From patchwork Tue Feb 12 20:52:17 2013 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "J. Bruce Fields" X-Patchwork-Id: 2131571 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-linux-nfs@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-process-083081@patchwork1.kernel.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by patchwork1.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 659233FCA4 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 20:53:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759238Ab3BLUwX (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2013 15:52:23 -0500 Received: from fieldses.org ([174.143.236.118]:48531 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756483Ab3BLUwT (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2013 15:52:19 -0500 Received: from bfields by fieldses.org with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1U5Mpt-00033U-7q; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 15:52:17 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 15:52:17 -0500 From: "J. Bruce Fields" To: Mark Lord Cc: Stanislav Kinsbursky , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel , =?utf-8?B?UGF3ZcWC?= Sikora , Tom Horsley Subject: Re: BUG at net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c:921 (another one) Message-ID: <20130212205216.GE10267@fieldses.org> References: <50F4D800.5040703@teksavvy.com> <20130115205625.GH4940@fieldses.org> <50F63882.8000607@parallels.com> <50F72F03.5070806@teksavvy.com> <50F786AF.4070107@parallels.com> <20130117130335.GD6598@fieldses.org> <50F7FB7E.2020503@parallels.com> <50F88C14.7030903@teksavvy.com> <50F8DF7E.8080107@parallels.com> <50FC74E0.20305@teksavvy.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50FC74E0.20305@teksavvy.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 05:51:12PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: > Got it again, this time on a different system > running mostly the same software. Mark, Pawe?, Tom, could any of you confirm whether this helps? --b. --- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc.c b/net/sunrpc/svc.c index dbf12ac..2d34b6b 100644 --- a/net/sunrpc/svc.c +++ b/net/sunrpc/svc.c @@ -515,15 +515,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(svc_create_pooled); void svc_shutdown_net(struct svc_serv *serv, struct net *net) { - /* - * The set of xprts (contained in the sv_tempsocks and - * sv_permsocks lists) is now constant, since it is modified - * only by accepting new sockets (done by service threads in - * svc_recv) or aging old ones (done by sv_temptimer), or - * configuration changes (excluded by whatever locking the - * caller is using--nfsd_mutex in the case of nfsd). So it's - * safe to traverse those lists and shut everything down: - */ svc_close_net(serv, net); if (serv->sv_shutdown) diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c index b8e47fa..ca71056 100644 --- a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c +++ b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c @@ -856,7 +856,6 @@ static void svc_age_temp_xprts(unsigned long closure) struct svc_serv *serv = (struct svc_serv *)closure; struct svc_xprt *xprt; struct list_head *le, *next; - LIST_HEAD(to_be_aged); dprintk("svc_age_temp_xprts\n"); @@ -877,25 +876,15 @@ static void svc_age_temp_xprts(unsigned long closure) if (atomic_read(&xprt->xpt_ref.refcount) > 1 || test_bit(XPT_BUSY, &xprt->xpt_flags)) continue; - svc_xprt_get(xprt); - list_move(le, &to_be_aged); + list_del_init(le); set_bit(XPT_CLOSE, &xprt->xpt_flags); set_bit(XPT_DETACHED, &xprt->xpt_flags); - } - spin_unlock_bh(&serv->sv_lock); - - while (!list_empty(&to_be_aged)) { - le = to_be_aged.next; - /* fiddling the xpt_list node is safe 'cos we're XPT_DETACHED */ - list_del_init(le); - xprt = list_entry(le, struct svc_xprt, xpt_list); - dprintk("queuing xprt %p for closing\n", xprt); /* a thread will dequeue and close it soon */ svc_xprt_enqueue(xprt); - svc_xprt_put(xprt); } + spin_unlock_bh(&serv->sv_lock); mod_timer(&serv->sv_temptimer, jiffies + svc_conn_age_period * HZ); } @@ -959,21 +948,24 @@ void svc_close_xprt(struct svc_xprt *xprt) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(svc_close_xprt); -static void svc_close_list(struct svc_serv *serv, struct list_head *xprt_list, struct net *net) +static int svc_close_list(struct svc_serv *serv, struct list_head *xprt_list, struct net *net) { struct svc_xprt *xprt; + int ret = 0; spin_lock(&serv->sv_lock); list_for_each_entry(xprt, xprt_list, xpt_list) { if (xprt->xpt_net != net) continue; + ret++; set_bit(XPT_CLOSE, &xprt->xpt_flags); - set_bit(XPT_BUSY, &xprt->xpt_flags); + svc_xprt_enqueue(xprt); } spin_unlock(&serv->sv_lock); + return ret; } -static void svc_clear_pools(struct svc_serv *serv, struct net *net) +static struct svc_xprt *svc_dequeue_net(struct svc_serv *serv, struct net *net) { struct svc_pool *pool; struct svc_xprt *xprt; @@ -988,42 +980,46 @@ static void svc_clear_pools(struct svc_serv *serv, struct net *net) if (xprt->xpt_net != net) continue; list_del_init(&xprt->xpt_ready); + spin_unlock_bh(&pool->sp_lock); + return xprt; } spin_unlock_bh(&pool->sp_lock); } + return NULL; } -static void svc_clear_list(struct svc_serv *serv, struct list_head *xprt_list, struct net *net) +static void svc_clean_up_xprts(struct svc_serv *serv, struct net *net) { struct svc_xprt *xprt; - struct svc_xprt *tmp; - LIST_HEAD(victims); - - spin_lock(&serv->sv_lock); - list_for_each_entry_safe(xprt, tmp, xprt_list, xpt_list) { - if (xprt->xpt_net != net) - continue; - list_move(&xprt->xpt_list, &victims); - } - spin_unlock(&serv->sv_lock); - list_for_each_entry_safe(xprt, tmp, &victims, xpt_list) + while ((xprt = svc_dequeue_net(serv, net))) { + set_bit(XPT_CLOSE, &xprt->xpt_flags); svc_delete_xprt(xprt); + } } +/* + * Server threads may still be running (especially in the case where the + * service is still running in other network namespaces). + * + * So we shut down sockets the same way we would on a running server, by + * setting XPT_CLOSE, enqueuing, and letting a thread pick it up to do + * the close. In the case there are no such other threads, + * threads running, svc_clean_up_xprts() does a simple version of a + * server's main event loop, and in the case where there are other + * threads, we may need to wait a little while and then check again to + * see if they're done. + */ void svc_close_net(struct svc_serv *serv, struct net *net) { - svc_close_list(serv, &serv->sv_tempsocks, net); - svc_close_list(serv, &serv->sv_permsocks, net); + int delay = 0; - svc_clear_pools(serv, net); - /* - * At this point the sp_sockets lists will stay empty, since - * svc_xprt_enqueue will not add new entries without taking the - * sp_lock and checking XPT_BUSY. - */ - svc_clear_list(serv, &serv->sv_tempsocks, net); - svc_clear_list(serv, &serv->sv_permsocks, net); + while (svc_close_list(serv, &serv->sv_permsocks, net) + + svc_close_list(serv, &serv->sv_tempsocks, net)) { + + svc_clean_up_xprts(serv, net); + msleep(delay++); + } } /*