diff mbox

[v3] mmc: fix async request mechanism for sequential read scenarios

Message ID 1352739112-19208-1-git-send-email-kdorfman@codeaurora.org (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Konstantin Dorfman Nov. 12, 2012, 4:51 p.m. UTC
When current request is running on the bus and if next request fetched
by mmcqd is NULL, mmc context (mmcqd thread) gets blocked until the
current request completes. This means if new request comes in while
the mmcqd thread is blocked, this new request can not be prepared in
parallel to current ongoing request. This may result in latency to
start new request.

This change allows to wake up the MMC thread (which
is waiting for the current running request to complete). Now once the
MMC thread is woken up, new request can be fetched and prepared in
parallel to current running request which means this new request can
be started immediately after the current running request completes.

With this change read throughput is improved by 16%.

Signed-off-by: Konstantin Dorfman <kdorfman@codeaurora.org>
---
v3:
	- new MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST flag to mark new request case
	- lock added to update is_new_req flag
	- condition for sending new req notification changed
	- Moved start waiting for new req notification after
	  fetching NULL
v2: 
	- Removed synchronization flags
	- removed lock from done()
	- flags names changed
v1: 
	- Initial submit

Comments

Seungwon Jeon Nov. 13, 2012, 1:42 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Konstantin,

I'm looking into this patch.
Idea looks good as a whole.

On Tuesday, November 13, 2012, Konstantin Dorfman <kdorfman@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> When current request is running on the bus and if next request fetched
> by mmcqd is NULL, mmc context (mmcqd thread) gets blocked until the
> current request completes. This means if new request comes in while
> the mmcqd thread is blocked, this new request can not be prepared in
> parallel to current ongoing request. This may result in latency to
> start new request.
> 
> This change allows to wake up the MMC thread (which
> is waiting for the current running request to complete). Now once the
> MMC thread is woken up, new request can be fetched and prepared in
> parallel to current running request which means this new request can
> be started immediately after the current running request completes.
> 
> With this change read throughput is improved by 16%.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Dorfman <kdorfman@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> v3:
> 	- new MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST flag to mark new request case
> 	- lock added to update is_new_req flag
> 	- condition for sending new req notification changed
> 	- Moved start waiting for new req notification after
> 	  fetching NULL
> v2:
> 	- Removed synchronization flags
> 	- removed lock from done()
> 	- flags names changed
> v1:
> 	- Initial submit
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
> index 172a768..34d8bd9 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
> @@ -112,17 +112,6 @@ struct mmc_blk_data {
> 
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(open_lock);
> 
> -enum mmc_blk_status {
> -	MMC_BLK_SUCCESS = 0,
> -	MMC_BLK_PARTIAL,
> -	MMC_BLK_CMD_ERR,
> -	MMC_BLK_RETRY,
> -	MMC_BLK_ABORT,
> -	MMC_BLK_DATA_ERR,
> -	MMC_BLK_ECC_ERR,
> -	MMC_BLK_NOMEDIUM,
> -};
> -
>  module_param(perdev_minors, int, 0444);
>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(perdev_minors, "Minors numbers to allocate per device");
> 
> @@ -1225,6 +1214,7 @@ static void mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep(struct mmc_queue_req *mqrq,
> 
>  	mqrq->mmc_active.mrq = &brq->mrq;
>  	mqrq->mmc_active.err_check = mmc_blk_err_check;
> +	mqrq->mmc_active.mrq->context_info = &mq->context_info;
> 
>  	mmc_queue_bounce_pre(mqrq);
>  }
> @@ -1284,9 +1274,12 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *rqc)
>  			areq = &mq->mqrq_cur->mmc_active;
>  		} else
>  			areq = NULL;
> -		areq = mmc_start_req(card->host, areq, (int *) &status);
> -		if (!areq)
> +		areq = mmc_start_req(card->host, areq, (int *)&status);
> +		if (!areq) {
> +			if (status == MMC_BLK_NEW_REQUEST)
> +				mq->flags |= MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST;
>  			return 0;
> +		}
> 
>  		mq_rq = container_of(areq, struct mmc_queue_req, mmc_active);
>  		brq = &mq_rq->brq;
> @@ -1295,6 +1288,8 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *rqc)
>  		mmc_queue_bounce_post(mq_rq);
> 
>  		switch (status) {
> +		case MMC_BLK_NEW_REQUEST:
> +			BUG(); /* should never get here */
>  		case MMC_BLK_SUCCESS:
>  		case MMC_BLK_PARTIAL:
>  			/*
> @@ -1367,7 +1362,8 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *rqc)
>  			 * prepare it again and resend.
>  			 */
>  			mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep(mq_rq, card, disable_multi, mq);
> -			mmc_start_req(card->host, &mq_rq->mmc_active, NULL);
> +			mmc_start_req(card->host, &mq_rq->mmc_active,
> +					(int *)&status);
Here, we'll try to send previous request  which is not completed successfully.
And then at the top of do~while, mmc_start_req will be called for current request and get the status.
Above change looks like unnecessary. Is there any reason?

Thanks,
Seungwon Jeon

>  		}
>  	} while (ret);
> 
> @@ -1407,6 +1403,8 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
>  		goto out;
>  	}
> 
> +	mq->flags &= ~MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST;
> +
>  	if (req && req->cmd_flags & REQ_DISCARD) {
>  		/* complete ongoing async transfer before issuing discard */
>  		if (card->host->areq)
> @@ -1426,9 +1424,10 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
>  	}
> 
>  out:
> -	if (!req)
> +	if (!req && !(mq->flags & MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST))
>  		/* release host only when there are no more requests */
>  		mmc_release_host(card->host);
> +
>  	return ret;
>  }
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c
> index fadf52e..ef575ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c
> @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@
> 
>  #define MMC_QUEUE_BOUNCESZ	65536
> 
> -#define MMC_QUEUE_SUSPENDED	(1 << 0)
> 
>  /*
>   * Prepare a MMC request. This just filters out odd stuff.
> @@ -63,11 +62,20 @@ static int mmc_queue_thread(void *d)
>  		set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
>  		req = blk_fetch_request(q);
>  		mq->mqrq_cur->req = req;
> +		if (!req && mq->mqrq_prev->req &&
> +			!(mq->mqrq_prev->req->cmd_flags & REQ_FLUSH) &&
> +			!(mq->mqrq_prev->req->cmd_flags & REQ_DISCARD)) {
> +			mq->context_info.is_waiting_last_req = true;
> +		}
>  		spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
> 
>  		if (req || mq->mqrq_prev->req) {
>  			set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
>  			mq->issue_fn(mq, req);
> +			if (mq->flags & MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST) {
> +				mq->flags &= ~MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST;
> +				continue; /* fetch again */
> +			}
> 
>  			/*
>  			 * Current request becomes previous request
> @@ -103,6 +111,7 @@ static void mmc_request_fn(struct request_queue *q)
>  {
>  	struct mmc_queue *mq = q->queuedata;
>  	struct request *req;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> 
>  	if (!mq) {
>  		while ((req = blk_fetch_request(q)) != NULL) {
> @@ -111,8 +120,19 @@ static void mmc_request_fn(struct request_queue *q)
>  		}
>  		return;
>  	}
> -
> -	if (!mq->mqrq_cur->req && !mq->mqrq_prev->req)
> +	if (!mq->mqrq_cur->req && mq->mqrq_prev->req) {
> +		/*
> +		 * New MMC request arrived when MMC thread may be
> +		 * blocked on the previous request to be complete
> +		 * with no current request fetched
> +		 */
> +		spin_lock_irqsave(&mq->context_info.lock, flags);
> +		if (mq->context_info.is_waiting_last_req) {
> +			mq->context_info.is_new_req = true;
> +			wake_up_interruptible(&mq->context_info.wait);
> +		}
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mq->context_info.lock, flags);
> +	} else if (!mq->mqrq_cur->req && !mq->mqrq_prev->req)
>  		wake_up_process(mq->thread);
>  }
> 
> @@ -262,6 +282,11 @@ int mmc_init_queue(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct mmc_card *card,
>  	}
> 
>  	sema_init(&mq->thread_sem, 1);
> +	spin_lock_init(&mq->context_info.lock);
> +	mq->context_info.is_new_req = false;
> +	mq->context_info.is_done_rcv = false;
> +	mq->context_info.is_waiting_last_req = false;
> +	init_waitqueue_head(&mq->context_info.wait);
> 
>  	mq->thread = kthread_run(mmc_queue_thread, mq, "mmcqd/%d%s",
>  		host->index, subname ? subname : "");
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.h b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.h
> index d2a1eb4..f5885e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.h
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.h
> @@ -26,6 +26,8 @@ struct mmc_queue {
>  	struct mmc_card		*card;
>  	struct task_struct	*thread;
>  	struct semaphore	thread_sem;
> +#define MMC_QUEUE_SUSPENDED	(1 << 0)
> +#define MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST	(1 << 1)
>  	unsigned int		flags;
>  	int			(*issue_fn)(struct mmc_queue *, struct request *);
>  	void			*data;
> @@ -33,6 +35,7 @@ struct mmc_queue {
>  	struct mmc_queue_req	mqrq[2];
>  	struct mmc_queue_req	*mqrq_cur;
>  	struct mmc_queue_req	*mqrq_prev;
> +	struct mmc_context_info	context_info;
>  };
> 
>  extern int mmc_init_queue(struct mmc_queue *, struct mmc_card *, spinlock_t *,
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> index 06c42cf..3374195 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> @@ -316,11 +316,43 @@ out:
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_start_bkops);
> 
> +/*
> + * mmc_wait_data_done() - done callback for data request
> + * @mrq: done data request
> + *
> + * Wakes up mmc context, passed as callback to host controller driver
> + */
> +static void mmc_wait_data_done(struct mmc_request *mrq)
> +{
> +	mrq->context_info->is_done_rcv = true;
> +	wake_up_interruptible(&mrq->context_info->wait);
> +}
> +
>  static void mmc_wait_done(struct mmc_request *mrq)
>  {
>  	complete(&mrq->completion);
>  }
> 
> +/*
> + *__mmc_start_data_req() - starts data request
> + * @host: MMC host to start the request
> + * @mrq: data request to start
> + *
> + * Fills done callback that will be used when request are done by card.
> + * Starts data mmc request execution
> + */
> +static int __mmc_start_data_req(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
> +{
> +	mrq->done = mmc_wait_data_done;
> +	if (mmc_card_removed(host->card)) {
> +		mrq->cmd->error = -ENOMEDIUM;
> +		return -ENOMEDIUM;
> +	}
> +	mmc_start_request(host, mrq);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int __mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
>  {
>  	init_completion(&mrq->completion);
> @@ -334,6 +366,60 @@ static int __mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
> +/*
> + * mmc_wait_for_data_req_done() - wait for request completed or new
> + *				  request notification arrives
> + * @host: MMC host to prepare the command.
> + * @mrq: MMC request to wait for
> + *
> + * Blocks MMC context till host controller will ack end of data request
> + * execution or new request arrives from block layer. Handles
> + * command retries.
> + *
> + * Returns enum mmc_blk_status after checking errors.
> + */
> +static int mmc_wait_for_data_req_done(struct mmc_host *host,
> +				      struct mmc_request *mrq)
> +{
> +	struct mmc_command *cmd;
> +	struct mmc_context_info *context_info = mrq->context_info;
> +	int err;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	while (1) {
> +		wait_event_interruptible(context_info->wait,
> +				(context_info->is_done_rcv ||
> +				 context_info->is_new_req));
> +		spin_lock_irqsave(&context_info->lock, flags);
> +		context_info->is_waiting_last_req = false;
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&context_info->lock, flags);
> +		if (context_info->is_done_rcv) {
> +			context_info->is_done_rcv = false;
> +			context_info->is_new_req = false;
> +			cmd = mrq->cmd;
> +			if (!cmd->error || !cmd->retries ||
> +					mmc_card_removed(host->card)) {
> +				err = host->areq->err_check(host->card,
> +						host->areq);
> +				break; /* return err */
> +			} else {
> +				pr_info("%s: req failed (CMD%u): %d, retrying...\n",
> +						mmc_hostname(host),
> +						cmd->opcode, cmd->error);
> +				cmd->retries--;
> +				cmd->error = 0;
> +				host->ops->request(host, mrq);
> +				continue; /* wait for done/new event again */
> +			}
> +		} else if (context_info->is_new_req) {
> +			context_info->is_new_req = false;
> +			err = MMC_BLK_NEW_REQUEST;
> +			break; /* return err */
> +		}
> +	} /* while */
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
>  static void mmc_wait_for_req_done(struct mmc_host *host,
>  				  struct mmc_request *mrq)
>  {
> @@ -396,23 +482,17 @@ static void mmc_post_req(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq,
>  }
> 
>  /**
> - *	mmc_start_req - start a non-blocking request
> - *	@host: MMC host to start command
> - *	@areq: async request to start
> - *	@error: out parameter returns 0 for success, otherwise non zero
> - *
> - *	Start a new MMC custom command request for a host.
> - *	If there is on ongoing async request wait for completion
> - *	of that request and start the new one and return.
> - *	Does not wait for the new request to complete.
> + * mmc_start_req - start a non-blocking data request
> + * @host: MMC host to start the command
> + * @areq: async request to start
> + * @error: out parameter; returns 0 for success, otherwise non zero
>   *
> - *      Returns the completed request, NULL in case of none completed.
> - *	Wait for the an ongoing request (previoulsy started) to complete and
> - *	return the completed request. If there is no ongoing request, NULL
> - *	is returned without waiting. NULL is not an error condition.
> + * Wait for the ongoing request (previoulsy started) to complete and
> + * return the completed request. If there is no ongoing request, NULL
> + * is returned without waiting. NULL is not an error condition.
>   */
>  struct mmc_async_req *mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host,
> -				    struct mmc_async_req *areq, int *error)
> +					 struct mmc_async_req *areq, int *error)
>  {
>  	int err = 0;
>  	int start_err = 0;
> @@ -423,8 +503,20 @@ struct mmc_async_req *mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host,
>  		mmc_pre_req(host, areq->mrq, !host->areq);
> 
>  	if (host->areq) {
> -		mmc_wait_for_req_done(host, host->areq->mrq);
> -		err = host->areq->err_check(host->card, host->areq);
> +		err = mmc_wait_for_data_req_done(host, host->areq->mrq);
> +		if (err == MMC_BLK_NEW_REQUEST) {
> +			if (areq) {
> +				pr_err("%s: new request while areq = %p",
> +						mmc_hostname(host), areq);
> +				BUG();
> +			}
> +			*error = err;
> +			/*
> +			 * The previous request was not completed,
> +			 * nothing to return
> +			 */
> +			return NULL;
> +		}
>  		/*
>  		 * Check BKOPS urgency for each R1 response
>  		 */
> @@ -436,7 +528,7 @@ struct mmc_async_req *mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host,
>  	}
> 
>  	if (!err && areq)
> -		start_err = __mmc_start_req(host, areq->mrq);
> +		start_err = __mmc_start_data_req(host, areq->mrq);
> 
>  	if (host->areq)
>  		mmc_post_req(host, host->areq->mrq, 0);
> @@ -452,6 +544,7 @@ struct mmc_async_req *mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host,
> 
>  	if (error)
>  		*error = err;
> +
>  	return data;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_start_req);
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/card.h b/include/linux/mmc/card.h
> index 943550d..9681d8f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmc/card.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/card.h
> @@ -186,6 +186,18 @@ struct sdio_func_tuple;
> 
>  #define SDIO_MAX_FUNCS		7
> 
> +enum mmc_blk_status {
> +	MMC_BLK_SUCCESS = 0,
> +	MMC_BLK_PARTIAL,
> +	MMC_BLK_CMD_ERR,
> +	MMC_BLK_RETRY,
> +	MMC_BLK_ABORT,
> +	MMC_BLK_DATA_ERR,
> +	MMC_BLK_ECC_ERR,
> +	MMC_BLK_NOMEDIUM,
> +	MMC_BLK_NEW_REQUEST,
> +};
> +
>  /* The number of MMC physical partitions.  These consist of:
>   * boot partitions (2), general purpose partitions (4) in MMC v4.4.
>   */
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/core.h b/include/linux/mmc/core.h
> index 9b9cdaf..aa17096 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmc/core.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/core.h
> @@ -120,6 +120,21 @@ struct mmc_data {
>  	s32			host_cookie;	/* host private data */
>  };
> 
> +/**
> + * mmc_context_info - synchronization details for mmc context
> + * @is_done_rcv		wake up reason was done request
> + * @is_new_req	wake up reason was new request
> + * @is_waiting_last_req	mmc context waiting for single running request
> + * @wait		wait queue
> + */
> +struct mmc_context_info {
> +	bool			is_done_rcv;
> +	bool			is_new_req;
> +	bool			is_waiting_last_req;
> +	wait_queue_head_t	wait;
> +	spinlock_t		lock;
> +};
> +
>  struct mmc_request {
>  	struct mmc_command	*sbc;		/* SET_BLOCK_COUNT for multiblock */
>  	struct mmc_command	*cmd;
> @@ -128,6 +143,7 @@ struct mmc_request {
> 
>  	struct completion	completion;
>  	void			(*done)(struct mmc_request *);/* completion function */
> +	struct mmc_context_info    *context_info;
>  };
> 
>  struct mmc_host;
> --
> 1.7.6
> --
> Konstantin Dorfman,
> QUALCOMM ISRAEL, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
> of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Seungwon Jeon Nov. 15, 2012, 10:23 a.m. UTC | #2
I checked this commit.
v3 doesn't work in dw_mmc host driver.
It makes some driver warning while v1 is fine.
I'm finding the reason. And could you check minor one below?

On Tuesday, November 13, 2012, Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@samsung.com>
> Hi Konstantin,
> 
> I'm looking into this patch.
> Idea looks good as a whole.
> 
> On Tuesday, November 13, 2012, Konstantin Dorfman <kdorfman@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> > When current request is running on the bus and if next request fetched
> > by mmcqd is NULL, mmc context (mmcqd thread) gets blocked until the
> > current request completes. This means if new request comes in while
> > the mmcqd thread is blocked, this new request can not be prepared in
> > parallel to current ongoing request. This may result in latency to
> > start new request.
> >
> > This change allows to wake up the MMC thread (which
> > is waiting for the current running request to complete). Now once the
> > MMC thread is woken up, new request can be fetched and prepared in
> > parallel to current running request which means this new request can
> > be started immediately after the current running request completes.
> >
> > With this change read throughput is improved by 16%.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Konstantin Dorfman <kdorfman@codeaurora.org>
> > ---
> > v3:
> > 	- new MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST flag to mark new request case
> > 	- lock added to update is_new_req flag
> > 	- condition for sending new req notification changed
> > 	- Moved start waiting for new req notification after
> > 	  fetching NULL
> > v2:
> > 	- Removed synchronization flags
> > 	- removed lock from done()
> > 	- flags names changed
> > v1:
> > 	- Initial submit
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
> > index 172a768..34d8bd9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
> > @@ -112,17 +112,6 @@ struct mmc_blk_data {
> >
> >  static DEFINE_MUTEX(open_lock);
> >
> > -enum mmc_blk_status {
> > -	MMC_BLK_SUCCESS = 0,
> > -	MMC_BLK_PARTIAL,
> > -	MMC_BLK_CMD_ERR,
> > -	MMC_BLK_RETRY,
> > -	MMC_BLK_ABORT,
> > -	MMC_BLK_DATA_ERR,
> > -	MMC_BLK_ECC_ERR,
> > -	MMC_BLK_NOMEDIUM,
> > -};
> > -
> >  module_param(perdev_minors, int, 0444);
> >  MODULE_PARM_DESC(perdev_minors, "Minors numbers to allocate per device");
> >
> > @@ -1225,6 +1214,7 @@ static void mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep(struct mmc_queue_req *mqrq,
> >
> >  	mqrq->mmc_active.mrq = &brq->mrq;
> >  	mqrq->mmc_active.err_check = mmc_blk_err_check;
> > +	mqrq->mmc_active.mrq->context_info = &mq->context_info;
> >
> >  	mmc_queue_bounce_pre(mqrq);
> >  }
> > @@ -1284,9 +1274,12 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *rqc)
> >  			areq = &mq->mqrq_cur->mmc_active;
> >  		} else
> >  			areq = NULL;
> > -		areq = mmc_start_req(card->host, areq, (int *) &status);
> > -		if (!areq)
> > +		areq = mmc_start_req(card->host, areq, (int *)&status);
> > +		if (!areq) {
> > +			if (status == MMC_BLK_NEW_REQUEST)
> > +				mq->flags |= MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST;
> >  			return 0;
> > +		}
> >
> >  		mq_rq = container_of(areq, struct mmc_queue_req, mmc_active);
> >  		brq = &mq_rq->brq;
> > @@ -1295,6 +1288,8 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *rqc)
> >  		mmc_queue_bounce_post(mq_rq);
> >
> >  		switch (status) {
> > +		case MMC_BLK_NEW_REQUEST:
> > +			BUG(); /* should never get here */
> >  		case MMC_BLK_SUCCESS:
> >  		case MMC_BLK_PARTIAL:
> >  			/*
> > @@ -1367,7 +1362,8 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *rqc)
> >  			 * prepare it again and resend.
> >  			 */
> >  			mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep(mq_rq, card, disable_multi, mq);
> > -			mmc_start_req(card->host, &mq_rq->mmc_active, NULL);
> > +			mmc_start_req(card->host, &mq_rq->mmc_active,
> > +					(int *)&status);
> Here, we'll try to send previous request  which is not completed successfully.
> And then at the top of do~while, mmc_start_req will be called for current request and get the status.
> Above change looks like unnecessary. Is there any reason?
> 
> Thanks,
> Seungwon Jeon
> 
> >  		}
> >  	} while (ret);
> >
> > @@ -1407,6 +1403,8 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
> >  		goto out;
> >  	}
> >
> > +	mq->flags &= ~MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST;
> > +
> >  	if (req && req->cmd_flags & REQ_DISCARD) {
> >  		/* complete ongoing async transfer before issuing discard */
> >  		if (card->host->areq)
> > @@ -1426,9 +1424,10 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
> >  	}
> >
> >  out:
> > -	if (!req)
> > +	if (!req && !(mq->flags & MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST))
> >  		/* release host only when there are no more requests */
> >  		mmc_release_host(card->host);
> > +
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c
> > index fadf52e..ef575ac 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c
> > @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@
> >
> >  #define MMC_QUEUE_BOUNCESZ	65536
> >
> > -#define MMC_QUEUE_SUSPENDED	(1 << 0)
> >
> >  /*
> >   * Prepare a MMC request. This just filters out odd stuff.
> > @@ -63,11 +62,20 @@ static int mmc_queue_thread(void *d)
> >  		set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> >  		req = blk_fetch_request(q);
> >  		mq->mqrq_cur->req = req;
> > +		if (!req && mq->mqrq_prev->req &&
> > +			!(mq->mqrq_prev->req->cmd_flags & REQ_FLUSH) &&
> > +			!(mq->mqrq_prev->req->cmd_flags & REQ_DISCARD)) {
> > +			mq->context_info.is_waiting_last_req = true;
> > +		}
> >  		spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
> >
> >  		if (req || mq->mqrq_prev->req) {
> >  			set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> >  			mq->issue_fn(mq, req);
> > +			if (mq->flags & MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST) {
> > +				mq->flags &= ~MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST;
> > +				continue; /* fetch again */
> > +			}
> >
> >  			/*
> >  			 * Current request becomes previous request
> > @@ -103,6 +111,7 @@ static void mmc_request_fn(struct request_queue *q)
> >  {
> >  	struct mmc_queue *mq = q->queuedata;
> >  	struct request *req;
> > +	unsigned long flags;
> >
> >  	if (!mq) {
> >  		while ((req = blk_fetch_request(q)) != NULL) {
> > @@ -111,8 +120,19 @@ static void mmc_request_fn(struct request_queue *q)
> >  		}
> >  		return;
> >  	}
> > -
> > -	if (!mq->mqrq_cur->req && !mq->mqrq_prev->req)
> > +	if (!mq->mqrq_cur->req && mq->mqrq_prev->req) {
> > +		/*
> > +		 * New MMC request arrived when MMC thread may be
> > +		 * blocked on the previous request to be complete
> > +		 * with no current request fetched
> > +		 */
> > +		spin_lock_irqsave(&mq->context_info.lock, flags);
> > +		if (mq->context_info.is_waiting_last_req) {
> > +			mq->context_info.is_new_req = true;
> > +			wake_up_interruptible(&mq->context_info.wait);
> > +		}
> > +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mq->context_info.lock, flags);
> > +	} else if (!mq->mqrq_cur->req && !mq->mqrq_prev->req)
> >  		wake_up_process(mq->thread);
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -262,6 +282,11 @@ int mmc_init_queue(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct mmc_card *card,
> >  	}
> >
> >  	sema_init(&mq->thread_sem, 1);
> > +	spin_lock_init(&mq->context_info.lock);
> > +	mq->context_info.is_new_req = false;
> > +	mq->context_info.is_done_rcv = false;
> > +	mq->context_info.is_waiting_last_req = false;
> > +	init_waitqueue_head(&mq->context_info.wait);
> >
> >  	mq->thread = kthread_run(mmc_queue_thread, mq, "mmcqd/%d%s",
> >  		host->index, subname ? subname : "");
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.h b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.h
> > index d2a1eb4..f5885e9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.h
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.h
> > @@ -26,6 +26,8 @@ struct mmc_queue {
> >  	struct mmc_card		*card;
> >  	struct task_struct	*thread;
> >  	struct semaphore	thread_sem;
> > +#define MMC_QUEUE_SUSPENDED	(1 << 0)
> > +#define MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST	(1 << 1)
> >  	unsigned int		flags;
> >  	int			(*issue_fn)(struct mmc_queue *, struct request *);
> >  	void			*data;
> > @@ -33,6 +35,7 @@ struct mmc_queue {
> >  	struct mmc_queue_req	mqrq[2];
> >  	struct mmc_queue_req	*mqrq_cur;
> >  	struct mmc_queue_req	*mqrq_prev;
> > +	struct mmc_context_info	context_info;
> >  };
> >
> >  extern int mmc_init_queue(struct mmc_queue *, struct mmc_card *, spinlock_t *,
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> > index 06c42cf..3374195 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> > @@ -316,11 +316,43 @@ out:
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_start_bkops);
> >
> > +/*
> > + * mmc_wait_data_done() - done callback for data request
> > + * @mrq: done data request
> > + *
> > + * Wakes up mmc context, passed as callback to host controller driver
> > + */
> > +static void mmc_wait_data_done(struct mmc_request *mrq)
> > +{
> > +	mrq->context_info->is_done_rcv = true;
> > +	wake_up_interruptible(&mrq->context_info->wait);
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void mmc_wait_done(struct mmc_request *mrq)
> >  {
> >  	complete(&mrq->completion);
> >  }
> >
> > +/*
> > + *__mmc_start_data_req() - starts data request
> > + * @host: MMC host to start the request
> > + * @mrq: data request to start
> > + *
> > + * Fills done callback that will be used when request are done by card.
> > + * Starts data mmc request execution
> > + */
> > +static int __mmc_start_data_req(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
> > +{
> > +	mrq->done = mmc_wait_data_done;
> > +	if (mmc_card_removed(host->card)) {
> > +		mrq->cmd->error = -ENOMEDIUM;
> > +		return -ENOMEDIUM;
> > +	}
> > +	mmc_start_request(host, mrq);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int __mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
> >  {
> >  	init_completion(&mrq->completion);
> > @@ -334,6 +366,60 @@ static int __mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * mmc_wait_for_data_req_done() - wait for request completed or new
> > + *				  request notification arrives
> > + * @host: MMC host to prepare the command.
> > + * @mrq: MMC request to wait for
> > + *
> > + * Blocks MMC context till host controller will ack end of data request
> > + * execution or new request arrives from block layer. Handles
> > + * command retries.
> > + *
> > + * Returns enum mmc_blk_status after checking errors.
> > + */
> > +static int mmc_wait_for_data_req_done(struct mmc_host *host,
> > +				      struct mmc_request *mrq)
> > +{
> > +	struct mmc_command *cmd;
> > +	struct mmc_context_info *context_info = mrq->context_info;
> > +	int err;
> > +	unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > +	while (1) {
> > +		wait_event_interruptible(context_info->wait,
> > +				(context_info->is_done_rcv ||
> > +				 context_info->is_new_req));
> > +		spin_lock_irqsave(&context_info->lock, flags);
> > +		context_info->is_waiting_last_req = false;
> > +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&context_info->lock, flags);
> > +		if (context_info->is_done_rcv) {
> > +			context_info->is_done_rcv = false;
> > +			context_info->is_new_req = false;
> > +			cmd = mrq->cmd;
> > +			if (!cmd->error || !cmd->retries ||
> > +					mmc_card_removed(host->card)) {
> > +				err = host->areq->err_check(host->card,
> > +						host->areq);
> > +				break; /* return err */
> > +			} else {
> > +				pr_info("%s: req failed (CMD%u): %d, retrying...\n",
> > +						mmc_hostname(host),
> > +						cmd->opcode, cmd->error);
> > +				cmd->retries--;
> > +				cmd->error = 0;
> > +				host->ops->request(host, mrq);
> > +				continue; /* wait for done/new event again */
> > +			}
> > +		} else if (context_info->is_new_req) {
> > +			context_info->is_new_req = false;
> > +			err = MMC_BLK_NEW_REQUEST;
> > +			break; /* return err */
> > +		}
> > +	} /* while */
> > +	return err;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void mmc_wait_for_req_done(struct mmc_host *host,
> >  				  struct mmc_request *mrq)
> >  {
> > @@ -396,23 +482,17 @@ static void mmc_post_req(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq,
> >  }
> >
> >  /**
> > - *	mmc_start_req - start a non-blocking request
> > - *	@host: MMC host to start command
> > - *	@areq: async request to start
> > - *	@error: out parameter returns 0 for success, otherwise non zero
> > - *
> > - *	Start a new MMC custom command request for a host.
> > - *	If there is on ongoing async request wait for completion
> > - *	of that request and start the new one and return.
> > - *	Does not wait for the new request to complete.
> > + * mmc_start_req - start a non-blocking data request
> > + * @host: MMC host to start the command
> > + * @areq: async request to start
> > + * @error: out parameter; returns 0 for success, otherwise non zero
> >   *
> > - *      Returns the completed request, NULL in case of none completed.
> > - *	Wait for the an ongoing request (previoulsy started) to complete and
> > - *	return the completed request. If there is no ongoing request, NULL
> > - *	is returned without waiting. NULL is not an error condition.
> > + * Wait for the ongoing request (previoulsy started) to complete and
> > + * return the completed request. If there is no ongoing request, NULL
> > + * is returned without waiting. NULL is not an error condition.
> >   */
> >  struct mmc_async_req *mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host,
> > -				    struct mmc_async_req *areq, int *error)
> > +					 struct mmc_async_req *areq, int *error)
> >  {
> >  	int err = 0;
> >  	int start_err = 0;
> > @@ -423,8 +503,20 @@ struct mmc_async_req *mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host,
> >  		mmc_pre_req(host, areq->mrq, !host->areq);
> >
> >  	if (host->areq) {
> > -		mmc_wait_for_req_done(host, host->areq->mrq);
> > -		err = host->areq->err_check(host->card, host->areq);
> > +		err = mmc_wait_for_data_req_done(host, host->areq->mrq);
> > +		if (err == MMC_BLK_NEW_REQUEST) {
> > +			if (areq) {
> > +				pr_err("%s: new request while areq = %p",
> > +						mmc_hostname(host), areq);
> > +				BUG();
> > +			}
> > +			*error = err;
Need to check NULL of error.
if (error)

Thanks,
Seungwon Jeon
> > +			/*
> > +			 * The previous request was not completed,
> > +			 * nothing to return
> > +			 */
> > +			return NULL;
> > +		}
> >  		/*
> >  		 * Check BKOPS urgency for each R1 response
> >  		 */
> > @@ -436,7 +528,7 @@ struct mmc_async_req *mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host,
> >  	}
> >
> >  	if (!err && areq)
> > -		start_err = __mmc_start_req(host, areq->mrq);
> > +		start_err = __mmc_start_data_req(host, areq->mrq);
> >
> >  	if (host->areq)
> >  		mmc_post_req(host, host->areq->mrq, 0);
> > @@ -452,6 +544,7 @@ struct mmc_async_req *mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host,
> >
> >  	if (error)
> >  		*error = err;
> > +
> >  	return data;
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_start_req);
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/card.h b/include/linux/mmc/card.h
> > index 943550d..9681d8f 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mmc/card.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mmc/card.h
> > @@ -186,6 +186,18 @@ struct sdio_func_tuple;
> >
> >  #define SDIO_MAX_FUNCS		7
> >
> > +enum mmc_blk_status {
> > +	MMC_BLK_SUCCESS = 0,
> > +	MMC_BLK_PARTIAL,
> > +	MMC_BLK_CMD_ERR,
> > +	MMC_BLK_RETRY,
> > +	MMC_BLK_ABORT,
> > +	MMC_BLK_DATA_ERR,
> > +	MMC_BLK_ECC_ERR,
> > +	MMC_BLK_NOMEDIUM,
> > +	MMC_BLK_NEW_REQUEST,
> > +};
> > +
> >  /* The number of MMC physical partitions.  These consist of:
> >   * boot partitions (2), general purpose partitions (4) in MMC v4.4.
> >   */
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/core.h b/include/linux/mmc/core.h
> > index 9b9cdaf..aa17096 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mmc/core.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mmc/core.h
> > @@ -120,6 +120,21 @@ struct mmc_data {
> >  	s32			host_cookie;	/* host private data */
> >  };
> >
> > +/**
> > + * mmc_context_info - synchronization details for mmc context
> > + * @is_done_rcv		wake up reason was done request
> > + * @is_new_req	wake up reason was new request
> > + * @is_waiting_last_req	mmc context waiting for single running request
> > + * @wait		wait queue
> > + */
> > +struct mmc_context_info {
> > +	bool			is_done_rcv;
> > +	bool			is_new_req;
> > +	bool			is_waiting_last_req;
> > +	wait_queue_head_t	wait;
> > +	spinlock_t		lock;
> > +};
> > +
> >  struct mmc_request {
> >  	struct mmc_command	*sbc;		/* SET_BLOCK_COUNT for multiblock */
> >  	struct mmc_command	*cmd;
> > @@ -128,6 +143,7 @@ struct mmc_request {
> >
> >  	struct completion	completion;
> >  	void			(*done)(struct mmc_request *);/* completion function */
> > +	struct mmc_context_info    *context_info;
> >  };
> >
> >  struct mmc_host;
> > --
> > 1.7.6
> > --
> > Konstantin Dorfman,
> > QUALCOMM ISRAEL, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
> > of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Seungwon Jeon Nov. 20, 2012, 2:05 a.m. UTC | #3
On Thursday, November 15, 2012, Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@samsung.com>
> I checked this commit.
> v3 doesn't work in dw_mmc host driver.
> It makes some driver warning while v1 is fine.
> I'm finding the reason. And could you check minor one below?
Please let me correct my test. There is something applied wrong.
Anyway I saw the working fine. Sorry for the confusion.

Thanks,
Seungwon Jeon
> 
> On Tuesday, November 13, 2012, Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@samsung.com>
> > Hi Konstantin,
> >
> > I'm looking into this patch.
> > Idea looks good as a whole.
> >
> > On Tuesday, November 13, 2012, Konstantin Dorfman <kdorfman@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> > > When current request is running on the bus and if next request fetched
> > > by mmcqd is NULL, mmc context (mmcqd thread) gets blocked until the
> > > current request completes. This means if new request comes in while
> > > the mmcqd thread is blocked, this new request can not be prepared in
> > > parallel to current ongoing request. This may result in latency to
> > > start new request.
> > >
> > > This change allows to wake up the MMC thread (which
> > > is waiting for the current running request to complete). Now once the
> > > MMC thread is woken up, new request can be fetched and prepared in
> > > parallel to current running request which means this new request can
> > > be started immediately after the current running request completes.
> > >
> > > With this change read throughput is improved by 16%.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Konstantin Dorfman <kdorfman@codeaurora.org>
> > > ---
> > > v3:
> > > 	- new MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST flag to mark new request case
> > > 	- lock added to update is_new_req flag
> > > 	- condition for sending new req notification changed
> > > 	- Moved start waiting for new req notification after
> > > 	  fetching NULL
> > > v2:
> > > 	- Removed synchronization flags
> > > 	- removed lock from done()
> > > 	- flags names changed
> > > v1:
> > > 	- Initial submit
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
> > > index 172a768..34d8bd9 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
> > > @@ -112,17 +112,6 @@ struct mmc_blk_data {
> > >
> > >  static DEFINE_MUTEX(open_lock);
> > >
> > > -enum mmc_blk_status {
> > > -	MMC_BLK_SUCCESS = 0,
> > > -	MMC_BLK_PARTIAL,
> > > -	MMC_BLK_CMD_ERR,
> > > -	MMC_BLK_RETRY,
> > > -	MMC_BLK_ABORT,
> > > -	MMC_BLK_DATA_ERR,
> > > -	MMC_BLK_ECC_ERR,
> > > -	MMC_BLK_NOMEDIUM,
> > > -};
> > > -
> > >  module_param(perdev_minors, int, 0444);
> > >  MODULE_PARM_DESC(perdev_minors, "Minors numbers to allocate per device");
> > >
> > > @@ -1225,6 +1214,7 @@ static void mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep(struct mmc_queue_req *mqrq,
> > >
> > >  	mqrq->mmc_active.mrq = &brq->mrq;
> > >  	mqrq->mmc_active.err_check = mmc_blk_err_check;
> > > +	mqrq->mmc_active.mrq->context_info = &mq->context_info;
> > >
> > >  	mmc_queue_bounce_pre(mqrq);
> > >  }
> > > @@ -1284,9 +1274,12 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *rqc)
> > >  			areq = &mq->mqrq_cur->mmc_active;
> > >  		} else
> > >  			areq = NULL;
> > > -		areq = mmc_start_req(card->host, areq, (int *) &status);
> > > -		if (!areq)
> > > +		areq = mmc_start_req(card->host, areq, (int *)&status);
> > > +		if (!areq) {
> > > +			if (status == MMC_BLK_NEW_REQUEST)
> > > +				mq->flags |= MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST;
> > >  			return 0;
> > > +		}
> > >
> > >  		mq_rq = container_of(areq, struct mmc_queue_req, mmc_active);
> > >  		brq = &mq_rq->brq;
> > > @@ -1295,6 +1288,8 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *rqc)
> > >  		mmc_queue_bounce_post(mq_rq);
> > >
> > >  		switch (status) {
> > > +		case MMC_BLK_NEW_REQUEST:
> > > +			BUG(); /* should never get here */
> > >  		case MMC_BLK_SUCCESS:
> > >  		case MMC_BLK_PARTIAL:
> > >  			/*
> > > @@ -1367,7 +1362,8 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *rqc)
> > >  			 * prepare it again and resend.
> > >  			 */
> > >  			mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep(mq_rq, card, disable_multi, mq);
> > > -			mmc_start_req(card->host, &mq_rq->mmc_active, NULL);
> > > +			mmc_start_req(card->host, &mq_rq->mmc_active,
> > > +					(int *)&status);
> > Here, we'll try to send previous request  which is not completed successfully.
> > And then at the top of do~while, mmc_start_req will be called for current request and get the status.
> > Above change looks like unnecessary. Is there any reason?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Seungwon Jeon
> >
> > >  		}
> > >  	} while (ret);
> > >
> > > @@ -1407,6 +1403,8 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
> > >  		goto out;
> > >  	}
> > >
> > > +	mq->flags &= ~MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST;
> > > +
> > >  	if (req && req->cmd_flags & REQ_DISCARD) {
> > >  		/* complete ongoing async transfer before issuing discard */
> > >  		if (card->host->areq)
> > > @@ -1426,9 +1424,10 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
> > >  	}
> > >
> > >  out:
> > > -	if (!req)
> > > +	if (!req && !(mq->flags & MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST))
> > >  		/* release host only when there are no more requests */
> > >  		mmc_release_host(card->host);
> > > +
> > >  	return ret;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c
> > > index fadf52e..ef575ac 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c
> > > @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@
> > >
> > >  #define MMC_QUEUE_BOUNCESZ	65536
> > >
> > > -#define MMC_QUEUE_SUSPENDED	(1 << 0)
> > >
> > >  /*
> > >   * Prepare a MMC request. This just filters out odd stuff.
> > > @@ -63,11 +62,20 @@ static int mmc_queue_thread(void *d)
> > >  		set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> > >  		req = blk_fetch_request(q);
> > >  		mq->mqrq_cur->req = req;
> > > +		if (!req && mq->mqrq_prev->req &&
> > > +			!(mq->mqrq_prev->req->cmd_flags & REQ_FLUSH) &&
> > > +			!(mq->mqrq_prev->req->cmd_flags & REQ_DISCARD)) {
> > > +			mq->context_info.is_waiting_last_req = true;
> > > +		}
> > >  		spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
> > >
> > >  		if (req || mq->mqrq_prev->req) {
> > >  			set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> > >  			mq->issue_fn(mq, req);
> > > +			if (mq->flags & MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST) {
> > > +				mq->flags &= ~MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST;
> > > +				continue; /* fetch again */
> > > +			}
> > >
> > >  			/*
> > >  			 * Current request becomes previous request
> > > @@ -103,6 +111,7 @@ static void mmc_request_fn(struct request_queue *q)
> > >  {
> > >  	struct mmc_queue *mq = q->queuedata;
> > >  	struct request *req;
> > > +	unsigned long flags;
> > >
> > >  	if (!mq) {
> > >  		while ((req = blk_fetch_request(q)) != NULL) {
> > > @@ -111,8 +120,19 @@ static void mmc_request_fn(struct request_queue *q)
> > >  		}
> > >  		return;
> > >  	}
> > > -
> > > -	if (!mq->mqrq_cur->req && !mq->mqrq_prev->req)
> > > +	if (!mq->mqrq_cur->req && mq->mqrq_prev->req) {
> > > +		/*
> > > +		 * New MMC request arrived when MMC thread may be
> > > +		 * blocked on the previous request to be complete
> > > +		 * with no current request fetched
> > > +		 */
> > > +		spin_lock_irqsave(&mq->context_info.lock, flags);
> > > +		if (mq->context_info.is_waiting_last_req) {
> > > +			mq->context_info.is_new_req = true;
> > > +			wake_up_interruptible(&mq->context_info.wait);
> > > +		}
> > > +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mq->context_info.lock, flags);
> > > +	} else if (!mq->mqrq_cur->req && !mq->mqrq_prev->req)
> > >  		wake_up_process(mq->thread);
> > >  }
> > >
> > > @@ -262,6 +282,11 @@ int mmc_init_queue(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct mmc_card *card,
> > >  	}
> > >
> > >  	sema_init(&mq->thread_sem, 1);
> > > +	spin_lock_init(&mq->context_info.lock);
> > > +	mq->context_info.is_new_req = false;
> > > +	mq->context_info.is_done_rcv = false;
> > > +	mq->context_info.is_waiting_last_req = false;
> > > +	init_waitqueue_head(&mq->context_info.wait);
> > >
> > >  	mq->thread = kthread_run(mmc_queue_thread, mq, "mmcqd/%d%s",
> > >  		host->index, subname ? subname : "");
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.h b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.h
> > > index d2a1eb4..f5885e9 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.h
> > > @@ -26,6 +26,8 @@ struct mmc_queue {
> > >  	struct mmc_card		*card;
> > >  	struct task_struct	*thread;
> > >  	struct semaphore	thread_sem;
> > > +#define MMC_QUEUE_SUSPENDED	(1 << 0)
> > > +#define MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST	(1 << 1)
> > >  	unsigned int		flags;
> > >  	int			(*issue_fn)(struct mmc_queue *, struct request *);
> > >  	void			*data;
> > > @@ -33,6 +35,7 @@ struct mmc_queue {
> > >  	struct mmc_queue_req	mqrq[2];
> > >  	struct mmc_queue_req	*mqrq_cur;
> > >  	struct mmc_queue_req	*mqrq_prev;
> > > +	struct mmc_context_info	context_info;
> > >  };
> > >
> > >  extern int mmc_init_queue(struct mmc_queue *, struct mmc_card *, spinlock_t *,
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> > > index 06c42cf..3374195 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> > > @@ -316,11 +316,43 @@ out:
> > >  }
> > >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_start_bkops);
> > >
> > > +/*
> > > + * mmc_wait_data_done() - done callback for data request
> > > + * @mrq: done data request
> > > + *
> > > + * Wakes up mmc context, passed as callback to host controller driver
> > > + */
> > > +static void mmc_wait_data_done(struct mmc_request *mrq)
> > > +{
> > > +	mrq->context_info->is_done_rcv = true;
> > > +	wake_up_interruptible(&mrq->context_info->wait);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static void mmc_wait_done(struct mmc_request *mrq)
> > >  {
> > >  	complete(&mrq->completion);
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +/*
> > > + *__mmc_start_data_req() - starts data request
> > > + * @host: MMC host to start the request
> > > + * @mrq: data request to start
> > > + *
> > > + * Fills done callback that will be used when request are done by card.
> > > + * Starts data mmc request execution
> > > + */
> > > +static int __mmc_start_data_req(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
> > > +{
> > > +	mrq->done = mmc_wait_data_done;
> > > +	if (mmc_card_removed(host->card)) {
> > > +		mrq->cmd->error = -ENOMEDIUM;
> > > +		return -ENOMEDIUM;
> > > +	}
> > > +	mmc_start_request(host, mrq);
> > > +
> > > +	return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static int __mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
> > >  {
> > >  	init_completion(&mrq->completion);
> > > @@ -334,6 +366,60 @@ static int __mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
> > >  	return 0;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +/*
> > > + * mmc_wait_for_data_req_done() - wait for request completed or new
> > > + *				  request notification arrives
> > > + * @host: MMC host to prepare the command.
> > > + * @mrq: MMC request to wait for
> > > + *
> > > + * Blocks MMC context till host controller will ack end of data request
> > > + * execution or new request arrives from block layer. Handles
> > > + * command retries.
> > > + *
> > > + * Returns enum mmc_blk_status after checking errors.
> > > + */
> > > +static int mmc_wait_for_data_req_done(struct mmc_host *host,
> > > +				      struct mmc_request *mrq)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct mmc_command *cmd;
> > > +	struct mmc_context_info *context_info = mrq->context_info;
> > > +	int err;
> > > +	unsigned long flags;
> > > +
> > > +	while (1) {
> > > +		wait_event_interruptible(context_info->wait,
> > > +				(context_info->is_done_rcv ||
> > > +				 context_info->is_new_req));
> > > +		spin_lock_irqsave(&context_info->lock, flags);
> > > +		context_info->is_waiting_last_req = false;
> > > +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&context_info->lock, flags);
> > > +		if (context_info->is_done_rcv) {
> > > +			context_info->is_done_rcv = false;
> > > +			context_info->is_new_req = false;
> > > +			cmd = mrq->cmd;
> > > +			if (!cmd->error || !cmd->retries ||
> > > +					mmc_card_removed(host->card)) {
> > > +				err = host->areq->err_check(host->card,
> > > +						host->areq);
> > > +				break; /* return err */
> > > +			} else {
> > > +				pr_info("%s: req failed (CMD%u): %d, retrying...\n",
> > > +						mmc_hostname(host),
> > > +						cmd->opcode, cmd->error);
> > > +				cmd->retries--;
> > > +				cmd->error = 0;
> > > +				host->ops->request(host, mrq);
> > > +				continue; /* wait for done/new event again */
> > > +			}
> > > +		} else if (context_info->is_new_req) {
> > > +			context_info->is_new_req = false;
> > > +			err = MMC_BLK_NEW_REQUEST;
> > > +			break; /* return err */
> > > +		}
> > > +	} /* while */
> > > +	return err;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static void mmc_wait_for_req_done(struct mmc_host *host,
> > >  				  struct mmc_request *mrq)
> > >  {
> > > @@ -396,23 +482,17 @@ static void mmc_post_req(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq,
> > >  }
> > >
> > >  /**
> > > - *	mmc_start_req - start a non-blocking request
> > > - *	@host: MMC host to start command
> > > - *	@areq: async request to start
> > > - *	@error: out parameter returns 0 for success, otherwise non zero
> > > - *
> > > - *	Start a new MMC custom command request for a host.
> > > - *	If there is on ongoing async request wait for completion
> > > - *	of that request and start the new one and return.
> > > - *	Does not wait for the new request to complete.
> > > + * mmc_start_req - start a non-blocking data request
> > > + * @host: MMC host to start the command
> > > + * @areq: async request to start
> > > + * @error: out parameter; returns 0 for success, otherwise non zero
> > >   *
> > > - *      Returns the completed request, NULL in case of none completed.
> > > - *	Wait for the an ongoing request (previoulsy started) to complete and
> > > - *	return the completed request. If there is no ongoing request, NULL
> > > - *	is returned without waiting. NULL is not an error condition.
> > > + * Wait for the ongoing request (previoulsy started) to complete and
> > > + * return the completed request. If there is no ongoing request, NULL
> > > + * is returned without waiting. NULL is not an error condition.
> > >   */
> > >  struct mmc_async_req *mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host,
> > > -				    struct mmc_async_req *areq, int *error)
> > > +					 struct mmc_async_req *areq, int *error)
> > >  {
> > >  	int err = 0;
> > >  	int start_err = 0;
> > > @@ -423,8 +503,20 @@ struct mmc_async_req *mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host,
> > >  		mmc_pre_req(host, areq->mrq, !host->areq);
> > >
> > >  	if (host->areq) {
> > > -		mmc_wait_for_req_done(host, host->areq->mrq);
> > > -		err = host->areq->err_check(host->card, host->areq);
> > > +		err = mmc_wait_for_data_req_done(host, host->areq->mrq);
> > > +		if (err == MMC_BLK_NEW_REQUEST) {
> > > +			if (areq) {
> > > +				pr_err("%s: new request while areq = %p",
> > > +						mmc_hostname(host), areq);
> > > +				BUG();
> > > +			}
> > > +			*error = err;
> Need to check NULL of error.
> if (error)
> 
> Thanks,
> Seungwon Jeon
> > > +			/*
> > > +			 * The previous request was not completed,
> > > +			 * nothing to return
> > > +			 */
> > > +			return NULL;
> > > +		}
> > >  		/*
> > >  		 * Check BKOPS urgency for each R1 response
> > >  		 */
> > > @@ -436,7 +528,7 @@ struct mmc_async_req *mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host,
> > >  	}
> > >
> > >  	if (!err && areq)
> > > -		start_err = __mmc_start_req(host, areq->mrq);
> > > +		start_err = __mmc_start_data_req(host, areq->mrq);
> > >
> > >  	if (host->areq)
> > >  		mmc_post_req(host, host->areq->mrq, 0);
> > > @@ -452,6 +544,7 @@ struct mmc_async_req *mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host,
> > >
> > >  	if (error)
> > >  		*error = err;
> > > +
> > >  	return data;
> > >  }
> > >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_start_req);
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/card.h b/include/linux/mmc/card.h
> > > index 943550d..9681d8f 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/mmc/card.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/mmc/card.h
> > > @@ -186,6 +186,18 @@ struct sdio_func_tuple;
> > >
> > >  #define SDIO_MAX_FUNCS		7
> > >
> > > +enum mmc_blk_status {
> > > +	MMC_BLK_SUCCESS = 0,
> > > +	MMC_BLK_PARTIAL,
> > > +	MMC_BLK_CMD_ERR,
> > > +	MMC_BLK_RETRY,
> > > +	MMC_BLK_ABORT,
> > > +	MMC_BLK_DATA_ERR,
> > > +	MMC_BLK_ECC_ERR,
> > > +	MMC_BLK_NOMEDIUM,
> > > +	MMC_BLK_NEW_REQUEST,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > >  /* The number of MMC physical partitions.  These consist of:
> > >   * boot partitions (2), general purpose partitions (4) in MMC v4.4.
> > >   */
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/core.h b/include/linux/mmc/core.h
> > > index 9b9cdaf..aa17096 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/mmc/core.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/mmc/core.h
> > > @@ -120,6 +120,21 @@ struct mmc_data {
> > >  	s32			host_cookie;	/* host private data */
> > >  };
> > >
> > > +/**
> > > + * mmc_context_info - synchronization details for mmc context
> > > + * @is_done_rcv		wake up reason was done request
> > > + * @is_new_req	wake up reason was new request
> > > + * @is_waiting_last_req	mmc context waiting for single running request
> > > + * @wait		wait queue
> > > + */
> > > +struct mmc_context_info {
> > > +	bool			is_done_rcv;
> > > +	bool			is_new_req;
> > > +	bool			is_waiting_last_req;
> > > +	wait_queue_head_t	wait;
> > > +	spinlock_t		lock;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > >  struct mmc_request {
> > >  	struct mmc_command	*sbc;		/* SET_BLOCK_COUNT for multiblock */
> > >  	struct mmc_command	*cmd;
> > > @@ -128,6 +143,7 @@ struct mmc_request {
> > >
> > >  	struct completion	completion;
> > >  	void			(*done)(struct mmc_request *);/* completion function */
> > > +	struct mmc_context_info    *context_info;
> > >  };
> > >
> > >  struct mmc_host;
> > > --
> > > 1.7.6
> > > --
> > > Konstantin Dorfman,
> > > QUALCOMM ISRAEL, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
> > > of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
index 172a768..34d8bd9 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
@@ -112,17 +112,6 @@  struct mmc_blk_data {
 
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(open_lock);
 
-enum mmc_blk_status {
-	MMC_BLK_SUCCESS = 0,
-	MMC_BLK_PARTIAL,
-	MMC_BLK_CMD_ERR,
-	MMC_BLK_RETRY,
-	MMC_BLK_ABORT,
-	MMC_BLK_DATA_ERR,
-	MMC_BLK_ECC_ERR,
-	MMC_BLK_NOMEDIUM,
-};
-
 module_param(perdev_minors, int, 0444);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(perdev_minors, "Minors numbers to allocate per device");
 
@@ -1225,6 +1214,7 @@  static void mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep(struct mmc_queue_req *mqrq,
 
 	mqrq->mmc_active.mrq = &brq->mrq;
 	mqrq->mmc_active.err_check = mmc_blk_err_check;
+	mqrq->mmc_active.mrq->context_info = &mq->context_info;
 
 	mmc_queue_bounce_pre(mqrq);
 }
@@ -1284,9 +1274,12 @@  static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *rqc)
 			areq = &mq->mqrq_cur->mmc_active;
 		} else
 			areq = NULL;
-		areq = mmc_start_req(card->host, areq, (int *) &status);
-		if (!areq)
+		areq = mmc_start_req(card->host, areq, (int *)&status);
+		if (!areq) {
+			if (status == MMC_BLK_NEW_REQUEST)
+				mq->flags |= MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST;
 			return 0;
+		}
 
 		mq_rq = container_of(areq, struct mmc_queue_req, mmc_active);
 		brq = &mq_rq->brq;
@@ -1295,6 +1288,8 @@  static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *rqc)
 		mmc_queue_bounce_post(mq_rq);
 
 		switch (status) {
+		case MMC_BLK_NEW_REQUEST:
+			BUG(); /* should never get here */
 		case MMC_BLK_SUCCESS:
 		case MMC_BLK_PARTIAL:
 			/*
@@ -1367,7 +1362,8 @@  static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *rqc)
 			 * prepare it again and resend.
 			 */
 			mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep(mq_rq, card, disable_multi, mq);
-			mmc_start_req(card->host, &mq_rq->mmc_active, NULL);
+			mmc_start_req(card->host, &mq_rq->mmc_active,
+					(int *)&status);
 		}
 	} while (ret);
 
@@ -1407,6 +1403,8 @@  static int mmc_blk_issue_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
 		goto out;
 	}
 
+	mq->flags &= ~MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST;
+
 	if (req && req->cmd_flags & REQ_DISCARD) {
 		/* complete ongoing async transfer before issuing discard */
 		if (card->host->areq)
@@ -1426,9 +1424,10 @@  static int mmc_blk_issue_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
 	}
 
 out:
-	if (!req)
+	if (!req && !(mq->flags & MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST))
 		/* release host only when there are no more requests */
 		mmc_release_host(card->host);
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c
index fadf52e..ef575ac 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.c
@@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ 
 
 #define MMC_QUEUE_BOUNCESZ	65536
 
-#define MMC_QUEUE_SUSPENDED	(1 << 0)
 
 /*
  * Prepare a MMC request. This just filters out odd stuff.
@@ -63,11 +62,20 @@  static int mmc_queue_thread(void *d)
 		set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
 		req = blk_fetch_request(q);
 		mq->mqrq_cur->req = req;
+		if (!req && mq->mqrq_prev->req &&
+			!(mq->mqrq_prev->req->cmd_flags & REQ_FLUSH) &&
+			!(mq->mqrq_prev->req->cmd_flags & REQ_DISCARD)) {
+			mq->context_info.is_waiting_last_req = true;
+		}
 		spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
 
 		if (req || mq->mqrq_prev->req) {
 			set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
 			mq->issue_fn(mq, req);
+			if (mq->flags & MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST) {
+				mq->flags &= ~MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST;
+				continue; /* fetch again */
+			}
 
 			/*
 			 * Current request becomes previous request
@@ -103,6 +111,7 @@  static void mmc_request_fn(struct request_queue *q)
 {
 	struct mmc_queue *mq = q->queuedata;
 	struct request *req;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
 	if (!mq) {
 		while ((req = blk_fetch_request(q)) != NULL) {
@@ -111,8 +120,19 @@  static void mmc_request_fn(struct request_queue *q)
 		}
 		return;
 	}
-
-	if (!mq->mqrq_cur->req && !mq->mqrq_prev->req)
+	if (!mq->mqrq_cur->req && mq->mqrq_prev->req) {
+		/*
+		 * New MMC request arrived when MMC thread may be
+		 * blocked on the previous request to be complete
+		 * with no current request fetched
+		 */
+		spin_lock_irqsave(&mq->context_info.lock, flags);
+		if (mq->context_info.is_waiting_last_req) {
+			mq->context_info.is_new_req = true;
+			wake_up_interruptible(&mq->context_info.wait);
+		}
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mq->context_info.lock, flags);
+	} else if (!mq->mqrq_cur->req && !mq->mqrq_prev->req)
 		wake_up_process(mq->thread);
 }
 
@@ -262,6 +282,11 @@  int mmc_init_queue(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct mmc_card *card,
 	}
 
 	sema_init(&mq->thread_sem, 1);
+	spin_lock_init(&mq->context_info.lock);
+	mq->context_info.is_new_req = false;
+	mq->context_info.is_done_rcv = false;
+	mq->context_info.is_waiting_last_req = false;
+	init_waitqueue_head(&mq->context_info.wait);
 
 	mq->thread = kthread_run(mmc_queue_thread, mq, "mmcqd/%d%s",
 		host->index, subname ? subname : "");
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.h b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.h
index d2a1eb4..f5885e9 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/card/queue.h
+++ b/drivers/mmc/card/queue.h
@@ -26,6 +26,8 @@  struct mmc_queue {
 	struct mmc_card		*card;
 	struct task_struct	*thread;
 	struct semaphore	thread_sem;
+#define MMC_QUEUE_SUSPENDED	(1 << 0)
+#define MMC_QUEUE_NEW_REQUEST	(1 << 1)
 	unsigned int		flags;
 	int			(*issue_fn)(struct mmc_queue *, struct request *);
 	void			*data;
@@ -33,6 +35,7 @@  struct mmc_queue {
 	struct mmc_queue_req	mqrq[2];
 	struct mmc_queue_req	*mqrq_cur;
 	struct mmc_queue_req	*mqrq_prev;
+	struct mmc_context_info	context_info;
 };
 
 extern int mmc_init_queue(struct mmc_queue *, struct mmc_card *, spinlock_t *,
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
index 06c42cf..3374195 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
@@ -316,11 +316,43 @@  out:
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_start_bkops);
 
+/*
+ * mmc_wait_data_done() - done callback for data request
+ * @mrq: done data request
+ *
+ * Wakes up mmc context, passed as callback to host controller driver
+ */
+static void mmc_wait_data_done(struct mmc_request *mrq)
+{
+	mrq->context_info->is_done_rcv = true;
+	wake_up_interruptible(&mrq->context_info->wait);
+}
+
 static void mmc_wait_done(struct mmc_request *mrq)
 {
 	complete(&mrq->completion);
 }
 
+/*
+ *__mmc_start_data_req() - starts data request
+ * @host: MMC host to start the request
+ * @mrq: data request to start
+ *
+ * Fills done callback that will be used when request are done by card.
+ * Starts data mmc request execution
+ */
+static int __mmc_start_data_req(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
+{
+	mrq->done = mmc_wait_data_done;
+	if (mmc_card_removed(host->card)) {
+		mrq->cmd->error = -ENOMEDIUM;
+		return -ENOMEDIUM;
+	}
+	mmc_start_request(host, mrq);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int __mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
 {
 	init_completion(&mrq->completion);
@@ -334,6 +366,60 @@  static int __mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/*
+ * mmc_wait_for_data_req_done() - wait for request completed or new
+ *				  request notification arrives
+ * @host: MMC host to prepare the command.
+ * @mrq: MMC request to wait for
+ *
+ * Blocks MMC context till host controller will ack end of data request
+ * execution or new request arrives from block layer. Handles
+ * command retries.
+ *
+ * Returns enum mmc_blk_status after checking errors.
+ */
+static int mmc_wait_for_data_req_done(struct mmc_host *host,
+				      struct mmc_request *mrq)
+{
+	struct mmc_command *cmd;
+	struct mmc_context_info *context_info = mrq->context_info;
+	int err;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	while (1) {
+		wait_event_interruptible(context_info->wait,
+				(context_info->is_done_rcv ||
+				 context_info->is_new_req));
+		spin_lock_irqsave(&context_info->lock, flags);
+		context_info->is_waiting_last_req = false;
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&context_info->lock, flags);
+		if (context_info->is_done_rcv) {
+			context_info->is_done_rcv = false;
+			context_info->is_new_req = false;
+			cmd = mrq->cmd;
+			if (!cmd->error || !cmd->retries ||
+					mmc_card_removed(host->card)) {
+				err = host->areq->err_check(host->card,
+						host->areq);
+				break; /* return err */
+			} else {
+				pr_info("%s: req failed (CMD%u): %d, retrying...\n",
+						mmc_hostname(host),
+						cmd->opcode, cmd->error);
+				cmd->retries--;
+				cmd->error = 0;
+				host->ops->request(host, mrq);
+				continue; /* wait for done/new event again */
+			}
+		} else if (context_info->is_new_req) {
+			context_info->is_new_req = false;
+			err = MMC_BLK_NEW_REQUEST;
+			break; /* return err */
+		}
+	} /* while */
+	return err;
+}
+
 static void mmc_wait_for_req_done(struct mmc_host *host,
 				  struct mmc_request *mrq)
 {
@@ -396,23 +482,17 @@  static void mmc_post_req(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq,
 }
 
 /**
- *	mmc_start_req - start a non-blocking request
- *	@host: MMC host to start command
- *	@areq: async request to start
- *	@error: out parameter returns 0 for success, otherwise non zero
- *
- *	Start a new MMC custom command request for a host.
- *	If there is on ongoing async request wait for completion
- *	of that request and start the new one and return.
- *	Does not wait for the new request to complete.
+ * mmc_start_req - start a non-blocking data request
+ * @host: MMC host to start the command
+ * @areq: async request to start
+ * @error: out parameter; returns 0 for success, otherwise non zero
  *
- *      Returns the completed request, NULL in case of none completed.
- *	Wait for the an ongoing request (previoulsy started) to complete and
- *	return the completed request. If there is no ongoing request, NULL
- *	is returned without waiting. NULL is not an error condition.
+ * Wait for the ongoing request (previoulsy started) to complete and
+ * return the completed request. If there is no ongoing request, NULL
+ * is returned without waiting. NULL is not an error condition.
  */
 struct mmc_async_req *mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host,
-				    struct mmc_async_req *areq, int *error)
+					 struct mmc_async_req *areq, int *error)
 {
 	int err = 0;
 	int start_err = 0;
@@ -423,8 +503,20 @@  struct mmc_async_req *mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host,
 		mmc_pre_req(host, areq->mrq, !host->areq);
 
 	if (host->areq) {
-		mmc_wait_for_req_done(host, host->areq->mrq);
-		err = host->areq->err_check(host->card, host->areq);
+		err = mmc_wait_for_data_req_done(host, host->areq->mrq);
+		if (err == MMC_BLK_NEW_REQUEST) {
+			if (areq) {
+				pr_err("%s: new request while areq = %p",
+						mmc_hostname(host), areq);
+				BUG();
+			}
+			*error = err;
+			/*
+			 * The previous request was not completed,
+			 * nothing to return
+			 */
+			return NULL;
+		}
 		/*
 		 * Check BKOPS urgency for each R1 response
 		 */
@@ -436,7 +528,7 @@  struct mmc_async_req *mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host,
 	}
 
 	if (!err && areq)
-		start_err = __mmc_start_req(host, areq->mrq);
+		start_err = __mmc_start_data_req(host, areq->mrq);
 
 	if (host->areq)
 		mmc_post_req(host, host->areq->mrq, 0);
@@ -452,6 +544,7 @@  struct mmc_async_req *mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host,
 
 	if (error)
 		*error = err;
+
 	return data;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_start_req);
diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/card.h b/include/linux/mmc/card.h
index 943550d..9681d8f 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmc/card.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmc/card.h
@@ -186,6 +186,18 @@  struct sdio_func_tuple;
 
 #define SDIO_MAX_FUNCS		7
 
+enum mmc_blk_status {
+	MMC_BLK_SUCCESS = 0,
+	MMC_BLK_PARTIAL,
+	MMC_BLK_CMD_ERR,
+	MMC_BLK_RETRY,
+	MMC_BLK_ABORT,
+	MMC_BLK_DATA_ERR,
+	MMC_BLK_ECC_ERR,
+	MMC_BLK_NOMEDIUM,
+	MMC_BLK_NEW_REQUEST,
+};
+
 /* The number of MMC physical partitions.  These consist of:
  * boot partitions (2), general purpose partitions (4) in MMC v4.4.
  */
diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/core.h b/include/linux/mmc/core.h
index 9b9cdaf..aa17096 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmc/core.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmc/core.h
@@ -120,6 +120,21 @@  struct mmc_data {
 	s32			host_cookie;	/* host private data */
 };
 
+/**
+ * mmc_context_info - synchronization details for mmc context
+ * @is_done_rcv		wake up reason was done request
+ * @is_new_req	wake up reason was new request
+ * @is_waiting_last_req	mmc context waiting for single running request
+ * @wait		wait queue
+ */
+struct mmc_context_info {
+	bool			is_done_rcv;
+	bool			is_new_req;
+	bool			is_waiting_last_req;
+	wait_queue_head_t	wait;
+	spinlock_t		lock;
+};
+
 struct mmc_request {
 	struct mmc_command	*sbc;		/* SET_BLOCK_COUNT for multiblock */
 	struct mmc_command	*cmd;
@@ -128,6 +143,7 @@  struct mmc_request {
 
 	struct completion	completion;
 	void			(*done)(struct mmc_request *);/* completion function */
+	struct mmc_context_info    *context_info;
 };
 
 struct mmc_host;