From patchwork Tue May 2 16:34:04 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Lorenzo Stoakes X-Patchwork-Id: 13229153 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74053C7EE23 for ; Tue, 2 May 2023 16:34:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 0CFAE900006; Tue, 2 May 2023 12:34:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 08206900002; Tue, 2 May 2023 12:34:17 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id E1592900006; Tue, 2 May 2023 12:34:16 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from mail-wr1-f42.google.com (mail-wr1-f42.google.com [209.85.221.42]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 928F6900002 for ; Tue, 2 May 2023 12:34:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wr1-f42.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3062c1e7df8so1849217f8f.1 for ; Tue, 02 May 2023 09:34:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1683045255; x=1685637255; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=hDxuvhlrwYGCtBwJIBLRhiGRbpzp5H+edOHA56egbkk=; b=IzG1Ue+sSjQWtDgF8bz1cO/9kEB4U3eS7wvUN/6uPiFcmH2vv0p05zz51RdT/E83Wn XQP93rJPRSGEFCCBeCbLVXitY9duUiLNsZBpeMytKwCqyjci89S5XDxh8M90J/hQDnzQ o25rVRVm2U142hmp8kO/5pvZGP9Xna1YVoCQEnY2Vd0m+39z5B55LjxK9+F1kqQnoD1P /9GV9jgDeJbIvZ6SINb2LlC1rtj1ZTv/EW8niyMtcoqE7W8ntWqIZ0bKole79HgABDsR ohN7aLpVRQqhatNalKmgDP71L16ymM+oJLSfAE6gwytQz7iNjYVNfYTkejTY81Whm9tn 0Vzw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1683045255; x=1685637255; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=hDxuvhlrwYGCtBwJIBLRhiGRbpzp5H+edOHA56egbkk=; b=BOWMGP2Cb7zUj8Vrm6G6mf7O6xp9tnditxxzv/a2R7vX73Esm17z0hUgAUD1jqvuhn Q8ay//+73eSWf9Ycx9c/WF4yK/XJSNymbzuzF1W1OVZ5IO5thruCao4/XdWcIILE1dAv mdnDOUCDlKXdt0P5l8PXkQLUL+ltabi11PestgLnMrEK+fH6ssuMFMrzFzbvji4CCNJQ G0KPm36Fohjirka1/guTC3QmJ/3TcK0IXYh1BJQnV6JVETs+UqVCwmxi9E+nMBMW6Bxd N7xnpnd/mHUI9QSlr9xeYyysPwPlY/RSosTh0to1pyGbgMzcxOJIq1Ugtwt29uEQAEGS zoQw== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDxUC0mZzWK95FWIHE36bzwQjKAVwkefu6tEaISng36LsAKoLDvw 5Z89sw4qXsxBZT99acpvKEoSDTdFn1N5PA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ426hhGDH8KE7RfWfcA7flmr3t4alMi7Lnczuum1dniVrvWCd3Qn1SCgRGMKiZ+pMysFexBCA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4090:0:b0:2c5:3cd2:b8e with SMTP id o16-20020a5d4090000000b002c53cd20b8emr10899748wrp.1.1683045255467; Tue, 02 May 2023 09:34:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lucifer.home (host86-156-84-164.range86-156.btcentralplus.com. [86.156.84.164]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id b10-20020a5d550a000000b0030639a86f9dsm1789919wrv.51.2023.05.02.09.34.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 02 May 2023 09:34:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Lorenzo Stoakes To: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton Cc: Jason Gunthorpe , Jens Axboe , Matthew Wilcox , Dennis Dalessandro , Leon Romanovsky , Christian Benvenuti , Nelson Escobar , Bernard Metzler , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Ian Rogers , Adrian Hunter , Bjorn Topel , Magnus Karlsson , Maciej Fijalkowski , Jonathan Lemon , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Christian Brauner , Richard Cochran , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , John Fastabend , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov , Jason Gunthorpe , John Hubbard , Jan Kara , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , Pavel Begunkov , Mika Penttila , David Hildenbrand , Dave Chinner , Theodore Ts'o , Peter Xu , Matthew Rosato , "Paul E . McKenney" , Christian Borntraeger , Lorenzo Stoakes Subject: [PATCH v7 2/3] mm/gup: disallow FOLL_LONGTERM GUP-nonfast writing to file-backed mappings Date: Tue, 2 May 2023 17:34:04 +0100 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.40.1 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Writing to file-backed mappings which require folio dirty tracking using GUP is a fundamentally broken operation, as kernel write access to GUP mappings do not adhere to the semantics expected by a file system. A GUP caller uses the direct mapping to access the folio, which does not cause write notify to trigger, nor does it enforce that the caller marks the folio dirty. The problem arises when, after an initial write to the folio, writeback results in the folio being cleaned and then the caller, via the GUP interface, writes to the folio again. As a result of the use of this secondary, direct, mapping to the folio no write notify will occur, and if the caller does mark the folio dirty, this will be done so unexpectedly. For example, consider the following scenario:- 1. A folio is written to via GUP which write-faults the memory, notifying the file system and dirtying the folio. 2. Later, writeback is triggered, resulting in the folio being cleaned and the PTE being marked read-only. 3. The GUP caller writes to the folio, as it is mapped read/write via the direct mapping. 4. The GUP caller, now done with the page, unpins it and sets it dirty (though it does not have to). This results in both data being written to a folio without writenotify, and the folio being dirtied unexpectedly (if the caller decides to do so). This issue was first reported by Jan Kara [1] in 2018, where the problem resulted in file system crashes. This is only relevant when the mappings are file-backed and the underlying file system requires folio dirty tracking. File systems which do not, such as shmem or hugetlb, are not at risk and therefore can be written to without issue. Unfortunately this limitation of GUP has been present for some time and requires future rework of the GUP API in order to provide correct write access to such mappings. However, for the time being we introduce this check to prevent the most egregious case of this occurring, use of the FOLL_LONGTERM pin. These mappings are considerably more likely to be written to after folios are cleaned and thus simply must not be permitted to do so. This patch changes only the slow-path GUP functions, a following patch adapts the GUP-fast path along similar lines. [1]:https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20180103100430.GE4911@quack2.suse.cz/ Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes Reviewed-by: John Hubbard Reviewed-by: Mika Penttilä Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe --- mm/gup.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c index ff689c88a357..6e209ca10967 100644 --- a/mm/gup.c +++ b/mm/gup.c @@ -959,16 +959,53 @@ static int faultin_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, return 0; } +/* + * Writing to file-backed mappings which require folio dirty tracking using GUP + * is a fundamentally broken operation, as kernel write access to GUP mappings + * do not adhere to the semantics expected by a file system. + * + * Consider the following scenario:- + * + * 1. A folio is written to via GUP which write-faults the memory, notifying + * the file system and dirtying the folio. + * 2. Later, writeback is triggered, resulting in the folio being cleaned and + * the PTE being marked read-only. + * 3. The GUP caller writes to the folio, as it is mapped read/write via the + * direct mapping. + * 4. The GUP caller, now done with the page, unpins it and sets it dirty + * (though it does not have to). + * + * This results in both data being written to a folio without writenotify, and + * the folio being dirtied unexpectedly (if the caller decides to do so). + */ +static bool writeable_file_mapping_allowed(struct vm_area_struct *vma, + unsigned long gup_flags) +{ + /* + * If we aren't pinning then no problematic write can occur. A long term + * pin is the most egregious case so this is the case we disallow. + */ + if (!(gup_flags & (FOLL_PIN | FOLL_LONGTERM))) + return true; + + /* + * If the VMA does not require dirty tracking then no problematic write + * can occur either. + */ + return !vma_needs_dirty_tracking(vma); +} + static int check_vma_flags(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long gup_flags) { vm_flags_t vm_flags = vma->vm_flags; int write = (gup_flags & FOLL_WRITE); int foreign = (gup_flags & FOLL_REMOTE); + bool vma_anon = vma_is_anonymous(vma); if (vm_flags & (VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP)) return -EFAULT; - if (gup_flags & FOLL_ANON && !vma_is_anonymous(vma)) + if ((gup_flags & FOLL_ANON) && !vma_anon) return -EFAULT; if ((gup_flags & FOLL_LONGTERM) && vma_is_fsdax(vma)) @@ -978,6 +1015,10 @@ static int check_vma_flags(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long gup_flags) return -EFAULT; if (write) { + if (!vma_anon && + !writeable_file_mapping_allowed(vma, gup_flags)) + return -EFAULT; + if (!(vm_flags & VM_WRITE)) { if (!(gup_flags & FOLL_FORCE)) return -EFAULT;