Message ID | 20151217042734.7581.35502.stgit@noble (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
diff --git a/utils/mount/network.c b/utils/mount/network.c index 8a9bf1476d51..7240ca7bcdc4 100644 --- a/utils/mount/network.c +++ b/utils/mount/network.c @@ -794,6 +794,7 @@ int start_statd(void) if (stat(START_STATD, &stb) == 0) { if (S_ISREG(stb.st_mode) && (stb.st_mode & S_IXUSR)) { int cnt = STATD_TIMEOUT * 10; + int status = 0; const struct timespec ts = { .tv_sec = 0, .tv_nsec = 100000000, @@ -808,7 +809,10 @@ int start_statd(void) progname, strerror(errno)); break; default: /* parent */ - waitpid(pid, NULL,0); + if (waitpid(pid, &status,0) == pid && + status == 0) + /* assume it worked */ + return 1; break; } while (1) {
If DNS service is particularly slow, nfs_probe_statd() can fail even though rpc.statd is actually running. This happens because rpc.statd is single threaded and could be waiting longer for DNS than nfs_probe_statd() will wait for it. This causes problems when mount.nfs uses nfs_probe_statd() to see if statd is running, as is needed for NFSv3. Currently in these circumstances there are two possible outcomes. 1/ if systemd is in use, it will be told to start rpc-statd, which is already running so no change. mount.nfs will try pinging rpc.statd a few more times and could eventually give up and fail the mount. While slow DNS may well result in slow service, it shouldn't cause a mount attempt to fail. 2/ if systemd is not in use, a new rpc.statd will be started. This can (and has) lead to a large number of rpc.statd processes running on the one machine. This patch addresses the first scenario. If START_STATD is run and exits with a success status, mount.nfs assumes statd is running and allows the mount to succeed. A separate patch will address the other scenario. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> --- utils/mount/network.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html