diff mbox

nfsv4.1 client refuses to suspend

Message ID 1363921041-5042-1-git-send-email-ycnian@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

ycnian@gmail.com March 22, 2013, 2:57 a.m. UTC
nfsv4.1 client suspending fails with such info

Freezing of tasks failed after 20.00 seconds (1 tasks refusing to freeze, wq_busy=0):
nfsv4.1-svc     S ffff88007889f2e0     0  3191      2 0x00000080   
 ffff88007b2f3e28 0000000000000046 ffff88007b2f2010 00000000000127c0
 ffff880079b08000 00000000000127c0 ffff88007b2f3fd8 00000000000127c0
 ffff88007b2f3fd8 00000000000127c0 ffffffff81a14410 ffff880079b08000
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff81441396>] schedule+0x64/0x66
 [<ffffffffa06a6892>] nfs41_callback_svc+0x100/0x129 [nfsv4]
 [<ffffffff8104fdb8>] ? wake_up_bit+0x2a/0x2a
 [<ffffffffa06a6792>] ? nfs_callback_up+0x548/0x548 [nfsv4]
 [<ffffffff8104f7e0>] kthread+0xb5/0xbd
 [<ffffffff8104f72b>] ? kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x65/0x65
 [<ffffffff8144912c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
 [<ffffffff8104f72b>] ? kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x65/0x65

I read such threads
[1] nfs/sunrpc: allow freezing of tasks with NFS calls in flight
[2] LOCKDEP: 3.9-rc1: mount.nfs/4272 still has locks held!
and then modify nfs41_callback_svc(). It works on my machine. I don't know
the details of freezing, so I'm not sure if the modification is reasonable.
This is not a formal patch. Thanks.

Signed-off-by: Yanchuan Nian <ycnian@gmail.com>
---
 fs/nfs/callback.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

Comments

Jeff Layton March 22, 2013, 11:40 a.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 10:57:21 +0800
ycnian@gmail.com wrote:

> nfsv4.1 client suspending fails with such info
> 
> Freezing of tasks failed after 20.00 seconds (1 tasks refusing to freeze, wq_busy=0):
> nfsv4.1-svc     S ffff88007889f2e0     0  3191      2 0x00000080   
>  ffff88007b2f3e28 0000000000000046 ffff88007b2f2010 00000000000127c0
>  ffff880079b08000 00000000000127c0 ffff88007b2f3fd8 00000000000127c0
>  ffff88007b2f3fd8 00000000000127c0 ffffffff81a14410 ffff880079b08000
> Call Trace:
>  [<ffffffff81441396>] schedule+0x64/0x66
>  [<ffffffffa06a6892>] nfs41_callback_svc+0x100/0x129 [nfsv4]
>  [<ffffffff8104fdb8>] ? wake_up_bit+0x2a/0x2a
>  [<ffffffffa06a6792>] ? nfs_callback_up+0x548/0x548 [nfsv4]
>  [<ffffffff8104f7e0>] kthread+0xb5/0xbd
>  [<ffffffff8104f72b>] ? kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x65/0x65
>  [<ffffffff8144912c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
>  [<ffffffff8104f72b>] ? kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x65/0x65
> 
> I read such threads
> [1] nfs/sunrpc: allow freezing of tasks with NFS calls in flight
> [2] LOCKDEP: 3.9-rc1: mount.nfs/4272 still has locks held!
> and then modify nfs41_callback_svc(). It works on my machine. I don't know
> the details of freezing, so I'm not sure if the modification is reasonable.
> This is not a formal patch. Thanks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yanchuan Nian <ycnian@gmail.com>
> ---
>  fs/nfs/callback.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/callback.c b/fs/nfs/callback.c
> index 5088b57..8addb7b 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/callback.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/callback.c
> @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ nfs41_callback_svc(void *vrqstp)
>  				error);
>  		} else {
>  			spin_unlock_bh(&serv->sv_cb_lock);
> -			schedule();
> +			freezable_schedule();
>  		}
>  		finish_wait(&serv->sv_cb_waitq, &wq);
>  	}

I think it'd be better to have that thread call try_to_freeze()
directly instead of doing this. There are some problems with
freezable_schedule() that still need to be resolved and I suspect that
it will eventually go away entirely.

It's may be sufficient to simply call try_to_freeze() at the top of
the loop, but that would need to be tested.
ycnian@gmail.com March 25, 2013, 9:27 a.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 07:40:03AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 10:57:21 +0800
> ycnian@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> > nfsv4.1 client suspending fails with such info
> > 
> > Freezing of tasks failed after 20.00 seconds (1 tasks refusing to freeze, wq_busy=0):
> > nfsv4.1-svc     S ffff88007889f2e0     0  3191      2 0x00000080   
> >  ffff88007b2f3e28 0000000000000046 ffff88007b2f2010 00000000000127c0
> >  ffff880079b08000 00000000000127c0 ffff88007b2f3fd8 00000000000127c0
> >  ffff88007b2f3fd8 00000000000127c0 ffffffff81a14410 ffff880079b08000
> > Call Trace:
> >  [<ffffffff81441396>] schedule+0x64/0x66
> >  [<ffffffffa06a6892>] nfs41_callback_svc+0x100/0x129 [nfsv4]
> >  [<ffffffff8104fdb8>] ? wake_up_bit+0x2a/0x2a
> >  [<ffffffffa06a6792>] ? nfs_callback_up+0x548/0x548 [nfsv4]
> >  [<ffffffff8104f7e0>] kthread+0xb5/0xbd
> >  [<ffffffff8104f72b>] ? kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x65/0x65
> >  [<ffffffff8144912c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
> >  [<ffffffff8104f72b>] ? kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x65/0x65
> > 
> > I read such threads
> > [1] nfs/sunrpc: allow freezing of tasks with NFS calls in flight
> > [2] LOCKDEP: 3.9-rc1: mount.nfs/4272 still has locks held!
> > and then modify nfs41_callback_svc(). It works on my machine. I don't know
> > the details of freezing, so I'm not sure if the modification is reasonable.
> > This is not a formal patch. Thanks.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Yanchuan Nian <ycnian@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/nfs/callback.c |    2 +-
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/nfs/callback.c b/fs/nfs/callback.c
> > index 5088b57..8addb7b 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfs/callback.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfs/callback.c
> > @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ nfs41_callback_svc(void *vrqstp)
> >  				error);
> >  		} else {
> >  			spin_unlock_bh(&serv->sv_cb_lock);
> > -			schedule();
> > +			freezable_schedule();
> >  		}
> >  		finish_wait(&serv->sv_cb_waitq, &wq);
> >  	}
> 
> I think it'd be better to have that thread call try_to_freeze()
> directly instead of doing this. There are some problems with
> freezable_schedule() that still need to be resolved and I suspect that
> it will eventually go away entirely.
> 
> It's may be sufficient to simply call try_to_freeze() at the top of
> the loop, but that would need to be tested.

Thanks, I tried it as follow
echo 'mem' > /sys/power/state
and it works ok. No further tests.
> 
> -- 
> Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Jeff Layton March 25, 2013, 12:01 p.m. UTC | #3
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 17:27:40 +0800
root <ycnian@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 07:40:03AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 10:57:21 +0800
> > ycnian@gmail.com wrote:
> > 
> > > nfsv4.1 client suspending fails with such info
> > > 
> > > Freezing of tasks failed after 20.00 seconds (1 tasks refusing to freeze, wq_busy=0):
> > > nfsv4.1-svc     S ffff88007889f2e0     0  3191      2 0x00000080   
> > >  ffff88007b2f3e28 0000000000000046 ffff88007b2f2010 00000000000127c0
> > >  ffff880079b08000 00000000000127c0 ffff88007b2f3fd8 00000000000127c0
> > >  ffff88007b2f3fd8 00000000000127c0 ffffffff81a14410 ffff880079b08000
> > > Call Trace:
> > >  [<ffffffff81441396>] schedule+0x64/0x66
> > >  [<ffffffffa06a6892>] nfs41_callback_svc+0x100/0x129 [nfsv4]
> > >  [<ffffffff8104fdb8>] ? wake_up_bit+0x2a/0x2a
> > >  [<ffffffffa06a6792>] ? nfs_callback_up+0x548/0x548 [nfsv4]
> > >  [<ffffffff8104f7e0>] kthread+0xb5/0xbd
> > >  [<ffffffff8104f72b>] ? kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x65/0x65
> > >  [<ffffffff8144912c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
> > >  [<ffffffff8104f72b>] ? kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x65/0x65
> > > 
> > > I read such threads
> > > [1] nfs/sunrpc: allow freezing of tasks with NFS calls in flight
> > > [2] LOCKDEP: 3.9-rc1: mount.nfs/4272 still has locks held!
> > > and then modify nfs41_callback_svc(). It works on my machine. I don't know
> > > the details of freezing, so I'm not sure if the modification is reasonable.
> > > This is not a formal patch. Thanks.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Yanchuan Nian <ycnian@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >  fs/nfs/callback.c |    2 +-
> > >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/fs/nfs/callback.c b/fs/nfs/callback.c
> > > index 5088b57..8addb7b 100644
> > > --- a/fs/nfs/callback.c
> > > +++ b/fs/nfs/callback.c
> > > @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ nfs41_callback_svc(void *vrqstp)
> > >  				error);
> > >  		} else {
> > >  			spin_unlock_bh(&serv->sv_cb_lock);
> > > -			schedule();
> > > +			freezable_schedule();
> > >  		}
> > >  		finish_wait(&serv->sv_cb_waitq, &wq);
> > >  	}
> > 
> > I think it'd be better to have that thread call try_to_freeze()
> > directly instead of doing this. There are some problems with
> > freezable_schedule() that still need to be resolved and I suspect that
> > it will eventually go away entirely.
> > 
> > It's may be sufficient to simply call try_to_freeze() at the top of
> > the loop, but that would need to be tested.
> 
> Thanks, I tried it as follow
> echo 'mem' > /sys/power/state
> and it works ok. No further tests.
> > 

I'm a little unclear on what patch you tested...

I just sent one that I think should fix this though. Would you be able
to test it and let me know if it helps?

Thanks,
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/fs/nfs/callback.c b/fs/nfs/callback.c
index 5088b57..8addb7b 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/callback.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/callback.c
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@  nfs41_callback_svc(void *vrqstp)
 				error);
 		} else {
 			spin_unlock_bh(&serv->sv_cb_lock);
-			schedule();
+			freezable_schedule();
 		}
 		finish_wait(&serv->sv_cb_waitq, &wq);
 	}