diff mbox

[RFC,09/15] ARM: dts: sun6i: sina31s: Switch to mmc3 for onboard eMMC

Message ID 1453354002-28366-10-git-send-email-wens@csie.org (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Chen-Yu Tsai Jan. 21, 2016, 5:26 a.m. UTC
According to Allwinner, only mmc3 supports 8 bit DDR transfers for eMMC.
Switch to mmc3 for the onboard eMMC, and also assign vqmmc for signal
voltage sensing/switching, and "cap-mmc-hw-reset" to denote this
instance can use eMMC hardware reset.

Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Hans de Goede Jan. 21, 2016, 11:16 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi,

On 21-01-16 06:26, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> According to Allwinner, only mmc3 supports 8 bit DDR transfers for eMMC.
> Switch to mmc3 for the onboard eMMC, and also assign vqmmc for signal
> voltage sensing/switching, and "cap-mmc-hw-reset" to denote this
> instance can use eMMC hardware reset.

This is going to need some more explanation, does this mean
that the old dtsi is wrong and the emmc does not work there are all ?

Regards,

Hans


>
> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
> ---
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi | 6 ++++--
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi
> index ea69fb8ad4d8..4ec0c8679b2e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi
> @@ -61,12 +61,14 @@
>   };
>
>   /* eMMC on core board */
> -&mmc2 {
> +&mmc3 {
>   	pinctrl-names = "default";
> -	pinctrl-0 = <&mmc2_8bit_emmc_pins>;
> +	pinctrl-0 = <&mmc3_8bit_emmc_pins>;
>   	vmmc-supply = <&reg_dcdc1>;
> +	vqmmc-supply = <&reg_dcdc1>;
>   	bus-width = <8>;
>   	non-removable;
> +	cap-mmc-hw-reset;
>   	status = "okay";
>   };
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Chen-Yu Tsai Jan. 21, 2016, 12:23 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 7:16 PM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 21-01-16 06:26, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>>
>> According to Allwinner, only mmc3 supports 8 bit DDR transfers for eMMC.
>> Switch to mmc3 for the onboard eMMC, and also assign vqmmc for signal
>> voltage sensing/switching, and "cap-mmc-hw-reset" to denote this
>> instance can use eMMC hardware reset.
>
>
> This is going to need some more explanation, does this mean
> that the old dtsi is wrong and the emmc does not work there are all ?

mmc2 works fine for either 4 bit SDR/DDR or 8 bit SDR only. It does
not work for 8 bit DDR. I actually tested all the above combinations.

Also see https://groups.google.com/d/msg/linux-sunxi/pMzwMWwLALw/6WGgCN1eAQAJ

About old DTs not working:

a) The old DT will not work with the mmc patches, as it will try 8 bit DDR
   and fail. Also, the old DT does not use the highest drive strength for
   the mmc pins, meaning it might not work for the other chip families.

b) Old DT + old kernel works fine (8 bit high-speed), just slower.

An alternative would be to drop MMC_CAP_1_8V_DDR from the driver, and
use the "mmc-ddr-1_8v" DT capability flag at the dtsi or board level.
There's no real way to describe "don't use 8 bit with MMC DDR" in the DT.


Regards
ChenYu

>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
>
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi | 6 ++++--
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi
>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi
>> index ea69fb8ad4d8..4ec0c8679b2e 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi
>> @@ -61,12 +61,14 @@
>>   };
>>
>>   /* eMMC on core board */
>> -&mmc2 {
>> +&mmc3 {
>>         pinctrl-names = "default";
>> -       pinctrl-0 = <&mmc2_8bit_emmc_pins>;
>> +       pinctrl-0 = <&mmc3_8bit_emmc_pins>;
>>         vmmc-supply = <&reg_dcdc1>;
>> +       vqmmc-supply = <&reg_dcdc1>;
>>         bus-width = <8>;
>>         non-removable;
>> +       cap-mmc-hw-reset;
>>         status = "okay";
>>   };
>>
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hans de Goede Jan. 21, 2016, 12:25 p.m. UTC | #3
Hi,

On 21-01-16 13:23, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 7:16 PM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 21-01-16 06:26, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>>>
>>> According to Allwinner, only mmc3 supports 8 bit DDR transfers for eMMC.
>>> Switch to mmc3 for the onboard eMMC, and also assign vqmmc for signal
>>> voltage sensing/switching, and "cap-mmc-hw-reset" to denote this
>>> instance can use eMMC hardware reset.
>>
>>
>> This is going to need some more explanation, does this mean
>> that the old dtsi is wrong and the emmc does not work there are all ?
>
> mmc2 works fine for either 4 bit SDR/DDR or 8 bit SDR only. It does
> not work for 8 bit DDR. I actually tested all the above combinations.
>
> Also see https://groups.google.com/d/msg/linux-sunxi/pMzwMWwLALw/6WGgCN1eAQAJ
>
> About old DTs not working:
>
> a) The old DT will not work with the mmc patches, as it will try 8 bit DDR
>     and fail. Also, the old DT does not use the highest drive strength for
>     the mmc pins, meaning it might not work for the other chip families.
>
> b) Old DT + old kernel works fine (8 bit high-speed), just slower.
>
> An alternative would be to drop MMC_CAP_1_8V_DDR from the driver, and
> use the "mmc-ddr-1_8v" DT capability flag at the dtsi or board level.
> There's no real way to describe "don't use 8 bit with MMC DDR" in the DT.

OK, so what is confusing me, is how can we choose between the emmc being
connected to mmc2 resp mmc3, are there dipswitches on the board? Or can both
mmc controllers be routed to the outside on the same port/pins ?

Regards,

Hans


>
>
> Regards
> ChenYu
>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Hans
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
>>> ---
>>>    arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi | 6 ++++--
>>>    1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi
>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi
>>> index ea69fb8ad4d8..4ec0c8679b2e 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi
>>> @@ -61,12 +61,14 @@
>>>    };
>>>
>>>    /* eMMC on core board */
>>> -&mmc2 {
>>> +&mmc3 {
>>>          pinctrl-names = "default";
>>> -       pinctrl-0 = <&mmc2_8bit_emmc_pins>;
>>> +       pinctrl-0 = <&mmc3_8bit_emmc_pins>;
>>>          vmmc-supply = <&reg_dcdc1>;
>>> +       vqmmc-supply = <&reg_dcdc1>;
>>>          bus-width = <8>;
>>>          non-removable;
>>> +       cap-mmc-hw-reset;
>>>          status = "okay";
>>>    };
>>>
>>>
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Chen-Yu Tsai Jan. 21, 2016, 12:28 p.m. UTC | #4
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 21-01-16 13:23, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 7:16 PM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 21-01-16 06:26, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> According to Allwinner, only mmc3 supports 8 bit DDR transfers for eMMC.
>>>> Switch to mmc3 for the onboard eMMC, and also assign vqmmc for signal
>>>> voltage sensing/switching, and "cap-mmc-hw-reset" to denote this
>>>> instance can use eMMC hardware reset.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This is going to need some more explanation, does this mean
>>> that the old dtsi is wrong and the emmc does not work there are all ?
>>
>>
>> mmc2 works fine for either 4 bit SDR/DDR or 8 bit SDR only. It does
>> not work for 8 bit DDR. I actually tested all the above combinations.
>>
>> Also see
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/linux-sunxi/pMzwMWwLALw/6WGgCN1eAQAJ
>>
>> About old DTs not working:
>>
>> a) The old DT will not work with the mmc patches, as it will try 8 bit DDR
>>     and fail. Also, the old DT does not use the highest drive strength for
>>     the mmc pins, meaning it might not work for the other chip families.
>>
>> b) Old DT + old kernel works fine (8 bit high-speed), just slower.
>>
>> An alternative would be to drop MMC_CAP_1_8V_DDR from the driver, and
>> use the "mmc-ddr-1_8v" DT capability flag at the dtsi or board level.
>> There's no real way to describe "don't use 8 bit with MMC DDR" in the DT.
>
>
> OK, so what is confusing me, is how can we choose between the emmc being
> connected to mmc2 resp mmc3, are there dipswitches on the board? Or can both
> mmc controllers be routed to the outside on the same port/pins ?

They are on the same pins, just with a different mux value/function.
I believe the previous patch explains this.

ChenYu

>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> ChenYu
>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Hans
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>    arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi | 6 ++++--
>>>>    1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi
>>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi
>>>> index ea69fb8ad4d8..4ec0c8679b2e 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi
>>>> @@ -61,12 +61,14 @@
>>>>    };
>>>>
>>>>    /* eMMC on core board */
>>>> -&mmc2 {
>>>> +&mmc3 {
>>>>          pinctrl-names = "default";
>>>> -       pinctrl-0 = <&mmc2_8bit_emmc_pins>;
>>>> +       pinctrl-0 = <&mmc3_8bit_emmc_pins>;
>>>>          vmmc-supply = <&reg_dcdc1>;
>>>> +       vqmmc-supply = <&reg_dcdc1>;
>>>>          bus-width = <8>;
>>>>          non-removable;
>>>> +       cap-mmc-hw-reset;
>>>>          status = "okay";
>>>>    };
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hans de Goede Jan. 21, 2016, 12:38 p.m. UTC | #5
Hi,

On 21-01-16 13:28, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 21-01-16 13:23, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 7:16 PM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On 21-01-16 06:26, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> According to Allwinner, only mmc3 supports 8 bit DDR transfers for eMMC.
>>>>> Switch to mmc3 for the onboard eMMC, and also assign vqmmc for signal
>>>>> voltage sensing/switching, and "cap-mmc-hw-reset" to denote this
>>>>> instance can use eMMC hardware reset.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is going to need some more explanation, does this mean
>>>> that the old dtsi is wrong and the emmc does not work there are all ?
>>>
>>>
>>> mmc2 works fine for either 4 bit SDR/DDR or 8 bit SDR only. It does
>>> not work for 8 bit DDR. I actually tested all the above combinations.
>>>
>>> Also see
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/linux-sunxi/pMzwMWwLALw/6WGgCN1eAQAJ
>>>
>>> About old DTs not working:
>>>
>>> a) The old DT will not work with the mmc patches, as it will try 8 bit DDR
>>>      and fail. Also, the old DT does not use the highest drive strength for
>>>      the mmc pins, meaning it might not work for the other chip families.
>>>
>>> b) Old DT + old kernel works fine (8 bit high-speed), just slower.
>>>
>>> An alternative would be to drop MMC_CAP_1_8V_DDR from the driver, and
>>> use the "mmc-ddr-1_8v" DT capability flag at the dtsi or board level.
>>> There's no real way to describe "don't use 8 bit with MMC DDR" in the DT.
>>
>>
>> OK, so what is confusing me, is how can we choose between the emmc being
>> connected to mmc2 resp mmc3, are there dipswitches on the board? Or can both
>> mmc controllers be routed to the outside on the same port/pins ?
>
> They are on the same pins, just with a different mux value/function.
> I believe the previous patch explains this.

Ah yes, I see the remark about them sharing pins in the previous
patch commit msg now, weird.

Regards,

Hans


>
> ChenYu
>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Hans
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> ChenYu
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Hans
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>     arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi | 6 ++++--
>>>>>     1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi
>>>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi
>>>>> index ea69fb8ad4d8..4ec0c8679b2e 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi
>>>>> @@ -61,12 +61,14 @@
>>>>>     };
>>>>>
>>>>>     /* eMMC on core board */
>>>>> -&mmc2 {
>>>>> +&mmc3 {
>>>>>           pinctrl-names = "default";
>>>>> -       pinctrl-0 = <&mmc2_8bit_emmc_pins>;
>>>>> +       pinctrl-0 = <&mmc3_8bit_emmc_pins>;
>>>>>           vmmc-supply = <&reg_dcdc1>;
>>>>> +       vqmmc-supply = <&reg_dcdc1>;
>>>>>           bus-width = <8>;
>>>>>           non-removable;
>>>>> +       cap-mmc-hw-reset;
>>>>>           status = "okay";
>>>>>     };
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Maxime Ripard Jan. 22, 2016, 8:39 p.m. UTC | #6
Hi,

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 01:26:36PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> According to Allwinner, only mmc3 supports 8 bit DDR transfers for eMMC.
> Switch to mmc3 for the onboard eMMC, and also assign vqmmc for signal
> voltage sensing/switching, and "cap-mmc-hw-reset" to denote this
> instance can use eMMC hardware reset.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi
> index ea69fb8ad4d8..4ec0c8679b2e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi
> @@ -61,12 +61,14 @@
>  };
>  
>  /* eMMC on core board */
> -&mmc2 {
> +&mmc3 {
>  	pinctrl-names = "default";
> -	pinctrl-0 = <&mmc2_8bit_emmc_pins>;
> +	pinctrl-0 = <&mmc3_8bit_emmc_pins>;
>  	vmmc-supply = <&reg_dcdc1>;
> +	vqmmc-supply = <&reg_dcdc1>;

That seems odd. IIRC the VCC was supposed to be fixed and VCCQ could
be either at 1.8 or 3V. Having the same regulator on both would make
VCCQ forced to 3.3V, which seems to go against your commit log.

What's the catch ? :)

Thanks!
Maxime
Chen-Yu Tsai Jan. 23, 2016, 4:21 a.m. UTC | #7
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 4:39 AM, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 01:26:36PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>> According to Allwinner, only mmc3 supports 8 bit DDR transfers for eMMC.
>> Switch to mmc3 for the onboard eMMC, and also assign vqmmc for signal
>> voltage sensing/switching, and "cap-mmc-hw-reset" to denote this
>> instance can use eMMC hardware reset.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi | 6 ++++--
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi
>> index ea69fb8ad4d8..4ec0c8679b2e 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi
>> @@ -61,12 +61,14 @@
>>  };
>>
>>  /* eMMC on core board */
>> -&mmc2 {
>> +&mmc3 {
>>       pinctrl-names = "default";
>> -     pinctrl-0 = <&mmc2_8bit_emmc_pins>;
>> +     pinctrl-0 = <&mmc3_8bit_emmc_pins>;
>>       vmmc-supply = <&reg_dcdc1>;
>> +     vqmmc-supply = <&reg_dcdc1>;
>
> That seems odd. IIRC the VCC was supposed to be fixed and VCCQ could
> be either at 1.8 or 3V. Having the same regulator on both would make
> VCCQ forced to 3.3V, which seems to go against your commit log.
>
> What's the catch ? :)

That is how the board is routed. Which means the only use for
vqmmc-supply is the driver will know that it can only do 3.3V,
i.e. voltage sensing.

It is the reason I requested Olimex to look into this. Allwinner
reference designs all tie vqmmc directly to 3.3V.

Actually with the latest driver patches, this is not even needed. To
make the driver backward compatible, if no vqmmc-supply is given, it
just assumes 3.3V signaling.

Regards
ChenYu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Maxime Ripard Jan. 24, 2016, 4:56 p.m. UTC | #8
Hi,

On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 12:21:55PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 4:39 AM, Maxime Ripard
> <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 01:26:36PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> >> According to Allwinner, only mmc3 supports 8 bit DDR transfers for eMMC.
> >> Switch to mmc3 for the onboard eMMC, and also assign vqmmc for signal
> >> voltage sensing/switching, and "cap-mmc-hw-reset" to denote this
> >> instance can use eMMC hardware reset.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
> >> ---
> >>  arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi | 6 ++++--
> >>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi
> >> index ea69fb8ad4d8..4ec0c8679b2e 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi
> >> @@ -61,12 +61,14 @@
> >>  };
> >>
> >>  /* eMMC on core board */
> >> -&mmc2 {
> >> +&mmc3 {
> >>       pinctrl-names = "default";
> >> -     pinctrl-0 = <&mmc2_8bit_emmc_pins>;
> >> +     pinctrl-0 = <&mmc3_8bit_emmc_pins>;
> >>       vmmc-supply = <&reg_dcdc1>;
> >> +     vqmmc-supply = <&reg_dcdc1>;
> >
> > That seems odd. IIRC the VCC was supposed to be fixed and VCCQ could
> > be either at 1.8 or 3V. Having the same regulator on both would make
> > VCCQ forced to 3.3V, which seems to go against your commit log.
> >
> > What's the catch ? :)
> 
> That is how the board is routed. Which means the only use for
> vqmmc-supply is the driver will know that it can only do 3.3V,
> i.e. voltage sensing.
> 
> It is the reason I requested Olimex to look into this. Allwinner
> reference designs all tie vqmmc directly to 3.3V.
> 
> Actually with the latest driver patches, this is not even needed. To
> make the driver backward compatible, if no vqmmc-supply is given, it
> just assumes 3.3V signaling.

Ok. I've applied this patch and changed the commit log to remove the
voltage switching mention then, since it won't happen.

Thanks!
Maxime
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi
index ea69fb8ad4d8..4ec0c8679b2e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31s-sina31s-core.dtsi
@@ -61,12 +61,14 @@ 
 };
 
 /* eMMC on core board */
-&mmc2 {
+&mmc3 {
 	pinctrl-names = "default";
-	pinctrl-0 = <&mmc2_8bit_emmc_pins>;
+	pinctrl-0 = <&mmc3_8bit_emmc_pins>;
 	vmmc-supply = <&reg_dcdc1>;
+	vqmmc-supply = <&reg_dcdc1>;
 	bus-width = <8>;
 	non-removable;
+	cap-mmc-hw-reset;
 	status = "okay";
 };