diff mbox

[2/2] mmc: dw_mmc: Handle wp-gpios from device tree

Message ID 1353535387-32106-2-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Doug Anderson Nov. 21, 2012, 10:03 p.m. UTC
On some SoCs (like exynos5250) you need to use an external GPIO for
write protect.  Add support for wp-gpios to the core dw_mmc driver
since it could be useful across multiple SoCs.

With this change I am able to make use of the write protect for the
external SD slot on exynos5250-snow.

Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
---
 drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c |   35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

Comments

Seungwon Jeon Nov. 22, 2012, 1:42 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi,

wp-gpios has been implemented in dw_mmc-exynos.c
It can be reused for EXYNOS platform? We need to modify some though.

Thanks,
Seungwon Jeon

On Thursday, November 22, 2012, Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> wrote:
> On some SoCs (like exynos5250) you need to use an external GPIO for
> write protect.  Add support for wp-gpios to the core dw_mmc driver
> since it could be useful across multiple SoCs.
> 
> With this change I am able to make use of the write protect for the
> external SD slot on exynos5250-snow.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c |   35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> index 5b41348..9c79870 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
>  #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>  #include <linux/workqueue.h>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
> 
>  #include "dw_mmc.h"
> 
> @@ -74,6 +75,7 @@ struct idmac_desc {
>   * struct dw_mci_slot - MMC slot state
>   * @mmc: The mmc_host representing this slot.
>   * @host: The MMC controller this slot is using.
> + * @wp_gpio: If gpio_is_valid() we'll use this to read write protect.
>   * @ctype: Card type for this slot.
>   * @mrq: mmc_request currently being processed or waiting to be
>   *	processed, or NULL when the slot is idle.
> @@ -88,6 +90,8 @@ struct dw_mci_slot {
>  	struct mmc_host		*mmc;
>  	struct dw_mci		*host;
> 
> +	int			wp_gpio;
> +
>  	u32			ctype;
> 
>  	struct mmc_request	*mrq;
> @@ -832,6 +836,8 @@ static int dw_mci_get_ro(struct mmc_host *mmc)
>  		read_only = 0;
>  	else if (brd->get_ro)
>  		read_only = brd->get_ro(slot->id);
> +	else if (gpio_is_valid(slot->wp_gpio))
> +		read_only = gpio_get_value(slot->wp_gpio);
>  	else
>  		read_only =
>  			mci_readl(slot->host, WRTPRT) & (1 << slot->id) ? 1 : 0;
> @@ -1802,6 +1808,29 @@ static u32 dw_mci_of_get_bus_wd(struct device *dev, u8 slot)
>  			       " as 1\n");
>  	return bus_wd;
>  }
> +
> +/* find the write protect gpio for a given slot; or -1 if none specified */
> +static u32 dw_mci_of_get_wp_gpio(struct device *dev, u8 slot)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *np = dw_mci_of_find_slot_node(dev, slot);
> +	int gpio;
> +
> +	if (!np)
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np, "wp-gpios", 0);
> +
> +	/* Having a missing entry is valid; return silently */
> +	if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio))
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	if (devm_gpio_request(dev, gpio, "dw-mci-wp")) {
> +		dev_warn(dev, "gpio [%d] request failed\n", gpio);
> +		return -1;
> +	}
> +
> +	return gpio;
> +}
>  #else /* CONFIG_OF */
>  static u32 dw_mci_of_get_bus_wd(struct device *dev, u8 slot)
>  {
> @@ -1811,6 +1840,10 @@ static struct device_node *dw_mci_of_find_slot_node(struct device *dev, u8 slot)
>  {
>  	return NULL;
>  }
> +static u32 dw_mci_of_get_wp_gpio(struct device *dev, u8 slot)
> +{
> +	return -1;
> +}
>  #endif /* CONFIG_OF */
> 
>  static int dw_mci_init_slot(struct dw_mci *host, unsigned int id)
> @@ -1923,6 +1956,8 @@ static int dw_mci_init_slot(struct dw_mci *host, unsigned int id)
>  	else
>  		clear_bit(DW_MMC_CARD_PRESENT, &slot->flags);
> 
> +	slot->wp_gpio = dw_mci_of_get_wp_gpio(host->dev, slot->id);
> +
>  	mmc_add_host(mmc);
> 
>  #if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)
> --
> 1.7.7.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Jaehoon Chung Nov. 22, 2012, 1:55 a.m. UTC | #2
On 11/22/2012 07:03 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On some SoCs (like exynos5250) you need to use an external GPIO for
> write protect.  Add support for wp-gpios to the core dw_mmc driver
> since it could be useful across multiple SoCs.
> 
> With this change I am able to make use of the write protect for the
> external SD slot on exynos5250-snow.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c |   35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> index 5b41348..9c79870 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
>  #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>  #include <linux/workqueue.h>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
>  
>  #include "dw_mmc.h"
>  
> @@ -74,6 +75,7 @@ struct idmac_desc {
>   * struct dw_mci_slot - MMC slot state
>   * @mmc: The mmc_host representing this slot.
>   * @host: The MMC controller this slot is using.
> + * @wp_gpio: If gpio_is_valid() we'll use this to read write protect.
>   * @ctype: Card type for this slot.
>   * @mrq: mmc_request currently being processed or waiting to be
>   *	processed, or NULL when the slot is idle.
> @@ -88,6 +90,8 @@ struct dw_mci_slot {
>  	struct mmc_host		*mmc;
>  	struct dw_mci		*host;
>  
> +	int			wp_gpio;
> +
>  	u32			ctype;
>  
>  	struct mmc_request	*mrq;
> @@ -832,6 +836,8 @@ static int dw_mci_get_ro(struct mmc_host *mmc)
>  		read_only = 0;
>  	else if (brd->get_ro)
>  		read_only = brd->get_ro(slot->id);
> +	else if (gpio_is_valid(slot->wp_gpio))
> +		read_only = gpio_get_value(slot->wp_gpio);
>  	else
>  		read_only =
>  			mci_readl(slot->host, WRTPRT) & (1 << slot->id) ? 1 : 0;
> @@ -1802,6 +1808,29 @@ static u32 dw_mci_of_get_bus_wd(struct device *dev, u8 slot)
>  			       " as 1\n");
>  	return bus_wd;
>  }
> +
> +/* find the write protect gpio for a given slot; or -1 if none specified */
> +static u32 dw_mci_of_get_wp_gpio(struct device *dev, u8 slot)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *np = dw_mci_of_find_slot_node(dev, slot);
> +	int gpio;
> +
> +	if (!np)
> +		return -1;
I think good that use the error number instead of -1. Also the below code.

> +
> +	gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np, "wp-gpios", 0);
> +
> +	/* Having a missing entry is valid; return silently */
> +	if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio))
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	if (devm_gpio_request(dev, gpio, "dw-mci-wp")) {
> +		dev_warn(dev, "gpio [%d] request failed\n", gpio);
> +		return -1;
> +	}
> +
> +	return gpio;
gpio is int type, but return type is u32?

Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
> +}
>  #else /* CONFIG_OF */
>  static u32 dw_mci_of_get_bus_wd(struct device *dev, u8 slot)
>  {
> @@ -1811,6 +1840,10 @@ static struct device_node *dw_mci_of_find_slot_node(struct device *dev, u8 slot)
>  {
>  	return NULL;
>  }
> +static u32 dw_mci_of_get_wp_gpio(struct device *dev, u8 slot)
> +{
> +	return -1;
> +}
>  #endif /* CONFIG_OF */
>  
>  static int dw_mci_init_slot(struct dw_mci *host, unsigned int id)
> @@ -1923,6 +1956,8 @@ static int dw_mci_init_slot(struct dw_mci *host, unsigned int id)
>  	else
>  		clear_bit(DW_MMC_CARD_PRESENT, &slot->flags);
>  
> +	slot->wp_gpio = dw_mci_of_get_wp_gpio(host->dev, slot->id);
> +
>  	mmc_add_host(mmc);
>  
>  #if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Doug Anderson Nov. 22, 2012, 4:33 a.m. UTC | #3
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@samsung.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> wp-gpios has been implemented in dw_mmc-exynos.c
> It can be reused for EXYNOS platform? We need to modify some though.

Yup, I've seen that.  Patch 1/2 ("mmc: dw_mmc: exynos: Stop claiming
wp-gpio") addressed that.  For some reason I can't find that on
LKML.org yet.  Strange.  :-/  I'll forward it on to you shortly.

In any case: I found that the exynos code didn't actually work.  It
claimed the GPIO but didn't ever look at it.

I have the beginnings of the code to implement this properly in the
exynos code but I stopped working on it when I decided that other SoCs
could also benefit from the code and it fit better in the general
dw_mmc driver.

If you disagree and would like me to cleanup the version of this patch
that's just in the exynos driver and post that, I will.  Just let me
know.


Thanks for the review!

-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Doug Anderson Nov. 22, 2012, 4:43 a.m. UTC | #4
Jaehoon,

Thanks for the review.  See below for comments.  I'll plan on a new
patch either Monday or Tuesday when I have a chance to spin and
re-test.


On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com> wrote:
> On 11/22/2012 07:03 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> On some SoCs (like exynos5250) you need to use an external GPIO for
>> write protect.  Add support for wp-gpios to the core dw_mmc driver
>> since it could be useful across multiple SoCs.
>>
>> With this change I am able to make use of the write protect for the
>> external SD slot on exynos5250-snow.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c |   35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>> index 5b41348..9c79870 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>>  #include <linux/workqueue.h>
>>  #include <linux/of.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
>>
>>  #include "dw_mmc.h"
>>
>> @@ -74,6 +75,7 @@ struct idmac_desc {
>>   * struct dw_mci_slot - MMC slot state
>>   * @mmc: The mmc_host representing this slot.
>>   * @host: The MMC controller this slot is using.
>> + * @wp_gpio: If gpio_is_valid() we'll use this to read write protect.
>>   * @ctype: Card type for this slot.
>>   * @mrq: mmc_request currently being processed or waiting to be
>>   *   processed, or NULL when the slot is idle.
>> @@ -88,6 +90,8 @@ struct dw_mci_slot {
>>       struct mmc_host         *mmc;
>>       struct dw_mci           *host;
>>
>> +     int                     wp_gpio;
>> +
>>       u32                     ctype;
>>
>>       struct mmc_request      *mrq;
>> @@ -832,6 +836,8 @@ static int dw_mci_get_ro(struct mmc_host *mmc)
>>               read_only = 0;
>>       else if (brd->get_ro)
>>               read_only = brd->get_ro(slot->id);
>> +     else if (gpio_is_valid(slot->wp_gpio))
>> +             read_only = gpio_get_value(slot->wp_gpio);
>>       else
>>               read_only =
>>                       mci_readl(slot->host, WRTPRT) & (1 << slot->id) ? 1 : 0;
>> @@ -1802,6 +1808,29 @@ static u32 dw_mci_of_get_bus_wd(struct device *dev, u8 slot)
>>                              " as 1\n");
>>       return bus_wd;
>>  }
>> +
>> +/* find the write protect gpio for a given slot; or -1 if none specified */
>> +static u32 dw_mci_of_get_wp_gpio(struct device *dev, u8 slot)
>> +{
>> +     struct device_node *np = dw_mci_of_find_slot_node(dev, slot);
>> +     int gpio;
>> +
>> +     if (!np)
>> +             return -1;
> I think good that use the error number instead of -1. Also the below code.

In this case it's not really returning an error code which is why I
chose -1.  It's returning a gpio number or anything that is a sentinel
value indicating that the GPIO is not valid.

...but you're right, an error code would work.  I'll replace with
"-EINVAL" in my next patch.

>
>> +
>> +     gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np, "wp-gpios", 0);
>> +
>> +     /* Having a missing entry is valid; return silently */
>> +     if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio))
>> +             return -1;
>> +
>> +     if (devm_gpio_request(dev, gpio, "dw-mci-wp")) {
>> +             dev_warn(dev, "gpio [%d] request failed\n", gpio);
>> +             return -1;
>> +     }
>> +
>> +     return gpio;
> gpio is int type, but return type is u32?

Good catch.  Will fix.

>
> Best Regards,
> Jaehoon Chung
>> +}
>>  #else /* CONFIG_OF */
>>  static u32 dw_mci_of_get_bus_wd(struct device *dev, u8 slot)
>>  {
>> @@ -1811,6 +1840,10 @@ static struct device_node *dw_mci_of_find_slot_node(struct device *dev, u8 slot)
>>  {
>>       return NULL;
>>  }
>> +static u32 dw_mci_of_get_wp_gpio(struct device *dev, u8 slot)
>> +{
>> +     return -1;
>> +}
>>  #endif /* CONFIG_OF */
>>
>>  static int dw_mci_init_slot(struct dw_mci *host, unsigned int id)
>> @@ -1923,6 +1956,8 @@ static int dw_mci_init_slot(struct dw_mci *host, unsigned int id)
>>       else
>>               clear_bit(DW_MMC_CARD_PRESENT, &slot->flags);
>>
>> +     slot->wp_gpio = dw_mci_of_get_wp_gpio(host->dev, slot->id);
>> +
>>       mmc_add_host(mmc);
>>
>>  #if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Seungwon Jeon Nov. 22, 2012, 5:49 a.m. UTC | #5
On Thursday, November 22, 2012, Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@samsung.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > wp-gpios has been implemented in dw_mmc-exynos.c
> > It can be reused for EXYNOS platform? We need to modify some though.
> 
> Yup, I've seen that.  Patch 1/2 ("mmc: dw_mmc: exynos: Stop claiming
> wp-gpio") addressed that.  For some reason I can't find that on
> LKML.org yet.  Strange.  :-/  I'll forward it on to you shortly.
> 
> In any case: I found that the exynos code didn't actually work.  It
> claimed the GPIO but didn't ever look at it.
> 
> I have the beginnings of the code to implement this properly in the
> exynos code but I stopped working on it when I decided that other SoCs
> could also benefit from the code and it fit better in the general
> dw_mmc driver.
> 
> If you disagree and would like me to cleanup the version of this patch
> that's just in the exynos driver and post that, I will.  Just let me
> know.
Yes, origin code of dw_mmc-exynos didn't work fine. We need to modify it.
Anyway, some problem in mailing? I didn't get 1/2 of patch.
In addition, it's not found in any mail-archive. After resolved, I can review.

Thanks, 
Seungwon Jeon
> 
> 
> Thanks for the review!
> 
> -Doug

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
index 5b41348..9c79870 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ 
 #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
 #include <linux/workqueue.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
 
 #include "dw_mmc.h"
 
@@ -74,6 +75,7 @@  struct idmac_desc {
  * struct dw_mci_slot - MMC slot state
  * @mmc: The mmc_host representing this slot.
  * @host: The MMC controller this slot is using.
+ * @wp_gpio: If gpio_is_valid() we'll use this to read write protect.
  * @ctype: Card type for this slot.
  * @mrq: mmc_request currently being processed or waiting to be
  *	processed, or NULL when the slot is idle.
@@ -88,6 +90,8 @@  struct dw_mci_slot {
 	struct mmc_host		*mmc;
 	struct dw_mci		*host;
 
+	int			wp_gpio;
+
 	u32			ctype;
 
 	struct mmc_request	*mrq;
@@ -832,6 +836,8 @@  static int dw_mci_get_ro(struct mmc_host *mmc)
 		read_only = 0;
 	else if (brd->get_ro)
 		read_only = brd->get_ro(slot->id);
+	else if (gpio_is_valid(slot->wp_gpio))
+		read_only = gpio_get_value(slot->wp_gpio);
 	else
 		read_only =
 			mci_readl(slot->host, WRTPRT) & (1 << slot->id) ? 1 : 0;
@@ -1802,6 +1808,29 @@  static u32 dw_mci_of_get_bus_wd(struct device *dev, u8 slot)
 			       " as 1\n");
 	return bus_wd;
 }
+
+/* find the write protect gpio for a given slot; or -1 if none specified */
+static u32 dw_mci_of_get_wp_gpio(struct device *dev, u8 slot)
+{
+	struct device_node *np = dw_mci_of_find_slot_node(dev, slot);
+	int gpio;
+
+	if (!np)
+		return -1;
+
+	gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np, "wp-gpios", 0);
+
+	/* Having a missing entry is valid; return silently */
+	if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio))
+		return -1;
+
+	if (devm_gpio_request(dev, gpio, "dw-mci-wp")) {
+		dev_warn(dev, "gpio [%d] request failed\n", gpio);
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	return gpio;
+}
 #else /* CONFIG_OF */
 static u32 dw_mci_of_get_bus_wd(struct device *dev, u8 slot)
 {
@@ -1811,6 +1840,10 @@  static struct device_node *dw_mci_of_find_slot_node(struct device *dev, u8 slot)
 {
 	return NULL;
 }
+static u32 dw_mci_of_get_wp_gpio(struct device *dev, u8 slot)
+{
+	return -1;
+}
 #endif /* CONFIG_OF */
 
 static int dw_mci_init_slot(struct dw_mci *host, unsigned int id)
@@ -1923,6 +1956,8 @@  static int dw_mci_init_slot(struct dw_mci *host, unsigned int id)
 	else
 		clear_bit(DW_MMC_CARD_PRESENT, &slot->flags);
 
+	slot->wp_gpio = dw_mci_of_get_wp_gpio(host->dev, slot->id);
+
 	mmc_add_host(mmc);
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)