[v2,3/5] nfs: convert nfs_rename to use async_rename infrastructure

Commit Message

Jeff Layton March 17, 2014, 11:06 a.m. UTC

There isn't much sense in maintaining two separate versions of rename
code. Convert nfs_rename to use the asynchronous rename infrastructure
that nfs_sillyrename uses, and emulate synchronous behavior by having
the task just wait on the reply.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <[e-mail]>
---
 fs/nfs/dir.c | 13 +++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Patch

diff --git a/fs/nfs/dir.c b/fs/nfs/dir.c
index 4a48fe4b84b6..e6f8e2c97653 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/dir.c
@@ -1911,6 +1911,7 @@  int nfs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
 	struct inode *old_inode = old_dentry->d_inode;
 	struct inode *new_inode = new_dentry->d_inode;
 	struct dentry *dentry = NULL, *rehash = NULL;
+	struct rpc_task *task;
 	int error = -EBUSY;
 
 	dfprintk(VFS, "NFS: rename(%pd2 -> %pd2, ct=%d)\n",
@@ -1958,8 +1959,16 @@  int nfs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
 	if (new_inode != NULL)
 		NFS_PROTO(new_inode)->return_delegation(new_inode);
 
-	error = NFS_PROTO(old_dir)->rename(old_dir, &old_dentry->d_name,
-					   new_dir, &new_dentry->d_name);
+	task = nfs_async_rename(old_dir, new_dir, old_dentry, new_dentry, NULL);
+	if (IS_ERR(task)) {
+		error = PTR_ERR(task);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	error = rpc_wait_for_completion_task(task);
+	if (error == 0)
+		error = task->tk_status;
+	rpc_put_task(task);
 	nfs_mark_for_revalidate(old_inode);
 out:
 	if (rehash)