@@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ void nfsd_reply_cache_shutdown(void)
static void
lru_put_end(struct svc_cacherep *rp)
{
+ rp->c_timestamp = jiffies;
list_move_tail(&rp->c_lru, &lru_head);
}
@@ -245,9 +246,9 @@ nfsd_cache_lookup(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
rpc_set_port((struct sockaddr *)&rp->c_addr, rpc_get_port(svc_addr(rqstp)));
rp->c_prot = proto;
rp->c_vers = vers;
- rp->c_timestamp = jiffies;
hash_refile(rp);
+ lru_put_end(rp);
/* release any buffer */
if (rp->c_type == RC_REPLBUFF) {
@@ -262,7 +263,6 @@ nfsd_cache_lookup(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
found_entry:
/* We found a matching entry which is either in progress or done. */
age = jiffies - rp->c_timestamp;
- rp->c_timestamp = jiffies;
lru_put_end(rp);
rtn = RC_DROPIT;
@@ -354,7 +354,6 @@ nfsd_cache_update(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, int cachetype, __be32 *statp)
rp->c_secure = rqstp->rq_secure;
rp->c_type = cachetype;
rp->c_state = RC_DONE;
- rp->c_timestamp = jiffies;
spin_unlock(&cache_lock);
return;
}
...otherwise, we end up with the list ordering wrong. Currently, it's not a problem since we skip RC_INPROG entries, but keeping the ordering strict will be necessary for a later patch that adds a cache cleaner. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> --- fs/nfsd/nfscache.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)