| Message ID | 1381317616-1229-5-git-send-email-b29396@freescale.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c index 2cce244..8721549 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c @@ -216,6 +216,10 @@ static u32 esdhc_readl_le(struct sdhci_host *host, int reg) } if (unlikely(reg == SDHCI_CAPABILITIES)) { + /* ignore bit[0-15] as it stores cap_2 register val for mx6sl */ + if (is_imx6sl_usdhc(imx_data)) + val &= 0xffff0000; + /* In FSL esdhc IC module, only bit20 is used to indicate the * ADMA2 capability of esdhc, but this bit is messed up on * some SOCs (e.g. on MX25, MX35 this bit is set, but they
When reading CAP_1 register for mx6sl, ignore bit[0-15] as it stores CAP_2 register value which is new introduced in mx6sl. Without this fix, the max clock for mx6sl may not be correct since it's wrongly calculated by reading CAP_1 register. Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <b29396@freescale.com> --- drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 4 ++++ 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)