| Message ID | 20180509110024.1772-1-nsekhar@ti.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 04:30:24PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote: > A well timed kernel preemption in the time_after() loop > in wait_for_idle() can result in a spurious timeout > error to be returned. > > Fix it by using readl_poll_timeout() which takes care of > this issue. > > Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> > --- > v2: use readl_poll_timeout() per suggestion from Andrew. > > The issue has not been personally observed by me, but has > been reported by users. Sending for next-next given the > non-critical nature. There is seems to be no easy way to > reproduce this. > > drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c | 15 +++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c > index 3c33f4504d8e..d073432a5dbe 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c > @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ > #include <linux/clk.h> > #include <linux/err.h> > #include <linux/io.h> > +#include <linux/iopoll.h> > #include <linux/pm_runtime.h> > #include <linux/davinci_emac.h> > #include <linux/of.h> > @@ -227,14 +228,16 @@ static inline int wait_for_user_access(struct davinci_mdio_data *data) > static inline int wait_for_idle(struct davinci_mdio_data *data) > { > struct davinci_mdio_regs __iomem *regs = data->regs; > - unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(MDIO_TIMEOUT); > + u32 val, ret; > > - while (time_after(timeout, jiffies)) { > - if (__raw_readl(®s->control) & CONTROL_IDLE) > - return 0; > + ret = readl_poll_timeout(®s->control, val, val & CONTROL_IDLE, > + 0, MDIO_TIMEOUT * 1000); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(data->dev, "timed out waiting for idle\n"); > + return ret; > } > - dev_err(data->dev, "timed out waiting for idle\n"); > - return -ETIMEDOUT; > + > + return 0; > } Hi Sekhar You could simplify this to: > + if (ret) > + dev_err(data->dev, "timed out waiting for idle\n"); > + return ret; Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Andrew -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wednesday 09 May 2018 07:00 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 04:30:24PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> A well timed kernel preemption in the time_after() loop >> in wait_for_idle() can result in a spurious timeout >> error to be returned. >> >> Fix it by using readl_poll_timeout() which takes care of >> this issue. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> >> --- >> v2: use readl_poll_timeout() per suggestion from Andrew. >> >> The issue has not been personally observed by me, but has >> been reported by users. Sending for next-next given the >> non-critical nature. There is seems to be no easy way to >> reproduce this. >> >> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c | 15 +++++++++------ >> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c >> index 3c33f4504d8e..d073432a5dbe 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c >> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ >> #include <linux/clk.h> >> #include <linux/err.h> >> #include <linux/io.h> >> +#include <linux/iopoll.h> >> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h> >> #include <linux/davinci_emac.h> >> #include <linux/of.h> >> @@ -227,14 +228,16 @@ static inline int wait_for_user_access(struct davinci_mdio_data *data) >> static inline int wait_for_idle(struct davinci_mdio_data *data) >> { >> struct davinci_mdio_regs __iomem *regs = data->regs; >> - unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(MDIO_TIMEOUT); >> + u32 val, ret; >> >> - while (time_after(timeout, jiffies)) { >> - if (__raw_readl(®s->control) & CONTROL_IDLE) >> - return 0; >> + ret = readl_poll_timeout(®s->control, val, val & CONTROL_IDLE, >> + 0, MDIO_TIMEOUT * 1000); >> + if (ret) { >> + dev_err(data->dev, "timed out waiting for idle\n"); >> + return ret; >> } >> - dev_err(data->dev, "timed out waiting for idle\n"); >> - return -ETIMEDOUT; >> + >> + return 0; >> } > > Hi Sekhar > > You could simplify this to: > >> + if (ret) >> + dev_err(data->dev, "timed out waiting for idle\n"); >> + return ret; > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Indeed. v3 sent. Thanks, Sekhar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c index 3c33f4504d8e..d073432a5dbe 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ #include <linux/clk.h> #include <linux/err.h> #include <linux/io.h> +#include <linux/iopoll.h> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h> #include <linux/davinci_emac.h> #include <linux/of.h> @@ -227,14 +228,16 @@ static inline int wait_for_user_access(struct davinci_mdio_data *data) static inline int wait_for_idle(struct davinci_mdio_data *data) { struct davinci_mdio_regs __iomem *regs = data->regs; - unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(MDIO_TIMEOUT); + u32 val, ret; - while (time_after(timeout, jiffies)) { - if (__raw_readl(®s->control) & CONTROL_IDLE) - return 0; + ret = readl_poll_timeout(®s->control, val, val & CONTROL_IDLE, + 0, MDIO_TIMEOUT * 1000); + if (ret) { + dev_err(data->dev, "timed out waiting for idle\n"); + return ret; } - dev_err(data->dev, "timed out waiting for idle\n"); - return -ETIMEDOUT; + + return 0; } static int davinci_mdio_read(struct mii_bus *bus, int phy_id, int phy_reg)
A well timed kernel preemption in the time_after() loop in wait_for_idle() can result in a spurious timeout error to be returned. Fix it by using readl_poll_timeout() which takes care of this issue. Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> --- v2: use readl_poll_timeout() per suggestion from Andrew. The issue has not been personally observed by me, but has been reported by users. Sending for next-next given the non-critical nature. There is seems to be no easy way to reproduce this. drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c | 15 +++++++++------ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)