| Message ID | 20231208202108.7468-2-kamal.dasu@broadcom.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [1/2] dt-bindings: mmc: brcm,sdhci-brcmstb: Add support for 74165b0 | expand |
Hi Kamal, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on robh/for-next] [also build test WARNING on soc/for-next linus/master v6.7-rc4 next-20231208] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Kamal-Dasu/mmc-add-new-sdhci-reset-sequence-for-brcm-74165b0/20231209-042222 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231208202108.7468-2-kamal.dasu%40broadcom.com patch subject: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: add new sdhci reset sequence for brcm 74165b0 config: arc-randconfig-001-20231209 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231209/202312091235.tzqwgYfT-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: arceb-elf-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231209/202312091235.tzqwgYfT-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312091235.tzqwgYfT-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c:237:16: warning: initialization discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers] 237 | .ops = &sdhci_brcmstb_ops_74165b0, | ^ vim +/const +237 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c 233 234 static const struct brcmstb_match_priv match_priv_74165b0 = { 235 .flags = BRCMSTB_MATCH_FLAGS_HAS_CLOCK_GATE, 236 .hs400es = sdhci_brcmstb_hs400es, > 237 .ops = &sdhci_brcmstb_ops_74165b0, 238 }; 239
Hi Kamal, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on robh/for-next] [also build test ERROR on soc/for-next linus/master v6.7-rc4 next-20231208] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Kamal-Dasu/mmc-add-new-sdhci-reset-sequence-for-brcm-74165b0/20231209-042222 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231208202108.7468-2-kamal.dasu%40broadcom.com patch subject: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: add new sdhci reset sequence for brcm 74165b0 config: arm-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231209/202312091608.0VbkRxlh-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 14.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git f28c006a5895fc0e329fe15fead81e37457cb1d1) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231209/202312091608.0VbkRxlh-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312091608.0VbkRxlh-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c:237:9: error: initializing 'struct sdhci_ops *' with an expression of type 'const struct sdhci_ops *' discards qualifiers [-Werror,-Wincompatible-pointer-types-discards-qualifiers] .ops = &sdhci_brcmstb_ops_74165b0, ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 error generated. vim +237 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c 233 234 static const struct brcmstb_match_priv match_priv_74165b0 = { 235 .flags = BRCMSTB_MATCH_FLAGS_HAS_CLOCK_GATE, 236 .hs400es = sdhci_brcmstb_hs400es, > 237 .ops = &sdhci_brcmstb_ops_74165b0, 238 }; 239
Hi Kamal, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on robh/for-next] [also build test WARNING on soc/for-next linus/master v6.7-rc4 next-20231208] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Kamal-Dasu/mmc-add-new-sdhci-reset-sequence-for-brcm-74165b0/20231209-042222 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231208202108.7468-2-kamal.dasu%40broadcom.com patch subject: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: add new sdhci reset sequence for brcm 74165b0 config: nios2-randconfig-r133-20231209 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231209/202312091905.UGzltx8A-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: nios2-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231209/202312091905.UGzltx8A-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312091905.UGzltx8A-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c:237:17: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different modifiers) @@ expected struct sdhci_ops *ops @@ got struct sdhci_ops const * @@ drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c:237:17: sparse: expected struct sdhci_ops *ops drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c:237:17: sparse: got struct sdhci_ops const * vim +237 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c 233 234 static const struct brcmstb_match_priv match_priv_74165b0 = { 235 .flags = BRCMSTB_MATCH_FLAGS_HAS_CLOCK_GATE, 236 .hs400es = sdhci_brcmstb_hs400es, > 237 .ops = &sdhci_brcmstb_ops_74165b0, 238 }; 239
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c index c23251bb95f3..3fac471b5b5d 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c @@ -44,8 +44,13 @@ struct brcmstb_match_priv { static inline void enable_clock_gating(struct sdhci_host *host) { + struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host); + struct sdhci_brcmstb_priv *priv = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host); u32 reg; + if (!(priv->flags & BRCMSTB_PRIV_FLAGS_GATE_CLOCK)) + return; + reg = sdhci_readl(host, SDHCI_VENDOR); reg |= SDHCI_VENDOR_GATE_SDCLK_EN; sdhci_writel(host, reg, SDHCI_VENDOR); @@ -53,14 +58,54 @@ static inline void enable_clock_gating(struct sdhci_host *host) static void brcmstb_reset(struct sdhci_host *host, u8 mask) { - struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host); - struct sdhci_brcmstb_priv *priv = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host); - sdhci_and_cqhci_reset(host, mask); /* Reset will clear this, so re-enable it */ - if (priv->flags & BRCMSTB_PRIV_FLAGS_GATE_CLOCK) - enable_clock_gating(host); + enable_clock_gating(host); +} + +static void brcmstb_sdhci_reset_cmd_data(struct sdhci_host *host, u8 mask) +{ + ktime_t timeout; + u32 reg; + u32 new_mask = (mask & (SDHCI_RESET_CMD | SDHCI_RESET_DATA)) << 24; + + new_mask |= SDHCI_CLOCK_CARD_EN | SDHCI_CLOCK_INT_EN; + reg = sdhci_readl(host, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL); + sdhci_writel(host, reg | new_mask, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL); + + /* Wait max 10 ms */ + timeout = ktime_add_ms(ktime_get(), 10); + + /* hw clears the bit when it's done */ + while (1) { + bool timedout = ktime_after(ktime_get(), timeout); + + if (!(sdhci_readb(host, SDHCI_SOFTWARE_RESET) & mask)) + break; + if (timedout) { + pr_err("%s: Reset 0x%x never completed.\n", + mmc_hostname(host->mmc), (int)mask); + sdhci_err_stats_inc(host, CTRL_TIMEOUT); + sdhci_dumpregs(host); + return; + } + udelay(10); + } +} + +static void brcmstb_reset_74165b0(struct sdhci_host *host, u8 mask) +{ + /* take care of RESET_ALL as usual */ + if (mask & SDHCI_RESET_ALL) + sdhci_and_cqhci_reset(host, SDHCI_RESET_ALL); + + /* cmd and/or data treated differently on this core */ + if (mask & (SDHCI_RESET_CMD | SDHCI_RESET_DATA)) + brcmstb_sdhci_reset_cmd_data(host, mask); + + /* Reset will clear this, so re-enable it */ + enable_clock_gating(host); } static void sdhci_brcmstb_hs400es(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios) @@ -162,6 +207,13 @@ static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_brcmstb_ops_7216 = { .set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_brcmstb_set_uhs_signaling, }; +static const struct sdhci_ops sdhci_brcmstb_ops_74165b0 = { + .set_clock = sdhci_brcmstb_set_clock, + .set_bus_width = sdhci_set_bus_width, + .reset = brcmstb_reset_74165b0, + .set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_brcmstb_set_uhs_signaling, +}; + static struct brcmstb_match_priv match_priv_7425 = { .flags = BRCMSTB_MATCH_FLAGS_NO_64BIT | BRCMSTB_MATCH_FLAGS_BROKEN_TIMEOUT, @@ -179,10 +231,17 @@ static const struct brcmstb_match_priv match_priv_7216 = { .ops = &sdhci_brcmstb_ops_7216, }; +static const struct brcmstb_match_priv match_priv_74165b0 = { + .flags = BRCMSTB_MATCH_FLAGS_HAS_CLOCK_GATE, + .hs400es = sdhci_brcmstb_hs400es, + .ops = &sdhci_brcmstb_ops_74165b0, +}; + static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused sdhci_brcm_of_match[] = { { .compatible = "brcm,bcm7425-sdhci", .data = &match_priv_7425 }, { .compatible = "brcm,bcm7445-sdhci", .data = &match_priv_7445 }, { .compatible = "brcm,bcm7216-sdhci", .data = &match_priv_7216 }, + { .compatible = "brcm,bcm74165b0-sdhci", .data = &match_priv_74165b0 }, {}, };