diff mbox series

NFSD: prevent integer overflow on 32 bit systems

Message ID 20220314140958.GE30883@kili (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series NFSD: prevent integer overflow on 32 bit systems | expand

Commit Message

Dan Carpenter March 14, 2022, 2:09 p.m. UTC
On a 32 bit system, the "len * sizeof(*p)" operation can have an
integer overflow.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
---
It's hard to pick a Fixes tag for this...  The temptation is to say:
Fixes: 37c88763def8 ("NFSv4; Clean up XDR encoding of type bitmap4")
But there were integer overflows in the code before that as well.

 include/linux/sunrpc/xdr.h | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

Comments

Chuck Lever March 14, 2022, 2:45 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Dan-

> On Mar 14, 2022, at 10:09 AM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> On a 32 bit system, the "len * sizeof(*p)" operation can have an
> integer overflow.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> ---
> It's hard to pick a Fixes tag for this...  The temptation is to say:
> Fixes: 37c88763def8 ("NFSv4; Clean up XDR encoding of type bitmap4")
> But there were integer overflows in the code before that as well.
> 
> include/linux/sunrpc/xdr.h | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/xdr.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/xdr.h
> index b519609af1d0..61b92e6b9813 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/xdr.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/xdr.h
> @@ -731,6 +731,8 @@ xdr_stream_decode_uint32_array(struct xdr_stream *xdr,
> 
> 	if (unlikely(xdr_stream_decode_u32(xdr, &len) < 0))
> 		return -EBADMSG;
> +	if (len > ULONG_MAX / sizeof(*p))
> +		return -EBADMSG;

IIUC xdr_inline_decode() returns NULL if the value of
"len * sizeof(p)" is larger than the remaining XDR buffer
size. I don't believe this extra check is necessary.


> 	p = xdr_inline_decode(xdr, len * sizeof(*p));
> 	if (unlikely(!p))
> 		return -EBADMSG;
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 

--
Chuck Lever
Dan Carpenter March 14, 2022, 5:03 p.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 05:45:59PM +0300, Chuck Lever III wrote:
> Hi Dan-
> 
> > On Mar 14, 2022, at 10:09 AM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> wrote:
> > 
> > On a 32 bit system, the "len * sizeof(*p)" operation can have an
> > integer overflow.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> > ---
> > It's hard to pick a Fixes tag for this...  The temptation is to say:
> > Fixes: 37c88763def8 ("NFSv4; Clean up XDR encoding of type bitmap4")
> > But there were integer overflows in the code before that as well.
> > 
> > include/linux/sunrpc/xdr.h | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/xdr.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/xdr.h
> > index b519609af1d0..61b92e6b9813 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/xdr.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/xdr.h
> > @@ -731,6 +731,8 @@ xdr_stream_decode_uint32_array(struct xdr_stream *xdr,
> > 
> > 	if (unlikely(xdr_stream_decode_u32(xdr, &len) < 0))
> > 		return -EBADMSG;
> > +	if (len > ULONG_MAX / sizeof(*p))
> > +		return -EBADMSG;
> 
> IIUC xdr_inline_decode() returns NULL if the value of
> "len * sizeof(p)" is larger than the remaining XDR buffer
> size. I don't believe this extra check is necessary.
> 

Yes, but because of the integer overflow then "len * sizeof(*p))" will
be a very reasonable small number.

regards,
dan carpenter

> 
> > 	p = xdr_inline_decode(xdr, len * sizeof(*p));
> > 	if (unlikely(!p))
> > 		return -EBADMSG;
> > -- 
> > 2.20.1
> > 
> 
> --
> Chuck Lever
> 
>
Chuck Lever March 14, 2022, 6:05 p.m. UTC | #3
> On Mar 14, 2022, at 1:03 PM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 05:45:59PM +0300, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>> Hi Dan-
>> 
>>> On Mar 14, 2022, at 10:09 AM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On a 32 bit system, the "len * sizeof(*p)" operation can have an
>>> integer overflow.
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
>>> ---
>>> It's hard to pick a Fixes tag for this...  The temptation is to say:
>>> Fixes: 37c88763def8 ("NFSv4; Clean up XDR encoding of type bitmap4")
>>> But there were integer overflows in the code before that as well.
>>> 
>>> include/linux/sunrpc/xdr.h | 2 ++
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/xdr.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/xdr.h
>>> index b519609af1d0..61b92e6b9813 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/xdr.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/xdr.h
>>> @@ -731,6 +731,8 @@ xdr_stream_decode_uint32_array(struct xdr_stream *xdr,
>>> 
>>> 	if (unlikely(xdr_stream_decode_u32(xdr, &len) < 0))
>>> 		return -EBADMSG;
>>> +	if (len > ULONG_MAX / sizeof(*p))
>>> +		return -EBADMSG;
>> 
>> IIUC xdr_inline_decode() returns NULL if the value of
>> "len * sizeof(p)" is larger than the remaining XDR buffer
>> size. I don't believe this extra check is necessary.
>> 
> 
> Yes, but because of the integer overflow then "len * sizeof(*p))" will
> be a very reasonable small number.

Got it.


> regards,
> dan carpenter
> 
>> 
>>> 	p = xdr_inline_decode(xdr, len * sizeof(*p));
>>> 	if (unlikely(!p))
>>> 		return -EBADMSG;
>>> -- 
>>> 2.20.1
>>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Chuck Lever

--
Chuck Lever
Trond Myklebust March 14, 2022, 7:25 p.m. UTC | #4
On Mon, 2022-03-14 at 18:05 +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote:
> 
> 
> > On Mar 14, 2022, at 1:03 PM, Dan Carpenter
> > <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 05:45:59PM +0300, Chuck Lever III wrote:
> > > Hi Dan-
> > > 
> > > > On Mar 14, 2022, at 10:09 AM, Dan Carpenter
> > > > <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > On a 32 bit system, the "len * sizeof(*p)" operation can have
> > > > an
> > > > integer overflow.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > It's hard to pick a Fixes tag for this...  The temptation is to
> > > > say:
> > > > Fixes: 37c88763def8 ("NFSv4; Clean up XDR encoding of type
> > > > bitmap4")
> > > > But there were integer overflows in the code before that as
> > > > well.
> > > > 
> > > > include/linux/sunrpc/xdr.h | 2 ++
> > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/xdr.h
> > > > b/include/linux/sunrpc/xdr.h
> > > > index b519609af1d0..61b92e6b9813 100644
> > > > --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/xdr.h
> > > > +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/xdr.h
> > > > @@ -731,6 +731,8 @@ xdr_stream_decode_uint32_array(struct
> > > > xdr_stream *xdr,
> > > > 
> > > >         if (unlikely(xdr_stream_decode_u32(xdr, &len) < 0))
> > > >                 return -EBADMSG;
> > > > +       if (len > ULONG_MAX / sizeof(*p))
> > > > +               return -EBADMSG;
> > > 
> > > IIUC xdr_inline_decode() returns NULL if the value of
> > > "len * sizeof(p)" is larger than the remaining XDR buffer
> > > size. I don't believe this extra check is necessary.
> > > 
> > 
> > Yes, but because of the integer overflow then "len * sizeof(*p))"
> > will
> > be a very reasonable small number.
> 
> Got it.

Shouldn't we technically rather specify SIZE_MAX instead of ULONG_MAX
since xdr_inline_decode() takes a size_t?
kernel test robot March 14, 2022, 7:57 p.m. UTC | #5
Hi Dan,

Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on trondmy-nfs/linux-next]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v5.17-rc8 next-20220310]
[cannot apply to cel-2.6/for-next]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Dan-Carpenter/NFSD-prevent-integer-overflow-on-32-bit-systems/20220314-221126
base:   git://git.linux-nfs.org/projects/trondmy/linux-nfs.git linux-next
config: s390-randconfig-r044-20220314 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220315/202203150321.2NA8SWEv-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 15.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 3e4950d7fa78ac83f33bbf1658e2f49a73719236)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # install s390 cross compiling tool for clang build
        # apt-get install binutils-s390x-linux-gnu
        # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/455f80f80ed34963bae40e552834c7483bcec80a
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Dan-Carpenter/NFSD-prevent-integer-overflow-on-32-bit-systems/20220314-221126
        git checkout 455f80f80ed34963bae40e552834c7483bcec80a
        # save the config file to linux build tree
        mkdir build_dir
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=s390 SHELL=/bin/bash net/ipv4/

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from net/ipv4/ipconfig.c:45:
   In file included from include/linux/inet.h:42:
   In file included from include/net/net_namespace.h:40:
   In file included from include/linux/skbuff.h:31:
   In file included from include/linux/dma-mapping.h:10:
   In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:464:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                             ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:477:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
                                                           ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:37:59: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
   #define __le16_to_cpu(x) __swab16((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
                                                             ^
   include/uapi/linux/swab.h:102:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab16'
   #define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x))
                                                        ^
   In file included from net/ipv4/ipconfig.c:45:
   In file included from include/linux/inet.h:42:
   In file included from include/net/net_namespace.h:40:
   In file included from include/linux/skbuff.h:31:
   In file included from include/linux/dma-mapping.h:10:
   In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:490:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
                                                           ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:35:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
   #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
                                                             ^
   include/uapi/linux/swab.h:115:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
   #define __swab32(x) (__u32)__builtin_bswap32((__u32)(x))
                                                        ^
   In file included from net/ipv4/ipconfig.c:45:
   In file included from include/linux/inet.h:42:
   In file included from include/net/net_namespace.h:40:
   In file included from include/linux/skbuff.h:31:
   In file included from include/linux/dma-mapping.h:10:
   In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:501:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                               ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:511:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                                                         ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:521:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                                                         ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:609:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                  ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:617:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                  ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:625:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                  ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:634:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:643:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:652:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   In file included from net/ipv4/ipconfig.c:59:
   In file included from include/linux/nfs_fs.h:31:
   In file included from include/linux/sunrpc/auth.h:13:
   In file included from include/linux/sunrpc/sched.h:19:
>> include/linux/sunrpc/xdr.h:734:10: warning: result of comparison of constant 4611686018427387903 with expression of type '__u32' (aka 'unsigned int') is always false [-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare]
           if (len > ULONG_MAX / sizeof(*p))
               ~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   13 warnings generated.


vim +734 include/linux/sunrpc/xdr.h

   712	
   713	/**
   714	 * xdr_stream_decode_uint32_array - Decode variable length array of integers
   715	 * @xdr: pointer to xdr_stream
   716	 * @array: location to store the integer array or NULL
   717	 * @array_size: number of elements to store
   718	 *
   719	 * Return values:
   720	 *   On success, returns number of elements stored in @array
   721	 *   %-EBADMSG on XDR buffer overflow
   722	 *   %-EMSGSIZE if the size of the array exceeds @array_size
   723	 */
   724	static inline ssize_t
   725	xdr_stream_decode_uint32_array(struct xdr_stream *xdr,
   726			__u32 *array, size_t array_size)
   727	{
   728		__be32 *p;
   729		__u32 len;
   730		ssize_t retval;
   731	
   732		if (unlikely(xdr_stream_decode_u32(xdr, &len) < 0))
   733			return -EBADMSG;
 > 734		if (len > ULONG_MAX / sizeof(*p))
   735			return -EBADMSG;
   736		p = xdr_inline_decode(xdr, len * sizeof(*p));
   737		if (unlikely(!p))
   738			return -EBADMSG;
   739		if (array == NULL)
   740			return len;
   741		if (len <= array_size) {
   742			if (len < array_size)
   743				memset(array+len, 0, (array_size-len)*sizeof(*array));
   744			array_size = len;
   745			retval = len;
   746		} else
   747			retval = -EMSGSIZE;
   748		for (; array_size > 0; p++, array++, array_size--)
   749			*array = be32_to_cpup(p);
   750		return retval;
   751	}
   752	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Dan Carpenter March 15, 2022, 3:40 p.m. UTC | #6
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 03:57:36AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>    In file included from net/ipv4/ipconfig.c:59:
>    In file included from include/linux/nfs_fs.h:31:
>    In file included from include/linux/sunrpc/auth.h:13:
>    In file included from include/linux/sunrpc/sched.h:19:
> >> include/linux/sunrpc/xdr.h:734:10: warning: result of comparison of constant 4611686018427387903 with expression of type '__u32' (aka 'unsigned int') is always false [-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare]
>            if (len > ULONG_MAX / sizeof(*p))
>                ~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Smatch also wanted to send this warning.  I am testing a fix to silence
this warning in Smatch.  It looks for an some_int > some_expression
where some_expression has ULONG_MAX on the far left hand side of the
binop.  Because the some_expression always starts with ULONG_MAX and
then divides it and/or subtracts from it to get the max.

regards,
dan carpenter
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/xdr.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/xdr.h
index b519609af1d0..61b92e6b9813 100644
--- a/include/linux/sunrpc/xdr.h
+++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/xdr.h
@@ -731,6 +731,8 @@  xdr_stream_decode_uint32_array(struct xdr_stream *xdr,
 
 	if (unlikely(xdr_stream_decode_u32(xdr, &len) < 0))
 		return -EBADMSG;
+	if (len > ULONG_MAX / sizeof(*p))
+		return -EBADMSG;
 	p = xdr_inline_decode(xdr, len * sizeof(*p));
 	if (unlikely(!p))
 		return -EBADMSG;