The plain unsigned branches (and unsigned tags) are getting rare enough that I'm slowly starting to consider making them a hard requirement. Not this release, probably not the next one, but... Linus
The pull request you sent on Mon, 12 Dec 2022 09:13:42 -0800:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dennis/percpu.git for-6.2
has been merged into torvalds/linux.git:
https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/ca1443c7e75a28c6fde5c67cb1904b624cf43c36
Thank you!
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 04:11:28PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 9:13 AM Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > Baoquan was nice enough to run some clean ups for percpu. There will be > > a minor merge conflict with Vlastimil's slab PR [1]. This is due to > > adjusting the PERCPU_DYNAMIC_EARLY_SIZE up for proper early percpu > > reservation size on arm64 with 64k pages. > > Well, the merge was trivial, but... > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dennis/percpu.git for-6.2 > > Argh, this is a plain branch. I was really hoping that we had all > moved on to using signed tags for pulls. > > I've pulled this, because I still don't absolutely _require_ signed > tags for kernel.org accounts, but can you please try to start using > them in the future? > > The plain unsigned branches (and unsigned tags) are getting rare > enough that I'm slowly starting to consider making them a hard > requirement. Not this release, probably not the next one, but... > Got it. I'll send you signed tags from now on. Thanks for pulling this. Thanks, Dennis > Linus