| Message ID | 20240810-b4-spdx-fixup-v1-0-b9c84d637fb3@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | Couple of SPDX fixes | expand |
On Sat, 10 Aug 2024 13:25:14 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: > Seems like the revision of the SPDX license identifiers, that landed in > master, dropped the wrong hunk/paragraph. > > Namely: a function description/summary was removed in one m4 file, while > the license exception in the second m4 file was intended. > > I've left the two changes as separate patches, since I'm not 100% sure > if dropping the former wasn't semi-intentional. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/2] m4: reinstate CC_CHECK_FLAG_APPEND summary commit: 0cdd9847206b368800dac9099d5af2332340a0eb [2/2] m4: remove verbose license exception clause commit: 5535278c8d6e05ebc9b5c413d495c155a8c09bba Best regards,
Hi all, Seems like the revision of the SPDX license identifiers, that landed in master, dropped the wrong hunk/paragraph. Namely: a function description/summary was removed in one m4 file, while the license exception in the second m4 file was intended. I've left the two changes as separate patches, since I'm not 100% sure if dropping the former wasn't semi-intentional. Feel free to pick whichever patch makes sense o/ --- Emil Velikov (2): m4: reinstate CC_CHECK_FLAG_APPEND summary m4: remove verbose license exception clause m4/attributes.m4 | 5 +++++ m4/features.m4 | 13 ------------- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) --- base-commit: af21689dd0f1ef6f40d6ecc323885026a07486f9 change-id: 20240810-b4-spdx-fixup-b7bdae8b60da Best regards,