Message ID | 20190809225833.6657-13-ira.weiny@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | RDMA/FS DAX truncate proposal V1,000,002 ;-) | expand |
On 8/9/19 3:58 PM, ira.weiny@intel.com wrote: > From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> > > Once callers start to use vaddr_pin the put_user_pages calls will need > to have access to this data coming in. Prep put_user_pages() for this > data. > > Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> > --- > include/linux/mm.h | 20 +------- > mm/gup.c | 122 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- > 2 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h > index befe150d17be..9d37cafbef9a 100644 > --- a/include/linux/mm.h > +++ b/include/linux/mm.h > @@ -1064,25 +1064,7 @@ static inline void put_page(struct page *page) > __put_page(page); > } > > -/** > - * put_user_page() - release a gup-pinned page > - * @page: pointer to page to be released > - * > - * Pages that were pinned via get_user_pages*() must be released via > - * either put_user_page(), or one of the put_user_pages*() routines > - * below. This is so that eventually, pages that are pinned via > - * get_user_pages*() can be separately tracked and uniquely handled. In > - * particular, interactions with RDMA and filesystems need special > - * handling. > - * > - * put_user_page() and put_page() are not interchangeable, despite this early > - * implementation that makes them look the same. put_user_page() calls must > - * be perfectly matched up with get_user_page() calls. > - */ > -static inline void put_user_page(struct page *page) > -{ > - put_page(page); > -} > +void put_user_page(struct page *page); > > void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages, > bool make_dirty); > diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c > index a7a9d2f5278c..10cfd30ff668 100644 > --- a/mm/gup.c > +++ b/mm/gup.c > @@ -24,30 +24,41 @@ > > #include "internal.h" > > -/** > - * put_user_pages_dirty_lock() - release and optionally dirty gup-pinned pages > - * @pages: array of pages to be maybe marked dirty, and definitely released. A couple comments from our circular review chain: some fellow with the same last name as you, recommended wording it like this: @pages: array of pages to be put > - * @npages: number of pages in the @pages array. > - * @make_dirty: whether to mark the pages dirty > - * > - * "gup-pinned page" refers to a page that has had one of the get_user_pages() > - * variants called on that page. > - * > - * For each page in the @pages array, make that page (or its head page, if a > - * compound page) dirty, if @make_dirty is true, and if the page was previously > - * listed as clean. In any case, releases all pages using put_user_page(), > - * possibly via put_user_pages(), for the non-dirty case. > - * > - * Please see the put_user_page() documentation for details. > - * > - * set_page_dirty_lock() is used internally. If instead, set_page_dirty() is > - * required, then the caller should a) verify that this is really correct, > - * because _lock() is usually required, and b) hand code it: > - * set_page_dirty_lock(), put_user_page(). > - * > - */ > -void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages, > - bool make_dirty) > +static void __put_user_page(struct vaddr_pin *vaddr_pin, struct page *page) > +{ > + page = compound_head(page); > + > + /* > + * For devmap managed pages we need to catch refcount transition from > + * GUP_PIN_COUNTING_BIAS to 1, when refcount reach one it means the > + * page is free and we need to inform the device driver through > + * callback. See include/linux/memremap.h and HMM for details. > + */ > + if (put_devmap_managed_page(page)) > + return; > + > + if (put_page_testzero(page)) > + __put_page(page); > +} > + > +static void __put_user_pages(struct vaddr_pin *vaddr_pin, struct page **pages, > + unsigned long npages) > +{ > + unsigned long index; > + > + /* > + * TODO: this can be optimized for huge pages: if a series of pages is > + * physically contiguous and part of the same compound page, then a > + * single operation to the head page should suffice. > + */ As discussed in the other review thread (""), let's just delete that comment, as long as you're moving things around. > + for (index = 0; index < npages; index++) > + __put_user_page(vaddr_pin, pages[index]); > +} > + > +static void __put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct vaddr_pin *vaddr_pin, > + struct page **pages, > + unsigned long npages, > + bool make_dirty) Elsewhere in this series, we pass vaddr_pin at the end of the arg list. Here we pass it at the beginning, and it caused a minor jar when reading it. Obviously just bike shedding at this point, though. Either way. :) > { > unsigned long index; > > @@ -58,7 +69,7 @@ void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages, > */ > > if (!make_dirty) { > - put_user_pages(pages, npages); > + __put_user_pages(vaddr_pin, pages, npages); > return; > } > > @@ -86,9 +97,58 @@ void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages, > */ > if (!PageDirty(page)) > set_page_dirty_lock(page); > - put_user_page(page); > + __put_user_page(vaddr_pin, page); > } > } > + > +/** > + * put_user_page() - release a gup-pinned page > + * @page: pointer to page to be released > + * > + * Pages that were pinned via get_user_pages*() must be released via > + * either put_user_page(), or one of the put_user_pages*() routines > + * below. This is so that eventually, pages that are pinned via > + * get_user_pages*() can be separately tracked and uniquely handled. In > + * particular, interactions with RDMA and filesystems need special > + * handling. > + * > + * put_user_page() and put_page() are not interchangeable, despite this early > + * implementation that makes them look the same. put_user_page() calls must > + * be perfectly matched up with get_user_page() calls. > + */ > +void put_user_page(struct page *page) > +{ > + __put_user_page(NULL, page); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_user_page); > + > +/** > + * put_user_pages_dirty_lock() - release and optionally dirty gup-pinned pages > + * @pages: array of pages to be maybe marked dirty, and definitely released. Same here: @pages: array of pages to be put > + * @npages: number of pages in the @pages array. > + * @make_dirty: whether to mark the pages dirty > + * > + * "gup-pinned page" refers to a page that has had one of the get_user_pages() > + * variants called on that page. > + * > + * For each page in the @pages array, make that page (or its head page, if a > + * compound page) dirty, if @make_dirty is true, and if the page was previously > + * listed as clean. In any case, releases all pages using put_user_page(), > + * possibly via put_user_pages(), for the non-dirty case. > + * > + * Please see the put_user_page() documentation for details. > + * > + * set_page_dirty_lock() is used internally. If instead, set_page_dirty() is > + * required, then the caller should a) verify that this is really correct, > + * because _lock() is usually required, and b) hand code it: > + * set_page_dirty_lock(), put_user_page(). > + * > + */ > +void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages, > + bool make_dirty) > +{ > + __put_user_pages_dirty_lock(NULL, pages, npages, make_dirty); > +} > EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_user_pages_dirty_lock); > > /** > @@ -102,15 +162,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_user_pages_dirty_lock); > */ > void put_user_pages(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages) > { > - unsigned long index; > - > - /* > - * TODO: this can be optimized for huge pages: if a series of pages is > - * physically contiguous and part of the same compound page, then a > - * single operation to the head page should suffice. > - */ > - for (index = 0; index < npages; index++) > - put_user_page(pages[index]); > + __put_user_pages(NULL, pages, npages); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_user_pages); > > This all looks pretty good, so regardless of the outcome of the minor points above, Reviewed-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> thanks,
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 05:30:00PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote: > On 8/9/19 3:58 PM, ira.weiny@intel.com wrote: > > From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> > > > > Once callers start to use vaddr_pin the put_user_pages calls will need > > to have access to this data coming in. Prep put_user_pages() for this > > data. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> [snip] > > diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c > > index a7a9d2f5278c..10cfd30ff668 100644 > > --- a/mm/gup.c > > +++ b/mm/gup.c > > @@ -24,30 +24,41 @@ > > > > #include "internal.h" > > > > -/** > > - * put_user_pages_dirty_lock() - release and optionally dirty gup-pinned pages > > - * @pages: array of pages to be maybe marked dirty, and definitely released. > > A couple comments from our circular review chain: some fellow with the same > last name as you, recommended wording it like this: > > @pages: array of pages to be put Sure, see below... > > > - * @npages: number of pages in the @pages array. > > - * @make_dirty: whether to mark the pages dirty > > - * > > - * "gup-pinned page" refers to a page that has had one of the get_user_pages() > > - * variants called on that page. > > - * > > - * For each page in the @pages array, make that page (or its head page, if a > > - * compound page) dirty, if @make_dirty is true, and if the page was previously > > - * listed as clean. In any case, releases all pages using put_user_page(), > > - * possibly via put_user_pages(), for the non-dirty case. > > - * > > - * Please see the put_user_page() documentation for details. > > - * > > - * set_page_dirty_lock() is used internally. If instead, set_page_dirty() is > > - * required, then the caller should a) verify that this is really correct, > > - * because _lock() is usually required, and b) hand code it: > > - * set_page_dirty_lock(), put_user_page(). > > - * > > - */ > > -void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages, > > - bool make_dirty) > > +static void __put_user_page(struct vaddr_pin *vaddr_pin, struct page *page) > > +{ > > + page = compound_head(page); > > + > > + /* > > + * For devmap managed pages we need to catch refcount transition from > > + * GUP_PIN_COUNTING_BIAS to 1, when refcount reach one it means the > > + * page is free and we need to inform the device driver through > > + * callback. See include/linux/memremap.h and HMM for details. > > + */ > > + if (put_devmap_managed_page(page)) > > + return; > > + > > + if (put_page_testzero(page)) > > + __put_page(page); > > +} > > + > > +static void __put_user_pages(struct vaddr_pin *vaddr_pin, struct page **pages, > > + unsigned long npages) > > +{ > > + unsigned long index; > > + > > + /* > > + * TODO: this can be optimized for huge pages: if a series of pages is > > + * physically contiguous and part of the same compound page, then a > > + * single operation to the head page should suffice. > > + */ > > As discussed in the other review thread (""), let's just delete that comment, > as long as you're moving things around. Done. > > > > + for (index = 0; index < npages; index++) > > + __put_user_page(vaddr_pin, pages[index]); > > +} > > + > > +static void __put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct vaddr_pin *vaddr_pin, > > + struct page **pages, > > + unsigned long npages, > > + bool make_dirty) > > Elsewhere in this series, we pass vaddr_pin at the end of the arg list. > Here we pass it at the beginning, and it caused a minor jar when reading it. > Obviously just bike shedding at this point, though. Either way. :) Yea I guess that is odd... I changed it. Not a big deal. > > > { > > unsigned long index; > > > > @@ -58,7 +69,7 @@ void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages, > > */ > > > > if (!make_dirty) { > > - put_user_pages(pages, npages); > > + __put_user_pages(vaddr_pin, pages, npages); > > return; > > } > > > > @@ -86,9 +97,58 @@ void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages, > > */ > > if (!PageDirty(page)) > > set_page_dirty_lock(page); > > - put_user_page(page); > > + __put_user_page(vaddr_pin, page); > > } > > } > > + > > +/** > > + * put_user_page() - release a gup-pinned page > > + * @page: pointer to page to be released > > + * > > + * Pages that were pinned via get_user_pages*() must be released via > > + * either put_user_page(), or one of the put_user_pages*() routines > > + * below. This is so that eventually, pages that are pinned via > > + * get_user_pages*() can be separately tracked and uniquely handled. In > > + * particular, interactions with RDMA and filesystems need special > > + * handling. > > + * > > + * put_user_page() and put_page() are not interchangeable, despite this early > > + * implementation that makes them look the same. put_user_page() calls must > > + * be perfectly matched up with get_user_page() calls. > > + */ > > +void put_user_page(struct page *page) > > +{ > > + __put_user_page(NULL, page); > > +} > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_user_page); > > + > > +/** > > + * put_user_pages_dirty_lock() - release and optionally dirty gup-pinned pages > > + * @pages: array of pages to be maybe marked dirty, and definitely released. > > Same here: > > @pages: array of pages to be put Actually here is the only place. Above was removing the text to be put here... Done -- I'll made a lead in patch because this was just copied text. > > > + * @npages: number of pages in the @pages array. > > + * @make_dirty: whether to mark the pages dirty > > + * > > + * "gup-pinned page" refers to a page that has had one of the get_user_pages() > > + * variants called on that page. > > + * > > + * For each page in the @pages array, make that page (or its head page, if a > > + * compound page) dirty, if @make_dirty is true, and if the page was previously > > + * listed as clean. In any case, releases all pages using put_user_page(), > > + * possibly via put_user_pages(), for the non-dirty case. > > + * > > + * Please see the put_user_page() documentation for details. > > + * > > + * set_page_dirty_lock() is used internally. If instead, set_page_dirty() is > > + * required, then the caller should a) verify that this is really correct, > > + * because _lock() is usually required, and b) hand code it: > > + * set_page_dirty_lock(), put_user_page(). > > + * > > + */ > > +void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages, > > + bool make_dirty) > > +{ > > + __put_user_pages_dirty_lock(NULL, pages, npages, make_dirty); > > +} > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_user_pages_dirty_lock); > > > > /** > > @@ -102,15 +162,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_user_pages_dirty_lock); > > */ > > void put_user_pages(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages) > > { > > - unsigned long index; > > - > > - /* > > - * TODO: this can be optimized for huge pages: if a series of pages is > > - * physically contiguous and part of the same compound page, then a > > - * single operation to the head page should suffice. > > - */ > > - for (index = 0; index < npages; index++) > > - put_user_page(pages[index]); > > + __put_user_pages(NULL, pages, npages); > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_user_pages); > > > > > > This all looks pretty good, so regardless of the outcome of the minor > points above, > > Reviewed-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Thanks, Ira > > > thanks, > -- > John Hubbard > NVIDIA
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h index befe150d17be..9d37cafbef9a 100644 --- a/include/linux/mm.h +++ b/include/linux/mm.h @@ -1064,25 +1064,7 @@ static inline void put_page(struct page *page) __put_page(page); } -/** - * put_user_page() - release a gup-pinned page - * @page: pointer to page to be released - * - * Pages that were pinned via get_user_pages*() must be released via - * either put_user_page(), or one of the put_user_pages*() routines - * below. This is so that eventually, pages that are pinned via - * get_user_pages*() can be separately tracked and uniquely handled. In - * particular, interactions with RDMA and filesystems need special - * handling. - * - * put_user_page() and put_page() are not interchangeable, despite this early - * implementation that makes them look the same. put_user_page() calls must - * be perfectly matched up with get_user_page() calls. - */ -static inline void put_user_page(struct page *page) -{ - put_page(page); -} +void put_user_page(struct page *page); void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages, bool make_dirty); diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c index a7a9d2f5278c..10cfd30ff668 100644 --- a/mm/gup.c +++ b/mm/gup.c @@ -24,30 +24,41 @@ #include "internal.h" -/** - * put_user_pages_dirty_lock() - release and optionally dirty gup-pinned pages - * @pages: array of pages to be maybe marked dirty, and definitely released. - * @npages: number of pages in the @pages array. - * @make_dirty: whether to mark the pages dirty - * - * "gup-pinned page" refers to a page that has had one of the get_user_pages() - * variants called on that page. - * - * For each page in the @pages array, make that page (or its head page, if a - * compound page) dirty, if @make_dirty is true, and if the page was previously - * listed as clean. In any case, releases all pages using put_user_page(), - * possibly via put_user_pages(), for the non-dirty case. - * - * Please see the put_user_page() documentation for details. - * - * set_page_dirty_lock() is used internally. If instead, set_page_dirty() is - * required, then the caller should a) verify that this is really correct, - * because _lock() is usually required, and b) hand code it: - * set_page_dirty_lock(), put_user_page(). - * - */ -void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages, - bool make_dirty) +static void __put_user_page(struct vaddr_pin *vaddr_pin, struct page *page) +{ + page = compound_head(page); + + /* + * For devmap managed pages we need to catch refcount transition from + * GUP_PIN_COUNTING_BIAS to 1, when refcount reach one it means the + * page is free and we need to inform the device driver through + * callback. See include/linux/memremap.h and HMM for details. + */ + if (put_devmap_managed_page(page)) + return; + + if (put_page_testzero(page)) + __put_page(page); +} + +static void __put_user_pages(struct vaddr_pin *vaddr_pin, struct page **pages, + unsigned long npages) +{ + unsigned long index; + + /* + * TODO: this can be optimized for huge pages: if a series of pages is + * physically contiguous and part of the same compound page, then a + * single operation to the head page should suffice. + */ + for (index = 0; index < npages; index++) + __put_user_page(vaddr_pin, pages[index]); +} + +static void __put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct vaddr_pin *vaddr_pin, + struct page **pages, + unsigned long npages, + bool make_dirty) { unsigned long index; @@ -58,7 +69,7 @@ void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages, */ if (!make_dirty) { - put_user_pages(pages, npages); + __put_user_pages(vaddr_pin, pages, npages); return; } @@ -86,9 +97,58 @@ void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages, */ if (!PageDirty(page)) set_page_dirty_lock(page); - put_user_page(page); + __put_user_page(vaddr_pin, page); } } + +/** + * put_user_page() - release a gup-pinned page + * @page: pointer to page to be released + * + * Pages that were pinned via get_user_pages*() must be released via + * either put_user_page(), or one of the put_user_pages*() routines + * below. This is so that eventually, pages that are pinned via + * get_user_pages*() can be separately tracked and uniquely handled. In + * particular, interactions with RDMA and filesystems need special + * handling. + * + * put_user_page() and put_page() are not interchangeable, despite this early + * implementation that makes them look the same. put_user_page() calls must + * be perfectly matched up with get_user_page() calls. + */ +void put_user_page(struct page *page) +{ + __put_user_page(NULL, page); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_user_page); + +/** + * put_user_pages_dirty_lock() - release and optionally dirty gup-pinned pages + * @pages: array of pages to be maybe marked dirty, and definitely released. + * @npages: number of pages in the @pages array. + * @make_dirty: whether to mark the pages dirty + * + * "gup-pinned page" refers to a page that has had one of the get_user_pages() + * variants called on that page. + * + * For each page in the @pages array, make that page (or its head page, if a + * compound page) dirty, if @make_dirty is true, and if the page was previously + * listed as clean. In any case, releases all pages using put_user_page(), + * possibly via put_user_pages(), for the non-dirty case. + * + * Please see the put_user_page() documentation for details. + * + * set_page_dirty_lock() is used internally. If instead, set_page_dirty() is + * required, then the caller should a) verify that this is really correct, + * because _lock() is usually required, and b) hand code it: + * set_page_dirty_lock(), put_user_page(). + * + */ +void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages, + bool make_dirty) +{ + __put_user_pages_dirty_lock(NULL, pages, npages, make_dirty); +} EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_user_pages_dirty_lock); /** @@ -102,15 +162,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_user_pages_dirty_lock); */ void put_user_pages(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages) { - unsigned long index; - - /* - * TODO: this can be optimized for huge pages: if a series of pages is - * physically contiguous and part of the same compound page, then a - * single operation to the head page should suffice. - */ - for (index = 0; index < npages; index++) - put_user_page(pages[index]); + __put_user_pages(NULL, pages, npages); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_user_pages);