| Message ID | 20211019234059.29877-1-digetx@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v1] ARM: dts: elpida_ecb240abacn: Change Elpida compatible | expand |
20.10.2021 02:40, Dmitry Osipenko пишет: > Vendor prefix shouldn't start with capital letter. The Elpida Memory > compatible was never used in practice, hence just correct the compatible. > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/elpida_ecb240abacn.dtsi | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/elpida_ecb240abacn.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/elpida_ecb240abacn.dtsi > index d87ee4794f83..9698801cbcfb 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/elpida_ecb240abacn.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/elpida_ecb240abacn.dtsi > @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ > > / { > elpida_ECB240ABACN: lpddr2 { > - compatible = "Elpida,ECB240ABACN","jedec,lpddr2-s4"; > + compatible = "elpida,ECB240ABACN","jedec,lpddr2-s4"; > density = <2048>; > io-width = <32>; > > This patch should go via OMAP tree since there is only OMAP board which uses this dtsi. To make it more clear, "elpida" variant is now documented in the bindings [1][2]. [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=9e17f71e9c334f14ad6a8ec3edc09c7a4244e12f [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=001b8b2594db4ea24fbea4c161e665f858917fce If there is no interest in taking the patch via OMAP tree, then it may go via the DT git tree. Rob, you should pick it up then. Thanks!
Hi, * Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> [211027 12:19]: > 20.10.2021 02:40, Dmitry Osipenko пишет: > > Vendor prefix shouldn't start with capital letter. The Elpida Memory > > compatible was never used in practice, hence just correct the compatible. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> > > --- > > arch/arm/boot/dts/elpida_ecb240abacn.dtsi | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/elpida_ecb240abacn.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/elpida_ecb240abacn.dtsi > > index d87ee4794f83..9698801cbcfb 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/elpida_ecb240abacn.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/elpida_ecb240abacn.dtsi > > @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ > > > > / { > > elpida_ECB240ABACN: lpddr2 { > > - compatible = "Elpida,ECB240ABACN","jedec,lpddr2-s4"; > > + compatible = "elpida,ECB240ABACN","jedec,lpddr2-s4"; > > density = <2048>; > > io-width = <32>; > > > > > > This patch should go via OMAP tree since there is only OMAP board which > uses this dtsi. To make it more clear, "elpida" variant is now > documented in the bindings [1][2]. > > [1] > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=9e17f71e9c334f14ad6a8ec3edc09c7a4244e12f > > [2] > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=001b8b2594db4ea24fbea4c161e665f858917fce > > If there is no interest in taking the patch via OMAP tree, then it may > go via the DT git tree. Rob, you should pick it up then. Applying into omap-for-v5.17/dt thanks. Regards, Tony
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/elpida_ecb240abacn.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/elpida_ecb240abacn.dtsi index d87ee4794f83..9698801cbcfb 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/elpida_ecb240abacn.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/elpida_ecb240abacn.dtsi @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ / { elpida_ECB240ABACN: lpddr2 { - compatible = "Elpida,ECB240ABACN","jedec,lpddr2-s4"; + compatible = "elpida,ECB240ABACN","jedec,lpddr2-s4"; density = <2048>; io-width = <32>;
Vendor prefix shouldn't start with capital letter. The Elpida Memory compatible was never used in practice, hence just correct the compatible. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/elpida_ecb240abacn.dtsi | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)