diff mbox

bh1770 hacks: get it to work on n950

Message ID 20171116115703.GA26735@amd (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Pavel Machek Nov. 16, 2017, 11:57 a.m. UTC 
Hi!

Ok, not for application, but I can get light sensor to work.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>

Comments

Sebastian Reichel Nov. 17, 2017, 11:35 a.m. UTC | #1 
Hi,

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 12:57:03PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Ok, not for application, but I can get light sensor to work.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>

There is no mainline user of this driver and it has a custom API, so
I think the driver should be dropped and an IIO based one should be
created instead.

-- Sebastian

> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n950.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n950.dts
> index 50c4fc6..15841f7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n950.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n950.dts
> @@ -150,6 +150,23 @@
>                 };
>         };
>  
> +       bh1770@38 {
> +       		 compatible = "bh1770glc";
> +		 reg = <0x38>;
> +
> +		 vdd-supply = <&vaux1>;
> +		 leds-supply = <&vaux1>; /* FIXME: really on vbat */
> +
> +		 /* GPIO 83 on n950.
> + 		 .leds              = BHSFH_LED1,
> + 		 .led_max_curr      = BHSFH_LED_100mA,
> + 		 .led_def_curr      = BHSFH_LED_50mA,
> + 		 .glass_attenuation = (16384 * 385) / 100, ... about 3.85x filtering
> + 		 */
> +       };
> +
> +       /* Also TLV320DAC33 and TPA6130A2 */
> +
>  	touch@4b {
>  		compatible = "atmel,maxtouch";
>  		reg = <0x4b>;
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/bh1770glc.c b/drivers/misc/bh1770glc.c
> index 9c62bf0..f08df29 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/bh1770glc.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/bh1770glc.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>   *
>   */
>  
> +#define DEBUG
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/i2c.h>
> @@ -525,16 +526,22 @@ static int bh1770_detect(struct bh1770_chip *chip)
>  	s32 ret;
>  	u8 manu, part;
>  
> +	printk("Detect...\n");
> +
>  	ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, BH1770_MANUFACT_ID);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		goto error;
>  	manu = (u8)ret;
>  
> +	printk("Detect... manufact\n");
> +
>  	ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, BH1770_PART_ID);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		goto error;
>  	part = (u8)ret;
>  
> +	printk("Detect... part ... got %x %x\n", manu, part);
> +
>  	chip->revision = (part & BH1770_REV_MASK) >> BH1770_REV_SHIFT;
>  	chip->prox_coef = BH1770_COEF_SCALER;
>  	chip->prox_const = 0;
> @@ -1179,6 +1186,8 @@ static const struct attribute_group bh1770_attribute_group = {
>  	.attrs = sysfs_attrs
>  };
>  
> +struct bh1770_platform_data def = {};
> +
>  static int bh1770_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>  				const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>  {
> @@ -1189,6 +1198,8 @@ static int bh1770_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>  	if (!chip)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> +	printk("bh1770: probe\n");
> +
>  	i2c_set_clientdata(client, chip);
>  	chip->client  = client;
>  
> @@ -1198,10 +1209,12 @@ static int bh1770_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>  
>  	if (client->dev.platform_data == NULL) {
>  		dev_err(&client->dev, "platform data is mandatory\n");
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +		//return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
>  	chip->pdata		= client->dev.platform_data;
> +	if (!chip->pdata)
> +		chip->pdata = &def;
>  	chip->lux_calib		= BH1770_LUX_NEUTRAL_CALIB_VALUE;
>  	chip->lux_rate_index	= BH1770_LUX_DEFAULT_RATE;
>  	chip->lux_threshold_lo	= BH1770_LUX_DEF_THRES;
> @@ -1220,6 +1233,8 @@ static int bh1770_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>  	chip->prox_rate		= BH1770_PROX_DEFAULT_RATE;
>  	chip->prox_data		= 0;
>  
> +	printk("bh1770: regulators\n");
> +	
>  	chip->regs[0].supply = reg_vcc;
>  	chip->regs[1].supply = reg_vleds;
>  
> @@ -1227,14 +1242,12 @@ static int bh1770_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>  				      ARRAY_SIZE(chip->regs), chip->regs);
>  	if (err < 0) {
>  		dev_err(&client->dev, "Cannot get regulators\n");
> -		return err;
>  	}
>  
>  	err = regulator_bulk_enable(ARRAY_SIZE(chip->regs),
>  				chip->regs);
>  	if (err < 0) {
>  		dev_err(&client->dev, "Cannot enable regulators\n");
> -		return err;
>  	}
>  
>  	usleep_range(BH1770_STARTUP_DELAY, BH1770_STARTUP_DELAY * 2);
> @@ -1242,6 +1255,8 @@ static int bh1770_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>  	if (err < 0)
>  		goto fail0;
>  
> +	printk("bh1770: detected\n");
> +
>  	/* Start chip */
>  	bh1770_chip_on(chip);
>  	pm_runtime_set_active(&client->dev);
> @@ -1269,6 +1284,8 @@ static int bh1770_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>  		goto fail1;
>  	}
>  
> +	printk("bh1770: sysfs ok\n");
> +	
>  	/*
>  	 * Chip needs level triggered interrupt to work. However,
>  	 * level triggering doesn't work always correctly with power
> @@ -1282,8 +1299,12 @@ static int bh1770_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>  	if (err) {
>  		dev_err(&client->dev, "could not get IRQ %d\n",
>  			client->irq);
> -		goto fail2;
> +		//goto fail2;
>  	}
> +
> +	printk("bh1770: irq ok, all done\n");
> +	err = 0;
> +	
>  	regulator_bulk_disable(ARRAY_SIZE(chip->regs), chip->regs);
>  	return err;
>  fail2:
> @@ -1393,10 +1414,18 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops bh1770_pm_ops = {
>  	SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(bh1770_runtime_suspend, bh1770_runtime_resume, NULL)
>  };
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +static const struct of_device_id bh1770_of_match_table[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "bq27200" },
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, bh1770_of_match_table);
> +#endif	
> +
>  static struct i2c_driver bh1770_driver = {
>  	.driver	 = {
>  		.name	= "bh1770glc",
>  		.pm	= &bh1770_pm_ops,
> +		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(bh1770_of_match_table),
>  	},
>  	.probe	  = bh1770_probe,
>  	.remove	  = bh1770_remove,
> 
> 
> -- 
> (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
> (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Pavel Machek Nov. 19, 2017, 12:41 p.m. UTC | #2 
On Fri 2017-11-17 12:35:40, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 12:57:03PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> > 
> > Ok, not for application, but I can get light sensor to work.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> 
> There is no mainline user of this driver and it has a custom API, so
> I think the driver should be dropped and an IIO based one should be
> created instead.

While I agree IIO interface might be better, and would welcome
patches, I don't think that dropping the driver is right action at
this point.
								Pavel
Ladislav Michl Nov. 19, 2017, 2:12 p.m. UTC | #3 
On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 01:41:50PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Fri 2017-11-17 12:35:40, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 12:57:03PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > > 
> > > Ok, not for application, but I can get light sensor to work.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> > 
> > There is no mainline user of this driver and it has a custom API, so
> > I think the driver should be dropped and an IIO based one should be
> > created instead.
> 
> While I agree IIO interface might be better, and would welcome
> patches, I don't think that dropping the driver is right action at
> this point.

That's the most elegant solution at all. How would you later motivate
people to try and test IIO driver? Let's pretend this patch have never
existed until someone notices and starts playing "you broke kernel ABI"
game.

Thank you,
	ladis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Pavel Machek Nov. 19, 2017, 3:07 p.m. UTC | #4 
On Sun 2017-11-19 15:12:13, Ladislav Michl wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 01:41:50PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Fri 2017-11-17 12:35:40, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 12:57:03PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > Hi!
> > > > 
> > > > Ok, not for application, but I can get light sensor to work.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> > > 
> > > There is no mainline user of this driver and it has a custom API, so
> > > I think the driver should be dropped and an IIO based one should be
> > > created instead.
> > 
> > While I agree IIO interface might be better, and would welcome
> > patches, I don't think that dropping the driver is right action at
> > this point.
> 
> That's the most elegant solution at all. How would you later motivate
> people to try and test IIO driver? Let's pretend this patch have never
> existed until someone notices and starts playing "you broke kernel ABI"
> game.

I'm using the driver; I'm even interested in fixing it. Please try not
to make my job any harder than it needs to be, and I'll try to break
ABI.

That goes to Sebastian, too.

If you want to convert the driver to IIO, please do so, I can test the patches.

Thank you,
									Pavel
Sebastian Reichel Nov. 19, 2017, 9:10 p.m. UTC | #5 
Hi,

On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 04:07:30PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Sun 2017-11-19 15:12:13, Ladislav Michl wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 01:41:50PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > On Fri 2017-11-17 12:35:40, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 12:57:03PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > > Hi!
> > > > > 
> > > > > Ok, not for application, but I can get light sensor to work.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> > > > 
> > > > There is no mainline user of this driver and it has a custom API, so
> > > > I think the driver should be dropped and an IIO based one should be
> > > > created instead.
> > > 
> > > While I agree IIO interface might be better, and would welcome
> > > patches, I don't think that dropping the driver is right action at
> > > this point.
> > 
> > That's the most elegant solution at all. How would you later motivate
> > people to try and test IIO driver? Let's pretend this patch have never
> > existed until someone notices and starts playing "you broke kernel ABI"
> > game.
> 
> I'm using the driver; I'm even interested in fixing it. Please try not
> to make my job any harder than it needs to be, and I'll try to break
> ABI.
> 
> That goes to Sebastian, too.
> 
> If you want to convert the driver to IIO, please do so, I can test
> the patches.

Looks like I need to be more explicit, so be it:

NAKed-by: Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>

-- Sebastian
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n950.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n950.dts
index 50c4fc6..15841f7 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n950.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n950.dts
@@ -150,6 +150,23 @@ 
                };
        };
 
+       bh1770@38 {
+       		 compatible = "bh1770glc";
+		 reg = <0x38>;
+
+		 vdd-supply = <&vaux1>;
+		 leds-supply = <&vaux1>; /* FIXME: really on vbat */
+
+		 /* GPIO 83 on n950.
+ 		 .leds              = BHSFH_LED1,
+ 		 .led_max_curr      = BHSFH_LED_100mA,
+ 		 .led_def_curr      = BHSFH_LED_50mA,
+ 		 .glass_attenuation = (16384 * 385) / 100, ... about 3.85x filtering
+ 		 */
+       };
+
+       /* Also TLV320DAC33 and TPA6130A2 */
+
 	touch@4b {
 		compatible = "atmel,maxtouch";
 		reg = <0x4b>;
diff --git a/drivers/misc/bh1770glc.c b/drivers/misc/bh1770glc.c
index 9c62bf0..f08df29 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/bh1770glc.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/bh1770glc.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ 
  *
  */
 
+#define DEBUG
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/i2c.h>
@@ -525,16 +526,22 @@  static int bh1770_detect(struct bh1770_chip *chip)
 	s32 ret;
 	u8 manu, part;
 
+	printk("Detect...\n");
+
 	ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, BH1770_MANUFACT_ID);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto error;
 	manu = (u8)ret;
 
+	printk("Detect... manufact\n");
+
 	ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, BH1770_PART_ID);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto error;
 	part = (u8)ret;
 
+	printk("Detect... part ... got %x %x\n", manu, part);
+
 	chip->revision = (part & BH1770_REV_MASK) >> BH1770_REV_SHIFT;
 	chip->prox_coef = BH1770_COEF_SCALER;
 	chip->prox_const = 0;
@@ -1179,6 +1186,8 @@  static const struct attribute_group bh1770_attribute_group = {
 	.attrs = sysfs_attrs
 };
 
+struct bh1770_platform_data def = {};
+
 static int bh1770_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
 				const struct i2c_device_id *id)
 {
@@ -1189,6 +1198,8 @@  static int bh1770_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
 	if (!chip)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
+	printk("bh1770: probe\n");
+
 	i2c_set_clientdata(client, chip);
 	chip->client  = client;
 
@@ -1198,10 +1209,12 @@  static int bh1770_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
 
 	if (client->dev.platform_data == NULL) {
 		dev_err(&client->dev, "platform data is mandatory\n");
-		return -EINVAL;
+		//return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
 	chip->pdata		= client->dev.platform_data;
+	if (!chip->pdata)
+		chip->pdata = &def;
 	chip->lux_calib		= BH1770_LUX_NEUTRAL_CALIB_VALUE;
 	chip->lux_rate_index	= BH1770_LUX_DEFAULT_RATE;
 	chip->lux_threshold_lo	= BH1770_LUX_DEF_THRES;
@@ -1220,6 +1233,8 @@  static int bh1770_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
 	chip->prox_rate		= BH1770_PROX_DEFAULT_RATE;
 	chip->prox_data		= 0;
 
+	printk("bh1770: regulators\n");
+	
 	chip->regs[0].supply = reg_vcc;
 	chip->regs[1].supply = reg_vleds;
 
@@ -1227,14 +1242,12 @@  static int bh1770_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
 				      ARRAY_SIZE(chip->regs), chip->regs);
 	if (err < 0) {
 		dev_err(&client->dev, "Cannot get regulators\n");
-		return err;
 	}
 
 	err = regulator_bulk_enable(ARRAY_SIZE(chip->regs),
 				chip->regs);
 	if (err < 0) {
 		dev_err(&client->dev, "Cannot enable regulators\n");
-		return err;
 	}
 
 	usleep_range(BH1770_STARTUP_DELAY, BH1770_STARTUP_DELAY * 2);
@@ -1242,6 +1255,8 @@  static int bh1770_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
 	if (err < 0)
 		goto fail0;
 
+	printk("bh1770: detected\n");
+
 	/* Start chip */
 	bh1770_chip_on(chip);
 	pm_runtime_set_active(&client->dev);
@@ -1269,6 +1284,8 @@  static int bh1770_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
 		goto fail1;
 	}
 
+	printk("bh1770: sysfs ok\n");
+	
 	/*
 	 * Chip needs level triggered interrupt to work. However,
 	 * level triggering doesn't work always correctly with power
@@ -1282,8 +1299,12 @@  static int bh1770_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
 	if (err) {
 		dev_err(&client->dev, "could not get IRQ %d\n",
 			client->irq);
-		goto fail2;
+		//goto fail2;
 	}
+
+	printk("bh1770: irq ok, all done\n");
+	err = 0;
+	
 	regulator_bulk_disable(ARRAY_SIZE(chip->regs), chip->regs);
 	return err;
 fail2:
@@ -1393,10 +1414,18 @@  static const struct dev_pm_ops bh1770_pm_ops = {
 	SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(bh1770_runtime_suspend, bh1770_runtime_resume, NULL)
 };
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_OF
+static const struct of_device_id bh1770_of_match_table[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "bq27200" },
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, bh1770_of_match_table);
+#endif	
+
 static struct i2c_driver bh1770_driver = {
 	.driver	 = {
 		.name	= "bh1770glc",
 		.pm	= &bh1770_pm_ops,
+		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(bh1770_of_match_table),
 	},
 	.probe	  = bh1770_probe,
 	.remove	  = bh1770_remove,