@@ -325,15 +325,18 @@ struct clk *clk_register_divider_table(struct device *dev, const char *name,
struct clk_div_table *of_clk_get_div_table(struct device_node *node)
{
int i;
- int table_size = 0;
+ u32 table_size;
struct clk_div_table *table;
- u32 pair[2];
+ const __be32 *tablespec;
+ u32 val;
- table_size = of_count_phandle_with_args(node, "table", "#clock-cells");
+ tablespec = of_get_property(node, "table", &table_size);
- if (table_size < 1)
+ if (!tablespec)
return NULL;
+ table_size /= sizeof(struct clk_div_table);
+
table = kzalloc(sizeof(struct clk_div_table) * table_size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!table) {
pr_err("%s: unable to allocate memory for %s table\n", __func__, node->name);
@@ -341,10 +344,10 @@ struct clk_div_table *of_clk_get_div_table(struct device_node *node)
}
for (i = 0; i < table_size; i++) {
- if (!of_property_read_u32_array(node, "table", pair, ARRAY_SIZE(pair))) {
- table[i].val = pair[0];
- table[i].div = pair[1];
- }
+ of_property_read_u32_index(node, "table", i * 2, &val);
+ table[i].div = val;
+ of_property_read_u32_index(node, "table", i * 2 + 1, &val);
+ table[i].val = val;
}
return table;
The existing implementation had a couple of bugs: 1) table_size was attempted to read improperly, it has to be calculated from the 'len' parameter of a property 2) Reading the integer entries from the table was reading only first two entries of the DT data Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com> --- drivers/clk/clk-divider.c | 19 +++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)