Message ID | 20200221032720.33893-7-alastair@au1.ibm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Add support for OpenCAPI Persistent Memory devices | expand |
On 21/2/20 2:26 pm, Alastair D'Silva wrote: > From: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@d-silva.org> > > Tally up the LPC memory on an OpenCAPI link & allow it to be mapped > > Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@d-silva.org> This commit message is a bit short and could do with some further explanation. In particular - it's worth explaining why the tracking of available LPC memory needs to be done at a link level, because a single OpenCAPI card can have multiple PCI functions, each with multiple AFUs which define an amount of LPC memory they have, even if the common case is expected to be a single function with a single AFU and thus one LPC area per link. Snowpatch has a few checkpatch issues to report: https://openpower.xyz/job/snowpatch/job/snowpatch-linux-checkpatch/11800//artifact/linux/checkpatch.log The code generally looks okay to me. > diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h b/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h > index 198e4e4bc51d..d0c8c4838f42 100644 > --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h > +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h > @@ -142,4 +142,37 @@ int ocxl_irq_offset_to_id(struct ocxl_context *ctx, u64 offset); > u64 ocxl_irq_id_to_offset(struct ocxl_context *ctx, int irq_id); > void ocxl_afu_irq_free_all(struct ocxl_context *ctx); > > +/** > + * ocxl_link_add_lpc_mem() - Increment the amount of memory required by an OpenCAPI link > + * > + * @link_handle: The OpenCAPI link handle > + * @offset: The offset of the memory to add > + * @size: The amount of memory to increment by > + * > + * Returns 0 on success, negative on overflow > + */ I think "amount of memory required" isn't the best way to express this. Might as well explicitly say -EINVAL on overflow.
On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 16:25 +1100, Andrew Donnellan wrote: > On 21/2/20 2:26 pm, Alastair D'Silva wrote: > > From: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@d-silva.org> > > > > Tally up the LPC memory on an OpenCAPI link & allow it to be mapped > > > > Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@d-silva.org> > > This commit message is a bit short and could do with some further > explanation. > > In particular - it's worth explaining why the tracking of available > LPC > memory needs to be done at a link level, because a single OpenCAPI > card > can have multiple PCI functions, each with multiple AFUs which define > an > amount of LPC memory they have, even if the common case is expected > to > be a single function with a single AFU and thus one LPC area per > link. Ok > > Snowpatch has a few checkpatch issues to report: > > https://openpower.xyz/job/snowpatch/job/snowpatch-linux-checkpatch/11800//artifact/linux/checkpatch.log > Gah, I could have sworn I ran checkpatch against this :/ > The code generally looks okay to me. > > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h > > b/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h > > index 198e4e4bc51d..d0c8c4838f42 100644 > > --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h > > +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h > > @@ -142,4 +142,37 @@ int ocxl_irq_offset_to_id(struct ocxl_context > > *ctx, u64 offset); > > u64 ocxl_irq_id_to_offset(struct ocxl_context *ctx, int irq_id); > > void ocxl_afu_irq_free_all(struct ocxl_context *ctx); > > > > +/** > > + * ocxl_link_add_lpc_mem() - Increment the amount of memory > > required by an OpenCAPI link > > + * > > + * @link_handle: The OpenCAPI link handle > > + * @offset: The offset of the memory to add > > + * @size: The amount of memory to increment by > > + * > > + * Returns 0 on success, negative on overflow > > + */ > > I think "amount of memory required" isn't the best way to express > this. > > Might as well explicitly say -EINVAL on overflow. > Ok
Le 21/02/2020 à 04:26, Alastair D'Silva a écrit : > From: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@d-silva.org> > > Tally up the LPC memory on an OpenCAPI link & allow it to be mapped > > Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@d-silva.org> > --- > drivers/misc/ocxl/core.c | 10 ++++++ > drivers/misc/ocxl/link.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h | 33 +++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 96 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/core.c b/drivers/misc/ocxl/core.c > index b7a09b21ab36..2531c6cf19a0 100644 > --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/core.c > +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/core.c > @@ -230,8 +230,18 @@ static int configure_afu(struct ocxl_afu *afu, u8 afu_idx, struct pci_dev *dev) > if (rc) > goto err_free_pasid; > > + if (afu->config.lpc_mem_size || afu->config.special_purpose_mem_size) { > + rc = ocxl_link_add_lpc_mem(afu->fn->link, afu->config.lpc_mem_offset, > + afu->config.lpc_mem_size + > + afu->config.special_purpose_mem_size); > + if (rc) > + goto err_free_mmio; > + } > + > return 0; > > +err_free_mmio: > + unmap_mmio_areas(afu); > err_free_pasid: > reclaim_afu_pasid(afu); > err_free_actag: > diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/link.c b/drivers/misc/ocxl/link.c > index 58d111afd9f6..1e039cc5ebe5 100644 > --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/link.c > +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/link.c > @@ -84,6 +84,11 @@ struct ocxl_link { > int dev; > atomic_t irq_available; > struct spa *spa; > + struct mutex lpc_mem_lock; /* protects lpc_mem & lpc_mem_sz */ > + u64 lpc_mem_sz; /* Total amount of LPC memory presented on the link */ > + u64 lpc_mem; > + int lpc_consumers; > + > void *platform_data; > }; > static struct list_head links_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(links_list); > @@ -396,6 +401,8 @@ static int alloc_link(struct pci_dev *dev, int PE_mask, struct ocxl_link **out_l > if (rc) > goto err_spa; > > + mutex_init(&link->lpc_mem_lock); > + > /* platform specific hook */ > rc = pnv_ocxl_spa_setup(dev, link->spa->spa_mem, PE_mask, > &link->platform_data); > @@ -711,3 +718,49 @@ void ocxl_link_free_irq(void *link_handle, int hw_irq) > atomic_inc(&link->irq_available); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ocxl_link_free_irq); > + > +int ocxl_link_add_lpc_mem(void *link_handle, u64 offset, u64 size) > +{ > + struct ocxl_link *link = (struct ocxl_link *) link_handle; > + > + // Check for overflow > + if (offset > (offset + size)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + mutex_lock(&link->lpc_mem_lock); > + link->lpc_mem_sz = max(link->lpc_mem_sz, offset + size); > + > + mutex_unlock(&link->lpc_mem_lock); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +u64 ocxl_link_lpc_map(void *link_handle, struct pci_dev *pdev) > +{ > + struct ocxl_link *link = (struct ocxl_link *) link_handle; > + > + mutex_lock(&link->lpc_mem_lock); > + > + if(!link->lpc_mem) > + link->lpc_mem = pnv_ocxl_platform_lpc_setup(pdev, link->lpc_mem_sz); > + > + if(link->lpc_mem) > + link->lpc_consumers++; > + mutex_unlock(&link->lpc_mem_lock); > + > + return link->lpc_mem; > +} > + > +void ocxl_link_lpc_release(void *link_handle, struct pci_dev *pdev) > +{ > + struct ocxl_link *link = (struct ocxl_link *) link_handle; > + > + mutex_lock(&link->lpc_mem_lock); > + WARN_ON(--link->lpc_consumers < 0); Here, we always decrement the lpc_consumers count. However, it was only incremented if the mapping was setup correctly in opal. We could arguably claim that ocxl_link_lpc_release() should only be called if ocxl_link_lpc_map() succeeded, but it would make error path handling easier if we only decrement the lpc_consumers count if link->lpc_mem is set. So that we can just call ocxl_link_lpc_release() in error paths without having to worry about triggering the WARN_ON message. Fred > + if (link->lpc_consumers == 0) { > + pnv_ocxl_platform_lpc_release(pdev); > + link->lpc_mem = 0; > + } > + > + mutex_unlock(&link->lpc_mem_lock); > +} > diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h b/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h > index 198e4e4bc51d..d0c8c4838f42 100644 > --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h > +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h > @@ -142,4 +142,37 @@ int ocxl_irq_offset_to_id(struct ocxl_context *ctx, u64 offset); > u64 ocxl_irq_id_to_offset(struct ocxl_context *ctx, int irq_id); > void ocxl_afu_irq_free_all(struct ocxl_context *ctx); > > +/** > + * ocxl_link_add_lpc_mem() - Increment the amount of memory required by an OpenCAPI link > + * > + * @link_handle: The OpenCAPI link handle > + * @offset: The offset of the memory to add > + * @size: The amount of memory to increment by > + * > + * Returns 0 on success, negative on overflow > + */ > +int ocxl_link_add_lpc_mem(void *link_handle, u64 offset, u64 size); > + > +/** > + * ocxl_link_lpc_map() - Map the LPC memory for an OpenCAPI device > + * Since LPC memory belongs to a link, the whole LPC memory available > + * on the link must be mapped in order to make it accessible to a device. > + * @link_handle: The OpenCAPI link handle > + * @pdev: A device that is on the link > + * > + * Returns the address of the mapped LPC memory, or 0 on error > + */ > +u64 ocxl_link_lpc_map(void *link_handle, struct pci_dev *pdev); > + > +/** > + * ocxl_link_lpc_release() - Release the LPC memory device for an OpenCAPI device > + * > + * Offlines LPC memory on an OpenCAPI link for a device. If this is the > + * last device on the link to release the memory, unmap it from the link. > + * > + * @link_handle: The OpenCAPI link handle > + * @pdev: A device that is on the link > + */ > +void ocxl_link_lpc_release(void *link_handle, struct pci_dev *pdev); > + > #endif /* _OCXL_INTERNAL_H_ */ >
On Tue, 2020-02-25 at 17:30 +0100, Frederic Barrat wrote: > > Le 21/02/2020 à 04:26, Alastair D'Silva a écrit : > > From: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@d-silva.org> > > > > Tally up the LPC memory on an OpenCAPI link & allow it to be mapped > > > > Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@d-silva.org> > > --- > > drivers/misc/ocxl/core.c | 10 ++++++ > > drivers/misc/ocxl/link.c | 53 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h | 33 +++++++++++++++++++ > > 3 files changed, 96 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/core.c b/drivers/misc/ocxl/core.c > > index b7a09b21ab36..2531c6cf19a0 100644 > > --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/core.c > > +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/core.c > > @@ -230,8 +230,18 @@ static int configure_afu(struct ocxl_afu *afu, > > u8 afu_idx, struct pci_dev *dev) > > if (rc) > > goto err_free_pasid; > > > > + if (afu->config.lpc_mem_size || afu- > > >config.special_purpose_mem_size) { > > + rc = ocxl_link_add_lpc_mem(afu->fn->link, afu- > > >config.lpc_mem_offset, > > + afu->config.lpc_mem_size + > > + afu- > > >config.special_purpose_mem_size); > > + if (rc) > > + goto err_free_mmio; > > + } > > + > > return 0; > > > > +err_free_mmio: > > + unmap_mmio_areas(afu); > > err_free_pasid: > > reclaim_afu_pasid(afu); > > err_free_actag: > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/link.c b/drivers/misc/ocxl/link.c > > index 58d111afd9f6..1e039cc5ebe5 100644 > > --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/link.c > > +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/link.c > > @@ -84,6 +84,11 @@ struct ocxl_link { > > int dev; > > atomic_t irq_available; > > struct spa *spa; > > + struct mutex lpc_mem_lock; /* protects lpc_mem & lpc_mem_sz */ > > + u64 lpc_mem_sz; /* Total amount of LPC memory presented on the > > link */ > > + u64 lpc_mem; > > + int lpc_consumers; > > + > > void *platform_data; > > }; > > static struct list_head links_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(links_list); > > @@ -396,6 +401,8 @@ static int alloc_link(struct pci_dev *dev, int > > PE_mask, struct ocxl_link **out_l > > if (rc) > > goto err_spa; > > > > + mutex_init(&link->lpc_mem_lock); > > + > > /* platform specific hook */ > > rc = pnv_ocxl_spa_setup(dev, link->spa->spa_mem, PE_mask, > > &link->platform_data); > > @@ -711,3 +718,49 @@ void ocxl_link_free_irq(void *link_handle, int > > hw_irq) > > atomic_inc(&link->irq_available); > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ocxl_link_free_irq); > > + > > +int ocxl_link_add_lpc_mem(void *link_handle, u64 offset, u64 size) > > +{ > > + struct ocxl_link *link = (struct ocxl_link *) link_handle; > > + > > + // Check for overflow > > + if (offset > (offset + size)) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + mutex_lock(&link->lpc_mem_lock); > > + link->lpc_mem_sz = max(link->lpc_mem_sz, offset + size); > > + > > + mutex_unlock(&link->lpc_mem_lock); > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +u64 ocxl_link_lpc_map(void *link_handle, struct pci_dev *pdev) > > +{ > > + struct ocxl_link *link = (struct ocxl_link *) link_handle; > > + > > + mutex_lock(&link->lpc_mem_lock); > > + > > + if(!link->lpc_mem) > > + link->lpc_mem = pnv_ocxl_platform_lpc_setup(pdev, link- > > >lpc_mem_sz); > > + > > + if(link->lpc_mem) > > + link->lpc_consumers++; > > + mutex_unlock(&link->lpc_mem_lock); > > + > > + return link->lpc_mem; > > +} > > + > > +void ocxl_link_lpc_release(void *link_handle, struct pci_dev > > *pdev) > > +{ > > + struct ocxl_link *link = (struct ocxl_link *) link_handle; > > + > > + mutex_lock(&link->lpc_mem_lock); > > + WARN_ON(--link->lpc_consumers < 0); > > Here, we always decrement the lpc_consumers count. However, it was > only > incremented if the mapping was setup correctly in opal. > > We could arguably claim that ocxl_link_lpc_release() should only be > called if ocxl_link_lpc_map() succeeded, but it would make error > path > handling easier if we only decrement the lpc_consumers count if > link->lpc_mem is set. So that we can just call > ocxl_link_lpc_release() > in error paths without having to worry about triggering the WARN_ON > message. > > Fred > > Ok, this makes sense. > > > + if (link->lpc_consumers == 0) { > > + pnv_ocxl_platform_lpc_release(pdev); > > + link->lpc_mem = 0; > > + } > > + > > + mutex_unlock(&link->lpc_mem_lock); > > +} > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h > > b/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h > > index 198e4e4bc51d..d0c8c4838f42 100644 > > --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h > > +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h > > @@ -142,4 +142,37 @@ int ocxl_irq_offset_to_id(struct ocxl_context > > *ctx, u64 offset); > > u64 ocxl_irq_id_to_offset(struct ocxl_context *ctx, int irq_id); > > void ocxl_afu_irq_free_all(struct ocxl_context *ctx); > > > > +/** > > + * ocxl_link_add_lpc_mem() - Increment the amount of memory > > required by an OpenCAPI link > > + * > > + * @link_handle: The OpenCAPI link handle > > + * @offset: The offset of the memory to add > > + * @size: The amount of memory to increment by > > + * > > + * Returns 0 on success, negative on overflow > > + */ > > +int ocxl_link_add_lpc_mem(void *link_handle, u64 offset, u64 > > size); > > + > > +/** > > + * ocxl_link_lpc_map() - Map the LPC memory for an OpenCAPI device > > + * Since LPC memory belongs to a link, the whole LPC memory > > available > > + * on the link must be mapped in order to make it accessible to a > > device. > > + * @link_handle: The OpenCAPI link handle > > + * @pdev: A device that is on the link > > + * > > + * Returns the address of the mapped LPC memory, or 0 on error > > + */ > > +u64 ocxl_link_lpc_map(void *link_handle, struct pci_dev *pdev); > > + > > +/** > > + * ocxl_link_lpc_release() - Release the LPC memory device for an > > OpenCAPI device > > + * > > + * Offlines LPC memory on an OpenCAPI link for a device. If this > > is the > > + * last device on the link to release the memory, unmap it from > > the link. > > + * > > + * @link_handle: The OpenCAPI link handle > > + * @pdev: A device that is on the link > > + */ > > +void ocxl_link_lpc_release(void *link_handle, struct pci_dev > > *pdev); > > + > > #endif /* _OCXL_INTERNAL_H_ */ > >
diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/core.c b/drivers/misc/ocxl/core.c index b7a09b21ab36..2531c6cf19a0 100644 --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/core.c +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/core.c @@ -230,8 +230,18 @@ static int configure_afu(struct ocxl_afu *afu, u8 afu_idx, struct pci_dev *dev) if (rc) goto err_free_pasid; + if (afu->config.lpc_mem_size || afu->config.special_purpose_mem_size) { + rc = ocxl_link_add_lpc_mem(afu->fn->link, afu->config.lpc_mem_offset, + afu->config.lpc_mem_size + + afu->config.special_purpose_mem_size); + if (rc) + goto err_free_mmio; + } + return 0; +err_free_mmio: + unmap_mmio_areas(afu); err_free_pasid: reclaim_afu_pasid(afu); err_free_actag: diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/link.c b/drivers/misc/ocxl/link.c index 58d111afd9f6..1e039cc5ebe5 100644 --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/link.c +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/link.c @@ -84,6 +84,11 @@ struct ocxl_link { int dev; atomic_t irq_available; struct spa *spa; + struct mutex lpc_mem_lock; /* protects lpc_mem & lpc_mem_sz */ + u64 lpc_mem_sz; /* Total amount of LPC memory presented on the link */ + u64 lpc_mem; + int lpc_consumers; + void *platform_data; }; static struct list_head links_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(links_list); @@ -396,6 +401,8 @@ static int alloc_link(struct pci_dev *dev, int PE_mask, struct ocxl_link **out_l if (rc) goto err_spa; + mutex_init(&link->lpc_mem_lock); + /* platform specific hook */ rc = pnv_ocxl_spa_setup(dev, link->spa->spa_mem, PE_mask, &link->platform_data); @@ -711,3 +718,49 @@ void ocxl_link_free_irq(void *link_handle, int hw_irq) atomic_inc(&link->irq_available); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ocxl_link_free_irq); + +int ocxl_link_add_lpc_mem(void *link_handle, u64 offset, u64 size) +{ + struct ocxl_link *link = (struct ocxl_link *) link_handle; + + // Check for overflow + if (offset > (offset + size)) + return -EINVAL; + + mutex_lock(&link->lpc_mem_lock); + link->lpc_mem_sz = max(link->lpc_mem_sz, offset + size); + + mutex_unlock(&link->lpc_mem_lock); + + return 0; +} + +u64 ocxl_link_lpc_map(void *link_handle, struct pci_dev *pdev) +{ + struct ocxl_link *link = (struct ocxl_link *) link_handle; + + mutex_lock(&link->lpc_mem_lock); + + if(!link->lpc_mem) + link->lpc_mem = pnv_ocxl_platform_lpc_setup(pdev, link->lpc_mem_sz); + + if(link->lpc_mem) + link->lpc_consumers++; + mutex_unlock(&link->lpc_mem_lock); + + return link->lpc_mem; +} + +void ocxl_link_lpc_release(void *link_handle, struct pci_dev *pdev) +{ + struct ocxl_link *link = (struct ocxl_link *) link_handle; + + mutex_lock(&link->lpc_mem_lock); + WARN_ON(--link->lpc_consumers < 0); + if (link->lpc_consumers == 0) { + pnv_ocxl_platform_lpc_release(pdev); + link->lpc_mem = 0; + } + + mutex_unlock(&link->lpc_mem_lock); +} diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h b/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h index 198e4e4bc51d..d0c8c4838f42 100644 --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h @@ -142,4 +142,37 @@ int ocxl_irq_offset_to_id(struct ocxl_context *ctx, u64 offset); u64 ocxl_irq_id_to_offset(struct ocxl_context *ctx, int irq_id); void ocxl_afu_irq_free_all(struct ocxl_context *ctx); +/** + * ocxl_link_add_lpc_mem() - Increment the amount of memory required by an OpenCAPI link + * + * @link_handle: The OpenCAPI link handle + * @offset: The offset of the memory to add + * @size: The amount of memory to increment by + * + * Returns 0 on success, negative on overflow + */ +int ocxl_link_add_lpc_mem(void *link_handle, u64 offset, u64 size); + +/** + * ocxl_link_lpc_map() - Map the LPC memory for an OpenCAPI device + * Since LPC memory belongs to a link, the whole LPC memory available + * on the link must be mapped in order to make it accessible to a device. + * @link_handle: The OpenCAPI link handle + * @pdev: A device that is on the link + * + * Returns the address of the mapped LPC memory, or 0 on error + */ +u64 ocxl_link_lpc_map(void *link_handle, struct pci_dev *pdev); + +/** + * ocxl_link_lpc_release() - Release the LPC memory device for an OpenCAPI device + * + * Offlines LPC memory on an OpenCAPI link for a device. If this is the + * last device on the link to release the memory, unmap it from the link. + * + * @link_handle: The OpenCAPI link handle + * @pdev: A device that is on the link + */ +void ocxl_link_lpc_release(void *link_handle, struct pci_dev *pdev); + #endif /* _OCXL_INTERNAL_H_ */