From patchwork Sat May 21 11:50:32 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Andrea Gelmini X-Patchwork-Id: 9130389 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36A9460762 for ; Sat, 21 May 2016 11:50:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C2F027B89 for ; Sat, 21 May 2016 11:50:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 0113828114; Sat, 21 May 2016 11:50:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B011527B89 for ; Sat, 21 May 2016 11:50:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752012AbcEULui (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 May 2016 07:50:38 -0400 Received: from mail-lf0-f68.google.com ([209.85.215.68]:36021 "EHLO mail-lf0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751156AbcEULuh (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 May 2016 07:50:37 -0400 Received: by mail-lf0-f68.google.com with SMTP id d132so1668387lfb.3 for ; Sat, 21 May 2016 04:50:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=DtB0I8LHJeO6G6NDwuF4WTvMUOak6b3SQXGoem8j2UQ=; b=K2+xUGlea3eFJ+3brUI/oluHLd04AMjBmCmVhEdoL7Af3x7dY1lqnYa8F0LKh/KDgB HYbpbJEr5dKQPRvo3/BCegUeJ0x9+NXOrdGtl/UpTjmd1Dg/lQ45oWqkThnHWasXBUzD MTcy/iox0VlRLGtAf45i+croimBcZXb13LmwCg/xUmfvaHRkKZdjJztO7E+3NttnTSAd 0PswTKPLpRFEgcwzr2yKECnaSYgpLCKoervtoJUAvmYj+dVlW+gU+gCIP7zvWho6abQ6 zVOU0dVPpGqDfw4I5ym3JEPgq06lC4FbSXzHm4ImSOIuwyWK67ukkLR1J/ZfQ3ykZmT4 4m1Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=DtB0I8LHJeO6G6NDwuF4WTvMUOak6b3SQXGoem8j2UQ=; b=SUgv7lbMzb+lF24GsAeKc7vXvkl96sYez6L6M7m0SJmLQz/o9y0pory+b0t3vDlnsv 5hUEDNNgBNt7+D54Hw6fvcK16BxVJ/dpoeibkNP46HtnTe7w/cHYHIV5ytBb+gCM4u5r H+3uSLsIB4b/N6HgMrhFliihngaSTAQKjQ/ypuVtP/pVX2gTMZSOkZ6ZagFhNdFSm29z q96DBOQBkVYiAdYU+MYsIroHr/q9MwzB/9m7dO5UaMtdm1GWVHzyavDKUFHEsQLJ4S99 AmHCqRghbxeJtagkWDzhyBHg4Hrrw/zL36LuqWTXMpB/eRjMbywAgRuS+WB+7/rgdP+X Lnkw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVo9/5rWq8aljZiGHayNdrVtwR5MSn1XdbJsLUMH+UaTag05EJyylhq/yyrtgGS7A== X-Received: by 10.25.144.70 with SMTP id s67mr2953923lfd.14.1463831436141; Sat, 21 May 2016 04:50:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from glen.ipredator.se (anon-35-25.vpn.ipredator.se. [46.246.35.25]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h18sm1978567lbb.8.2016.05.21.04.50.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 21 May 2016 04:50:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrea Gelmini To: andrea.gelmini@gelma.net Cc: trivial@kernel.org, tony@atomide.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH 0108/1529] Fix typo Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 13:50:32 +0200 Message-Id: <20160521115032.4966-1-andrea.gelmini@gelma.net> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.8.2.534.g1f66975 Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Signed-off-by: Andrea Gelmini --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/sdrc.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sdrc.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sdrc.h index 645a2a4..f115006 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sdrc.h +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sdrc.h @@ -175,8 +175,8 @@ u32 omap2xxx_sdrc_reprogram(u32 level, u32 force); * don't adjust it down as your clock period increases the refresh interval * will not be met. Setting all parameters for complete worst case may work, * but may cut memory performance by 2x. Due to errata the DLLs need to be - * unlocked and their value needs run time calibration. A dynamic call is - * need for that as no single right value exists acorss production samples. + * unlocked and their value needs run time calibration. A dynamic call is + * need for that as no single right value exists across production samples. * * Only the FULL speed values are given. Current code is such that rate * changes must be made at DPLLoutx2. The actual value adjustment for low