| Message ID | 20201110040553.1381-1-frank@allwinnertech.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | Second step support for A100 | expand |
It seems that sending too many e-mails at one time will cause some emails to fail to be sent out. I will try again. BR / Yangtao
On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 at 07:00, Frank Lee <tiny.windzz@gmail.com> wrote: > > It seems that sending too many e-mails at one time will cause some > emails to fail to be sent out. I will try again. Hi, Instead please reduce the address list to relevant people, as pointed out by scripts/get_maintainer.pl. Don't Cc irrelevant developers unless a file is abandoned and you need to get as much audience as possible... but sunxi is not abandoned. Best regards, Krzysztof
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 4:43 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 at 07:00, Frank Lee <tiny.windzz@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > It seems that sending too many e-mails at one time will cause some > > emails to fail to be sent out. I will try again. > > Hi, > > Instead please reduce the address list to relevant people, as pointed > out by scripts/get_maintainer.pl. Don't Cc irrelevant developers > unless a file is abandoned and you need to get as much audience as > possible... but sunxi is not abandoned. Thank you for the reminder. I resend the version in the afternoon, only CC the relevant people. I'm not sure. Should the cover be copied to everyone? Yangtao
On 10-11-20, 16:51, Frank Lee wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 4:43 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 at 07:00, Frank Lee <tiny.windzz@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > It seems that sending too many e-mails at one time will cause some > > > emails to fail to be sent out. I will try again. > > > > Hi, > > > > Instead please reduce the address list to relevant people, as pointed > > out by scripts/get_maintainer.pl. Don't Cc irrelevant developers > > unless a file is abandoned and you need to get as much audience as > > possible... but sunxi is not abandoned. > > Thank you for the reminder. I resend the version in the afternoon, > only CC the relevant people. I'm not sure. Should the cover be copied > to everyone? Any reason why this should be a single series.. why not split it to bunch of chunks, one per subsystem like pinctrl, phy, dmaengine, etc... And then DTS parts and CC relevant list and maintainers. I do not think there is any dependency, right?
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 06:18:29PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > On 10-11-20, 16:51, Frank Lee wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 4:43 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 at 07:00, Frank Lee <tiny.windzz@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > It seems that sending too many e-mails at one time will cause some > > > > emails to fail to be sent out. I will try again. > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Instead please reduce the address list to relevant people, as pointed > > > out by scripts/get_maintainer.pl. Don't Cc irrelevant developers > > > unless a file is abandoned and you need to get as much audience as > > > possible... but sunxi is not abandoned. > > > > Thank you for the reminder. I resend the version in the afternoon, > > only CC the relevant people. I'm not sure. Should the cover be copied > > to everyone? > > Any reason why this should be a single series.. why not split it to > bunch of chunks, one per subsystem like pinctrl, phy, dmaengine, etc... > And then DTS parts and CC relevant list and maintainers. I do not think > there is any dependency, right? Yeah, I agree. One series should be about one topic, so you should have at least: - One for the pinctrl fixes - One for the DMA controller and related DT patches - One for the MMC controller and related DT patches - One for the USB controllers and related DT patches * And for the PHY, the enable_pmu_unk1 and devm_* patches should be sent independently as well - One for the watchdog - And the PMU patch should be sent independently too Maxime
Hi, Let's add watchdog, arm-pmu, dma, usb, mmc..... support for allwinner a100 soc. Yangtao Li (19): pinctrl: sunxi: fix irq bank map for the Allwinner A100 pin controller pinctrl: sunxi: Mark the irq bank not found in sunxi_pinctrl_irq_handler() with WARN_ON pinctrl: sunxi: Always call chained_irq_{enter, exit} in sunxi_pinctrl_irq_handler dt-bindings: dma: allwinner,sun50i-a64-dma: Add A100 compatible dmaengine: sun6i: Add support for A100 DMA arm64: allwinner: a100: Add device node for DMA controller arm64: dts: allwinner: A100: Add PMU mode phy: sun4i-usb: remove enable_pmu_unk1 from sun50i_h6_cfg phy: allwinner: Convert to devm_platform_ioremap_* API dt-bindings: watchdog: sun4i: Add A100 compatible arm64: dts: allwinner: a100: add watchdog node dt-bindings: Add bindings for USB phy on Allwinner A100 phy: sun4i-usb: add support for A100 USB PHY arm64: dts: allwinner: a100: add usb related nodes arm64: allwinner: A100: enable EHCI, OHCI and USB PHY nodes in Perf1 dt-bindings: mmc: sunxi: Add A100 compatibles mmc: sunxi: add support for A100 mmc controller arm64: allwinner: a100: Add MMC related nodes arm64: dts: allwinner: a100: perf1: Add eMMC and MMC node .../dma/allwinner,sun50i-a64-dma.yaml | 5 +- .../bindings/mmc/allwinner,sun4i-a10-mmc.yaml | 2 + .../phy/allwinner,sun50i-a100-usb-phy.yaml | 105 ++++++++++ .../watchdog/allwinner,sun4i-a10-wdt.yaml | 3 + .../allwinner/sun50i-a100-allwinner-perf1.dts | 54 +++++ .../arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a100.dtsi | 197 +++++++++++++++++- drivers/dma/sun6i-dma.c | 25 +++ drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c | 28 ++- drivers/phy/allwinner/phy-sun4i-usb.c | 29 ++- drivers/phy/allwinner/phy-sun50i-usb3.c | 4 +- drivers/phy/allwinner/phy-sun6i-mipi-dphy.c | 4 +- drivers/phy/allwinner/phy-sun9i-usb.c | 4 +- drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sun50i-a100.c | 2 +- drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c | 9 +- 14 files changed, 443 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/allwinner,sun50i-a100-usb-phy.yaml