Message ID | 20241223093840.29417-1-petr.pavlu@suse.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | module: Make .static_call_sites read-only after init | expand |
Hi Petr, Le 23/12/2024 à 10:37, Petr Pavlu a écrit : > Section .static_call_sites holds data structures that need to be sorted and > processed only at module load time. The section is never modified afterwards. > Make it therefore read-only after module initialization to avoid any > (non-)accidental modifications. > > Petr Pavlu (3): > module: Constify parameters of module_enforce_rwx_sections() > module: Add a separate function to mark sections as read-only after > init > module: Make .static_call_sites read-only after init > > kernel/module/internal.h | 7 ++++-- > kernel/module/main.c | 18 +++------------ > kernel/module/strict_rwx.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > We have a problem at the moment with ro_after_init sections, isn't it better to fix it before adding new stuff to ro_after_init ? This series conflicts with my series which aims at fixing up ro_after_init handling in modules, see https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-modules/cover/cover.1733427536.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu/ I was expecting my series to land in modules-next, do you or Luis plan to take it anytime soon ? Christophe
On 1/3/25 15:06, Christophe Leroy wrote: > Le 23/12/2024 à 10:37, Petr Pavlu a écrit : >> Section .static_call_sites holds data structures that need to be sorted and >> processed only at module load time. The section is never modified afterwards. >> Make it therefore read-only after module initialization to avoid any >> (non-)accidental modifications. >> >> Petr Pavlu (3): >> module: Constify parameters of module_enforce_rwx_sections() >> module: Add a separate function to mark sections as read-only after >> init >> module: Make .static_call_sites read-only after init >> >> kernel/module/internal.h | 7 ++++-- >> kernel/module/main.c | 18 +++------------ >> kernel/module/strict_rwx.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- >> 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) >> >> > > We have a problem at the moment with ro_after_init sections, isn't it > better to fix it before adding new stuff to ro_after_init ? > > This series conflicts with my series which aims at fixing up > ro_after_init handling in modules, see > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-modules/cover/cover.1733427536.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu/ Sure, this is a fairly minor change to keep what the modules loader does in sync with how the same .static_call_sites data in vmlinux is handled. It can wait. > I was expecting my series to land in modules-next, do you or Luis plan > to take it anytime soon ? Sorry for the lack of clarity. I've been waiting with applying that series as there was still some discussion. I have now replied in its thread [1]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-modules/f0e892c7-43cd-4310-9d60-1d6e839f5bb2@suse.com/