From patchwork Fri Feb 21 08:11:03 2025 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Zheng Qixing X-Patchwork-Id: 13984994 Received: from dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (dggsgout12.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38350202C56 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 08:15:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740125704; cv=none; b=CuR5vYdGHB3kEV+n5G4+pslmhGWdKOPaKC/huapDmnOyz6/n9QD8wCvBTc9GK/qazmycDIv3Cb6PF4k3AMxFHv+CiZRepRVJ5JC5A3pXxQJSSrwdYpWqZxrW63KYg0uYHPqpNpiag6cOa35yFiCL3LRzIVp61VfDAeMq56+SqhY= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740125704; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BVQ2JLHfvl7SJ1XVdk8tTQQ6U/sJhzvQG0qFBGRubgE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=CVL914r/fr/4wihPu6nimI9uUcDcnntfrLDgwSOA+mPfo38SQZkhTmoAGRJAgJPwMj4YpuBnd9exjP5encZo6ePh/JjslCS67GzncKs8W7gRakeUUlPmk0mtz26p7VEFSd01hCHVUQ+vtcCrdSTEV1fkVyW//vWDS6FQ7ZxxN3k= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.216]) by dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4YzjbK2vMjz4f3jXt for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 16:14:37 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [10.116.40.128]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 152C41A1AC2 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 16:14:59 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.104.67]) by APP4 (Coremail) with SMTP id gCh0CgC3Gl_8NbhnHF3eEQ--.3944S10; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 16:14:58 +0800 (CST) From: Zheng Qixing To: axboe@kernel.dk, song@kernel.org, colyli@kernel.org, yukuai3@huawei.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, vishal.l.verma@intel.com, dave.jiang@intel.com, ira.weiny@intel.com, dlemoal@kernel.org, yanjun.zhu@linux.dev, kch@nvidia.com, hare@suse.de, zhengqixing@huawei.com, john.g.garry@oracle.com, geliang@kernel.org, xni@redhat.com, colyli@suse.de Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com Subject: [PATCH 06/12] badblocks: fix the using of MAX_BADBLOCKS Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 16:11:03 +0800 Message-Id: <20250221081109.734170-7-zhengqixing@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20250221081109.734170-1-zhengqixing@huaweicloud.com> References: <20250221081109.734170-1-zhengqixing@huaweicloud.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: nvdimm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: gCh0CgC3Gl_8NbhnHF3eEQ--.3944S10 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvdXoWrtF48ZF4rCw1DAr47uw43trb_yoWkGwb_J3 WDt3ykWr4kJr1rCw1ayryDtrWFyF47Cr4SkrZ2yr1kZr47tF1DZw45Xr98Xrs8CFWUJanx tw1fZrWS9F4IqjkaLaAFLSUrUUUUbb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUIcSsGvfJTRUUUbgxYFVCjjxCrM7AC8VAFwI0_Wr0E3s1l1xkIjI8I6I8E6xAIw20E Y4v20xvaj40_Wr0E3s1l1IIY67AEw4v_Jr0_Jr4l82xGYIkIc2x26280x7IE14v26r126s 0DM28IrcIa0xkI8VCY1x0267AKxVW5JVCq3wA2ocxC64kIII0Yj41l84x0c7CEw4AK67xG Y2AK021l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvE14v26w1j6s0DM28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14 v26r4UJVWxJr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxVW0oVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAF wI0_GcCE3s1le2I262IYc4CY6c8Ij28IcVAaY2xG8wAqx4xG64xvF2IEw4CE5I8CrVC2j2 WlYx0E2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jrv_JF1lYx0Ex4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMcvjeVCFs4IE7xkE bVWUJVW8JwACjcxG0xvY0x0EwIxGrwACI402YVCY1x02628vn2kIc2xKxwCY1x0262kKe7 AKxVW8ZVWrXwCF04k20xvY0x0EwIxGrwCFx2IqxVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwC20s026c02 F40E14v26r1j6r18MI8I3I0E7480Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E67AF67kF1VAFwI0_GFv_Wr ylIxkGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVW8JVW5JwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvEc7Cj xVAFwI0_Gr1j6F4UJwCI42IY6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC2z280aVAFwI 0_Gr0_Cr1lIxAIcVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW8Jr0_Cr1UYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x 07jxwIDUUUUU= X-CM-SenderInfo: x2kh0wptl0x03j6k3tpzhluzxrxghudrp/ From: Li Nan The number of badblocks cannot exceed MAX_BADBLOCKS, but it should be allowed to equal MAX_BADBLOCKS. Fixes: aa511ff8218b ("badblocks: switch to the improved badblock handling code") Signed-off-by: Li Nan Reviewed-by: Zhu Yanjun Acked-by: Coly Li Reviewed-by: Yu Kuai --- block/badblocks.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/badblocks.c b/block/badblocks.c index a953d2e9417f..87267bae6836 100644 --- a/block/badblocks.c +++ b/block/badblocks.c @@ -700,7 +700,7 @@ static bool can_front_overwrite(struct badblocks *bb, int prev, *extra = 2; } - if ((bb->count + (*extra)) >= MAX_BADBLOCKS) + if ((bb->count + (*extra)) > MAX_BADBLOCKS) return false; return true; @@ -1135,7 +1135,7 @@ static int _badblocks_clear(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int sectors) if ((BB_OFFSET(p[prev]) < bad.start) && (BB_END(p[prev]) > (bad.start + bad.len))) { /* Splitting */ - if ((bb->count + 1) < MAX_BADBLOCKS) { + if ((bb->count + 1) <= MAX_BADBLOCKS) { len = front_splitting_clear(bb, prev, &bad); bb->count += 1; cleared++;