diff mbox series

[ndctl,v5,04/16] util: add the struct_size() helper from the kernel

Message ID 20211111204436.1560365-5-vishal.l.verma@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series Initial CXL support | expand

Commit Message

Verma, Vishal L Nov. 11, 2021, 8:44 p.m. UTC
Add struct_size() from include/linux/overflow.h which calculates the
size of a struct with a trailing variable length array.

Suggested-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
---
 util/size.h | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 util/util.h |  6 ++++++
 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+)

Comments

Joao Martins Jan. 31, 2022, 11:47 a.m. UTC | #1
Hey Vishal,

On 11/11/21 20:44, Vishal Verma wrote:
> Add struct_size() from include/linux/overflow.h which calculates the
> size of a struct with a trailing variable length array.

[...]

> +/*
> + * Helpers for struct_size() copied from include/linux/overflow.h (GPL-2.0)
> + *
> + * For simplicity and code hygiene, the fallback code below insists on
> + * a, b and *d having the same type (similar to the min() and max()
> + * macros), whereas gcc's type-generic overflow checkers accept
> + * different types. Hence we don't just make check_add_overflow an
> + * alias for __builtin_add_overflow, but add type checks similar to
> + * below.
> + */
> +#define check_add_overflow(a, b, d) (({	\
> +	typeof(a) __a = (a);			\
> +	typeof(b) __b = (b);			\
> +	typeof(d) __d = (d);			\
> +	(void) (&__a == &__b);			\
> +	(void) (&__a == __d);			\
> +	__builtin_add_overflow(__a, __b, __d);	\
> +}))
> +
> +#define check_mul_overflow(a, b, d) (({	\
> +	typeof(a) __a = (a);			\
> +	typeof(b) __b = (b);			\
> +	typeof(d) __d = (d);			\
> +	(void) (&__a == &__b);			\
> +	(void) (&__a == __d);			\
> +	__builtin_mul_overflow(__a, __b, __d);	\
> +}))
> +

The introduction of this two macro helpers broke compilation against < gcc 5.1.0 (think
CentOS/OL/RHEL 7 or anything resembling that) and clang 3.4. Particularly because of the
lack of these overflow builtins __builtin_mul_overflow() / __buitin_add_overflow() giving
errors like:

BUILDSTDERR: lib/.libs/libcxl.so: undefined reference to `__builtin_mul_overflow'
BUILDSTDERR: lib/.libs/libcxl.so: undefined reference to `__builtin_add_overflow'

Since you pulled this helper from the kernel, you might wanna pull the compat code too
that was there in commit f0907827a8a9 ("compiler.h: enable builtin overflow checkers and
add fallback code"), particularly something like below.

#if GCC_VERSION >= 50100
#define COMPILER_HAS_GENERIC_BUILTIN_OVERFLOW 1
#endif

#if __clang__ && \
    __has_builtin(__builtin_mul_overflow) && \
    __has_builtin(__builtin_add_overflow)
#define COMPILER_HAS_GENERIC_BUILTIN_OVERFLOW 1
#endif

#if COMPILER_HAS_GENERIC_BUILTIN_OVERFLOW

#define check_add_overflow(a, b, d) (({	\
	typeof(a) __a = (a);			\
	typeof(b) __b = (b);			\
	typeof(d) __d = (d);			\
	(void) (&__a == &__b);			\
	(void) (&__a == __d);			\
	__builtin_add_overflow(__a, __b, __d);	\
}))

#define check_mul_overflow(a, b, d) (({	\
	typeof(a) __a = (a);			\
	typeof(b) __b = (b);			\
	typeof(d) __d = (d);			\
	(void) (&__a == &__b);			\
	(void) (&__a == __d);			\
	__builtin_mul_overflow(__a, __b, __d);	\
}))


#else /* !COMPILER_HAS_GENERIC_BUILTIN_OVERFLOW */

/* Checking for unsigned overflow is relatively easy without causing UB. */
#define __unsigned_add_overflow(a, b, d) ({	\
	typeof(a) __a = (a);			\
	typeof(b) __b = (b);			\
	typeof(d) __d = (d);			\
	(void) (&__a == &__b);			\
	(void) (&__a == __d);			\
	*__d = __a + __b;			\
	*__d < __a;				\
})
#define __unsigned_sub_overflow(a, b, d) ({	\
	typeof(a) __a = (a);			\
	typeof(b) __b = (b);			\
	typeof(d) __d = (d);			\
	(void) (&__a == &__b);			\
	(void) (&__a == __d);			\
	*__d = __a - __b;			\
	__a < __b;				\
})
/*
 * If one of a or b is a compile-time constant, this avoids a division.
 */
#define __unsigned_mul_overflow(a, b, d) ({		\
	typeof(a) __a = (a);				\
	typeof(b) __b = (b);				\
	typeof(d) __d = (d);				\
	(void) (&__a == &__b);				\
	(void) (&__a == __d);				\
	*__d = __a * __b;				\
	__builtin_constant_p(__b) ?			\
	  __b > 0 && __a > type_max(typeof(__a)) / __b : \
	  __a > 0 && __b > type_max(typeof(__b)) / __a;	 \
})

/*
 * For signed types, detecting overflow is much harder, especially if
 * we want to avoid UB. But the interface of these macros is such that
 * we must provide a result in *d, and in fact we must produce the
 * result promised by gcc's builtins, which is simply the possibly
 * wrapped-around value. Fortunately, we can just formally do the
 * operations in the widest relevant unsigned type (u64) and then
 * truncate the result - gcc is smart enough to generate the same code
 * with and without the (u64) casts.
 */

/*
 * Adding two signed integers can overflow only if they have the same
 * sign, and overflow has happened iff the result has the opposite
 * sign.
 */
#define __signed_add_overflow(a, b, d) ({	\
	typeof(a) __a = (a);			\
	typeof(b) __b = (b);			\
	typeof(d) __d = (d);			\
	(void) (&__a == &__b);			\
	(void) (&__a == __d);			\
	*__d = (u64)__a + (u64)__b;		\
	(((~(__a ^ __b)) & (*__d ^ __a))	\
		& type_min(typeof(__a))) != 0;	\
})

/*
 * Subtraction is similar, except that overflow can now happen only
 * when the signs are opposite. In this case, overflow has happened if
 * the result has the opposite sign of a.
 */
#define __signed_sub_overflow(a, b, d) ({	\
	typeof(a) __a = (a);			\
	typeof(b) __b = (b);			\
	typeof(d) __d = (d);			\
	(void) (&__a == &__b);			\
	(void) (&__a == __d);			\
	*__d = (u64)__a - (u64)__b;		\
	((((__a ^ __b)) & (*__d ^ __a))		\
		& type_min(typeof(__a))) != 0;	\
})

/*
 * Signed multiplication is rather hard. gcc always follows C99, so
 * division is truncated towards 0. This means that we can write the
 * overflow check like this:
 *
 * (a > 0 && (b > MAX/a || b < MIN/a)) ||
 * (a < -1 && (b > MIN/a || b < MAX/a) ||
 * (a == -1 && b == MIN)
 *
 * The redundant casts of -1 are to silence an annoying -Wtype-limits
 * (included in -Wextra) warning: When the type is u8 or u16, the
 * __b_c_e in check_mul_overflow obviously selects
 * __unsigned_mul_overflow, but unfortunately gcc still parses this
 * code and warns about the limited range of __b.
 */

#define __signed_mul_overflow(a, b, d) ({				\
	typeof(a) __a = (a);						\
	typeof(b) __b = (b);						\
	typeof(d) __d = (d);						\
	typeof(a) __tmax = type_max(typeof(a));				\
	typeof(a) __tmin = type_min(typeof(a));				\
	(void) (&__a == &__b);						\
	(void) (&__a == __d);						\
	*__d = (u64)__a * (u64)__b;					\
	(__b > 0   && (__a > __tmax/__b || __a < __tmin/__b)) ||	\
	(__b < (typeof(__b))-1  && (__a > __tmin/__b || __a < __tmax/__b)) || \
	(__b == (typeof(__b))-1 && __a == __tmin);			\
})


#define check_add_overflow(a, b, d)					\
	__builtin_choose_expr(is_signed_type(typeof(a)),		\
			__signed_add_overflow(a, b, d),			\
			__unsigned_add_overflow(a, b, d))

#define check_sub_overflow(a, b, d)					\
	__builtin_choose_expr(is_signed_type(typeof(a)),		\
			__signed_sub_overflow(a, b, d),			\
			__unsigned_sub_overflow(a, b, d))

#define check_mul_overflow(a, b, d)					\
	__builtin_choose_expr(is_signed_type(typeof(a)),		\
			__signed_mul_overflow(a, b, d),			\
			__unsigned_mul_overflow(a, b, d))

#endif
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/util/size.h b/util/size.h
index 646edae..a0f3593 100644
--- a/util/size.h
+++ b/util/size.h
@@ -4,6 +4,8 @@ 
 #ifndef _NDCTL_SIZE_H_
 #define _NDCTL_SIZE_H_
 #include <stdbool.h>
+#include <stdint.h>
+#include <util/util.h>
 
 #define SZ_1K     0x00000400
 #define SZ_4K     0x00001000
@@ -30,4 +32,64 @@  static inline bool is_power_of_2(unsigned long long v)
 #define BITS_PER_LONG (sizeof(unsigned long) * 8)
 #define HPAGE_SIZE (2 << 20)
 
+/*
+ * Helpers for struct_size() copied from include/linux/overflow.h (GPL-2.0)
+ *
+ * For simplicity and code hygiene, the fallback code below insists on
+ * a, b and *d having the same type (similar to the min() and max()
+ * macros), whereas gcc's type-generic overflow checkers accept
+ * different types. Hence we don't just make check_add_overflow an
+ * alias for __builtin_add_overflow, but add type checks similar to
+ * below.
+ */
+#define check_add_overflow(a, b, d) (({	\
+	typeof(a) __a = (a);			\
+	typeof(b) __b = (b);			\
+	typeof(d) __d = (d);			\
+	(void) (&__a == &__b);			\
+	(void) (&__a == __d);			\
+	__builtin_add_overflow(__a, __b, __d);	\
+}))
+
+#define check_mul_overflow(a, b, d) (({	\
+	typeof(a) __a = (a);			\
+	typeof(b) __b = (b);			\
+	typeof(d) __d = (d);			\
+	(void) (&__a == &__b);			\
+	(void) (&__a == __d);			\
+	__builtin_mul_overflow(__a, __b, __d);	\
+}))
+
+/*
+ * Compute a*b+c, returning SIZE_MAX on overflow. Internal helper for
+ * struct_size() below.
+ */
+static inline size_t __ab_c_size(size_t a, size_t b, size_t c)
+{
+	size_t bytes;
+
+	if (check_mul_overflow(a, b, &bytes))
+		return SIZE_MAX;
+	if (check_add_overflow(bytes, c, &bytes))
+		return SIZE_MAX;
+
+	return bytes;
+}
+
+/**
+ * struct_size() - Calculate size of structure with trailing array.
+ * @p: Pointer to the structure.
+ * @member: Name of the array member.
+ * @count: Number of elements in the array.
+ *
+ * Calculates size of memory needed for structure @p followed by an
+ * array of @count number of @member elements.
+ *
+ * Return: number of bytes needed or SIZE_MAX on overflow.
+ */
+#define struct_size(p, member, count)					\
+	__ab_c_size(count,						\
+		    sizeof(*(p)->member) + __must_be_array((p)->member),\
+		    sizeof(*(p)))
+
 #endif /* _NDCTL_SIZE_H_ */
diff --git a/util/util.h b/util/util.h
index ae0e4e1..b2b4ae6 100644
--- a/util/util.h
+++ b/util/util.h
@@ -63,6 +63,12 @@ 
 #define BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(e) (sizeof(struct { int:-!!(e); }))
 #define BUILD_BUG_ON(condition) ((void)sizeof(char[1 - 2*!!(condition)]))
 
+/* Are two types/vars the same type (ignoring qualifiers)? */
+#define __same_type(a, b) __builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof(a), typeof(b))
+
+/* &a[0] degrades to a pointer: a different type from an array */
+#define __must_be_array(a)	BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(__same_type((a), &(a)[0]))
+
 enum {
 	READ, WRITE,
 };