| Message ID | 20190811150802.2418-8-efremov@linux.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Add definition for the number of standard PCI BARs | expand |
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 06:08:04PM +0300, Denis Efremov wrote: > This patch refactors the loop condition scheme from > 'i <= PCI_STD_RESOURCE_END' to 'i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS'. > > Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com> > --- > drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c | 2 +- > drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h | 4 ++-- > 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c > index 703948c9fbe1..13f5430e3f3c 100644 > --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c > +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c > @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ static void vfio_pci_probe_mmaps(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev) > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vdev->dummy_resources_list); > > - for (bar = PCI_STD_RESOURCES; bar <= PCI_STD_RESOURCE_END; bar++) { > + for (bar = 0; bar < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; bar++) { > res = vdev->pdev->resource + bar; PCI_STD_RESOURCES is indeed 0, but since the original went to the trouble of avoiding that assumption, I would probably do this: for (bar = 0; bar < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; bar++) { res = vdev->pdev->resource + bar + PCI_STD_RESOURCES; or maybe even this: res = &vdev->pdev->resource[bar + PCI_STD_RESOURCES]; which is more common outside vfio. But I wouldn't change to using the &dev->resource[] form if other vfio code that you're *not* changing uses the dev->resource + bar form. > if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_PCI_MMAP)) > @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ static void vfio_pci_disable(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev) > > vfio_config_free(vdev); > > - for (bar = PCI_STD_RESOURCES; bar <= PCI_STD_RESOURCE_END; bar++) { > + for (bar = 0; bar < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; bar++) { > if (!vdev->barmap[bar]) > continue; > pci_iounmap(pdev, vdev->barmap[bar]); > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c > index f0891bd8444c..6035a2961160 100644 > --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c > +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c > @@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ static void vfio_bar_fixup(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev) > > bar = (__le32 *)&vdev->vconfig[PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0]; > > - for (i = PCI_STD_RESOURCES; i <= PCI_STD_RESOURCE_END; i++, bar++) { > + for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; i++, bar++) { > if (!pci_resource_start(pdev, i)) { > *bar = 0; /* Unmapped by host = unimplemented to user */ > continue; > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h > index ee6ee91718a4..8a2c7607d513 100644 > --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h > +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h > @@ -86,8 +86,8 @@ struct vfio_pci_reflck { > > struct vfio_pci_device { > struct pci_dev *pdev; > - void __iomem *barmap[PCI_STD_RESOURCE_END + 1]; > - bool bar_mmap_supported[PCI_STD_RESOURCE_END + 1]; > + void __iomem *barmap[PCI_STD_NUM_BARS]; > + bool bar_mmap_supported[PCI_STD_NUM_BARS]; > u8 *pci_config_map; > u8 *vconfig; > struct perm_bits *msi_perm; > -- > 2.21.0 >
On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 15:02:34 -0500 Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 06:08:04PM +0300, Denis Efremov wrote: > > This patch refactors the loop condition scheme from > > 'i <= PCI_STD_RESOURCE_END' to 'i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS'. > > > > Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com> > > --- > > drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c | 4 ++-- > > drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c | 2 +- > > drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h | 4 ++-- > > 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c > > index 703948c9fbe1..13f5430e3f3c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c > > @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ static void vfio_pci_probe_mmaps(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev) > > > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vdev->dummy_resources_list); > > > > - for (bar = PCI_STD_RESOURCES; bar <= PCI_STD_RESOURCE_END; bar++) { > > + for (bar = 0; bar < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; bar++) { > > res = vdev->pdev->resource + bar; > > PCI_STD_RESOURCES is indeed 0, but since the original went to the > trouble of avoiding that assumption, I would probably do this: > > for (bar = 0; bar < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; bar++) { > res = vdev->pdev->resource + bar + PCI_STD_RESOURCES; > > or maybe even this: > > res = &vdev->pdev->resource[bar + PCI_STD_RESOURCES]; > > which is more common outside vfio. But I wouldn't change to using the > &dev->resource[] form if other vfio code that you're *not* changing > uses the dev->resource + bar form. I don't think we have any other instances like that, so the latter form is fine with me if it's more broadly used. I do spot one use of [bar] in drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_rdwr.c that could also take on this form to void the same assumption though. Thanks, Alex > > if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_PCI_MMAP)) > > @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ static void vfio_pci_disable(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev) > > > > vfio_config_free(vdev); > > > > - for (bar = PCI_STD_RESOURCES; bar <= PCI_STD_RESOURCE_END; bar++) { > > + for (bar = 0; bar < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; bar++) { > > if (!vdev->barmap[bar]) > > continue; > > pci_iounmap(pdev, vdev->barmap[bar]); > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c > > index f0891bd8444c..6035a2961160 100644 > > --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c > > @@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ static void vfio_bar_fixup(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev) > > > > bar = (__le32 *)&vdev->vconfig[PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0]; > > > > - for (i = PCI_STD_RESOURCES; i <= PCI_STD_RESOURCE_END; i++, bar++) { > > + for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; i++, bar++) { > > if (!pci_resource_start(pdev, i)) { > > *bar = 0; /* Unmapped by host = unimplemented to user */ > > continue; > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h > > index ee6ee91718a4..8a2c7607d513 100644 > > --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h > > @@ -86,8 +86,8 @@ struct vfio_pci_reflck { > > > > struct vfio_pci_device { > > struct pci_dev *pdev; > > - void __iomem *barmap[PCI_STD_RESOURCE_END + 1]; > > - bool bar_mmap_supported[PCI_STD_RESOURCE_END + 1]; > > + void __iomem *barmap[PCI_STD_NUM_BARS]; > > + bool bar_mmap_supported[PCI_STD_NUM_BARS]; > > u8 *pci_config_map; > > u8 *vconfig; > > struct perm_bits *msi_perm; > > -- > > 2.21.0 > >
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c index 703948c9fbe1..13f5430e3f3c 100644 --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ static void vfio_pci_probe_mmaps(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev) INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vdev->dummy_resources_list); - for (bar = PCI_STD_RESOURCES; bar <= PCI_STD_RESOURCE_END; bar++) { + for (bar = 0; bar < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; bar++) { res = vdev->pdev->resource + bar; if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_PCI_MMAP)) @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ static void vfio_pci_disable(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev) vfio_config_free(vdev); - for (bar = PCI_STD_RESOURCES; bar <= PCI_STD_RESOURCE_END; bar++) { + for (bar = 0; bar < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; bar++) { if (!vdev->barmap[bar]) continue; pci_iounmap(pdev, vdev->barmap[bar]); diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c index f0891bd8444c..6035a2961160 100644 --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c @@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ static void vfio_bar_fixup(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev) bar = (__le32 *)&vdev->vconfig[PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0]; - for (i = PCI_STD_RESOURCES; i <= PCI_STD_RESOURCE_END; i++, bar++) { + for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; i++, bar++) { if (!pci_resource_start(pdev, i)) { *bar = 0; /* Unmapped by host = unimplemented to user */ continue; diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h index ee6ee91718a4..8a2c7607d513 100644 --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h @@ -86,8 +86,8 @@ struct vfio_pci_reflck { struct vfio_pci_device { struct pci_dev *pdev; - void __iomem *barmap[PCI_STD_RESOURCE_END + 1]; - bool bar_mmap_supported[PCI_STD_RESOURCE_END + 1]; + void __iomem *barmap[PCI_STD_NUM_BARS]; + bool bar_mmap_supported[PCI_STD_NUM_BARS]; u8 *pci_config_map; u8 *vconfig; struct perm_bits *msi_perm;
This patch refactors the loop condition scheme from 'i <= PCI_STD_RESOURCE_END' to 'i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS'. Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com> --- drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c | 4 ++-- drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c | 2 +- drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)