diff mbox

[03/12] afs: Be more aggressive in retiring cached vnodes

Message ID 152287962276.14760.9298205710182682407.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

David Howells April 4, 2018, 10:07 p.m. UTC 
When relinquishing cookies, either due to iget failure or to inode
eviction, retire a cookie if we think the corresponding vnode got deleted
on the server rather than just letting it lie in the cache.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
---

 fs/afs/inode.c |    5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/fs/afs/inode.c b/fs/afs/inode.c
index 42f83fd5a896..c942c79fc5f0 100644
--- a/fs/afs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/afs/inode.c
@@ -327,7 +327,7 @@  struct inode *afs_iget(struct super_block *sb, struct key *key,
 	/* failure */
 bad_inode:
 #ifdef CONFIG_AFS_FSCACHE
-	fscache_relinquish_cookie(vnode->cache, 0);
+	fscache_relinquish_cookie(vnode->cache, ret == -ENOENT);
 	vnode->cache = NULL;
 #endif
 	iget_failed(inode);
@@ -511,7 +511,8 @@  void afs_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
 	}
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_AFS_FSCACHE
-	fscache_relinquish_cookie(vnode->cache, 0);
+	fscache_relinquish_cookie(vnode->cache,
+				  test_bit(AFS_VNODE_DELETED, &vnode->flags));
 	vnode->cache = NULL;
 #endif