@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
* NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS
* SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
*/
+#include <linux/fs_struct.h>
#include <linux/file.h>
#include <linux/falloc.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
@@ -252,11 +253,13 @@ do_open_lookup(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate, stru
* Note: create modes (UNCHECKED,GUARDED...) are the same
* in NFSv4 as in v3 except EXCLUSIVE4_1.
*/
+ current->fs->umask = open->op_umask;
status = do_nfsd_create(rqstp, current_fh, open->op_fname.data,
open->op_fname.len, &open->op_iattr,
*resfh, open->op_createmode,
(u32 *)open->op_verf.data,
&open->op_truncate, &open->op_created);
+ current->fs->umask = 0;
if (!status && open->op_label.len)
nfsd4_security_inode_setsecctx(*resfh, &open->op_label, open->op_bmval);
@@ -603,6 +606,7 @@ nfsd4_create(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
if (status)
return status;
+ current->fs->umask = create->cr_umask;
switch (create->cr_type) {
case NF4LNK:
status = nfsd_symlink(rqstp, &cstate->current_fh,
@@ -611,20 +615,22 @@ nfsd4_create(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
break;
case NF4BLK:
+ status = nfserr_inval;
rdev = MKDEV(create->cr_specdata1, create->cr_specdata2);
if (MAJOR(rdev) != create->cr_specdata1 ||
MINOR(rdev) != create->cr_specdata2)
- return nfserr_inval;
+ goto out_umask;
status = nfsd_create(rqstp, &cstate->current_fh,
create->cr_name, create->cr_namelen,
&create->cr_iattr, S_IFBLK, rdev, &resfh);
break;
case NF4CHR:
+ status = nfserr_inval;
rdev = MKDEV(create->cr_specdata1, create->cr_specdata2);
if (MAJOR(rdev) != create->cr_specdata1 ||
MINOR(rdev) != create->cr_specdata2)
- return nfserr_inval;
+ goto out_umask;
status = nfsd_create(rqstp, &cstate->current_fh,
create->cr_name, create->cr_namelen,
&create->cr_iattr,S_IFCHR, rdev, &resfh);
@@ -668,6 +674,8 @@ nfsd4_create(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
fh_dup2(&cstate->current_fh, &resfh);
out:
fh_put(&resfh);
+out_umask:
+ current->fs->umask = 0;
return status;
}
@@ -33,7 +33,6 @@
* SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
*/
-#include <linux/fs_struct.h>
#include <linux/file.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/namei.h>
@@ -682,7 +681,7 @@ nfsd4_decode_create(struct nfsd4_compoundargs *argp, struct nfsd4_create *create
status = nfsd4_decode_fattr(argp, create->cr_bmval, &create->cr_iattr,
&create->cr_acl, &create->cr_label,
- ¤t->fs->umask);
+ &create->cr_umask);
if (status)
goto out;
@@ -927,7 +926,6 @@ nfsd4_decode_open(struct nfsd4_compoundargs *argp, struct nfsd4_open *open)
case NFS4_OPEN_NOCREATE:
break;
case NFS4_OPEN_CREATE:
- current->fs->umask = 0;
READ_BUF(4);
open->op_createmode = be32_to_cpup(p++);
switch (open->op_createmode) {
@@ -935,7 +933,7 @@ nfsd4_decode_open(struct nfsd4_compoundargs *argp, struct nfsd4_open *open)
case NFS4_CREATE_GUARDED:
status = nfsd4_decode_fattr(argp, open->op_bmval,
&open->op_iattr, &open->op_acl, &open->op_label,
- ¤t->fs->umask);
+ &open->op_umask);
if (status)
goto out;
break;
@@ -950,7 +948,7 @@ nfsd4_decode_open(struct nfsd4_compoundargs *argp, struct nfsd4_open *open)
COPYMEM(open->op_verf.data, NFS4_VERIFIER_SIZE);
status = nfsd4_decode_fattr(argp, open->op_bmval,
&open->op_iattr, &open->op_acl, &open->op_label,
- ¤t->fs->umask);
+ &open->op_umask);
if (status)
goto out;
break;
@@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ struct nfsd4_create {
} u;
u32 cr_bmval[3]; /* request */
struct iattr cr_iattr; /* request */
+ int cr_umask; /* request */
struct nfsd4_change_info cr_cinfo; /* response */
struct nfs4_acl *cr_acl;
struct xdr_netobj cr_label;
@@ -230,6 +231,7 @@ struct nfsd4_open {
u32 op_why_no_deleg; /* response - DELEG_NONE_EXT only */
u32 op_create; /* request */
u32 op_createmode; /* request */
+ int op_umask; /* request */
u32 op_bmval[3]; /* request */
struct iattr op_iattr; /* UNCHECKED4, GUARDED4, EXCLUSIVE4_1 */
nfs4_verifier op_verf __attribute__((aligned(32)));
This is what I'm planning to apply (pending some testing). --b. commit 880a3a532548 Author: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Date: Wed Mar 21 17:19:02 2018 -0400 nfsd: fix incorrect umasks We're neglecting to clear the umask after it's set, which can cause a later unrelated rpc to (incorrectly) use the same umask if it happens to be processed by the same thread. There's a more subtle problem here too: An NFSv4 compound request is decoded all in one pass before any operations are executed. Currently we're setting current->fs->umask at the time we decode the compound. In theory a single compound could contain multiple creates each setting a umask. In that case we'd end up using whichever umask was passed in the *last* operation as the umask for all the creates, whether that was correct or not. So, we should just be saving the umask at decode time and waiting to set it until we actually process the corresponding operation. In practice it's unlikely any client would do multiple creates in a single compound. And even if it did they'd likely be from the same process (hence carry the same umask). So this is a little academic, but we should get it right anyway. Fixes: 47057abde515 (nfsd: add support for the umask attribute) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Lucash Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html