Message ID | CA+a=Yy78jFNm+fqmX9FeK5MivT4A3homrV2=ZQLHgzusZZ0x+Q@mail.gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 01:45:29AM +0800, Peng Tao wrote: > After fixing common.rc, "./check -nfs" can run but failed and stopped > at case 088. Both pnfs block and NFSv4 failed at the same case. Did > anyone run xfstests over NFSv4 before? I'm wondering whether it is a > regression or if case 088 is valid for NFSv4. I've only tested it on NFSv3, and can't remember 088 failing. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--- 088.out 2011-07-29 07:33:58.180218573 -0400 +++ 088.out.bad 2011-07-29 08:50:55.242319901 -0400 @@ -1,9 +1,2 @@ QA output created by 088 -access(TEST_DIR/t_access, 0) returns 0 -access(TEST_DIR/t_access, R_OK) returns 0 -access(TEST_DIR/t_access, W_OK) returns 0 -access(TEST_DIR/t_access, X_OK) returns -1 -access(TEST_DIR/t_access, R_OK | W_OK) returns 0 -access(TEST_DIR/t_access, R_OK | X_OK) returns -1 -access(TEST_DIR/t_access, W_OK | X_OK) returns -1 -access(TEST_DIR/t_access, R_OK | W_OK | X_OK) returns -1 +fchown: Invalid argument