diff mbox

[v2,03/23] OMAPDSS: output: Add set/unset device ops for omap_dss_output

Message ID 1346326845-16583-4-git-send-email-archit@ti.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

archit taneja Aug. 30, 2012, 11:40 a.m. UTC
An output entity represented by the struct omap_dss_output connects to a
omap_dss_device entity. Add functions to set or unset an output's device. This
is similar to how managers and devices were connected previously. An output can
connect to a device without being connected to a manager. However, the output
needs to eventually connect to a manager so that the connected panel can be
enabled.

Keep the omap_overlay_manager pointer in omap_dss_device for now to prevent
breaking things. This will be removed later when outputs are supported
completely.

Signed-off-by: Archit Taneja <archit@ti.com>
---
 drivers/video/omap2/dss/output.c |   67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/video/omapdss.h          |    5 +++
 2 files changed, 72 insertions(+)

Comments

Tomi Valkeinen Aug. 31, 2012, 12:03 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, 2012-08-30 at 17:10 +0530, Archit Taneja wrote:
> An output entity represented by the struct omap_dss_output connects to a
> omap_dss_device entity. Add functions to set or unset an output's device. This
> is similar to how managers and devices were connected previously. An output can
> connect to a device without being connected to a manager. However, the output
> needs to eventually connect to a manager so that the connected panel can be
> enabled.
> 
> Keep the omap_overlay_manager pointer in omap_dss_device for now to prevent
> breaking things. This will be removed later when outputs are supported
> completely.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Archit Taneja <archit@ti.com>
> ---
>  drivers/video/omap2/dss/output.c |   67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/video/omapdss.h          |    5 +++
>  2 files changed, 72 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/output.c b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/output.c
> index 7d81be5..abc3aa2 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/output.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/output.c
> @@ -24,9 +24,76 @@
>  #include "dss.h"
>  
>  static LIST_HEAD(output_list);
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(output_lock);
> +
> +static int dss_output_set_device(struct omap_dss_output *out,
> +		struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
> +{
> +	int r;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&output_lock);
> +
> +	if (out->device) {
> +		DSSERR("output already has device %s connected to it\n",
> +			out->device->name);
> +		r = -EINVAL;
> +		goto err;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (out->type != dssdev->type) {
> +		DSSERR("output type and display type don't match\n");
> +		r = -EINVAL;
> +		goto err;
> +	}
> +
> +	out->device = dssdev;
> +	dssdev->output = out;
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&output_lock);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +err:
> +	mutex_unlock(&output_lock);
> +
> +	return r;
> +}
> +
> +static int dss_output_unset_device(struct omap_dss_output *out)
> +{
> +	int r;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&output_lock);
> +
> +	if (!out->device) {
> +		DSSERR("output doesn't have a device connected to it\n");
> +		r = -EINVAL;
> +		goto err;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (out->device->state != OMAP_DSS_DISPLAY_DISABLED) {
> +		DSSERR("device %s is not disabled, cannot unset device\n",
> +				out->device->name);
> +		r = -EINVAL;
> +		goto err;
> +	}
> +
> +	out->device->output = NULL;
> +	out->device = NULL;
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&output_lock);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +err:
> +	mutex_unlock(&output_lock);
> +
> +	return r;
> +}
>  
>  void dss_register_output(struct omap_dss_output *out)
>  {
> +	out->set_device = &dss_output_set_device;
> +	out->unset_device = &dss_output_unset_device;
> +
>  	list_add_tail(&out->list, &output_list);
>  }

I don't think there's need for this indirection. We should use function
pointers only when the func pointer may lead to different functions.
Here we'll always have just one function, dss_output_set_device. We can
as well call the function directly.

I know we have similar func pointers for ovls/mgrs currently, but I
don't think they are good either. They are a relic from the time we
supported "virtual" overlays and managers, and thus could have different
implementations for the operations.

 Tomi
Archit Taneja Aug. 31, 2012, 12:24 p.m. UTC | #2
On Friday 31 August 2012 05:33 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-08-30 at 17:10 +0530, Archit Taneja wrote:
>> An output entity represented by the struct omap_dss_output connects to a
>> omap_dss_device entity. Add functions to set or unset an output's device. This
>> is similar to how managers and devices were connected previously. An output can
>> connect to a device without being connected to a manager. However, the output
>> needs to eventually connect to a manager so that the connected panel can be
>> enabled.
>>
>> Keep the omap_overlay_manager pointer in omap_dss_device for now to prevent
>> breaking things. This will be removed later when outputs are supported
>> completely.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Archit Taneja <archit@ti.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/video/omap2/dss/output.c |   67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   include/video/omapdss.h          |    5 +++
>>   2 files changed, 72 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/output.c b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/output.c
>> index 7d81be5..abc3aa2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/output.c
>> +++ b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/output.c
>> @@ -24,9 +24,76 @@
>>   #include "dss.h"
>>
>>   static LIST_HEAD(output_list);
>> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(output_lock);
>> +
>> +static int dss_output_set_device(struct omap_dss_output *out,
>> +		struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
>> +{
>> +	int r;
>> +
>> +	mutex_lock(&output_lock);
>> +
>> +	if (out->device) {
>> +		DSSERR("output already has device %s connected to it\n",
>> +			out->device->name);
>> +		r = -EINVAL;
>> +		goto err;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (out->type != dssdev->type) {
>> +		DSSERR("output type and display type don't match\n");
>> +		r = -EINVAL;
>> +		goto err;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	out->device = dssdev;
>> +	dssdev->output = out;
>> +
>> +	mutex_unlock(&output_lock);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +err:
>> +	mutex_unlock(&output_lock);
>> +
>> +	return r;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int dss_output_unset_device(struct omap_dss_output *out)
>> +{
>> +	int r;
>> +
>> +	mutex_lock(&output_lock);
>> +
>> +	if (!out->device) {
>> +		DSSERR("output doesn't have a device connected to it\n");
>> +		r = -EINVAL;
>> +		goto err;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (out->device->state != OMAP_DSS_DISPLAY_DISABLED) {
>> +		DSSERR("device %s is not disabled, cannot unset device\n",
>> +				out->device->name);
>> +		r = -EINVAL;
>> +		goto err;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	out->device->output = NULL;
>> +	out->device = NULL;
>> +
>> +	mutex_unlock(&output_lock);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +err:
>> +	mutex_unlock(&output_lock);
>> +
>> +	return r;
>> +}
>>
>>   void dss_register_output(struct omap_dss_output *out)
>>   {
>> +	out->set_device = &dss_output_set_device;
>> +	out->unset_device = &dss_output_unset_device;
>> +
>>   	list_add_tail(&out->list, &output_list);
>>   }
>
> I don't think there's need for this indirection. We should use function
> pointers only when the func pointer may lead to different functions.
> Here we'll always have just one function, dss_output_set_device. We can
> as well call the function directly.

Okay. I understand that. But in general, don't func pointers prevent us 
from exporting more symbols?

>
> I know we have similar func pointers for ovls/mgrs currently, but I
> don't think they are good either. They are a relic from the time we
> supported "virtual" overlays and managers, and thus could have different
> implementations for the operations.

Oh okay, I guess you mean the L4/sDMA updates for DSI command mode.

Archit

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Tomi Valkeinen Aug. 31, 2012, 12:28 p.m. UTC | #3
On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 17:54 +0530, Archit Taneja wrote:
> On Friday 31 August 2012 05:33 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:

> > I don't think there's need for this indirection. We should use function
> > pointers only when the func pointer may lead to different functions.
> > Here we'll always have just one function, dss_output_set_device. We can
> > as well call the function directly.
> 
> Okay. I understand that. But in general, don't func pointers prevent us 
> from exporting more symbols?

Yes. But I'm not sure if there's any real downside to exporting, as long
as the names are prefixed properly so that there are no name clashes.

> > I know we have similar func pointers for ovls/mgrs currently, but I
> > don't think they are good either. They are a relic from the time we
> > supported "virtual" overlays and managers, and thus could have different
> > implementations for the operations.
> 
> Oh okay, I guess you mean the L4/sDMA updates for DSI command mode.

Yep.

 Tomi
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/output.c b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/output.c
index 7d81be5..abc3aa2 100644
--- a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/output.c
+++ b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/output.c
@@ -24,9 +24,76 @@ 
 #include "dss.h"
 
 static LIST_HEAD(output_list);
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(output_lock);
+
+static int dss_output_set_device(struct omap_dss_output *out,
+		struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
+{
+	int r;
+
+	mutex_lock(&output_lock);
+
+	if (out->device) {
+		DSSERR("output already has device %s connected to it\n",
+			out->device->name);
+		r = -EINVAL;
+		goto err;
+	}
+
+	if (out->type != dssdev->type) {
+		DSSERR("output type and display type don't match\n");
+		r = -EINVAL;
+		goto err;
+	}
+
+	out->device = dssdev;
+	dssdev->output = out;
+
+	mutex_unlock(&output_lock);
+
+	return 0;
+err:
+	mutex_unlock(&output_lock);
+
+	return r;
+}
+
+static int dss_output_unset_device(struct omap_dss_output *out)
+{
+	int r;
+
+	mutex_lock(&output_lock);
+
+	if (!out->device) {
+		DSSERR("output doesn't have a device connected to it\n");
+		r = -EINVAL;
+		goto err;
+	}
+
+	if (out->device->state != OMAP_DSS_DISPLAY_DISABLED) {
+		DSSERR("device %s is not disabled, cannot unset device\n",
+				out->device->name);
+		r = -EINVAL;
+		goto err;
+	}
+
+	out->device->output = NULL;
+	out->device = NULL;
+
+	mutex_unlock(&output_lock);
+
+	return 0;
+err:
+	mutex_unlock(&output_lock);
+
+	return r;
+}
 
 void dss_register_output(struct omap_dss_output *out)
 {
+	out->set_device = &dss_output_set_device;
+	out->unset_device = &dss_output_unset_device;
+
 	list_add_tail(&out->list, &output_list);
 }
 
diff --git a/include/video/omapdss.h b/include/video/omapdss.h
index 2926a04..b3fba19 100644
--- a/include/video/omapdss.h
+++ b/include/video/omapdss.h
@@ -518,6 +518,10 @@  struct omap_dss_output {
 	struct omap_overlay_manager *manager;
 
 	struct omap_dss_device *device;
+
+	int (*set_device) (struct omap_dss_output *out,
+		struct omap_dss_device *dssdev);
+	int (*unset_device) (struct omap_dss_output *out);
 };
 
 struct omap_dss_device {
@@ -619,6 +623,7 @@  struct omap_dss_device {
 	enum omap_display_caps caps;
 
 	struct omap_overlay_manager *manager;
+	struct omap_dss_output *output;
 
 	enum omap_dss_display_state state;