diff mbox series

[RFC] nfsd: set security label during create operations

Message ID 20240502175818.21890-1-stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [RFC] nfsd: set security label during create operations | expand

Commit Message

Stephen Smalley May 2, 2024, 5:58 p.m. UTC
When security labeling is enabled, the client can pass a file security
label as part of a create operation for the new file, similar to mode
and other attributes. At present, the security label is received by nfsd
and passed down to nfsd_create_setattr(), but nfsd_setattr() is never
called and therefore the label is never set on the new file. I couldn't
tell if this has always been broken or broke at some point in time. Looking
at nfsd_setattr() I am uncertain as to whether the same issue presents for
file ACLs and therefore requires a similar fix for those. I am not overly
confident that this is the right solution.

An alternative approach would be to introduce a new LSM hook to set the
"create SID" of the current task prior to the actual file creation, which
would atomically label the new inode at creation time. This would be better
for SELinux and a similar approach has been used previously
(see security_dentry_create_files_as) but perhaps not usable by other LSMs.

Reproducer:
1. Install a Linux distro with SELinux - Fedora is easiest
2. git clone https://github.com/SELinuxProject/selinux-testsuite
3. Install the requisite dependencies per selinux-testsuite/README.md
4. Run something like the following script:
MOUNT=$HOME/selinux-testsuite
sudo systemctl start nfs-server
sudo exportfs -o rw,no_root_squash,security_label localhost:$MOUNT
sudo mkdir -p /mnt/selinux-testsuite
sudo mount -t nfs -o vers=4.2 localhost:$MOUNT /mnt/selinux-testsuite
pushd /mnt/selinux-testsuite/
sudo make -C policy load
pushd tests/filesystem
sudo runcon -t test_filesystem_t ./create_file -f trans_test_file \
	-e test_filesystem_filetranscon_t -v
sudo rm -f trans_test_file
popd
sudo make -C policy unload
popd
sudo umount /mnt/selinux-testsuite
sudo exportfs -u localhost:$MOUNT
sudo rmdir /mnt/selinux-testsuite
sudo systemctl stop nfs-server

Expected output:
<eliding noise from commands run prior to or after the test itself>
Process context:
	unconfined_u:unconfined_r:test_filesystem_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
Created file: trans_test_file
File context: unconfined_u:object_r:test_filesystem_filetranscon_t:s0
File context is correct

Actual output:
<eliding noise from commands run prior to or after the test itself>
Process context:
	unconfined_u:unconfined_r:test_filesystem_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
Created file: trans_test_file
File context: system_u:object_r:test_file_t:s0
File context error, expected:
	test_filesystem_filetranscon_t
got:
	test_file_t

Signed-off-by: Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com>
---
 fs/nfsd/vfs.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Jeff Layton May 2, 2024, 6:28 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, 2024-05-02 at 13:58 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> When security labeling is enabled, the client can pass a file security
> label as part of a create operation for the new file, similar to mode
> and other attributes. At present, the security label is received by nfsd
> and passed down to nfsd_create_setattr(), but nfsd_setattr() is never
> called and therefore the label is never set on the new file. I couldn't
> tell if this has always been broken or broke at some point in time. Looking
> at nfsd_setattr() I am uncertain as to whether the same issue presents for
> file ACLs and therefore requires a similar fix for those. I am not overly
> confident that this is the right solution.
> 

Nice catch. I think you're correct on file ACLs too.

We're probably saved in many cases by the fact that clients usually
send ACLs and seclabels alongside other attributes during a create.
Obviously, that's not _always_ the case though.

> An alternative approach would be to introduce a new LSM hook to set the
> "create SID" of the current task prior to the actual file creation, which
> would atomically label the new inode at creation time. This would be better
> for SELinux and a similar approach has been used previously
> (see security_dentry_create_files_as) but perhaps not usable by other LSMs.
> 
> Reproducer:
> 1. Install a Linux distro with SELinux - Fedora is easiest
> 2. git clone https://github.com/SELinuxProject/selinux-testsuite
> 3. Install the requisite dependencies per selinux-testsuite/README.md
> 4. Run something like the following script:
> MOUNT=$HOME/selinux-testsuite
> sudo systemctl start nfs-server
> sudo exportfs -o rw,no_root_squash,security_label localhost:$MOUNT
> sudo mkdir -p /mnt/selinux-testsuite
> sudo mount -t nfs -o vers=4.2 localhost:$MOUNT /mnt/selinux-testsuite
> pushd /mnt/selinux-testsuite/
> sudo make -C policy load
> pushd tests/filesystem
> sudo runcon -t test_filesystem_t ./create_file -f trans_test_file \
> 	-e test_filesystem_filetranscon_t -v
> sudo rm -f trans_test_file
> popd
> sudo make -C policy unload
> popd
> sudo umount /mnt/selinux-testsuite
> sudo exportfs -u localhost:$MOUNT
> sudo rmdir /mnt/selinux-testsuite
> sudo systemctl stop nfs-server
> 
> Expected output:
> <eliding noise from commands run prior to or after the test itself>
> Process context:
> 	unconfined_u:unconfined_r:test_filesystem_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
> Created file: trans_test_file
> File context: unconfined_u:object_r:test_filesystem_filetranscon_t:s0
> File context is correct
> 
> Actual output:
> <eliding noise from commands run prior to or after the test itself>
> Process context:
> 	unconfined_u:unconfined_r:test_filesystem_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
> Created file: trans_test_file
> File context: system_u:object_r:test_file_t:s0
> File context error, expected:
> 	test_filesystem_filetranscon_t
> got:
> 	test_file_t
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com>
> ---
>  fs/nfsd/vfs.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> index 2e41eb4c3cec..9b777ea7ef26 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
> @@ -1422,7 +1422,7 @@ nfsd_create_setattr(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp,
>  	 * Callers expect new file metadata to be committed even
>  	 * if the attributes have not changed.
>  	 */
> -	if (iap->ia_valid)
> +	if (iap->ia_valid || (attrs->na_seclabel && attrs->na_seclabel->len))
>  		status = nfsd_setattr(rqstp, resfhp, attrs, NULL);
>  	else
>  		status = nfserrno(commit_metadata(resfhp));

This looks like the right approach to me, but can we instead add a
nfsd_attrs_valid() helper function that checks ia_valid and does the
test above?

Then we can add similar tests for ACLs to it later, once we do a bit
more investigation.

Thanks,
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
index 2e41eb4c3cec..9b777ea7ef26 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
@@ -1422,7 +1422,7 @@  nfsd_create_setattr(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp,
 	 * Callers expect new file metadata to be committed even
 	 * if the attributes have not changed.
 	 */
-	if (iap->ia_valid)
+	if (iap->ia_valid || (attrs->na_seclabel && attrs->na_seclabel->len))
 		status = nfsd_setattr(rqstp, resfhp, attrs, NULL);
 	else
 		status = nfserrno(commit_metadata(resfhp));