Message ID | 20170415171652.675049942@linutronix.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Delegated to: | Bjorn Helgaas |
Headers | show |
On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 07:01:24PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c > @@ -320,10 +320,19 @@ static long local_pci_probe(void *_ddi) > return 0; > } > > +static bool pci_physfn_is_probed(struct pci_dev *dev) > +{ > +#ifdef CONFIG_ATS > + return dev->physfn->is_probed; > +#else > + return false; > +#endif > +} > + Should be in the next patch perhaps?
On Mon, 17 Apr 2017, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 07:01:24PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c > > @@ -320,10 +320,19 @@ static long local_pci_probe(void *_ddi) > > return 0; > > } > > > > +static bool pci_physfn_is_probed(struct pci_dev *dev) > > +{ > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ATS > > + return dev->physfn->is_probed; > > +#else > > + return false; > > +#endif > > +} > > + > > Should be in the next patch perhaps? Indeed.
On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 07:01:24PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Converting the hotplug locking, i.e. get_online_cpus(), to a percpu rwsem > unearthed a circular lock dependency which was hidden from lockdep due to > the lockdep annotation of get_online_cpus() which prevents lockdep from > creating full dependency chains. There are several variants of this. And > example is: > > Chain exists of: > > cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem --> drm_global_mutex --> &item->mutex > > CPU0 CPU1 > ---- ---- > lock(&item->mutex); > lock(drm_global_mutex); > lock(&item->mutex); > lock(cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem); > > because there are dependencies through workqueues. The call chain is: > > get_online_cpus > apply_workqueue_attrs > __alloc_workqueue_key > ttm_mem_global_init > ast_ttm_mem_global_init > drm_global_item_ref > ast_mm_init > ast_driver_load > drm_dev_register > drm_get_pci_dev > ast_pci_probe > local_pci_probe > work_for_cpu_fn > process_one_work > worker_thread > > This is not a problem of get_online_cpus() recursion, it's a possible > deadlock undetected by lockdep so far. > > The cure is to use cpu_hotplug_disable() instead of get_online_cpus() to > protect the PCI probing. > > There is a side effect to this: cpu_hotplug_disable() makes a concurrent > cpu hotplug attempt via the sysfs interfaces fail with -EBUSY, but PCI > probing usually happens during the boot process where no interaction is > possible. Any later invocations are infrequent enough and concurrent > hotplug attempts are so unlikely that the danger of user space visible > regressions is very close to zero. Anyway, thats preferrable over a real > deadlock. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> > Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org > --- > drivers/pci/pci-driver.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > --- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c > @@ -320,10 +320,19 @@ static long local_pci_probe(void *_ddi) > return 0; > } > > +static bool pci_physfn_is_probed(struct pci_dev *dev) > +{ > +#ifdef CONFIG_ATS I think this was intended to be CONFIG_PCI_ATS, not CONFIG_ATS. But I think CONFIG_PCI_IOV would be more appropriate. With that, and squashing this into the next patch, Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> I expect you'll merge this along with the rest of the series. Let me know if you need anything else from me. > + return dev->physfn->is_probed; > +#else > + return false; > +#endif > +} > + > static int pci_call_probe(struct pci_driver *drv, struct pci_dev *dev, > const struct pci_device_id *id) > { > - int error, node; > + int error, node, cpu; > struct drv_dev_and_id ddi = { drv, dev, id }; > > /* > @@ -349,13 +358,13 @@ static int pci_call_probe(struct pci_dri > if (node >= 0 && node != numa_node_id()) { > int cpu; > > - get_online_cpus(); > + cpu_hotplug_disable(); > cpu = cpumask_any_and(cpumask_of_node(node), cpu_online_mask); > if (cpu < nr_cpu_ids) > error = work_on_cpu(cpu, local_pci_probe, &ddi); > else > error = local_pci_probe(&ddi); > - put_online_cpus(); > + cpu_hotplug_enable(); > } else > error = local_pci_probe(&ddi); > > >
On Tue, 18 Apr 2017, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > +static bool pci_physfn_is_probed(struct pci_dev *dev) > > +{ > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ATS > > I think this was intended to be CONFIG_PCI_ATS, not CONFIG_ATS. yes. > > But I think CONFIG_PCI_IOV would be more appropriate. With that, and The physfn member is under CONFIG_PCI_ATS so I took that one, but you are right PCI_IOV is the proper one. Will fix. > squashing this into the next patch, Did so Thanks, tglx
--- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c @@ -320,10 +320,19 @@ static long local_pci_probe(void *_ddi) return 0; } +static bool pci_physfn_is_probed(struct pci_dev *dev) +{ +#ifdef CONFIG_ATS + return dev->physfn->is_probed; +#else + return false; +#endif +} + static int pci_call_probe(struct pci_driver *drv, struct pci_dev *dev, const struct pci_device_id *id) { - int error, node; + int error, node, cpu; struct drv_dev_and_id ddi = { drv, dev, id }; /* @@ -349,13 +358,13 @@ static int pci_call_probe(struct pci_dri if (node >= 0 && node != numa_node_id()) { int cpu; - get_online_cpus(); + cpu_hotplug_disable(); cpu = cpumask_any_and(cpumask_of_node(node), cpu_online_mask); if (cpu < nr_cpu_ids) error = work_on_cpu(cpu, local_pci_probe, &ddi); else error = local_pci_probe(&ddi); - put_online_cpus(); + cpu_hotplug_enable(); } else error = local_pci_probe(&ddi);
Converting the hotplug locking, i.e. get_online_cpus(), to a percpu rwsem unearthed a circular lock dependency which was hidden from lockdep due to the lockdep annotation of get_online_cpus() which prevents lockdep from creating full dependency chains. There are several variants of this. And example is: Chain exists of: cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem --> drm_global_mutex --> &item->mutex CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&item->mutex); lock(drm_global_mutex); lock(&item->mutex); lock(cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem); because there are dependencies through workqueues. The call chain is: get_online_cpus apply_workqueue_attrs __alloc_workqueue_key ttm_mem_global_init ast_ttm_mem_global_init drm_global_item_ref ast_mm_init ast_driver_load drm_dev_register drm_get_pci_dev ast_pci_probe local_pci_probe work_for_cpu_fn process_one_work worker_thread This is not a problem of get_online_cpus() recursion, it's a possible deadlock undetected by lockdep so far. The cure is to use cpu_hotplug_disable() instead of get_online_cpus() to protect the PCI probing. There is a side effect to this: cpu_hotplug_disable() makes a concurrent cpu hotplug attempt via the sysfs interfaces fail with -EBUSY, but PCI probing usually happens during the boot process where no interaction is possible. Any later invocations are infrequent enough and concurrent hotplug attempts are so unlikely that the danger of user space visible regressions is very close to zero. Anyway, thats preferrable over a real deadlock. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org --- drivers/pci/pci-driver.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)