Message ID | 20171009090338.26033-2-kishon@ti.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki On 09/10/17 12:03, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > PCI core access configuration space registers in resume_noirq callbacks. > In the case of dra7xx, PIPE3 PHY connected to PCIe controller has to be > enabled before accessing configuration space registers. Since > PIPE3 PHY is enabled by only configuring control module registers, no > aborts has been observed so far (though during noirq stage, interface > clock of PIPE3 PHY is not enabled). > > With new TRM updates, PIPE3 PHY has to be initialized (PIPE3 PHY > registers has to be accessed) as well which requires the interface > clock of PIPE3 PHY to be enabled. The interface clock of PIPE3 PHY is > derived from OCP2SCP and hence PCIe PHY is modeled as a child of > OCP2SCP. Since pm_runtime is not enabled during noirq stage, > pm_runtime_get_sync done in phy_init doesn't enable > OCP2SCP clocks resulting in abort when PIPE3 PHY registers are > accessed. This could be the case not only with PCIe but even with USB and SATA? Maybe today it doesn't complain because USB/SATA is being resumed (by chance) after PHY? > > Create a function dependency between PCIe and PHY here to make > sure PCIe is suspended before PCIe PHY/OCP2SCP and resumed after > PCIe PHY/OCP2SCP. > > Suggested-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> > Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> > Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> > --- > drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c > index 34427a6a15af..362607f727ee 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ > */ > > #include <linux/delay.h> > +#include <linux/device.h> > #include <linux/err.h> > #include <linux/interrupt.h> > #include <linux/irq.h> > @@ -594,6 +595,7 @@ static int __init dra7xx_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > int i; > int phy_count; > struct phy **phy; > + struct device_link **link; > void __iomem *base; > struct resource *res; > struct dw_pcie *pci; > @@ -649,11 +651,21 @@ static int __init dra7xx_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (!phy) > return -ENOMEM; > > + link = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*link) * phy_count, GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!link) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > for (i = 0; i < phy_count; i++) { > snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "pcie-phy%d", i); > phy[i] = devm_phy_get(dev, name); > if (IS_ERR(phy[i])) > return PTR_ERR(phy[i]); > + > + link[i] = device_link_add(dev, &phy[i]->dev, DL_FLAG_STATELESS); > + if (!link[i]) { > + ret = -EINVAL; > + goto err_link; > + } > } > > dra7xx->base = base; > @@ -732,6 +744,10 @@ static int __init dra7xx_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > pm_runtime_disable(dev); > dra7xx_pcie_disable_phy(dra7xx); > > +err_link: > + while (--i >= 0) > + device_link_del(link[i]); > + > return ret; > } > >
Roger, On Tuesday 10 October 2017 12:49 PM, Roger Quadros wrote: > On 09/10/17 12:03, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> PCI core access configuration space registers in resume_noirq callbacks. >> In the case of dra7xx, PIPE3 PHY connected to PCIe controller has to be >> enabled before accessing configuration space registers. Since >> PIPE3 PHY is enabled by only configuring control module registers, no >> aborts has been observed so far (though during noirq stage, interface >> clock of PIPE3 PHY is not enabled). >> >> With new TRM updates, PIPE3 PHY has to be initialized (PIPE3 PHY >> registers has to be accessed) as well which requires the interface >> clock of PIPE3 PHY to be enabled. The interface clock of PIPE3 PHY is >> derived from OCP2SCP and hence PCIe PHY is modeled as a child of >> OCP2SCP. Since pm_runtime is not enabled during noirq stage, >> pm_runtime_get_sync done in phy_init doesn't enable >> OCP2SCP clocks resulting in abort when PIPE3 PHY registers are >> accessed. > > This could be the case not only with PCIe but even with USB and SATA? right, if USB/SATA driver has no_irq callbacks then the same issue might occur. But looks like none of them uses no_irq callbacks. > Maybe today it doesn't complain because USB/SATA is being resumed (by chance) after PHY? But once pm_runtime is enabled, USB/SATA can enable PHY which in turn will enable OCP2SCP and PHY can be accessed without any issues. Thanks Kishon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki On 10/10/17 10:42, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > Roger, > > On Tuesday 10 October 2017 12:49 PM, Roger Quadros wrote: >> On 09/10/17 12:03, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >>> PCI core access configuration space registers in resume_noirq callbacks. >>> In the case of dra7xx, PIPE3 PHY connected to PCIe controller has to be >>> enabled before accessing configuration space registers. Since >>> PIPE3 PHY is enabled by only configuring control module registers, no >>> aborts has been observed so far (though during noirq stage, interface >>> clock of PIPE3 PHY is not enabled). >>> >>> With new TRM updates, PIPE3 PHY has to be initialized (PIPE3 PHY >>> registers has to be accessed) as well which requires the interface >>> clock of PIPE3 PHY to be enabled. The interface clock of PIPE3 PHY is >>> derived from OCP2SCP and hence PCIe PHY is modeled as a child of >>> OCP2SCP. Since pm_runtime is not enabled during noirq stage, >>> pm_runtime_get_sync done in phy_init doesn't enable >>> OCP2SCP clocks resulting in abort when PIPE3 PHY registers are >>> accessed. >> >> This could be the case not only with PCIe but even with USB and SATA? > > right, if USB/SATA driver has no_irq callbacks then the same issue might occur. OK. Is this something that we should document in Documentation/phy.txt? > But looks like none of them uses no_irq callbacks. >> Maybe today it doesn't complain because USB/SATA is being resumed (by chance) after PHY? > > But once pm_runtime is enabled, USB/SATA can enable PHY which in turn will > enable OCP2SCP and PHY can be accessed without any issues. > > Thanks > Kishon >
Hi, On Tuesday 10 October 2017 01:29 PM, Roger Quadros wrote: > On 10/10/17 10:42, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> Roger, >> >> On Tuesday 10 October 2017 12:49 PM, Roger Quadros wrote: >>> On 09/10/17 12:03, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >>>> PCI core access configuration space registers in resume_noirq callbacks. >>>> In the case of dra7xx, PIPE3 PHY connected to PCIe controller has to be >>>> enabled before accessing configuration space registers. Since >>>> PIPE3 PHY is enabled by only configuring control module registers, no >>>> aborts has been observed so far (though during noirq stage, interface >>>> clock of PIPE3 PHY is not enabled). >>>> >>>> With new TRM updates, PIPE3 PHY has to be initialized (PIPE3 PHY >>>> registers has to be accessed) as well which requires the interface >>>> clock of PIPE3 PHY to be enabled. The interface clock of PIPE3 PHY is >>>> derived from OCP2SCP and hence PCIe PHY is modeled as a child of >>>> OCP2SCP. Since pm_runtime is not enabled during noirq stage, >>>> pm_runtime_get_sync done in phy_init doesn't enable >>>> OCP2SCP clocks resulting in abort when PIPE3 PHY registers are >>>> accessed. >>> >>> This could be the case not only with PCIe but even with USB and SATA? >> >> right, if USB/SATA driver has no_irq callbacks then the same issue might occur. > > OK. Is this something that we should document in Documentation/phy.txt? Yeah it could be but the dependency is not required for a lot of phy consumer drivers. Do you think it makes sense to create functional dependency between phy and it's consumers in phy_get? Thanks Kishon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi, On 18/10/17 15:12, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > Hi, > > On Tuesday 10 October 2017 01:29 PM, Roger Quadros wrote: >> On 10/10/17 10:42, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >>> Roger, >>> >>> On Tuesday 10 October 2017 12:49 PM, Roger Quadros wrote: >>>> On 09/10/17 12:03, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >>>>> PCI core access configuration space registers in resume_noirq callbacks. >>>>> In the case of dra7xx, PIPE3 PHY connected to PCIe controller has to be >>>>> enabled before accessing configuration space registers. Since >>>>> PIPE3 PHY is enabled by only configuring control module registers, no >>>>> aborts has been observed so far (though during noirq stage, interface >>>>> clock of PIPE3 PHY is not enabled). >>>>> >>>>> With new TRM updates, PIPE3 PHY has to be initialized (PIPE3 PHY >>>>> registers has to be accessed) as well which requires the interface >>>>> clock of PIPE3 PHY to be enabled. The interface clock of PIPE3 PHY is >>>>> derived from OCP2SCP and hence PCIe PHY is modeled as a child of >>>>> OCP2SCP. Since pm_runtime is not enabled during noirq stage, >>>>> pm_runtime_get_sync done in phy_init doesn't enable >>>>> OCP2SCP clocks resulting in abort when PIPE3 PHY registers are >>>>> accessed. >>>> >>>> This could be the case not only with PCIe but even with USB and SATA? >>> >>> right, if USB/SATA driver has no_irq callbacks then the same issue might occur. >> >> OK. Is this something that we should document in Documentation/phy.txt? > > Yeah it could be but the dependency is not required for a lot of phy consumer > drivers. But they could add a no_irq callback in the future and then things break. > Do you think it makes sense to create functional dependency between phy and > it's consumers in phy_get? I think making it generic makes more sense without placing restrictions on users. > > Thanks > Kishon >
diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c index 34427a6a15af..362607f727ee 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ */ #include <linux/delay.h> +#include <linux/device.h> #include <linux/err.h> #include <linux/interrupt.h> #include <linux/irq.h> @@ -594,6 +595,7 @@ static int __init dra7xx_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) int i; int phy_count; struct phy **phy; + struct device_link **link; void __iomem *base; struct resource *res; struct dw_pcie *pci; @@ -649,11 +651,21 @@ static int __init dra7xx_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (!phy) return -ENOMEM; + link = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*link) * phy_count, GFP_KERNEL); + if (!link) + return -ENOMEM; + for (i = 0; i < phy_count; i++) { snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "pcie-phy%d", i); phy[i] = devm_phy_get(dev, name); if (IS_ERR(phy[i])) return PTR_ERR(phy[i]); + + link[i] = device_link_add(dev, &phy[i]->dev, DL_FLAG_STATELESS); + if (!link[i]) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto err_link; + } } dra7xx->base = base; @@ -732,6 +744,10 @@ static int __init dra7xx_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) pm_runtime_disable(dev); dra7xx_pcie_disable_phy(dra7xx); +err_link: + while (--i >= 0) + device_link_del(link[i]); + return ret; }