| Message ID | 20240319110633.230329-1-matthijs@stdin.nl (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | pinctrl: single: Fix PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE handling | expand |
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 12:07 PM Matthijs Kooijman <matthijs@stdin.nl> wrote: > The pinctrl-single driver handles pin_config_set by looking up the > requested setting in a DT-defined lookup table, which defines what bits > correspond to each setting. There is no way to add > PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE entries to the table, since there is instead > code to disable the bias by applying the disable values of both the > pullup and pulldown entries in the table. > > However, this code is inside the table-lookup loop, so it would only > execute if there is an entry for PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE in the table, > which can never exist, so this code never runs. > > This commit lifts the offending code out of the loop, so it just > executes directly whenever PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE is requested, > skippipng the table lookup loop. > > This also introduces a new `param` variable to make the code slightly > more readable. > > This bug seems to have existed when this code was first merged in commit > 9dddb4df90d13 ("pinctrl: single: support generic pinconf"). Earlier > versions of this patch did have an entry for PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE in > the lookup table, but that was removed, which is probably how this bug > was introduced. > > Signed-off-by: Matthijs Kooijman <matthijs@stdin.nl> This looks reasonable to me, but I need Tony to review it before applying. Yours, Linus Walleij
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 12:06:34PM +0100, Matthijs Kooijman wrote: > The pinctrl-single driver handles pin_config_set by looking up the > requested setting in a DT-defined lookup table, which defines what bits > correspond to each setting. There is no way to add > PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE entries to the table, since there is instead > code to disable the bias by applying the disable values of both the > pullup and pulldown entries in the table. > > However, this code is inside the table-lookup loop, so it would only > execute if there is an entry for PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE in the table, > which can never exist, so this code never runs. > > This commit lifts the offending code out of the loop, so it just > executes directly whenever PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE is requested, > skippipng the table lookup loop. > > This also introduces a new `param` variable to make the code slightly > more readable. > > This bug seems to have existed when this code was first merged in commit > 9dddb4df90d13 ("pinctrl: single: support generic pinconf"). Earlier > versions of this patch did have an entry for PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE in > the lookup table, but that was removed, which is probably how this bug > was introduced. > > Signed-off-by: Matthijs Kooijman <matthijs@stdin.nl> > --- > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 18 ++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c > index 19cc0db771a5a..c7a03b63fa812 100644 > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c > @@ -554,21 +554,30 @@ static int pcs_pinconf_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, > unsigned offset = 0, shift = 0, i, data, ret; > u32 arg; > int j; > + enum pin_config_param param; > > ret = pcs_get_function(pctldev, pin, &func); > if (ret) > return ret; > > for (j = 0; j < num_configs; j++) { > + param = pinconf_to_config_param(configs[j]); > + > + /* BIAS_DISABLE has no entry in the func->conf table */ > + if (param == PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE) { > + /* This just disables all bias entries */ > + pcs_pinconf_clear_bias(pctldev, pin); > + continue; > + } > + > for (i = 0; i < func->nconfs; i++) { > - if (pinconf_to_config_param(configs[j]) > - != func->conf[i].param) > + if (param != func->conf[i].param) > continue; > > offset = pin * (pcs->width / BITS_PER_BYTE); > data = pcs->read(pcs->base + offset); > arg = pinconf_to_config_argument(configs[j]); > - switch (func->conf[i].param) { > + switch (param) { > /* 2 parameters */ > case PIN_CONFIG_INPUT_SCHMITT: > case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_STRENGTH: > @@ -580,9 +589,6 @@ static int pcs_pinconf_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, > data |= (arg << shift) & func->conf[i].mask; > break; > /* 4 parameters */ > - case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE: > - pcs_pinconf_clear_bias(pctldev, pin); > - break; > case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN: > case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP: > if (arg) > -- > 2.40.1 > Reviewed-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@linaro.org>
* Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> [240328 21:02]: > On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 12:07 PM Matthijs Kooijman <matthijs@stdin.nl> wrote: > > > The pinctrl-single driver handles pin_config_set by looking up the > > requested setting in a DT-defined lookup table, which defines what bits > > correspond to each setting. There is no way to add > > PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE entries to the table, since there is instead > > code to disable the bias by applying the disable values of both the > > pullup and pulldown entries in the table. > > > > However, this code is inside the table-lookup loop, so it would only > > execute if there is an entry for PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE in the table, > > which can never exist, so this code never runs. > > > > This commit lifts the offending code out of the loop, so it just > > executes directly whenever PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE is requested, > > skippipng the table lookup loop. > > > > This also introduces a new `param` variable to make the code slightly > > more readable. > > > > This bug seems to have existed when this code was first merged in commit > > 9dddb4df90d13 ("pinctrl: single: support generic pinconf"). Earlier > > versions of this patch did have an entry for PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE in > > the lookup table, but that was removed, which is probably how this bug > > was introduced. > > > > Signed-off-by: Matthijs Kooijman <matthijs@stdin.nl> > > This looks reasonable to me, but I need Tony to review it before applying. Looks good to me: Reviewed-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 12:07 PM Matthijs Kooijman <matthijs@stdin.nl> wrote: > The pinctrl-single driver handles pin_config_set by looking up the > requested setting in a DT-defined lookup table, which defines what bits > correspond to each setting. There is no way to add > PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE entries to the table, since there is instead > code to disable the bias by applying the disable values of both the > pullup and pulldown entries in the table. > > However, this code is inside the table-lookup loop, so it would only > execute if there is an entry for PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE in the table, > which can never exist, so this code never runs. > > This commit lifts the offending code out of the loop, so it just > executes directly whenever PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE is requested, > skippipng the table lookup loop. > > This also introduces a new `param` variable to make the code slightly > more readable. > > This bug seems to have existed when this code was first merged in commit > 9dddb4df90d13 ("pinctrl: single: support generic pinconf"). Earlier > versions of this patch did have an entry for PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE in > the lookup table, but that was removed, which is probably how this bug > was introduced. > > Signed-off-by: Matthijs Kooijman <matthijs@stdin.nl> Patch applied! Yours, Linus Walleij
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c index 19cc0db771a5a..c7a03b63fa812 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c @@ -554,21 +554,30 @@ static int pcs_pinconf_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned offset = 0, shift = 0, i, data, ret; u32 arg; int j; + enum pin_config_param param; ret = pcs_get_function(pctldev, pin, &func); if (ret) return ret; for (j = 0; j < num_configs; j++) { + param = pinconf_to_config_param(configs[j]); + + /* BIAS_DISABLE has no entry in the func->conf table */ + if (param == PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE) { + /* This just disables all bias entries */ + pcs_pinconf_clear_bias(pctldev, pin); + continue; + } + for (i = 0; i < func->nconfs; i++) { - if (pinconf_to_config_param(configs[j]) - != func->conf[i].param) + if (param != func->conf[i].param) continue; offset = pin * (pcs->width / BITS_PER_BYTE); data = pcs->read(pcs->base + offset); arg = pinconf_to_config_argument(configs[j]); - switch (func->conf[i].param) { + switch (param) { /* 2 parameters */ case PIN_CONFIG_INPUT_SCHMITT: case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_STRENGTH: @@ -580,9 +589,6 @@ static int pcs_pinconf_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, data |= (arg << shift) & func->conf[i].mask; break; /* 4 parameters */ - case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE: - pcs_pinconf_clear_bias(pctldev, pin); - break; case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN: case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP: if (arg)
The pinctrl-single driver handles pin_config_set by looking up the requested setting in a DT-defined lookup table, which defines what bits correspond to each setting. There is no way to add PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE entries to the table, since there is instead code to disable the bias by applying the disable values of both the pullup and pulldown entries in the table. However, this code is inside the table-lookup loop, so it would only execute if there is an entry for PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE in the table, which can never exist, so this code never runs. This commit lifts the offending code out of the loop, so it just executes directly whenever PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE is requested, skippipng the table lookup loop. This also introduces a new `param` variable to make the code slightly more readable. This bug seems to have existed when this code was first merged in commit 9dddb4df90d13 ("pinctrl: single: support generic pinconf"). Earlier versions of this patch did have an entry for PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE in the lookup table, but that was removed, which is probably how this bug was introduced. Signed-off-by: Matthijs Kooijman <matthijs@stdin.nl> --- drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 18 ++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)